REASSESSING THE BARILOCHE VISIT

REASSESSING THE BARILOCHE VISIT

One of the most difficult things that confronts me when I sit down is not only making final selections from the vast amount of very provocative material and articles that people send me, but oftentimes, how to connect it all. Sometimes people send me their own analyses of events. This past two weeks has been such a flood of thought-provoking analysis and sharing of stories from readers here that I almost decided to start a whole new category of blogs here called the "grab bag", and simply list a bunch of articles, without much comment, that people had sent me.To put it plainly, I wish I had the time and energy to blog about all of it, because it is all worthy of attention. All I can say is, thank you, to everyone sending articles, analyses, and comments, for truly, it is all worthy of attention. But alas, I am only one person, a hack from South Dakota, and can only select from various stories.

Many of these articles had to do with Saudi Arabia, and the apparent implosion of the (out)House of Saud. For example, this article was sent by Ms. K.F., and its a stunner by any stretch of the imagination, for it details one aspect of what I and others have suspected, namely, that there is a very real internal and factional struggle taking place within the American military-intelligence ocmplex on what, if anything to do about, or do to, Saudi Arabia:

The Implosion of the House of Saud

Bear this factional infighting scenario in mind.

Then there was this strange article in Reuters, detailing Saudi lobbying and influence peddling, shared by Mr. J.S.:

Additionally, I received many articles from readers about the possibility even of a joint Saudi-Israeli(!) military force, something that boggles the mind to be sure, but in these strange upside down days, it would seem that almost any high octane speculation can be floated without much accompanying fuss.

But the real kicker this week was an email, with the following two articles from Zero Hedge, from Mr. B. The context here is the recent spate of reports about that 289 page heavily redacted report made to the 9/11 commission about the Saudi role in funding terrorism and in the events of that day. While I wrote about this more completely in my most recent book Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery, the conentional wisdom is that this episode has to deal with Saudi Arabia, and Saudi Arabia alone. As Ii make clear in the book, I do not think so. There are deeper players involved, but Mr. B presented an interesting high octanne speculation of his own, and I want to passs it along, because I am in substantiall agreement with it, and advanced a simillar scenario in that book. Here's the two articles from Zero Hedge in question:

Obama Responds To Saudi Threat To Dump Treasuries If Its Role In Sept 11 Is Probed

Obama Administration Makes Stunning Admission: "Seed Money For Al Qaeda Came From Saudi Arabia"

Now Mr. B's high octane speculation, if I have understood it correctly, is based on careful consideration of the timeline of events and other stories that were occurring as the 9/11-Saudi bill was being debated in Congress: (1) the Panama papers story broke, (2) Mr. Obama made a state visit to Argentine, meeting with the Argentine president in San Carlos di Bariloche. (3) Mr. Obama returned to Washington, and made clear his opposition to the bill, and hence, to any examination in public of the Saudi role in 9/11. Again, conventional wisdom has it that what is being protected here is not only the Saudi role, but the close ties of the Shrubbery dynasty to the (out)house of Saud, or, as I put it in the recent book, there's Saudis in the Bushes.

But this, notes Mr. B(and as I and many others have noted) came after Mr. Obama's eye-opening interview in The Atlantic Monthly magazine, in which he questioned the whole "special relationship" with the odious and cruel (and hypocritical) regime of Riyadh. So, in view of this timeline of events, something happened between Mr. Obama's article, and his subsequent stonewalling of the bill to bring to light the Saudi role in 9/11, and that was, of course, his visit to Bariloche.

Now, for regular readers here and more importantly, for readers of my books, Bariloche is, of course, close to a postwar haven for what I have called "The Nazi International." In other words, what is being implied is that Mr. Obama "received instructions" in Bariloche, not to expose the Saudi role, because that would expose even deeper players in the events. Given what I uncovered in the book, this would not surprise me at all.

But viewed in the light of the first referenced article above concerning the implosion of the (out)house of Saud, the factional infighting which it suggests is taking place within the American military intelligence community, what one may also be looking at is a real power struggle between two groups, one with deep connection to the "veterans' group" in Bariloche, and one diametrically opposed to it. Add to this volatile high octane speculation mixture the divestiture of the Rockefeller interests in their petroleum stakes, their backing of odd fusion projects with their own odd little connections to goings-on in Patagonia, and one has quite a few broken eggs and a major omelette.

Will the Saudi role be exposed? I suspect that the real evidence in favor of this bizarre scenario is already there: the Saudi role is well-known and by any reading of the evidence, clear and palpable. It is already out there. What is being sought to be covered up is therefore something else.

See you on the flip side...

16 thoughts on “REASSESSING THE BARILOCHE VISIT”

  1. They’re all in it together, and being alpha psychopaths, are all jockeying for position and willing to throw each other under the bus if it will get them ahead. Truth or justice mean squat and is openly scorned by the politico puppets; 911 is now just a tar baby that has been put into motion for the next chapter of the game. And personally I think the 28 page Saudi card is being held to be played in case the dead man walking “financial system” finally melts down or they want to push the fabled NWO full-on reset button.

  2. We’re all more right than wrong. Much more right. In fact our biggest wrong is misunderestimating our accuracy.

    Couple givens that are easily proven out from years of reading people who proved out repeatedly to be as accurate as Tesla – and more often than not in USSA federal courts in testimony under oath and verified by other witnesses.

    Saudi and Israel money is one. BinLaden/Bush/Saud money is one. They are all one. All or almost all intel ops on the planet are in the same organization and paid by the same folk. Call them some name (Jesuits, Illuminati, Rothschild, Royals, Aliens, Fascists, Flavians, Knights of Malta, Templars, Corporatists, Masons,… or just Mr Global). Their ops sometimes expose who they are and what they do and some of their factional in-fighting and in-co-operations. Evidence is everywhere all the time.

    Neil Bush is working for Trump. Cheney is backing Killary. Kissinger is backing everyone. Cruz’ dad worked with Poppy in Dallas and disappeared awhile into Canada. Poppy’s best friends did things in Dallas and elsewhere to many of the infighting frenemies of Poppy and the Dulles’. Poppy’s friends sometimes had kids who grew up mkultra’d into assassinating (just like the origins of the word – hashishinated) famous folk like Reagan, John Lennon,… Trump is getting endless reverse psyche negative publicity. Killary is getting ridiculous cred with infinite airbrushed reverse psyche aggressive defensive positive negative publicity. Bernie’s getting little to no coverage and is easily coopted and controlled should saner masses prove more difficult to sway with gafla news, cooked diebold voting machines and false flag festivals.

    Even caught red handed in some of these ops, media distracts enough to keep common folk gaslighted enough to give plausible deniability (back and to the left,….). We all heard of Iran/Contra. Gary Webb did way more than a chunk of that pie. While Contra’s shipped coke to Cali and Arkansas, through Evergreen air and W and Clintons and friends, the money went to Contras and CIA to buy weapons for Contras from the likes of Adnan Kashogi and his Israeli and Saudi friends. Some of the money was used to ship weapons and parts (landing gear and tires) through Israel to Iran. It’s the same stuff different day and all the same people. Literally all the same people. And sometimes their kids. With Gold Oil and Drugs to spread to other regimes to be destabilized and/or changed and/or torturedly installed. Everywhere.

    Sure, there are some players who seem more good than ziocon bush cabalists. Naval intel sometimes comes out smelling a tad rosier than the rest. But how would we know? And how much can we know other than that Mr Global’s hands are throughout the cake and engineering most of it and co-opting everything else than he can.

    Speculating on the likes of the Kennedies and/or Obamas and/or whoever’s motives is pointless. Real honest folk like Paul Wellstone get single aircraft accidented and that’s one of the best signals we get as to how real and potent their opposition to Mr Global was. Someone getting out of line? Midair JFK jr’s aircraft. Drunk drive and drown Teddies girlfriend. Mike Connell’s one aircraft accident? Michael Hastings new Mercedes out of control on closed captioned video? Aubrey McLendon dies at 88 mph the day after an indictment he’ll fight well with plenty of money?

    As much as we high octane speculate, we’re not able to keep up with a fraction of what Mr Global’s spreading around all the time. I look to Doc and y’all to help me get better overviews that help me figure how and why so many Russian oligarchs on the outs in Russia spend so much time on their estates in the UK and Israel.

    So even when a faction of Mr Global, sells out or sells short another faction, we’re not getting what we desire much. Are the real Saudi profiteers likely to get hurt while the outhouse gets scapegoated and strawmanned down? If Bormann is comfortable writing and cashing multimillion dollar checks down under west, who else and how much power is doing the same in Bariloche?

    For sure Mr Global made a show of summoning his favorite psyop puppet for a brief visit before sending them back to DC. Definitely not a vacation for Barry and Mikey and Malia. So who is it down at Bariloche? Evelyn R? Marty B Jr? More importantly what were Barry’s orders?

    1. ZDB: #1, an excellent though horrific post. #2, how did you get all that past the mods? (grin)

      On who’s at Bariloche: One can ‘Sherlock Holmes’ that it is someone (or someones) who is in deep hiding, for whatever reason. Not only are they in boondocksville, but the Argentine bigwigs were not allowed to view them. I would also add that this is their ‘territory’ (or stronghold), as a meeting could have occurred in, say, the Appalachians. Putting the above together, I would say that the ‘person’ is powerful but afraid (in an ‘I could get killed if I step beyond my force field’ sense).

      Personally, I don’t think that 2nd/3rd generation Nazis fit the above profile. They would not do a public Summons and put their operation in a bullseye. There would be easier, safer ways to make contact.

      I do think that someone ‘non-human’ fits that profile…

      1. yeh i am a bit aspergers sometimes. it gives a bit of relief in a bill hicks kinda way. if the moderator’s got any reason to put me under moderation now, it’s like dmitry orlov once told me – go start your own blog – or words to that effect. god bless dmitry. reminds me, i’ll have to take a look at what he thought of obama’s trip to bariloche.

        along the lines of the guess who’s in the woods behind the hotel, if we had to i’d say you’re spot on about someone staying within their force field. i’m guessing it’s a mere human with profound wealth beyond even our high octane speculations. and knowledge. and technology. and brains enough to know to stay in the shadows at least to some degree.

        which is more than i can say for some aspergered meat heads.

        and by the way doc and daniel and mod r ator, appreciate the patience for those of us with so much time to blog out these tomes.

        so if i had to bet, i’d say evelyn r is sitting back in a place he feels safe. probably identifying strongly with a character in childhood’s end.

  3. Obama had to go get his cover up orders, no surprise here , I think most folks know the presidents are just the faces for the masses

    1. Agree totally. What I found surprising was the in-your-face-ness of the Summons. Unless Obama had to go down to see some physical object (energy device, spacecraft, etc.), he could have met Whomever outside D.C. Going to the south of South America for a few-day ‘vacation’ was a rampant showing of ‘pecking order’. Wow.

  4. Yes, I agree, it’s not about the House of Saud, Obama isn’t trying to protect them, it’s much deeper, and that deeper connection will be evident (is my guess) if the report is allowed to come to light. As I’ve said before, I believe Obama knows exactly what happened to JFK and why (he was good friends with Ted) and he has learned the lesson well. So if the same players are involved, what good would it do if he did try to let the bill pass? He could get taken out, and the bill would die anyway, they would make sure of it, just like all the other cover-ups they have engineered. If that would be the case, it’s better to just try to sideline the Sauds in other ways.
    But the thing is, it’s not the House of Saud that is the problem, they were being used. If you tear down the House of Saud, the problem persists.

  5. Back in WWII, there was a defense strategy used by the Wehrmacht where you made a slow, rolling retreat while fortifying each defensible hill, river, etc. It was meant to buy time, while inflicting maximum casualties on an enemy forced to frontal-assault each position. It worked.

    I see the ‘action’ around the redacted papers in the same manner. As Joseph postulates, there are probably ‘layers’ of implicit parties in those pages. So, give ground slowly and defend each position fiercely…

    (To me, the most eyebrow-raising part of Obama’s Bariloche trip was the fact that he was SUMMONED down there. There are all sorts of cover stories in place, but he was SUMMONED and went. That says it all…)

  6. There has been friction between factions for some time.
    What’s new is that these fractures are being evidenced by more & more eyeballs. Thus the purposed bogus releases to muddy the media waters from any clear pictures – of those working behind the scenes, under very deep waters indeed.
    Yet, the telltale signs are surfacing, as the under currents themselves appear to have minds of their own.
    It appears that following in one’s footsteps…
    isn’t always going to be the path taken.

  7. So the Saudis are to be Oswaldize to cover the ass of the masters of the CSA. The NAZI International which has one of it’s major branch’s in Argentina how far down the rabbit hole to Oz do our elites intend to go.

  8. In the later 19th century, John Keely is supposed to have demonstrated, for the US Army, a variation of his technology that could powderize steel, absent explosion in any conventional (or nuclear) sense.

    Later, in the early 1950s, one of Wilhelm Reich’s more dangerous experiments demonstrated a capacity to powderize small quantities of stone–albeit over the course of weeks, not seconds.

    I can’t imagine that some parties didn’t try to chase down one, or both, of these effects.

Comments are closed.