I have to share this very intriguing article that was in turn, sent to me by Mr. W.M., cconcerning a type of analysis of America's policy, as exemplified most recently in a series of what the article's author, Anrew Korybko, calls "hybrid wars."  This is a lengthy, meaty article, but there's one paragraph in particular that caught my attention:


First, note what the goal of hybrid war is; namely, to destablize connective regions in multipolar blocs with multinational projects:

The grand objective behind every Hybrid War is to disrupt multipolar transnational connective projects through externally provoked identity conflicts (ethnic, religious, regional, political, etc.) within a targeted transit state.

But here's the paragraph that caught my eye, and particularly with respect to the recent years' mess in the Middle East in general, and Syria (and to some extent, Iraq) in particular:

The first thing that one needs to know about Hybrid Wars is that they’re never unleashed against an American ally or anywhere that the US has premier preexisting infrastructural interests. The chaotic processes that are unleashed during the post-modern regime change ploy are impossible to fully control and could potentially engender the same type of geopolitical blowback against the US that Washington is trying to directly or indirectly channel towards its multipolar rivals. Correspondingly, this is why the US won’t ever attempt Hybrid War anywhere that it has interests which are “too big to fail”, although such an assessment is of course contemporaneously relative and could quickly change depending on the geopolitical circumstances. Nevertheless, it remains a general rule of thumb that the US won’t ever intentionally sabotage its own interests unless there’s a scorched-earth benefit in doing so during a theater-wide retreat, in this context conceivably in Saudi Arabia if the US is ever pushed out of the Mideast. (Emphasis added)

The two italicized caught my eye  because, in the first instance, there are those internet rumors going around that the current immigration crisis is being driven in part by the USA (and by Twitter feeds no less), in an effort to keep Europe in general, and Germany in particular, busy with "domestic unrest at home" and to prevent a European turn to the East in general and to Russia in particular. While I have advanced the speculation that in some respect that crisis is also being driven by an agenda to create a "cultural European identity" to cement the EU more tightly, I do not rule out this possibility either, for as I have also stated many times, it has been a consistent foreign policy agenda of the Anglo-American oligarchy since the late 19th century and the formation of the German state in 1871, that any Russo-German entente had to be prevented at all costs, for such a power bloc would dominate the crucial Eurasian "heartland" as outlined by British geopolitician Halford MacKinder. I also personally think this strategy, if indeed there is an American component driving the immigration crisis in Europe and Germany, is bound to fail.

In the second instance, I suspect Mr. Korybko's analysis is true as well, that in the face of a collapse of the American position in any geopolitical theatre, that the infrastructure of that region would be deliberately collapsed in order to deny its use to any power able to fill the vacuum.

Enter Syria.

This strategy was very clearly pursued with respect to that country, and the objective, following Mr. Korybko's line of careful reasoning, was never to replace Assad (though that was its publicly announced and ostensible purpose), but simply to destabilize the country and deny to Russia(and potentially China) any foothold in the region. But, as we have seen, Mr. Putin and his advisors may have thrown a monkey wrench into the works by his intervention and the pummeling that the Russians meted out to ISIS, and then the equally dramatic, sudden, and unexpected withdrawal from the operation once the objectives were achieved, which objectives, as I opined on Mr. Hoagland's radio show of Tues, Mar 15th, were in part to show the US effort for what it really was, a sham, for had the USA been seriously intent on combatting ISIS, it could have done so in a matter of weeks, as Russia demonstrated. Thus, the Russian effort was as much about public perceptions and changing the perception in world opinion of the US narrative as it was about ISIS.

If this analysis be correct, then one will expect Russia, and very possibly China as well, to assume a more aggressive stance with any similar "hybrid wars" that the USA may choose to engage in, and their formula will be similar to that which Mr. Putin demonstrated in Syria: a sudden, sharp, dramatic and powerful military intervention, a drubbing of the US proxies causing the unrest, and then a calculated manipulation of world opinion on the real motivations of the American sponsorship of the "hybrid war."

In short, Mr. Korybko's analysis is one to watch, for it heralds the shape of warfare in the 21st century. My prediction?

The US strategy in evidence here is that of Venice, and notably, Russia's response was equally Venetian: a sudden sharp application of military force, and a return to diplomacy. But Venice, as we know from history - and as they've apparently forgotten in Washington - led to that "War of the League of Cambrai Moment," when all of the then European powers had simply "had enough" of the "Republic in the Serene Swamp" and converged to destroy it, once and for all. Only papal duplicity, and Venetian diplomacy, saved it from extinction long before Bonaparte unloaded his cannon in the lagoon. Now, there will be no papal duplicity, and one looks at the droning dumbness of the American "elite", and the prospects don't look too promising for a diplomatic exit from that possible "League of Cambrai" moment.

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Neru on March 29, 2016 at 10:46 am

    Why would anything change?

    Humane beings hiding behind any religion with or without God projecting the “untermensch” in someone else.

    Think we will be amusing our selves for millenniums to come, very few seem interested what “humane, humanity, being human” constitutes.
    Hard work and no money, yeah right, move along!!

    And frankly, I am the last one to blame anyone else I also can’t hold on long to good intentions.

  2. goshawks on March 27, 2016 at 2:22 am

    Good article:
    thesaker dot is/saker-rant-about-a-stolen-europe/

    “I personally expect that the first explosion against the EU will come from France, a country which, like Russia, has a deep, almost visceral, attachment to freedom and which will, I am certain, eventually blow up. When that happens, it will be violent and bloody (alas, another French – and Russian – tradition). I think that the AngloZionists will go to unimaginable levels of depravity and dishonesty to prevent it, but my money stays on France as the first country in the EU to rise up against the Empire. Why? Because the other candidates – Greece, Spain, or Italy – will always ‘look over the shoulders’ whereas the French will simply explode in rage with no regard to the consequences (in that, the French are much more like the Russians). Plus, the French will always hate the Anglos anyway.”

  3. Nathan on March 25, 2016 at 9:57 pm

    Empires will be empires, until they no longer can

  4. goshawks on March 25, 2016 at 7:57 pm

    Good. I’m glad to see that the Russians are finally coming up with a strategy to counter “hybrid wars.” They have seemed like a deer in the headlights in the past. I presume this is from not wanting to revive/renew old Stalinist behaviors, and not having a clear insight as to where the ‘punches’ were coming from. Ironically, being forced into the capitalist system has likely given them more ‘ground truth’ as to the latter…

    Russia has been operating with ‘barbarians inside the gate’ since the infamous sell-off and privatization years. Even their Central Bank is Rothschild owned & influenced…

    I would look to the upcoming 2018 Russian elections for a clue to future ‘possibilities’. Putin is being careful to keep his popularity high, in the run-up to those elections. Witness the Syria pull-out. With that in mind, I do not see any moves on the ‘barbarians’ and their ‘foreign’ Central Bank before the election.

    As for the election, Putin knows that this is probably his last ‘run’. He has to wait out-of-office (by Russian rules) before he can officially-run again. By then, he may be too old and/or be ‘suicided’.

    So, I expect a grand ‘street-cleaning’ soon after Putin sweeps into office. The next presidential elections in Russia will take place in or before March 2018. After-that is when I expect all-hell to break loose on local TPTB interests, with appropriate cover-story as needed.

    On the other side of the fence, global TPTB have probably assumed the above scenario as fact. They are desperate to unseat or discredit Putin before that time. So, the upcoming two years are going to get VERY interesting…

    • goshawks on March 25, 2016 at 7:59 pm

      “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” I will let you know when it reappears or is disappeared. My last Comment is S*T*I*L*L under moderation… goshawks – March 25, 2016 at 7:57 pm.

    • goshawks on March 30, 2016 at 2:45 am

      My Comment is out of moderation. Enjoy! (Just above this one.)

  5. Pellevoisin on March 25, 2016 at 7:48 pm

    Although I am predisposed to be positive about the Russian Orthodox faithful and was grateful for Putin’s sudden and clear action to destroy ISIS, the destroyers of Christians, I remain very, very curious about what happened to the Soviet Communist enforcers, the KGB among others, who never stood trial in any of the post-Soviet nations as one would expect in a revolution, but they simply seemed to withdraw from the stage … perhaps like the devil to await a more opportune time.

  6. basta on March 25, 2016 at 6:06 pm

    “Hybrid war” or “beggar thy neighbor?”

    The zombified US goes around breaking kneecaps like a mafia thug, which it is, and collecting its protection money.

    The ZioCon pinheads in charge see the world as a zero-sum game and pursue beggar-thy-neighbor policies pumped up on steroids. They sow chaos where once was order to reap the fruit of scorched earth.

    Everything is perverted, inverted, negative and destructive.

  7. Roger on March 25, 2016 at 1:37 pm

    The “League of Cambrai” moment is most likely the true objective of US global interventionism. The globalists have no loyalty to the US nor any other country under their it appears. It makes perfect sense for them to use our interventionism not only to accomplish unpopular regime changes in other countries but to ultimately use our policies to galvanize the rest of the world into bringing war to our soil. Our ideology of liberty and God given rights is the greatest threat to their future global plans. It only makes sense for them to plot to in the near future to turn this country into a depopulated wasteland. But first they would be wise to get as much of the bad stuff that they can out of the way using us as the scapegoat. I bet Obama was indeed sight seeing his future family fiefdom and ranch down there in Paraguay for after they set fire to the US if need be.

    • Aridzonan_13 on March 25, 2016 at 2:49 pm

      IMHO, if they the rest of the World opts out of WWIV. I’m in agreement with you that they’ll bring open warfare here. The illegal invasion adds fuel to that fire, props up Social Insecurity and lowers the US wage scale. It’s a triple win from the PTB playbook.

    • Guygrr on March 25, 2016 at 5:14 pm

      That’s what I’m seeing as well.

  8. marcos toledo on March 25, 2016 at 11:25 am

    I just curious when did the term “The Great Game” come into political parlance. When was the term first used and by whom this so called game has to be stopped if there to be anything like peace on this planet and the possibility of a bright future for our species instead of the hellish dystopia these monsters desire.

    • marcos toledo on March 25, 2016 at 11:39 am

      You assume our elites care about the USA dream on this is stolen property. Like the UK which they took over beginning in 1066 AD their MO is nearly a millennium old. So long as they can live it up to the hilt what do they care about the mayhem they create around the World. Their motto is LETS HAVE A BALL DAMN THE CONSEQUENCES.

  9. Aridzonan_13 on March 25, 2016 at 9:55 am

    War is the most profitable endeavour. Especially, for those that have the ability to print money out of thin air. I still can’t believe there has been no serious karmatic blow back leveled at the top of this egregious mess. How they keep getting away with this is beyond me.

    • WalkingDead on March 25, 2016 at 11:34 am

      They have placed themselves above the law by purchasing the governments and courts. Do you honestly believe Hillary will ever be indicted?
      We have the best government money can buy.

  10. chimera on March 25, 2016 at 8:18 am

    From Ken at http://redefininggod.com/the-rockefeller-plan-for-the-brics-new-world-order-in-their-own-words/

    The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words…

    Decades before President George H.W. Bush introduced the “New World Order” (NWO) into the American vernacular, the Rockefeller family and their minions were making plans to expend America’s post-World War 2 power to bring about such an order. In the course of researching Laurance Rockefeller for my last entry, Why are the Rockefellers and the Jesuits guiding the UFO Disclosure Movement?, I came across a book titled Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports…
    …It was the product of a 1956 Rockefeller Brothers Fund effort known as the Special Studies Project, and it lays out the blueprint for the multilateral / multipolar New World Order that is currently materializing around us.

    In the aftermath of World War 2 and the resulting formation of the United Nations (which the Rockefellers were instrumental in creating and funding), the Special Studies Project, directed by Henry Kissinger, was formed to carry out two apparent tasks:

    1) to create an action plan to bring about the “elite’s” long-sought world government within the existing postwar environment, and

    2) to spin the agenda in such a way that it could be sold to the American people as being in their best interest.

    Upon completion of their work, the Special Studies Project’s various panels compiled their reports in an incomplete, sanitized, and heavily spun book, the above-mentioned Prospect for America. The book spells out how to sacrifice the national interests of the United States for…
    …(from page 35)

    To begin our journey through the Rockefeller plan for the NWO, let’s start with their definition of the Old World Order (OWO).

    The 13 Empires of the Old World Order

    From pages 163-164 of Prospect for America…

    So after having consolidated power over most of the world through empire building, the Occulted Powers (OPs) faced a problem. Empires, by their very nature, are territorial, competitive and nationalistic, and are not amenable to submitting to outside control as would be required for world governance. Clearly, these old structures would need to be demolished and replaced by newer, more malleable structures in order to finish the global consolidation. For this reason, the OPs fomented and financed the two world wars to break down the old empires and create international chaos from which a New Order could be birthed.

    At the end of each world war, the OPs immediately planted the seed of global governance, but the seeds didn’t germinate as expected…
    …(from page 164)

    De-spinning the last underlined statement, they are basically saying that the nations were insufficiently motivated to hand over sovereignty to the globalist institutions. So to overcome this lack of “shared aspirations,” the OPs fostered the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.

    By threatening some nations with Soviet aggression and others with American aggression, they compelled the nations to band together and join sides for protection. The members of each side were then pressured to increase economic and defensive cooperation to fend off the menace of the other side. Those who were programmed to believe they lived in the “people’s (communist) world” cooperated to block aggression from the “imperialist world,” and those who were programmed to believe they lived in the “free world” cooperated to block aggression from the “Soviet sphere”…
    …(from page 180)

    In the United States, people were programmed to believe that fending off the “Red Menace” was a matter of life and death…
    …(from page 162)

    But the Cold War, just like the current crop of engineered conflicts raging about us (ISIS, Ukraine, and the China Seas), was all about forcing nations into groups and groups into a world order. Once it had served its purpose, the Cold War was ended in order to allow the two sides to be merged under the NWO. And as one would expect, Prospect for America offers a glimpse of what the NWO will look like.

    The New World Order

    On page 26, we’re told what the OPs and their globalist minions are hoping for…

    Take note of how the passage says “combined so as to be able to deal with those problems that increasingly the separate nations will not be able to solve alone.” Here they are telling us that they’ll be purposefully creating increasingly difficult problems to compel the nations to accept the NWO. We’ve certainly been witnessing that, haven’t we?

    As for the NWO structure itself, we’re told that it will “consist of regional institutions under an international body of growing [to the point of total control] authority.” Elsewhere in the book, we’re told that the NWO will also include functional structures for matters that require management beyond the regional boundaries. So let’s delve deeper into how such a structure would look and operate:

    1) At the top is the “international body of growing authority.” Needless to say, this is…
    …(from page 33) Also note this…
    …(from page 35)

    2) Below the UN will be the…
    …(from page 189)

    Here are the ten UN development regions…

    And page 190 spells out how the regional arrangements will manifest themselves…

    Free trade agreements, joint economic development institutions, exchange agreements — this all sounds very familiar, doesn’t it? So when an East versus West propagandist tries to sell you the idea that the BRICS Development Bank or a Chinese/Russian currency swap deal demonstrates nations trying to free themselves from the New World Order, just remember this passage. Russia and China are following the NWO script to the letter, but I’ll get back to this point a little later in the article.

    3) Below the UN will also be…
    …(from page 191)

    One example of a functional arrangement is the BRICS alliance. It cuts across regional lines and gives form to the dialectic clash between Anglo-American bankers and BRICS bankers which will birth the NWO. Another example is the International Monetary Fund, which will manage the new global reserve currency after the engineered East versus West drama has climaxed.

    With the planned structure of the New World Order laid before us, let’s have a look at how the Rockefellers planned to get America to join in.

    The NWO as America’s Grand Objective

    Prospect for America goes to great lengths to make the counterintuitive case that building a global government is in America’s best interest. It starts by implying that nation-states are somehow outmoded by the fact that they trade with each other, and then it offers the false choice of floundering by engaging in no trade at all…
    …(from page 60) or prospering by engaging in trade managed by the NWO…
    …(from page 161) They conveniently fail to mention that there are many other options besides resorting to either of those two extremes.

    Kissinger and Co. also make the assertion that building the NWO is the “grand objective” of America’s foreign policy…
    …(from page 26) and that the effectiveness of US policy will be judged by how well America fosters the globalist institutions…
    …(from page 27) Also note how the passage assigns the US to the Western Sphere. The planners had another nation in mind to lead the Eastern Sphere (China).

    The book then goes on to offer specific ways America can sacrifice its national interests to build the global government.

    The Deindustrialization of America

    On page 173, we see the genesis of the economic policies that have brought the American economy to ruin…
    …as the globalists make the case for unilaterally removing the trade barriers that protected America’s economy from competition with foreign slave labor.

    Kissinger and Co. also make the case that we shouldn’t economically defend ourselves since it might create “impediments… to the progress of others”…
    …(from page 75)

    And to give Americans a taste of what’s coming, page 75 also drops this little hint…
    …As it turns out, America did indeed lay itself down as a bridge to pull China into the NWO. We did it by luring them in with a great deal of our national wealth through lopsided trade and outsourcing.

    And this brings us to the subject of the BRICS…

    The BRICS role in erecting the New World Order

    Prospect goes on to address the status of those nations that were “freed” by the engineered collapse of the Old World Order…
    …(from page 164)

    If we remove the spin from this passage, it tells us that the new nation-states’ drive to achieve true independence must be “balanced by converging forces.” And what form did these “converging forces” take? The globalists employed hot & cold wars and insurgencies, trade conflicts, and “economic hit men” to make life unbearable for any nation-state attempting to be independent. All this strife forced such nations to reach out to international institutions for “help” (which came in the form of military occupation or debt bondage).

    Only in the arms of the globalist institutions would such nations find any peace…
    …(from page 61)

    When Prospect spoke on page 60 of what animates such peoples…
    …it brought to mind something I wrote in an old article titled David Wilcock and the Real NWO, Part 2 of 2:

    >>>Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order?

    A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…

    “The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”

    The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:

    1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
    This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.

    2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
    How have they approached this, you ask?

    > They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers…
    …while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies…
    …thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another.

    > They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).

    > They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) are where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.

    It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.<<<

    Clearly, the globalists took into account “the aspirations of peoples all over the globe… to emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism” in their planning of the NWO. It is for this reason that the BRICS alliance was formed and the NWO was designed in a multipolar fashion. They want the oppressed peoples of the world to join together and see themselves beating the West. And they want them to believe that the Illuminati’s multipolar New World Order represents their final victory over oppression and ascension to equality, when it is actually just the beginning of a new phase of subjugation and their fall into equality as global serfs.

    With the Rockefeller plan for the BRICS New World Order laid out before us, let’s take a look at how it was implemented.

    China: Building up the False Savior

    Major moves towards building the New World Order outlined in Prospect for America began in the late sixties…

    1969 – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduces the Special Drawing Right, the planned replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency…

    July 1971 – former Special Studies Project director Henry Kissinger held secret meetings in China to lay the groundwork for their introduction onto the global stage. Here he is with Chinese Premier Chou En-Lai (a.k.a. Zhou Enlai) during the visit…

    August 1971 – President Richard Nixon takes America off of the gold standard…
    …This was the first major explosion in the dollar’s demolition as the global reserve currency (to make way for its replacement by the globalists’ SDR sometime around 2018).

    February 1972 – Nixon visits (and “opens”) China. Here he is with Chairman Mao…

    June 1973 – David Rockefeller Sr. visits China to start working out implementation details for what is to come. Here he is meeting with Premier Chou En-Lai…

    So what was set in motion by these events? By 1978, Deng Xiaoping took power and “developed ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’ and Chinese economic reform, also known as the ‘socialist market economy,’ and opened China to the global market.” An interesting view on the hidden dynamics behind this development is offered in the above-linked “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati” article…

    “Wang Hao, a historian at the China Institute of International Studies, has recorded that Mao’s deputy Zhou Enlai met David Rockefeller in June 1973:

    ‘When meeting David Rockefeller, Zhou said to him that it was necessary to find appropriate methods conducive to the development of the trade between two sides under different political systems.’

    The corporate-communist merger began when Deng Xiaoping came to power in the late 1970s and introduced his market reforms with the slogan ‘to get rich is glorious.’

    However, after 30 years of Maoism his regime was hopelessly ill equipped to run a market economy. They turned to the wealthiest Chinese tycoons in Hong Kong for guidance.

    The most powerful HK tycoon is Li Ka-Shing, the richest Asian in the world and an Illuminati insider.”

    (For Fritz Springmeier’s writeup on the Illuminati Li family, click here.)

    This helped put in place a Chinese elite that “is a merger between the Communist leadership, Hong Kong tycoons, and the criminal Triads. All three factions derive their power from Illuminati collaboration.”

    Needless to say, globalist coordination with China…
    …and their BRICS partner Russia…
    …has continued unabated to this day.

    In closing, I’d simply say that any global solution offered to us in the coming years is, in fact, a globalist solution. If you do not get together with your neighbors to start exercising self-sufficiency and control over your life, you will fall into globalist dependency and control by default. And if you do not get together with those in your local community to devise a currency (or other method of trade/barter) of your own, you will end up using bankster currency by default. Power that is not taken into your own hands is left to the predators who grasp for it.

    [Update 1 – 11 November 2014]

    In response to this comment from a suspected webtroll…

    “How do you know that Putin isn’t telling Kissinger, ‘Buddy, your days are numbered.'”

    …I looked up an old New York Times article I ran across a while ago…

    So while the front page news has blaring headlines about the supposed conflict between West and East, you’ll find the truth a little deeper in the paper: that all these political types work for the same bosses and are actually buddies behind the scenes. Don’t be distracted by the public puppet theater.

  11. WalkingDead on March 25, 2016 at 8:10 am

    When you compare the Anglo-American oligarchy to your typical school yard bully, you soon see the smaller, weaker children banning together to put an end to his “reign of terror” in short brutal fashion. The justification for that response is self evident.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events