User Answers

THE PANAMA PAPERS AGAIN: IS IT REALLY A US-SOROS-ROCKEFELLER VS. ...

Almost everyone has a theory now about who or what was behind the Panama Papers story, and admittedly, the story does present much for high octane speculation. As time goes by, more and more theories are coming out. Others seem to have the view that I propounded in last Thursday's News and Views from the Nefarium that the Panama Papers story represents, at least in part, evidence of "factional infighting" that goes on in the mafia we call "the global financial elite". Consider for example, this article shared by Mr. T.K., outlining the hypothesis that the papers represent, at their deepest level, a struggle between the "Rockefellers" and the "Rothschilds":

Panama Papers: Soros against the Rothschilds?

Here the crux interpretum seems to be the struggle between a global financial system based on the dollar and one based on the rising markets of Asia and gold, with a backdrop of similar exposure of "Rothschild corruption":

The Investigation into Mossack Fonseca's activity is a continuation of the anti-offshore campaign that ICIJ began in 2013. Then, unknown persons allegedly handed over 260 gigabytes of data regarding the ownership of secret offshore bank accounts to ICIJ director Gerard Ryle. ICIJ published the Offshore leaks, comprising tens of thousands of offshore bank accounts, in which many prominent international figures were implicated, including Baron Elie de Rothschild, the head of French branch of Rothschild dynasty.

Clans of Rothschild, Sachs, Thyssens and Safra, closely associated with the Rothschild family, were the focus of ICIJ Swiss Leaks in 2013. Then the data of a number of Swiss lawyers and trusts was declassified. "They helped clients all over the world establish offshore firms and trusts to protect their assets from tax collectors or over-zealous heirs".

The publication of the so-called Luxembourg leaks was also aimed against the ruling family of Luxembourg, also related to the Rothschilds.

Today, one of companies affected is Rothschild Trust, which managed the assets of some key world politicians in offshore locations. For example, it was revealed that Rothschild Trust, a branch of Rothschild Wealth Management & Trust, manages the assets of Ukrainian oligarch President Poroshenko on the British Virgin Islands. Among ten banks that requested the most offshore companies for clients, Rothschild Trust Guernsey is visible. One of the top politicians in the scandal, British Prime-Minister David Cameron, is said to have close relations with British branch of Rothschild family. Very interesting coincidence. Did you get it?

Butressing this analysis is this article shared by Mr. W.M., detailing just who is behind the so-called "International Coalition of Investigative Journalists":

The Panama Papers: The People Deceived

Here the list is comprehensive:

For to understand what this story is about it is important to know who put it out, with whom they are connected and who provides the money.

The key is found in the list of the members of the Advisory Board, the Board of Directors and the funders of its parent organisation, the Centre For Public Integrity (CFPI). The ICIJ states on its website that is a non-profit organisation. That technically may be true but they failed to add that they act for the profit of the people who fund them and who control their operations. Funders of the CFPI include the Democracy Fund, the Carnegie Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, the Open Society Foundations of George Soros, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Family Fund and many others of the same pedigree. Individual donors include such people as Paul Volcker, former chairman of the US Federal Reserve and many others of the powerful US corporate and financial elite.

From all of this, one is to conclude, by parity of reasoning, that the people behind the Panama papers are the USA's intelligence-Soros-Rockefeller complex:

The point is made. This is not some independent, muckraking group dedicated to truth and democracy. This is a group of propagandists who, under the cloak of journalism, carry out the art of deception on behalf of the American government and secret services. Indeed in the annual report, they even quote President Obama approving their work. In January this same group launched an attack on the government of China with another story of “leaked” financial documents implicating the Chinese leadership and have done it again in this new story, now doubt part of the “pivot to China.”

So there you have it, the information you need to know but which CNN, The Guardian, the BBC, CBC, the New York Times and all the rest of the media refuse to provide you so that you can properly assess the story they have propagated through the world media. The role of the western media is not to inform the public but, as Umberto Eco says, “to teach people how to think,” to manipulate opinion and action. Their suppression of that information is a lie and as that other great writer, Jose Saramago, wrote, they use “the lie as a weapon, the lie as the advance guard of tanks and cannons, the lie told over the ruins, over the corpses, over humanity’s wretched and perpetually frustrated hopes.” It is time for these people to be exposed for what they are and called to account for their deception of the people they claim to serve, for what greater crime can there be than to deceive the people?

In other words, the lack of mention of any major American "deep state" players, plus the media feeding frenzy and ongoing demonization of Mr. Putin throughout the whole affair means that this Intelligence-Soros-Rockefeller complex are behind it all. Setting aside for the moment the fact that Mr. Putin seems to have replaced the Jews as the favorite scapegoat (or Most Favored Conspiracy Orchestrator Status), I really remain quite unconvinced, and I know that puts me into a decided minority in the alternative community assessment of the whole affair. This doesn't mean that I don't think the Soros-Rockefeller-Intelligence complex wouldn't try to pull such a stunt, or be capable of it. Any investigation of these financial interests and the people behind them will show they're capable of almost anything, except moral scruples of course.

I'm suspicious of this whole reading for an entirely different reason, and one which I articulated in a previous blog: the effort, if this was the goal, was very clumsily done. If one wanted to cloak one's tracks and "embarass Mr. Putin," or, for that matter, go after the Rothschild interests, surely one would want to include a few of one's own "expendable persons" on the list of "implicated people." Otherwise, the first suspicion falls on the interests not being mentioned in the leaks.  In short, if this really was a brainchild of the Soros-Rockefeller complex, then they could hardly have done a better job in calling attention to themselves. As it stands, however, not only are the "named people" implicated in the whole thing, but also the unnamed ones.

Or to put this even more "country simple", whoever is behind these leaks would appear to be wanting to draw attention not only to the Rothschild interests, but to the Soros and Rockefeller ones as well. And if that reading be the case, then that means - uncomfortably - that there's a "third player" on the scene that neither of the two other factions represents.

This brings us to the problem of the media attention on the story. A well-meaning individual emailed me and challenged my view of this story by pointing out that the media attention resembled an orchestrated campaign, and therefore, that whoever was behind the leaks was behind the media campaign, and voila, we're back with the Soros-Rockefeller-intelligence complex once again. But I would respectfully suggest that the jury is still out on this story, and that the two things - the leaks and the media campaign - do not necessary point to the same player being behind both, for if there is a "third player" on the scene, then in order to conceal that third player's existence and role, a "spin" will have to be created, one using the affair as a "crisis of opportunity" not only to spin away that third player, but to attack the Most Favored Enemy and Conspirator, Mr. Putin.

Which brings me to my high octane speculation of the day, one I've been thinking about, and which many of you suggested in emails to me: namely, that the Panama Papers really represent what Catherine Austin Fitts calls "control files," and by leaking them, those not named are put on notice that there are files on them as well. In short, we may be looking at signs not only of the factional infighting going on in the global mafia of the financial elite represented by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their allied clans, but we may also be looking at that third player serving notice that those elites themselves are being handed, or in danger of being handed, their pink slips and "downsized".

To put it "country simple" once again, what the Panama Papers may represent is the notice that "The Powers that Be" may no longer be "The Powers that Be." They're a not-too-nice way of saying "thank you for your services in the past, but they are no longer needed." The elite, in other words, is no longer the elite, and there's a new player on the block.  If this interpretation be true, then I suspect that the Panama Papers story is only a part of a much larger story that will reveal itself over time. How? I suspect - if this reading be true or even decently close to the mark - that in addition to indictments of various Rothschilds for crimes, that one will expect similar indictments in various countries to emerge against the Soros-Rockefeller complex as well.

See you on the flip side...

27 thoughts on “ THE PANAMA PAPERS AGAIN: IS IT REALLY A US-SOROS-ROCKEFELLER VS. ...”

  1. I would be more inclined to believe that someone wants us to believe that Nergal’s illegitimate offspring are engaged in internal factional warfare. But it is all one game, and humanity’s best strategy is to overturn the game-board and scatter the pieces.

  2. sounds like it’s more gaslighting on top of gaslighting we’re getting used to. looking at the vaxxed doc and tribeca lately. on the whole, it smacks of propagandists migrating the majority of their control from the networks over to alternative media. the most deceptive part feels like it’s a psyop about media coming out and not coming out with truths about another psyop.

    in the end, besides generally gaslighting, one’s gotta wonder what the plan of action is by the rendon group et al who have taken up where bernays and lee left off. the pretense is the internet is less controlled than the networks. and that now the truth on many subjects is finally coming out progressively much faster. makes me wonder if they’re institutionalizing the coopting of their already controlled opposition.

    btw, most here probably already know this but oh well, wasn’t julian assagne’s parent both intel players in europe? thought he was raised in to that swamp. pretty certain he’s as much psyop as any other. lord knows the only people who learned anything new from assange et al were willfully ignorant before the leaks.

    1. There are no clean hands. Assange is a player for sure and he is the face of something more. He and his certainly delivered many from ignorance to join the ranks of the informed and from there aspire to smug sagacity. What he did to you that would warrant you likening him to a semi-aquatic rodent i can only guess.

  3. “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” Non-controversial. Sigh. goshawks – April 13, 2016 at 10:42 pm.

  4. If Jim Willie is as correct as he proclaims, the wealth accumulated to Poppy is now quite vast, enough to play at the very top of the financial heap…(Trillions.) That said, the next likelies would be the White Dragons, some Russian Oligarch, course Imwouldn’tbrule the House ofmSaud, either, given the way the West is now ganging up on them…

    1. yg might have something here. poppy and binladen were sitting in the ritz watching the towers come down in their carlyle meeting. and poppy combining wealth with binladens and sauds might make enough holdings up to be that 3rd player, right? and sauds aren’t dumb. they gotta know they need to move and soon and alot. poppy’s probably just closing out what kermit started in ww2.

      anyone else remember getting their subscription cancelled without any splaining shortly after this came out?

      http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/linkscopy/CarlylesWay.html

  5. And now making a cameo appearance, stage left, Germany. Any takers?

    “It appears that the whistleblower is German. This appears to be an internal breach rather than a state-orchestrated event. There appears to be no real motive to expose the Panama Papers for this has been following the same path as to why Hitler did not invade Switzerland; he too needed access to secret measures. Switzerland’s secrecy began when Hitler made it illegal to have an account outside of Germany. He could have invaded Switzerland for defeating his laws, but he did not. There are some lines you do not cross and this is one of them.”

    https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/panama-papers-who-instigated-the-leak-usa-or-russia/

    1. Switzerland’s secrecy began when the Knights Templar ‘moved in’ after they were ousted from France. They not only brought a specialized, seasoned fighting force (to gain/enforce Switzerland’s independence), but all their knowledge of banking. What’s not to like? (Perhaps even the Templar treasury; the La Rochelle ship-escape with the treasury could have been a ruse…)

      The two parties shook hands on it, and the agreement has been in place ever since…

    2. Stage Left indeed. If true though it doesn’t have to mean anything. Yes Bertilsmann is German – and what they are doing to books is depressing, but so is KDE which was always intended as a desktop which was an alternative to IP encumbrances. Germany is full of people who could do this – both able and able to find motivation – who don’t talk to each other. Which again may be the article’s point, but again, that the source is German doesn’t even make this an inside job.

  6. I hope you’re not going to say the third party is your elusive Nazi International.
    To put it in marketing speak, their brand is tarnished beyond repair and I’d foresee complete disclosure by the outgoing elites if it ever happened, just to bring the whole house down.

  7. I never thought I’d disagree with you for this reason: when I was first introduced to GNU/Linux at Rhode Island College in the nineties it was drilled into my head: Windows got viruses. Linux got targeted attacks. The attackers were a varied bunch: script kiddies, hackers who just liked to take everything apart and crackers who were REAL black hats. I even met some script kiddies and hackers (yes I was targeted by someone who was left speechless when I commiserated with him for succeeding – who I asked would WANT access to my files when even the graphics files I always drew on after printing them out).

    As time went on and Gates’s championship of data mining left many back doors hacking got more dangerous – but not harder, sorry. And while I’d heard many technical discussions between hackers and their victims – however angry they got when the world was quite different there were writers of these exploits even someone with my knowledge could usually understand. But then one reason I liked Linux was gcc. Things have not improved. Sony has refused to be shamed for several incidents – not just one – of exposing customers – like buying a rootkit as DRM for their CDs or storing their playstation network files unencrypted.

    Hackers are more capable but they don’t have to be that much more capable. That ransomeware which encrypts your hard drive and holds it hostage did affect all the operating systems, but Linux and MacOSX had tutorials for unencrypting it without paying ransome up in hours and the one for Windows went up today. They will still make money. People are stupid and lazy but EVERYONE is stupid and lazy.

    M&f is being shamed in the tech press now for their 2007 level protections – and it sounds like they should be. Probably they have IT people who don’t understand their security at home is better than they were allowed to do for files at work. And you can’t tell me their customers were on top of this. They sound to me like the Buchanans from Gatsby.

    So no, I can’t believe this is a signal. I can believe it reflects the tensions between two factions but both of them have shown so much sloppiness in this either it is a crisis of opportunity or whomever did it wasn’t sure whose names would turn up – but didn’t get all they wanted.

    Respectfully I think you are imputing too much discernment to everyone involved.

    1. Windows has a fix? Great news, a family member just got that ransom bug 2 weeks ago. It’s not nice finding all your music and memories are disappeared. Of course it teaches you a lesson to back up what you hold dear. How do they choose their targets?

      1. They don’t.
        They just mass-email and wait for uninformed people to click the embedded link. If you have no further protection on your PC, then it’s game over.

  8. Who is this new player bringing the old guard to heel?
    It is almost like someone finally oiled the wheels of justice and now its on a roll. Pedophiles and mafia banksters are on the run, rocks are being overturned and slimy things are cringing in the light.
    Those with an esoteric bent might say that the world did end in 2012.
    This is like the end of the party, you know how it is. There are chips stomped into the rug and empty bottles on every surface, gary is asleep in your bath. Its a time for reflections and for taking out the trash.
    Those more practically minded might say, it is Julian Assange.

  9. Robert Barricklow

    There are no winners in this battle of the oligarchs.
    Which feudal fearless leader will run the peasants into the ground?

  10. This beginning to look like the old comic strip from Mad magazine “SPY vs Spy”. It a nasty game of which liar and con-artist are you going to or can believe. Who are those people in trench coats hiding in the shadows.

  11. These things are rarely ever sophisticated and are always staggeringly obvious to any sentient being; they just have to be decent enough to confuse the gullible masses.

    9/11 for example was ridiculous and impossible and the co-conspirators were dragged kicking and screaming to authorize an “investigation,” but yet the official story stuck. So no, that it’s threadbare and obviously an op doesn’t mean much one way or another.

    You don’t name your third party, but one thing’s for sure, it sure ain’t Nazis. My money’s on Golden Sacks. They run everything now anyway, and this is a mop-up operation.

  12. Very possible! Now, just Who is this Third Party? The Lions are being released – and the Wookie is now in charge? Oyvey!

  13. Creativity as a whole is in decline. Running thru te same grooves adopted mostly from the outside world is a major problem. The alternative media is for the most part sadly sick in the same bed as the regular media. It uses a few different boxes and squirt everything thru that vision making it as stale as regular media.

    We have less problems believing aliens are running around on earth then that there is a third fraction running loose doing God knows what.
    It is human nature to deflect unpleasantness untill our noses almost can touch it.

  14. Interesting 3rd Party premise! Question is who? And who would take a chance on alienating so many powerful people? This mystery entity would have to have the teeth to back up a plan to knock the old guard out of the top spot. Hmmm? FYI, there were an amazing number of EQ’s around the globe yesterday. I mention this because, if this is indeed a rumble at the top. It may portend the strategic use of aCTS of gOD. To be filed under “We’ll see”.

    All I can say is, something is up and everyone should be on their toes..

  15. The world’s media outlets are owned by these dynasties and information only gets leaked if they give it the green light. This is quite clear by the number of stories that should be headline news but are simply supressed by the mainstream gatekeepers. The world’s media outlets have been consolidated to the point where almost all news comes from just six sources. Choice is simply an illusion.

  16. Yes, I agree. Someone is waving a red flag at the Bull! And if the Bull charges it’s dead, and if it doesn’t …. it’s put out to pasture!

Comments are closed.