May 28, 2016 By Joseph P. Farrell

There's more news about the hacking group Anoonymous and its hacking exploits, or is there? Wwll, if you're watching the lamestream news, not really, at least, not according to these two artcles that many of you shared:

Anonymous Hits New York Stock Exchange, World Bank, The Fed, and Vatican — Total Media Blackout

Anonymous Hits New York Stock Exchange, World Bank, The Fed, & Vatican — Total Media Blackout

We blogged this story previously but now there appears to be a new wrinkle to ponder if  you read these two articles closely, a wrinkle having to do with our high octane  speculation of the day. But first, a caveat: we are assuming for the sake of argument that these two articles - which are more or less the same - are in fact true. But there is equally the possibility that they may not be, or at least, may contain a degree of "disinformation." This would dovetail quite nicely with the veiew of some that Anonymous may not be the "independent, altruistic" group that some say it is, but rather, a global organization with big backers behind it. Some have been of the opinion that it represents a cut-out for Chinese and/or Russian cyber warfare activity aagainst the West, and given the West's own economic warfare on Russia, a response in some form is to be expected. "Two can play the covert operations game".  Again, completeness also demands that one entertain the possibility that the group may even be the dialectical catspaw for the banksters themselves, a way of demonstrating the vulberability of current digital financial systems to creaate a climate of opinion to emplace something draconian.

In short, there are any number of ways to speculate possible interpretations and implications of the story.

But assume, for the sake of argument, that these articles are true and genuine. If one does so, there's a paragraph that caught my eye, and that, upon reflection, fits in rather interestingly with a scenario I've been arguing over the past few years. The claim of the group calling itself OpIcarus(Operation Icarus), is straightforward enough:

Greetings citizens of the world, we are OpIcarus a collective of citizens from around the globe working on exposing the 1% through the global banking systems. The elite are responsible for the corruption currently taking place in all governments, media, drug cartels, sex trafficking and money laundering. This last week we have had success in taking down the banking systems of the Bank of International Settlements, the World Bank, the Vatican, Morocco, Macedonia as well as the Central Bank of Venezuela. We stand with the people of Venezuela as they protest their corrupt government and all should expect our support through operations during these uprisings wherever they may arise. We are the people, We stand with the people, We support the people.

You'll note first the greeting is addressed to the "citizens of the world," a greeting that could be interpreted in a way condign to the aims and goals of Mr. Global. No thank you; I am a citizen of the United States of America. But I digress. The paragraph that caught my eye was this one:

In a previous interview with the Free Thought Project, an Anonymous representative clarified that the operation is in no way intended to impact individuals accounts held within the banks, explaining that OpIcarus is directed solely at the 1% perpetuating injustice:

“We would just like to make it very clear that all targets of #OpIcarus have been Rothschild and BIS central owned banks. In fact most of the targets so far such as Guernsey, Cyprus, Panama, Jordan, British Virgin Isles, etc are in the top 10 places of tax havens for the elite. No on-line consumer accounts were harmed, no ATM’s were blocked and no personal client data was leaked. This has been a protest against the Central Banks and the 1% — no innocent or poor people were harmed”  (Emphases added)

Like most readers here, I certainly am sympathetic at least to the emotional response most people have to the major banks and their role in creating the  current mess. "Too big to jail" is the epithet many have used. What I found interesting here is the specific reference to "Rothschild and BIS central owned banks." So herewith my high octane speculation: could we be looking, in fact, at that "factional infighting" I've suspected has been going on at the top of the plutocrats' pyramid? A real struggle for control as "they" near their goal of global institutions? Could, say, the "Rockefeller" faction, which has always emphasized control of advanced technology, be battling it out with the "Rothschild" faction, which has emphasized control of land and actual physical assets, be battling it out?

Behind such a view of course lurks another for grist in our high octane speculation mill, for note that these two factions also represent a primarily American vs European interest, and the BIS, as most regular readers here are aware, represents a peculiar fusion between the two, and a further common surface with that "Fascist/Nazi International mafia" I've written so much about.

The bottom linee here is that  I suspect, if this story be true, that we are possibly looking at more clues to that "factional infighting" that may be going on in the international criminal mafia of Mr. Global.

See  you on the flip side...