NEW GEOPOLITICS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

In the wake of the deal between the USA and Iran over its nuclear program, and in the wake of recent Saudi visits to Russia, Mr. S.D. sent me this important article outlining the possibilities that a new Middle Eastern geopolitical earthquake may be in the making:

“New Silk Road” and Iran’s Potential as “Energy Disruptor”. Polar Reorientation In the Middle East

The essence of the article is that the USA may be gambling on a very radical reorientation of Middle East geopolitics, essentially throwing over Saudi Arabia for Iran, and for the ability to use or manipulate Iran as a base of operations for destablization efforts in the former Soviet republics of Central Asia, and to shut Russia out of the Middle East once and for all:

The current situation can be summed up with the following dilemmatic axiom: the closer that the US and Iran move to one another, the more suspicious this makes Russia and Saudi Arabia; likewise, the closer that Russia and Saudi Arabia move to one another, the more suspicious this makes the US and Iran. In both instances, each pair feels compelled to continue moving in their newfound direction out of fear that failure to do so would place it in a comparative disadvantage vis-à-vis its primary rival’s engagement with its thought-to-be ally, as such is the nature of this strategic security dilemma.

...

The US awaits the day that it can use Iran as an indirect proxy of destabilizing influence against Russia’s southern former Soviet periphery. Part I touched upon this possibility in citing the Hoagland-Blinken Doctrine for Central Asia and how it holds open the prospect of strategic collaboration with Iran in penetrating that region. While short in words, it’s big in implications, and with Iran feeling rightfully confident and newly assertive as a result of its nuclear ‘victory’, it could very well be guided into a ‘Northern Pivot’ of influence projection along the Caucasus, Caspian, and Central Asia if ‘properly’ manipulated. This would relieve Saudi Arabia of whatever ‘pressure’ it feels and ease some of its anti-Iranian paranoia, which could help the US convince them that the deal wasn’t ‘so bad’ for its interests and thus work to reverse the Russian reorientation to a certain degree. This would leave Russia as the biggest loser, since it wouldn’t really have anything to show for its advances with Saudi Arabia, and it would also have a heated rival in Iran (which would be behaving that way both for its own ‘self-interested’ reasons [supported by the US, directly or indirectly] and perhaps even to pay Russia back for its prior relationship with Riyadh).

Well...maybe, but all of this depends in large part on how the USA is assessing the long term prospects in the Ukraine. So long as American military and financial interests there (and in the old cordon sanitaire in Eastern Europe) can be maintained, then the necessity for such a radical and revolutionary remaking of geopolitics in the Middle East seems at best redundant (why have Iran as an anti-Russian base of operations when the Ukraine is closer?) and at worst, wishful thinking. As I indicated earlier this week, the Ukraine itself, however, is in question, with the Donbass region planning to hold a referendum on whether or not to join the Russian Federation. If that happens, and if Mr Putin and his advisors accede to that, then it might possibly spell the beginning of the end for The Ukraine, as other secessionist efforts in the country might be tempted to form and break away, in Galicia and the Ciscarpathian regions of the western Ukraine. If so, then Mr. Korybko's speculations about US intentions vis-a-vis Iran in the article begin to make sense, but it would also mean that the US analysis of the long-term strategic interest and outcome of its Ukrainian policy has read the handwriting on the wall.

The chief problem here is that it ascribes too much sanity to Washington. Additionally, with the penetration of the Ukraine by IG Farbensanto and other big American and European GMO "agribusiness" giants, it is unlikely that Washington needs a second base in central Asia in the form of Iran, a dubious ally even under the best of circumstances. So why the deal, and what's going on?

Any high octane speculation here is perhaps as good as any other, and there are all sorts of possibilities: the USA, as Mr. Korybko hints, might be vying simply for a relaxation of tensions in order to mount a "color revolution" in that country and install a more friendly government. However, there are other possibilities, and the key here is in the word "nuclear", for there is a country in the west that has much to gain, and little to lose, by the USA acceding to the deal it recently noegotiated with Iran, a deal that was aided, abetted, and brokered by yet another western country...

...You know who it is...

See you on the flip side....

29 thoughts on “NEW GEOPOLITICS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?”

  1. Overthrowing Mossadegh in ’53 was the absolutely stupidest move the CIA and MI5 ever did. Absolutely moronic and unforgiveable.

    Iran is a natural ally to the US; it is a large, stable, deeply cultured and oil-rich nation, and was the only country in the ME to have a democratically elected government before Kermit Roosevelt and Co. toppled it at the behest of the Anglo-American oil companies. It is peaceful and has not attacked another nation since the 1730s.

    Idiots one and all.

    The ultimate result is what we have now: our “steadfast ally,” that treacherous little Worse-than-the-Nazis aparthied monstrosity, and a series of toppled tin-horn-dictator regimes and overall, chaos ab ordo.

    US foreign policy is, quite simply, psychopathic and insane, and ME policy in particular is the first proof to be put forward as evidence. Second is the ZioCon-driven Ukraine fiasco. Third is this ridiculous, concocted theatre-of-the-absurd bogeyman they’ve named ISIS to take down Assad and get their pipeline through.

    Everything is a bald-faced lie and FUBAR. The US is clinically insane, period. Just look at the clinically insane in power: John McInsane, or Victoria Kagan, nee Nudelmann, or that shrew Samantha Power. She is a first-rate psycho who can stand with the best of them.

    With these sorts of sociopaths in control, how can one even talk of policy? We are in clinical insanity territory here, so any attempt to rationalize US ME policy is moot. They’re all bloodthirsty nutjubs.

    1. basta, I agree with all you say, fact-wise. I just think it is ‘calculated’ rather than insane. Kermit Roosevelt and ‘The Company’ were tasked to bring down Mossadegh after he nationalized Iran’s oil companies. Same with all the (owned) ‘military dictators’ appearing in Banana Belt countries after natives got uppity over all the profits going to United Fruit Company and tried to take-back national sovereignty. They have a short-term ‘don’t mess with our profits’ view of reality, rather than a long-term ‘helping humanity’ viewpoint. Classic hard-core Capitalism.

      Whether there is a long-term, problem-reaction-solution, NWO scenario in-play IN ADDITION to the above is likely, IMHO…

      (Add Enlil & Co., as you wish.)

  2. The suggestion that neocons are nazis is plain silly. Neoconservatism has jewish zionist origins. Most of the prominent neocons are pro-israeli jews and the rest are pro-israeli gentiles. These guys are obviously not nazis. Do you have the slightest understanding of nazi ideology?

    1. Before you adopt high and mighty tones with me, you might want to check out Christopher Simpson’s book Blowback, Ben Hecht’s Perfidy, or other books, dealing with the connections between the two. Do you not have the slightest conception of the fact that one blog does not, and cannot capture or reveal all of a person’s thought on a subject?

  3. Milton Zentmyer

    Why do we assume that the Zionist leaders and “Big Jews”, i.e.,Rothschild who were so active before and during the WWI and WWII have disappeared? In Yahweh the Two Faced God, Dr. Farrell plainly shows the Zionist leaders were very much involved in making sure that the “right Jews” got into Palestine and they were behind the slogan about wearing of the yellow star to stop assimilation of Jews in Germany. Where are they now?

    In reading Black’s, IBM and the Holocaust, it appears to me that both the Nazis and the Jewish elite were very interested in the data that IBM could provide to find out who had “assimilated”. Racial purity was the focus of both the Nazis and the Zionists and also the Nazis needed to keep track of the slave labor. Where they were, how long they could work them on what number of daily calories, etc.

    The Zionists survived as well; The Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, a/k/a Wall Street and Media. No one can run for public office in the US unless they sign up as an unquestioning supporter of Israel. Look at the heat that Cynthia McKinney took because she would not sign the legislation of total support for Israel. She has had to leave the country because of her work with the Palestinian people recently.

    I’d really like to find out what other people think as to where these hidden forms of finance and black budgets for science and tech come from. Nazi only? Where is the vast wealth of the Rothschild banking cartel in all of this? Are they still doing deals with each other at the top? Are they in disagreement?

    Mr. Goldman above asks the question why do you think that you have to be German to be Nazi? My observation is that conversely, you do not need to be Jewish to be a Zionist. Look at our Vice President.

    It seems to me that we are only looking at one side of this equation. I’d love to have Dr. Farrell address some of these questions in a vidchat. The dot needs to be connected from Yahweh The Two Faced God to The Third Way in my opinion.

  4. Robert Barricklow

    No doubt Iran’s Mosaddegh is very much part of their mindset. Also, the good cop/bad cop routine of the U.S. vs. the crazy-out-of-the-box Israelis, won’t have a huge-box office as that playhouse 90 works itself through congress. Once again, the dance is being choreographed with threatening steps orchestrated baton applause & explosive cymbals. But there are those ready in the wings with another performance altogether in mind. Problem is, is that many think they have an inside track encased in neoliberal assumptions. Neoliberalism, which dovetails perfectly with meritocracy, generating a caste system: “winners and loser”, “makers and takers”, “the best and the brightest”, the whole gospel of Ann Rand and her Ubermenschen. After all, that is “leadership” is all about.

  5. The Iranians are not dumb, they could see some tomfoolery a mile away. The thing is, that major corporations are making a bee line to Iran to do business, especially Germany. The deal with Iran by the US led talks has been seen as very good “for the world”, but Israel is the stinker. Well Obama went ahead a did the deal, so Israel can go jump. What’s happens next with Iran is anybody’s guess. The US has thrown the Ukraine under the bus, the IMF has it’s claws into the Ukraine for billions, and when you’ve said that, the Ukraine is TOAST, it’s finished.

  6. Neo-Confederates-Neo-NAZIs is probably a better definition of who we are dealing with Frankie. Planetary Viking raiders tortures and killers ultra mass serial killers to be frank about it. As I mention yesterday if you have cable or satellite service and have Cartoon Network watch the anime series “Akame Ga Kill” Saturday night Sunday morning it will show you the criminal scum mentality we dealing with.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      When I watched that cartoon; it was sickening to see that “mentality” portrayed in such cold-blooded accuracy.

      1. And Robert if this anime is based on a manga it will more sickening . Because the rating for “Kill La Kill” anime is 14 but the manga is 17 one can only guess what the rating of the manga of “Akame Ga Kill” are.

  7. Frankie Calcutta

    As I was reading the Third Way last night, it struck me that the recent events in Iran hint that, despite all the bluster from the Zion International, the German lobby has won the day in DC. The question is: is there a German lobby separate from a Nazi International lobby? This may be evidenced by the divergent geopolitical strategies regarding Russia. One group wants to eviscerate Russia while the other wants to join commercially with Russia to create a Eurasian behemoth. Somewhere in the Third Way there is mention of the long term goal of annihilating the Slavic “untermensch.” I believe this is stated in the Madrid Circular, otherwise known as the Protocols of the Elders of Thule. Yet, I believe Dr. Farrell uncovers other evidence that German oligarchs sought/seek a partnership with Russia as the end game. (Someone please correct me if I’m wrong). So it seems the current position from Berlin is the latter– a Eurasian union, while what is coming out of DC is total subjugation of Russia. (Possible the soft position towards Russia has the same savage endgame?) And while the DC faction wants to mercilessly dominate a whole (the) Ukraine, possibly it is the aim of the other faction to splinter the Ukraine into manageable pieces which also can be given as booty to other European partners as well. Could this also have been a long range German plan, interrupted by WWII, and now being resumed despite the resistance being put up by the other faction?

    So if one faction comprises German nationalistic oligarchs, who then comprises the other faction in DC (Denver?)? Is the corporate fascist state of the US really just the marriage of Nazi International and the Zion International, the Zionazis, a separate entity entirely from the EU oligarchy? I guess this is why Dr. Farrell alludes to the nazis and neocons as being one and the same. So do we have two groups of Germans at odds with each other? I suppose the Nazi International based in the US would be second or third generation German-Americans, now comparing their version of teutonic talmudism with their former enemies and now new partners’ ancient Hebrew version. (I would wager they have been comparing lots of genetic information as well and finding many similarities. In effect discovering– we are not that different. Lets take over the world together).

    So this US based faction’s open immigration strategy for predominantly caucasian nations makes sense from a diabolical perspective– zionazi control of the planet using any means necessary. But how do you explain the EU’s open immigration policy if it is run by nationalist ethnic Germans, unless control of the EU is still up for grabs.

    Also some reference in the Third Way (which escapes me) that made me wonder if the Putin government wasn’t actually installed by German national oligarchs and now being directed by them.

    1. Re: “I suppose the Nazi International based in the US would be second or third generation German-Americans. . .”

      You’re thinking that to be a Nazi one needs to be of German origin? Why suppose that? Wouldn’t reshaping the world according to traditional Nazi principles make one a Nazi, regardless of one’s national origins?

      1. Over time there have been the most unlikely enthusiasts for Nazism and its Pan-Germanic precedents (Italians Poles Russians Brazilians Greeks etc. etc.); they have to go through all sorts of intellectual acrobatics to prove that they, their group or their idols are actually part of the “Aryan race” a.k.a. German ethnicity (just think of the “Aryan Christ” theory that was all the rage in 19th century Germany!).
        But apart from the ideologues, who seldom reach the inner sanctum of power, we have to look at the inter-generational wealth factor, as Catherine Fitts reminds us. The primary way such wealth is transmitted to ensure personal control is via marriage and inheritance, with attempts to bolster the position by close intermarriage, and occasional “outside” marriages for the purpose of forging alliances or recruiting “new blood” (which may not be so “new” as they put out).
        Since the “4th Reich”, unless a “secret SS” still exists somewhere, no longer seems to have a component that looks like a religious order (like the Templars etc., another way of preserving inter-generational wealth via family-like control and co-opting into the hierarchy), or unless there is some “high octane” alternative such as interdimensional or interplanetary factors, the old fashioned methods of human marriage and reproduction, with all their risks and uncertainties, seem to be at play. And if it is on the public record that certain well-known American “gentlemen” are getting their 6th heart transplant at the age of 99, it’s hard to say just how many “colleagues” of his, of German descent, unknown to the masses or presumed dead, may be around. And how many of their offspring. Subject matter for a sequel to The Third Way – or perhaps to Genes Giants Monsters and Men?

        1. Robert Barricklow

          They still laugh all the way to the bank and tax havens, as the little people bail them out.

      2. Frankie Calcutta

        Traditionally, the core belief of nazism is German racial superiority. That being said, I doubt nazi internationalists adhere to much standard nazi ideology other than the embrace of technology, brute force to achieve aims, and corporate fascism. Anti-semitism has probably been replaced with judeophilism and ardent zionism and I doubt they practice any leader worship at all.

        The transplanted nazis in the US were German and I would assume there may remain a cadre of their descendants still part of the nazi international. The nazi international as we know it probably inspired those American oligarchs with fascistic aspirations and more than likely served as a mercenary organization and continue to do so today. But I would doubt German nazis are solely in charge of the American corporate fascist state. Yet, who knows what is going on below ground and above us in space in the breakaway civilization command centers? A 130 year old Martin Borman calling the shots from his lair on the dark side of the Moon? Hitler’s brain now hooked up to a massive computer below Denver with thousands of genetically improved German SS soldiers manning the facility?

        To answer your question: no, to be a nazi one doesn’t have to be German. I can think of several instances where nazis weren’t German at all, such as the former head of the American nazi party back in the sixties who turned out to be jewish.

        1. “A 130 year old Martin Borman calling the shots from his lair on the dark side of the Moon?” – Love it – this image is already on the way to cafepress for a pin/button, mug, t-shirt, poster, totebag combo printing. The next will be a picture of the CERN machine spawning more CERN machines.

    2. I was going to pose that very question to the Doc for the vidchat. When and why did the Nazis over here split from the Nazis over there?

      1. Frankie Calcutta

        Question is: where do the Rothschilds and Rockefellers play into all this? Exactly what side do they fall on in the schism between IG Farben East and West? I imagine the Rockefellers were business partners of the original IG Farben conglomerate back in the good old days. Are they a business partner today or even a controlling stock interest in the more pugnacious American branch of IG Farben? Yet, the Rockefeller wing seems to share the more prudent geopolitical views of IG Farben East, at least in regards to Russia, the Ukraine, and Iran. So are they now allied with the German oligarchs? The Rothschilds on the other hand created the zionist state. This would put them in the camp of modern day IG Farben East and its zio-opic neo-con thugs who, stationed on the Eastern corridor, seem to be the brass knuckles for the American corporate fascists. Yet, I would imagine at one time, the Rothschilds were IG Farben’s chief nemesis, if we assume the Roosevelt administration was the Rothschilds’ vassals. We can’t forget Morgenthau’s attempt to totally de-industrialize Germany after WWII or t he attempted coup against Roosevelt by what seemed to be American fascists (IG Farben employees).

        1. Robert Barricklow

          After WW11 Morgenthau’s policy was, by design, to depopulate the Germans; but cooler heads finally deep-sixed that genocide[presumably “reeducation” prevailed].

    3. Robert Barricklow

      Just got my copy of The Third Way.
      I’m going to savor it; and read it a little at a time.
      Too many other books have bought into the mainstream viewpoints; in one way or another.
      Unfortunately, I need a daily antidotes.

  8. The BRICs are working in-step with each other, which simply means that they are suddenly “out-of-step” with the US/UK CABAL..the currency deval and stock crash is “foreplay” to the events coming next month which will be geopolitical, as you indicate. Iran is now “up-for-grabs” having been “sweated-out” this summer by HAARP Technology…I think the Chinese and Putin are as aware of the CABAL’s Plans and are now working in unison to counter…The IRAN “DEAL” is too thin to really work from the US’ POV, unless, there is “an agreement” in the background we are not yet privy to…But, Obama has really been acting strange in many ways and on many fronts since his re-election…was he originally pushed into power/the Pres? or was he a wild card who, like all Pres since Eisenhower were compromised or pushed out of office. Also, why is Carter the only Pres to get cancer…asked by a former Monsanto peer-reviewed micro-biologist who left their labs when he realized what they were planning to do with the “biotech” they were amassing…

  9. As you suggest, Germany seems to have faded into the woodwork in places like Iran (and Iraq – let’s not forget the ancient artefacts issue) where it has had a long-term presence. And would probably not take more than 5 minutes to re-emerge with a strategy already in place.

    1. This strategy would likely regard the nuclear industry but maybe also the new energy sources sector that Teheran is rumored to be developing…

Comments are closed.