So many of you noticed this story and passed along various versions of this story, that I have to talk about it, for it would seem the (Out)House of Saud is pleading the fifth, in that inimitable way that tyrants and mediaeval butchers plead the fifth. You'll recall that I've blogged about the story that former U.S. Senators Bob Graham has been pressing for the release of still classified 9/11 documents that implicate the Saudis as having a role in that day's events:

Saudi Arabia wants US to kill 9/11 bill, threatens to dump US assets worth $750 bn - report

Saudis threaten to sell $750 billion US assets if Congress passes bill that would let 9/11 victims sue Saudi Arabia

Of course, what's intriguing here is why the (out)House of Saud would resort to such blatant blackmail tactics. Granted, it's to be expected from this type of regime. But the oddity of it won't go away for all that. Most everyone who has studied 9/11 in depth has come to the reasonable conclusion that there was a Saudi role, at some deep level (though, I would aver, not at the deepest level). What is odd is why, by this action alone, the Saudi's would seek to confirm it.

The second linked article above, by Russia's RT, contains an interesting observation when seen in context:

The warning was delivered by Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir last month during a visit to Washington, the New York Times reported. He said his country would sell up to $750 billion in US treasury securities and other assets before the bill puts them in jeopardy.

The newspaper said Riyadh's resolve to actually deliver on the threat is dubious, since selling off those assets would be technically challenging and would damage the dollar, against which the Saudi national currency is pegged.

Under the current US law, foreign nations have a degree of immunity from being sued in American courts. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 is one of the reasons why families of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks largely failed to bring to court the Saudi royal family and charities over suspicion of financially supporting the attacks.

The bill introduced in the Senate would waiver the immunity for cases involving terrorist attacks that kill US citizens on US soil. Introduced by Republican Senator John Cornyn and Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer, it managed to overcome partisan divisions in the US legislation and passed without dissent through the Judiciary Committee in January.

“As our nation confronts new and expanding terror networks that are targeting our citizens, stopping the funding source for terrorists becomes even more important,” Senator Cornyn said last month.(Emphasis in the original)

Thus, lurking behind all the rhetoric about allowing soverign immunity to be suspended in cases of international terrorism, is an attempt to get at the source of funding for international terrorism, and as has been long known, the Saudis are an epicenter of funding of radical Wahhabist types of madrasas, and they in turn are linked to terrorism.  So again, why draw attention to the fact by such a blatant maneuver? As the article points out, the Obama Administration is opposed to the bill:

...  it would make foreign nations retaliate by passing similar legislation and target American citizens and corporations in their national courts. Secretary of State John Kerry told a Senate panel in February that the bill, in its current form, would “expose the United States of America to lawsuits and take away our sovereign immunity and create a terrible precedent.”

In other words, American companies could be sued in, say, Iraqi courts (and who could blame them?). So why such bluster from Riyadh, why a round-about and tacit admission that the suspicions about Saudi participation in the 9/11 events are true, for the Saudi action can be construed as nothing other than that. What has made Riyadh uncharacteristically fall on its own sword? My suspicion, and high octane speculation, is that the Saudis are being pressured to do this, that they are acting as someone else's catspaw in the whole matter, for if the Saudi regime's role were exposed by declassification of documents, or in a court case, this might lead to even deeper, and murkier, connections, connections that would implicate far more powerful players than Riyadh. Just who that might be is anyone's guess, though I have a few suspicions. There are, for example, the close ties of a certain American political dynasty associated with plants, with the Saudis. But that shubbery also hides a multitude of other very odd ties too. And we've also seen those strange Fed references to "third parties" lately, that do make one wonder just what actor or actors on the world stage might be being referred to.

TIme, of course, will tell, but in the meantime, Riyadh's lips are closed. Thus, it's not when the Saudis start threatening to sell off US treasuries that I get concerned. The time for concern is when the Saudis, as they increasingly seem to understand, realize they're "on the menu," and threaten to start talking.

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. T.J. on April 29, 2016 at 9:33 pm

    Evidence indicates 9/11 was done with multi-factorial ‘controlled demolition’ (e.g., 5th gen. micro-nukes and/or directed energy weapons [DEW], ETC.).

    Nazis, Banksters & The Cabal planned to bomb NYC since WW2. KSA’s 9/11 role was small — another limited hangout, another red herring. Other players were Bush/NeoCons & Rotten-Child/Bibi (not really Israel per se). Given super-advanced DEW tech (probably also) used on 9/11, SSP elements and/or ETs/NTIs may also have played a role. As per 45+ years of ‘hands-on’ experiences.

    VeteransToday.com (VT) has best info on 9/11 and Rotten-Child/Bibi 5th gen. micro-nukes. Judy Wood has best info on 9/11 and DEW. BreakForNews.com has best info on 9/11 and Nazi & Bankster involvement. SSP conferences, Wilcock-Goode, VT & Joseph Farrell have best info on 9/11 and possible SSP+ roles. Have worked with all of them — both sides, all sides.

    Saudi threats to dump $750B in USTs if U.S. releases 28 pages are a multilevel distraction — both from 9/11 AND from what’s really ailing the U.S. & global economies and the Rothschild-based monetary & banking systems.

    9/11 preserved Unipolarism. Geopolitical & economic Multipolarism is now here (as per Henry) — especially after BRICS activities, Ukraine & Syria.

    Taking down KSA is a possible lynchpin for New Economics and/or New Energy — OR a Lehman-like initiation of the collapse of The Cabal and Full Disclosure.

  2. LSM on April 29, 2016 at 5:24 pm

    if my read sources are correct the Haus of Saud is actually Jewish, not Moslem-

    sort of makes sense since Saudia Arabia never denies its air space to Israeli aircraft-

    according to some (well, most in the alternative media) the events of 9/11 have been blamed on Israel but yet the MSM (“officious” explainations) has blamed Saudis for the 9/11 attack- therefore Iraq was invaded- you go figure;

    do we see a very clever ‘bait and switch’ here?-

    I certainly have no bone of contention against loving, caring Jews/Arabs- most are-

    but I have a bone to pick with the the Jewish financial elite (hiding behind Judaism- they cannot be ‘religious’- genocide is normaly not a Judaic value) who have for centuries mis-used their own kind for their own nefarious agendas-

    be well all-

    Larry in Germany

  3. zendogbreath on April 29, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    the layers of memes to use to spread blame are pretty thick.

    who gave the stand down orders that let the planes fly for hours?
    who set up the drills that went live that mimicked the attacks?
    who took out all the cameras and video evidence of the pentagon missile?
    who set the charges that took down building 7?
    and the other building?
    who profited off the huge short trades just before?
    who profited off the huge security complex brought by the paranoia?
    who flew binladens out of country that day?

    farenheit 911 went into a few layers. so did rubicon.

    yeh limited hangouts comes to mind. kinda like those russian dolls.

    blaming the saudi’s for collapse will not hurt the saudi regime and may be enough to protect the banksters down the road from accurate blame. considering how well laid out the timeline was and how accurately mr global has stuck to it, we can be confident 911 was an early step in a 20+ year plan.

    so how to best protect ourselves during its execution?

    • zendogbreath on April 29, 2016 at 4:45 pm

      who called the sa the new jack ruby?

  4. goshawks on April 29, 2016 at 1:17 pm

    (It is interesting to see Joseph trying to ‘press the limits’ while not becoming a target himself…)

    “…[the bill] managed to overcome partisan divisions in the US legislation and passed without dissent through the Judiciary Committee in January.”

    Well, that tells you that the ‘directive’ for the bill came from way above the political class. Neocons alone would not have that kind of clout. I would guess that the Siths in charge of the international banksters were issuing the orders.

    For me, the hardest part is determining how ‘omnipotent’ the deep Players are. How truly wide their ‘web’ is. One can go from simple conspiracies all the way up to Third Force (terrestrial or alien) or even Higher Powers. One’s mindset determines the degree of The Game…

  5. lazer-eye on April 29, 2016 at 1:02 pm

    I think The Saudis only role in 9/11 was to act as the fall guy and take all the blame. Elements of the CIA and the Breakaway Civilization engineered this scheme from beginning to end. So even The Saudis see no future in being pushed around by U.S. bullies…

  6. basta on April 29, 2016 at 10:53 am

    Ultimately, this is not only about the utterly obvious positioning of the Saudis to take the fall for 911, but I think they are also being set up to take the fall for the by-now also utterly obvious impending collapse of the parasitic rentier Ponzi scheme aka “the financial system.”

    Whether you want to believe it is simply fraud or fraud + Fabian snakes, NWO stooges and ZioCon banksters that will bring this about, nonetheless it is coming. So better have a super comfy safe space and a fall guy to pin the blame on crashing the petrodollar.

    There is a wonderful quote from the physicist Otto Stern which goes something like this, “If a system can no longer go on, eventually it will stop.”

  7. Robert Barricklow on April 29, 2016 at 10:43 am

    The Saudis and Nazis have a history with a shrubbery interface.
    Also, a rock solid financial center may have got caught with they’re hand in the cookie jar.
    Are those Rotten Child types going ornamental by design?
    Did they know of 9/11?

  8. emlong on April 29, 2016 at 10:34 am

    The rigged visa thing alone implicates the CIA just for starters:


    • marcos toledo on April 29, 2016 at 12:12 pm

      Thanks for the link emlong but this article is barely over two years after 9/11. And the press is talking about twenty eight redacted pages from the 9/11 Commission Report this more damning than that.

  9. marcos toledo on April 29, 2016 at 10:04 am

    Lets face it the Saudis have no intention or should they be the fall guys or patsies. Since they’re at most the bagmen for the real culprits who cooked up 9/11. They should have remained silent and got themselves good lawyers and gotten some blackmail documents to cover their asses.

  10. purplelama on April 29, 2016 at 9:58 am

    The whole debacle has screamed limited hangout from the get go.

  11. old97polarcat on April 29, 2016 at 9:56 am

    Yes, I can’t help wondering at what point the Sauds pull out their dead-man’s trigger, which will implicate not just the Bush cabal but also Bibi and Co. and, ulitmately, PNAC, et.al.

    Of course, the Empire of Chaos has undoubtedly put in many hundreds of hours of super-computer time gaming out the various probably outcomes.

    But so, presumably, has the “third-party.”

  12. justawhoaman on April 29, 2016 at 8:50 am

    “There are, for example, the close ties of a certain American political dynasty associated with plants, with the Saudis. But that shubbery also hides a multitude of other very odd ties too.”

    LOL. Good one, Dr. Farrell!

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events