Now this one is really something to ponder carefully:

Moons of Saturn May Be Younger Than the Dinosaurs

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. DanaThomas on April 6, 2016 at 3:12 am

    I may be no astrophysicist but the remark that the present moons of Saturn were formed from a mass of “rubble” seems rather, well, unscientific. In any case, the reference to the “present set of moons” is telling and suggests as yet unexplained catastrophic events that until no so long ago were a definite NO-NO in academia. As for the rings, may be a step away from the Begrun hypthesis being outed by “official” science. Velikovsky must be having a good laugh now!

  2. Robert Barricklow on April 5, 2016 at 7:39 pm

    I wo9nder how many artificial moons there are in “our” solar system?
    How many owners?
    Or, is property a barbarian concept?

    • Roger on April 5, 2016 at 10:24 pm

      Property is deffinately a barbarian concept. Without it everyone would have a plot of land to live on and to grow their own garden and raise their own livestock. Look at all the inefficiently used and misused land around us. There is no real need for anyone to be homeless in this day and age except for the ego trip some get owning all the usable land and denying the use of it to those in need. Unless those in need prove useful and slave away the majority of their life doing something useful for those who control the land use for their personal gain and prestige and not for the betterment of the human race.

      • Robert Barricklow on April 6, 2016 at 10:16 am

        That’s why the Haitian Revolution[1791] doesn’t get ink.
        It was the property revolution; by definition,
        the slaves were property.
        No Press![at least from those who own a press]

  3. Guygrr on April 5, 2016 at 6:04 pm

    “So the question arises, what caused the recent birth of the inner moons?” asks Cuk. “Our best guess is that Saturn had a similar collection of moons before, but their orbits were disturbed by a special kind of orbital resonance involving Saturn’s motion around the Sun.”

    Or… a neighboring planet went boom, and the orbital resonance was thrown out of whack, requiring the deep to be remeasured.

  4. WalkingDead on April 5, 2016 at 5:36 pm

    Just what would be left after mining a moon. Mostly rocks of various sizes orbiting the planet in the same orbit the moon once had. If you were still processing those rocks for oar, you would string them out in a ring and place your mining equipment in the ring. Just what was it those probes photographed in the rings of Saturn? Could it have been mining equipment? Vessels of this nature would have to be rather large to process the oar and would hide in the rings quite nicely from earthbound telescopes.

    • WalkingDead on April 6, 2016 at 3:43 am

      Oar=Ore. Something to be said for proof reading, no spell check is perfect.

  5. Dan on April 5, 2016 at 3:09 pm

    what came first, the chicken or the artificial moon?
    cant wait for the joint ESA/NASA mission to get there and be eaten by titans.
    Arthur did warn us.

  6. marcos toledo on April 5, 2016 at 11:11 am

    Evidence of your Cosmic War Joseph or a case of gigo garbage in garbage out. These scientist worship their computer models.

  7. Mark Rose on April 5, 2016 at 7:48 am

    They obviously have not noticed that Saturn, like the other outer planets, are accumulating moons.
    Saturn has increased it’s moons from ca 18 in 1980 to 60+ today
    See the article


Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events