Airport Bombings

HA’ARETZ: A LIHOP (LET IT HAPPEN ON PURPOSE) SCENARIO IN ...

This article popped up on many people's radar in the wake of the ISIS attacks in Brussels, and accordingly, I am going to indulge in my usual high octane speculation here. The article's title speaks for itself, as apparently there were clear intelligence warnings that something was going to happen, and (connect the dots here to 9/11) the authorities allowed it to happen:

EXCLUSIVE: Belgian Intelligence Had Precise Warning That Airport Targeted for Bombing read more: http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.710572

The article is alleging that Western intelligence services had clear and specific warnings concerning planned attacks at the Brussels airport and subway:

The Belgian security services, as well as other Western intelligence agencies, had advance and precise intelligence warnings regarding the terrorist attacks in Belgium on Tuesday, Haaretz has learned.

The security services knew, with a high degree of certainty, that attacks were planned in the very near future for the airport and, apparently, for the subway as well.

Despite the advance warning, the intelligence and security preparedness in Brussels, where most of the European Union agencies are located, was limited in its scope and insufficient for the severity and immediacy of the alert.

As far as is known, the attacks were planned by the headquarters of the Islamic State (ISIS) in Raqqa, Syria, which it has pronounced as the capital of its Islamic caliphate.

The terror cell responsible for the attacks in Brussels on Tuesday was closely associated with the network behind the series of attacks in Paris last November.

Given the indications that ISIS is a creature to some extent of the USA and its dubious "friends" in the Middle East like Turkey and Saudi Arabia, the many-headed hydra of international terrorism once again seems to connect all the dots to Riyadh, but more importantly, as I indicated in last week's News and Views from the Nefarium, ISIS always seems to show up in places where US foreign policy is in trouble.

Which brings us to high octane speculation number one: why Europe? There is a school of thought out there that the refugee crisis is being driven in large part by the USA in order to prevent a European break with the USA and a "reset" of relations with Russia. I have also advanced the idea that perhaps the crisis is in part also being used to create a "cultural" transformation of Europe, for if one listens carefully to the growing opposition in various countries in Europe to the "open borders" policy of Berlin and Brussels, care is given to state that in the name of the various nationalisms, what is really being defended is "European culture", which, such speeches are careful to point out, is not Islamic. Creation of a "European" identity, as distinct from a specifically French or Spanish or Italian or Hungarian one, can only benefit the bureaucrats in Brussels. In this light, time will tell.

But my high octane speculation of the day really concerns Number Two: Why Ha'aretz? There's little doubt in my mind that this story may have had some intelligence backing of its own, namely, from the Mossad. But the real story here seems to me to be even deeper, for it was the very same Ha'Aretz that, among many other sources, also indicated that there were advanced warnings of 9/11, and that, again, the authorities more or less allowed it to happen, the now infamous "LIHOP" or "Let It Happen on Purpose" scenario.  In short, the same 9/11 pattern now seems to have repeated itself in Brussels, on a much smaller scale. In both cases, there seems to be a widespread set of warnings from intelligence sources, and this, to my mind, argues that former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's observation about 9/11 is still in play, namely, that Al Qaeda represents a "global network", a network that he left carefully unspecified. There's no doubt that ISIS and its Middle Eastern state backers is an odious murderous entity. But if it in fact represents a portion of Mr. Blair's unspecified "global network" then eventually it will act against some of those sponsors - namely the USA -  themselves.

And again.... time will tell.

See you on the flip side...

25 thoughts on “ HA’ARETZ: A LIHOP (LET IT HAPPEN ON PURPOSE) SCENARIO IN ...”

  1. I suspect that the Empire is practicing a “scorched-earth” policy in Europe, similar to what they’ve done in Ukraine. The Empire feels itself lose control of the EU to Russia, so they will leave the EU one massive, chaotic mess of social unrest and financial insolvency that will represent only a giant liability for Russia.

  2. That scenario may work in the US, but in Europe the refugee crisis has had exactly the opposite effect. It is directly undermining the rule of law and the middle classes are becoming increasingly disillusioned and frustrated, and punctilious, law-abiding peoples like the Germans are shocked by how their government has thrown all rules and laws to the wind to welcome the refugees. People are starting to ask, What’s the point of following the rules if the governments flaunt all rules and norms?

    1. Regarding your ‘opposite effect’:
      thesaker dot is/saker-rant-about-a-stolen-europe/

      “I personally expect that the first explosion against the EU will come from France, a country which, like Russia, has a deep, almost visceral, attachment to freedom and which will, I am certain, eventually blow up. When that happens, it will be violent and bloody (alas, another French – and Russian – tradition). I think that the AngloZionists will go to unimaginable levels of depravity and dishonesty to prevent it, but my money stays on France as the first country in the EU to rise up against the Empire. Why? Because the other candidates – Greece, Spain, or Italy – will always ‘look over the shoulders’ whereas the French will simply explode in rage with no regard to the consequences (in that, the French are much more like the Russians). Plus, the French will always hate the Anglos anyway.”

      1. NO goshawks the French hate the Normans took them over five hundred years to kick them out. And the Normans are screwing them from London and Washington DC.

        1. marcos, the point of the article was in the whole paragraph before that single line. Delete that one line, if you choose, and reread it. (Also, it was The Saker speaking. Read his article for the ‘context’ within-which he was speaking.)

          And, would you please explain your fixation on the Normans as to the source of all world badness? The Vikings (ancestors to the Norman French) were ruthless and territory-grabbing, but were not banksters and rule-by-stealth types…

          1. The Vikings of the Danelaw after their defeat were intergraded into Anglo-Saxon-Jute England. The Norman became and still are the ruling class in Britain. And proceeded to attack and conquer Ireland and Scotland that’s the difference. And maybe were taken over by the banksters and rule by-by-stealth types goshawks.

  3. Joseph, your friend, Catherine Austin Fitts, over at The Saker:
    thesaker dot is/saker-rant-about-a-stolen-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-222506

    “Grossly oversimplified, the bailouts/low interest rates/financial coup d’etat shifted enormous amounts of retirements savings out of the existing legal structures, including pension funds, into private hands. After this, how would the existing leadership stay in control? Why would people continue to pay taxes to a government they saw as a criminal enterprise – one that had cooperated in the theft of their savings?

    Polls show that the approval of existing governments in Europe and the US is falling. However, add immigration and terrorism, and the polls reverse. The people feel the need for their government and often say their government is doing a good job on dealing with these things.

    It’s a trick – but it has worked so far.”

  4. When I read this sort of information, I am reminded how scripted world events are and that the Controllers have no concern for human life at all. Such a line of reasoning could lead me to invoke the name of Enlil concerning any beings hiding behind the curtain at the top of the Controllers’ networks who do not regard themselves as human in the first place and regard the human being as a thing owned, cattle to be driven to new pasture, cattle to be culled.

  5. It would be interesting to research whether that airport had contracted-out its security services, and to whom. Ditto with other services who have the run of the terminal. Remember who had the contract for security services at the 9/11 airports?

    1. Oh yes I remember who had security for those airports. This all smells of the breakaway civilization that Joseph talks about…motive, means, opportunity…it’s all there.

    2. From Fulford (2016-03-28), so it needs independent checking. Nevertheless:

      “Mossad front company ICTS was in charge of security at the [Belgium] airport, and the attack killed no Khazarians…”

  6. It took authorities less than two hours to post pictures of the two suicide bombers, where have we seen this before ???
    On 9/11, they had who did it, how they did it before lunch.
    This suicide bomber situation is getting so “regular” that it barely surprises anyone around the world. Sure it makes headlines and gets plenty of ink, but if one looks at “where” and “how” it is plainly obvious that these terrorists are not “rookies” at bombing people. It takes a lot of money and planning to pull off these stunts, does the word “Gladio” ring a bell here ???

  7. IMHO there are several actors in this play who knew this was going to happen, it’s like a bad rerun as far as these attacks are concerned, ,Paris , Brussels, etc….. there is always a piece of evidence found at the crime scene, the reality is these events are planned to facilitate fear and keep pushing forth the agenda, plus making some cash on top of it

  8. I want to encourage Joseph to create a forum and a podcast. I’d really like him to be on Joe Rogans podcast or Duncan Trussells but IDK how to get a hold of them.

  9. “2) how they were allowed to print them, since the obvious implication is usually that Mossad was involved in the op they are exposing (otherwise how would they know in detail what they know?”
    Why would one assume that Mossad was involved in the op just because Mossad knew of it? Israel has some of the best intelligence gathering in the world, that doesn’t mean they are involved, only that that they are very good at finding out what’s going on.

    1. Any way you slice it, the article indicates that they were involved. Passively (by having foreknowledge of the plot but sitting on their hands) or actively by materially enabling it to any degree.

  10. Unfortunately it will be the people outside of Western Asia, Mediterranean, Western Europe. Who will pay with lives for these Machiavellians since they have never been considered anything but beast of burden to be worked to death for their masters profit and enjoyment. As for the Western Asians, Mediterranean’s, Western Europeans they’re be keep as useful idiots and biped beasts of burden for their masters use.

  11. Ha’aretz is a very interesting media outlet that clearly has a deep relationship to what appears to be group of white hats in Israeli intelligence and military circles. They have broken a number of similar stories which make you wonder 1) how they got them and 2) how they were allowed to print them, since the obvious implication is usually that Mossad was involved in the op they are exposing (otherwise how would they know in detail what they know?).

    It’s either LIHOP or Interpol and the various national security services are all being run and staffed by offspring of Inspector Clouseau. Forward to the NWO comrades! Sorry for the mess, but you have to break some eggs to make an omelet you know.

    1. I wondered if Ha’aretz releasing information like this was MOSSAD’s way of saying that, yes, they knew of it but they are not responsible for it ‘so don’t blame us.’.

Comments are closed.