This article was shared by Mr. V.T., and I've simply got to blog about it, given all the concerns about CERN's large hadron collider:

Archives Profile Subscribe "Cosmic Leapfrog" --Will China's Enormous 'Super Collider' Reveal Unknowns of the Universe? (A 'Galaxy' Insight)

So what's the conCERN here? Where's the high octane speculation? China wants to build a bigger better version of CERN's Large Hadron Collider, so what?

In my book, The Third Way, I called CERN's LHC a "cosmology cartel", for the simple philosophical reason that it was a monopoly on cosmological-quantum mechanical science; there was no way to independently check its results unless one built a similar or larger collider, and hence, "big science" had marched itself into a philosophical corner: how would one duplicate results and confirm an experiment independently of the CERN Cartel itself? The question assumes some importance since CERN claims to have found the Higgs boson, the so-called "God-particle" that, in the standard theory, is responsible for imparting mass. Some, though not many, have questioned the result, thus casting a faint but palpable pall over its scientific ukases.

The only way to combat and verify such a priesthood is to have your own collider, and reperform the same experiments, which China wants to do.

Now, stop and ponder for a moment what this narrative has now asked you to do.  It has asked you to believe that China wants to spend billions of dollars to construct a machine to verify CERN's results, all in the name of "pure science."  I don't know about you, but color me skeptical here, because the last time I checked, humanity has a track record of spending lots of money on scientific projects only when they promise to give them some sort of military leverage over competotors.

Which brings us to today's high octane speculation. Over the course of a book (The Third Way), some discussions in the members' vidchats, and in a few blogs, I have pointed out two basic things about CERN's toy: (1) it is the world's largest user of the Internet, disseminating its results to scientific teams around the world for analysis. Given the billions of collisions and data that are generated in the collider, computer algorithms do the initial selection of events for scientists to analyze, and (2) the collider (actually, FIVE colliders), generate such enormous magnetic fields, in coms cases, several times the Earth's local magnetic field, that it is conceivable that the machine might have planetary effects, having nothing to do with particle physics and everything to do with torsion, and even perhaps with physiological and weather effects, notwithstanding all the theories out there about ":strangelets(quark gluon plasmas), and that, given all this, there might actually be a secret project, a second set of computer filter algorithms, designed to "pull" anomalous events, and to correlate these data with other data, ranging from geodetic data, weather phenomena, and even sociological data like market performances, crime statistics, and so on. Indeed, these types of "data correlation experiments" as I have called them, have gained a certain amount of traction within the alternative community, with various amateur websites looking at such possibilities.

Which brings us back to China, and its collider, and some (really) high octane speculation. Suppose, for a moment, the Chinese might suspect such things are going on, above and beyond the public-consumption particle physics and "strangelets" creation. If they suspected, even for a moment, that these possibilities were in play, then would you want only the European powers to have access to such a machine, with its vast military potential(on this highly speculative reading of things, to be sure)?

Answer: probably not.

And therewith, we may be looking at a new kind of "military race". a "collider race." If this reading be at all anywhere near the truth, then one can expect other countries to get in on the "race" as well. Time, of course, will tell, But for the moment, I am skeptical of the reading that says this is all in the name of "pure, and big 'science.'" And even if it is, China will be in a position to challenge CERN's current "cosmology cartel."

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. goshawks on June 2, 2016 at 10:38 pm

    I just ran across this (c.1988) paper by Bearden on ‘Maxwell’s lost unified field theory of electromagnetics and gravitation’. In it, Note 31 says:

    “In Heaviside EM theory, we are taught to discard zero translation resultant electromagnetic stresses. We are taught to discard those aspects of EM that: (1) form gravitational and inertial effects, and (2) are capable of directly reaching and engineering the atomic nucleus in a controlled fashion. Consequently, our present crude ‘engineering’ of the nucleus is largely restricted to introducing a whole neutral particle or violently striking the atom with a speeding particle ‘hammer’. With scalar EM we should be able to tune, change and control the nucleus like fine-tuning a precision watch.”—off-0hdl–00-0—-0-10-0—0—0direct-10—4——-0-1l–11-en-50—20-about—00-0-1-00-0–4—-0-0-11-10-0utfZz-8-00&cl=CL1.12&d=HASHedccacb18da2d2ee0851c7.3.3&x=1

    In the CERN context regarding this, I wonder whether there are scalar EM technologies ‘hidden’ in the vast physical apparatus to tinker with particles traveling at nearly the speed of light. There might be some experimental data ‘needed’ by the breakaway civilization that can only obtained at near lightspeed. Under this hypothesis, the CERN Super Collider simply becomes a ‘wind tunnel’ for scalar engineering.

    Of course, this ‘data’ will not appear in the standard channels…

    • goshawks on June 2, 2016 at 11:28 pm

      Same paper:

      “This profoundly affects one of the fundamental assumptions of quantum mechanics: that the nature of quantum change is totally statistical. With internally structured potentials and direct control and manipulation of ‘hidden variables’, one can engineer quantum change itself, even before collapse of the wave function. That is, one can speak of engineering physical reality itself.”

      • zendogbreath on June 2, 2016 at 11:33 pm

        gosh, you’re talking about heterodyning, right?

        • goshawks on June 3, 2016 at 2:57 am

          ZDB, no idea about heterodyning. I was an aero engineer. A foreign language. (grin)

          However, the ‘internally structured potentials’ implies being able to work-with the pre-collapse wave function. In one way, this parallels the explanations of David Icke about the problems with shapeshifting; how to deal with weight and size differences…

          If you are ‘outside’ the wave function, you can ‘tweak’ it in any manner you choose. It will simply ‘blink out’ of one configuration and ‘blink in’ in another. No need to conserve weight and size, or any other quantity.

          This ability/tool might also be a good candidate for anything from tales of ancient (really big) giants to ‘gods’ changing shape/species. And, remember Moses’ rod changing to a snake?

        • goshawks on June 3, 2016 at 3:53 am

          Also, same paper:

          “As can be realized, by changing the magnitudes, phasing, directions, rotations and dynamic frequencies of the vector components of the zero-vector stress system, very elaborate and sophisticated structuring of the local space-time medium (the local vacuum) may be deterministically constructed and controlled at will.”

          • zendogbreath on June 3, 2016 at 11:38 pm

            wow that’s alot of potential to one idea

            i was thinking of something a little simpler, easier to apply, with existent tech and hw and probably with greater returns on investement

            say perhaps


            weather engineering?

            and countless other apps

          • zendogbreath on June 3, 2016 at 11:44 pm

            will work on better examples of heterodyned wsrad and nexrad weather engineering. it gets easier daily to see it. meanwhile ww101 is some of the best graphics around.

      • goshawks on June 3, 2016 at 2:59 am

        “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” ZDB, my reply must have been too close. goshawks – June 3, 2016 at 2:57 am.

    • DEBRA on June 23, 2016 at 12:09 am

      Hello goShawks, et Al: I just finished reading those books, the Third Way and the 911 sorcery book. I have some questions about the phase conjugate mirror idea related to the Exotic Weaponry used on the Twin Towers. I am a real real neophyte with this stuff so I’m wondering if one of you smart guys can help me out or point me to a forum where I can ask these questions. One of my first question is this. Was it necessary to demonstrate this new weapon on a site that actually had Twin Towers? That is, the energy was building up in those towers since they acted as antennas, and they passed that energy between each other, like, back and forth like ping pong balls? Also I need a little more help understanding the phase conjugation Mirror part. I have seen some papers on the internet that are helpful but I have some additional questions.

  2. bdw000 on June 1, 2016 at 5:15 pm

    “several times the Earth’s local magnetic field”

    iirc, CERN produces magnetic fields that are around 50,000 to 100,000 times stronger than the Earth’s magnetic field. I am no expert, but I did the simple math myself a few years back and the number is at least 50,000 (if I did the math correctly). “Several times” just doesn’t get the point across. Just think about that: 50 THOUSAND to 100 THOUSAND times stronger than the Earth’s magnetic field. The potential for serious consequences is obvious. If we were talking temperature it would mean instant death. If we were talking gravity it would mean instant death. If we were talking wind speed, it would mean instant death. If we were talking light intensity, it would mean instant death. To magnify physical quantities by 50,000 is not trivial . . . . .

    These strong magnetic fields are, of course, deep inside the ring somewhere. I have no idea how strong the magnetic fields are outside of CERN, but for some considerations it may not even matter. For instance, if they measure magnetic fields on the fields above CERN and get not much more than the Earth’s magnetic field, what does that prove about what is BELOW CERN (pointing down into the Earth?).

  3. djtromma on June 1, 2016 at 2:11 pm

    I am new to the website so I apologize if I’m in the wrong place. I’d like to know what you guys think about the simulation hypothesis/theory. I was also curious what Dr. Farrell and the members thought of the work of Harold Kautz Vella? While they all seem to have truth to them, the idea that they could all mesh together is a hard one to grasp.

  4. Hawkeye Lockhart on June 1, 2016 at 11:44 am

    And let us not forget the premise and plot of the Ron Howard film Angels & Demons, a real-time drama spin on the old good vs. evil, science vs. religion conflict, in which Illuminati operatives obtain a flask of anti-matter from CERN, with the intent to destroy the Vatican. If such weaponization is revealed in ‘fiction’ you can bet it has already been researched & developed by the lunatics running the asylum. Art imitating life?

    Here’s a quote from Dan Brown’s website for the bestseller:

    Antimatter… The Most Volatile Substance Known to Man
    A single droplet of antimatter contains the explosive power of a ten kiloton bomb (Hiroshima). Antimatter is extremely unstable and explodes when it comes in contact with absolutely anything (even air). Nonetheless, antimatter is now being produced at CERN in Switzerland, where antiparticles are accelerated around a 27-mile-long circular tunnel… traveling so fast that they complete the enormous circle over 11,000 times per second.

  5. Nathan on June 1, 2016 at 4:42 am

    I would agree with your suspicions Dr.Farrell, also who really knows what they are using the CERN for? TPTB are famous for saying one thing yet doing quite another, I think these people are crazy!

  6. Eve Leung on May 31, 2016 at 9:52 pm

    LMAO!!! Imagine all the big countries built one, and turn it on at the same time, I think our “cosmic parents” will have to open up a portal and spank our bottom lololololololol.

  7. Pellevoisin on May 31, 2016 at 7:53 pm

    I ponder whether or not these devices are intended to serve as escape hatches for the powers that be, Mr. Global, and the man behind the curtain.

    • Robert Barricklow on May 31, 2016 at 8:02 pm

      There’s a HUGE Powder Keg ready to blow; a singularity is merging from a multitude of hot political issues: immigration; robotics & AI swallowing vast swaths of employment worldwide[driverless vehicles for one], unemployment; industrial strength global inequalities; toxic foods; pollution; radiation; on & on like an energizer bunny their all hopping towards a singularity explosion!

  8. goshawks on May 31, 2016 at 6:10 pm

    Outside of nano-blackholes falling-through the vacuum tube before evaporating, my main concern has to do with manipulating the Earth’s future magnetic poles.

    Right now, Earth is almost at the global minima of magnetic field strength. It has been slowly decreasing for decades, if not centuries. Soon, the magnetic poles will switch, as they have done many times in the past. The ‘South Atlantic Anomaly’ is one place where the switch has already occurred…

    What if you had a machine powerful enough to effect where the future magnetic poles would come to rest? Where would you put them?

    And, if you were another nation and found out about that ‘plot’, would you build your own machine?

    • Hawkeye Lockhart on May 31, 2016 at 8:14 pm

      That is assuming that the magnetic field remains in the state of bi-polar opposition. However, truth be told, the poles are documented to be moving TOWARD one another. Could this be the end of pos/neg duality and a shift into something else?
      Lots of questions have been addressed by the Electric Universe theory crowd, and the Thunderbolts Project in particular…

      5 Truths About Earth’s Magnetic Reversal

      Your Questions on Earth’s Magnetic Reversal

    • Guygrr on June 1, 2016 at 12:42 pm

      Now that is an interesting hypothesis. Might explain the flight to Uruguay by the rich. I have a feeling Antartica will be switching places with Africa, much easier to melt the ice that way. Also staving off magnetic pole reversal would account for the continued experiments in spite of the physiological harm.

      • goshawks on June 1, 2016 at 5:11 pm

        What is called ‘true polar wander’ (entire Earth moving as a rigid body) is different from ‘crustal slippage’ (in effect, Earth’s crust breaking free from the mantle and sliding independently). Both, however, try to align the maximum inertia with the current rotation axis.

        Thus, the huge buildup of ice in Antarctica makes the Earth want to move Antarctica to the equator. However, it needs some ‘nudge’ to get it going. (CERN?) Otherwise, it is the case of the perfectly-balanced pencil – statically stable, although dynamically unstable.

        Ironically, if global warming causes all the ice to melt in Antarctica before any movement, the shift will not happen. Antarctica would be stable where it is, inertia-wise…

        (One thing that many people don’t get about ‘crustal slippage’ is that the Earth is not spherical. Close, but not exactly. So, as significant ‘crustal slippage’ happens, different areas would be elevated or sunk by MILES. Atlantis?)

  9. Guygrr on May 31, 2016 at 2:10 pm

    I seriously want to cry, this week they turn that monster on again for its biggest run yet and then a few years down the road they plan to construct another collider that uses freaking 7x the energy. The physiological effects of the current machine are astronomically terrible for the body, and you can’t tell me that they aren’t aware of this, the PTB have sponsored mind control and biological studies on the effects of em fields for decades. They aren’t exempt from the physiological consequences themselves so why continue to conduct these experiments? Keep your eyes on the skies because I guarantee the metal particulate spraying will ratchet up as well. What happens when we nest two such massive em fields inside each other while surrounded by and having ingested a bunch of metal particulates?Consciousness and temporal effects are bound to crop up if the Philadelphia Experiment is any example. What happens when those metal particulates in our bodies are radioactive and displace the naturally stable calcium ions that, in my opinion, are key to the transduction of non-local consciousness and memory? I’m honestly beside myself.

    I basically have two options, signing up for the Mars One program so I can get off this planet, or mailing CERN some weasels with the hope that they get loose on the premisses. I’m currently just not well enough myself that I could make any kind of comprehensive argument that all of these unnatural physics experiments have immensely severe physiological effects with the haste that such an important matter requires. I’m affraid my efforts will be too little too late.

    • Roger on May 31, 2016 at 5:00 pm

      Perhaps they hide in faraday cages when cerns are fired up.

  10. Roger on May 31, 2016 at 12:31 pm

    The colliders could really be producing a secret fuel source to run high energy weapons systems, space platforms, and/or craft. Or it could be producing something to make more powerful bombs then atomic weapons without the harmful radiation that would poison the planet for millions of years.

  11. Aridzonan_13 on May 31, 2016 at 12:18 pm

    Atlantis part deux, let’s have several of this mega magnetic field generators around the earth.. It would be nice to think that they have some adult supervision in this arena. But, it’s just a thought.

  12. Pellevoisin on May 31, 2016 at 12:15 pm

    I have something more than a suspicion that a few supercollider projects prior to CERN are neither dormant nor unfinished.

    There is a possibility that what was built in Texas was completed or is as complete as it is supposed to be as a kind of resonator for CERN. Forgive me if resonator is the wrong word in English.

    By way of example, the data work of CERN requires the strength of the internet which is not localised at CERN(unnos). Imagine that for CERN to properly function it requires physical structural components not at its Swiss location.

  13. loisg on May 31, 2016 at 11:48 am

    With one LHC creating problems with our environment, what will two of them do, especially if they start directing energy at each other? And what happens when they are both fired up at the same time? Would this cause some massive earthquakes, make the earth wobble, break apart some of its basic structure?

    • Roger on May 31, 2016 at 12:39 pm

      The unintelligent ever plotting beasts that usurp the higher man’s visions, potentials, and works will wind up destroying the planet if the higher man creating all these new innovations don’t find a way to topple their thrones and stutnex their institutions of financial control.

    • Hawkeye Lockhart on May 31, 2016 at 8:21 pm

      We wind up like Maldek/Phaeton, aka the asteroid belt…. finis autem fabulae

  14. marcos toledo on May 31, 2016 at 11:20 am

    Stargates anyone ala the movie and several tv series. Anyway the West since at least the fall of the Roman Empire has been more into magic-sorcery than science they tend to confuse the two. Science is a code-slang term for being able to dispose of your rivals-enemies-victims via non material means think the state alchemist of the Fullmetal Alchemist manga’s anime’s series. As for China it can team up with Russia, India possibly South Africa Brazil is out of this do to the coup in that country.

  15. Robert Barricklow on May 31, 2016 at 10:38 am

    No doubt China & Russia have had their intelligence sources somewhat pooled with this major conCERN.
    There are military aspects. Many weaponized possibilities are replete within these conCERNs; including mass social upheavals engineered via socialized means. Weaponizing the masses, if you will.

    • Robert Barricklow on May 31, 2016 at 10:40 am

      Mind control?
      That’s the ultimate source of control, isn’t it?

  16. Lost on May 31, 2016 at 9:04 am

    And Bruce Cathie made the point decades ago that most big particle accelerators are clearly set up to access something more.

    Can’t imagine that the Chinese don’t know this.

    Interesting that the big US accelerator to be built in Texas was cancelled in 1993/4. Probably meaning that physics is done with. (But ostensibly about saving billions of dollars.)

    Eric Dollard has points about nuclear weapons’ detonation being more about an electro-magnetic stress than about bashing unstable nuclei together–shades of Wilhelm Reich and again Cathie.

  17. DanaThomas on May 31, 2016 at 7:26 am

    With C.A. Fitts we might ask: “who audits CERN?” But we wouldn’t get an answer. Ditto for the alleged China project…

  18. Ramura on May 31, 2016 at 5:47 am

    First there was “The Machine” (CERN) and then there was “Samaritan” (the OTHER/”bad guys” machine). And the war was on.

    “Person of Interest” predictive programming strikes again…

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events