THOSE BANKSTER HACKS: A STRANGE STORY ABOUT HACKING THE FED

THOSE BANKSTER HACKS: A STRANGE STORY ABOUT HACKING THE FED

This very important story was shared by Ms. KM, and it's so signifiant I simply have to blog about it, especially given the previous weeks' stories about various banks being hacked. Only this one is far more serious:

"Anonymous" Hacks Federal Reserve; Grabs Stock Ownership files!

Now the title here says it all: the hacking group Anonymous has allegedly hacked not only the FEderal Reserve, but stolen files indicating which corporations the US Fed has purchased:

The hacker group known as "Anonymous" has announced it successfully penetrated multiple systems within the federal reserve bank, and successfully downloaded two crucial files: One showing an account number and the stocks owned by that account number, the other showing an account number and the name of the owner of that account. Without having BOTH files, no one could ever tell who owned what.  Anonymous claims they stole BOTH files!

Anonymous says the federal reserve bank owns more than fifty percent of the stock in quite a few major US Corporations!  If the fed had not purchased these vast quantities of stocks (Think Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) and the S&P 500) both markets would have crashed long ago!

Even worse, the group claims that the US federal reserve also purchased stocks in foreign companies and foreign banks in such vast quantities as to prop-up European and Asian markets!!!!

Now there's an implication here that is also equally disturbing. Since the Federal Reserve is a privately owned stock corporation, the actual owners of its stock are also not well known, though it has been more or less an accepted theory in the alternative research community that the major banking families have been the major owners ot the Fed's own stock since its founding, but there's never been a real historical history of who owned how much, nor how these blocks of stock might have changed over time. The usual suspects are, of course, the Morgan interests, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Warburgs, Schiffs, and so on. But what was true in 1913 may not be true now.

If this story is true, the possibility thus arises that Anonymous may have found these files as well, and knows exactly who owns how much, and has been profiting from the Fed's activities. Consider that implication in the light of the 2008 bailout hearings, where the banksters informed Congress that they wanted billions in bailouts, and could tolerate no Congressional oversight on where all that money went.

So what;s the high octane speculation here? Well, for one thing, consider that if this story is true, it would give Anonymous enormous "blakmail" power, and the threat of exposure of some of this information could be an indicator of some behind-the-scenes blackmail. But for our purposes, the more important question is who, or what, is behind Anonymous? Many have speculated that the group may be a front group for Russia or China, since it seems to choose its targets carefully, and these have been almost completely directed at some of the pillars of the "deep state" and financial system of the West and of the USA. In the context of the ongoing economic warfare taking place between the West and the two principal BRICSA nations, the thesis has some merit. There is also the possibility that Anonymous represents a kind of cyber-warfare operational front for what I have been calling the international Fascist Mafia, that it is truly what it says it is, an international and extraterritorial group. If so, possession of such files alone sends a message, namely, that te group knows exactly who is who in the financial pecking orderand that the list they hold shows exactly where, and how, all that bailout money was used, and ultimately, who may really be determining the policies of the fed.

But any way one slices it, if the story is true, there's probably a lot of anxious banksters and family banking dynasty patriarchs not sleeping too soundly these days.

See you on the flip side...

57 thoughts on “THOSE BANKSTER HACKS: A STRANGE STORY ABOUT HACKING THE FED”

  1. lost,
    not sure where you’re going here and there on this page. some of your points are sensible enough. the point on who owns and runs the fed is beyond the realm of believable naive thought. it looks willfully blind.

    are you actually going to site harvard as an example of a not for profit as an entity of good will? perhaps you might talk with ted kazinski of what was done with him there – before he was driven to unibombering?

    1. Fed owners: There none, there are board members.

      There are no owners of say Yale University either, another big non-profit.

      If you want to speculate on some secret dealings, or secret set of books and bonds and currency–like those billion dollar “Fed bonds” that show up, go right ahead. But label such as speculation.

      And no, lists of banks circa 1976 that “own” the Fed are not evidence of anything other than someone being able to type a list.

      If you mean that say Chase or Citi or etc have board positions, absolutely, and from those positions they can do big favors for themselves yes. Look into how many favors Harvard’s endowment did for Harkin Energy (G. W. Bush’s oil company) circa 1990, and you get an idea of what a powerful non-profit with no owners can do.

      1. I think we are arguing semantics here. The board and member banks profit, maybe directly, or maybe not, possibly through favors or other secret illicit means, but regardless someone owns the shares or holds the leash(es), and whomever that is, they are the ones that benefit. It’s much like the Venitian Council of Ten model, the public faces circulate through a revolving door, while the hidden factions/families continue to accrue power and scheme amongst themselves. Following the model, we’re at the point where the Venitian Republic declares bankruptcy and disperses throughout the rest of Europe, except this time it’s more likely they will disperse to underground or underwater bases. The Panama papers are evidence enough of them trying to disseminate their wealth. The real question is, who are the Huns at the gates and who is financing them?

        1. No one owns Harvard University. No one has shares in Harvard, or the Ford Foundation, or the Gates Foundation.

          If you want to speculate on some hidden system of credit/finance/alchemy, which could link to the Fed and other central banks (not that of North Korea), by all means do so, but label it as speculation.

          1. yep agreed g-hawk and guygrr well said and insightful. thank you.

            lost, this is careful dancing around pertinent facts. slicing and dicing semantics.

            reminds one of hearing young girls discussing whether or not a friend is pregnant or if she is pregnant pregnant. is the shareholder oligarchic families owners or owner owners?

  2. In my Opinion, just as in the menu pertaining to the COMMUNITY button one may click on “Meet Some Members”, so one ought to be able to select a menu item stating “Meet Some Regular (Non-Member) Site Visitors.

  3. “Would you kindly pass me that soapbox?”
    One mans factional schisms is another’s diversity.
    Blackmail doesn’t ring true with the anon perceived ethos but what do I know. Our view from the armchair is limited to said view from the armchair, is it not?
    Diversity and weeds. A weed at some location at some point in history is a weed yet at another moment in time it was a pioneer and in another, a native.
    A weed is a future native because diversity is king whereever life seeks ever more complexity.
    Would Darwin now wonder if perhaps it is rather, the survival of the most complex?
    What would become, in this brave new world, of monoculture?
    We have seen.
    Extending the metaphor, what of inflexible ontologies?
    So we turn to the internal infernal moral compass and wonder about filling in those blank bits on the dial because surely as a circle is round one way will lead to the other and so there is no point in denying one direction because one direction is the same direction regardless of nuance, (all pop references aside).
    We now see that conscientiousness is experiencing itself through matter.
    Does this matter?
    No this does not matter unless you wish to respect and align with the source by becoming ever more complex and thus increasing the benefits to All by merely enjoying a diverse existence.
    Is any of this meaningful?
    No, or yes depending on if it is what is.
    A wise tiny alien once said; “Do, or do not.”

    *No animals were harmed in the making of this presentation.

  4. heHeh I really do pity the shill that is assigned to the comments section of this website. Whether it be playing the futile devil’s advocate for some unknown pride issue or being a paid liar, the result will always be the same in this arena.

  5. zendogbreath says:
    June 7, 2016 at 12:38 am
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    i love this stuff

    zendogbreath says:
    June 7, 2016 at 12:38 am
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    g-hawk
    maybe it goes to attitude percieved?

  6. Lost,
    saying something is a conspiracy no longer does what the coiners of the phrase intended in the 60’s when they coined and marketed the term “conspiracy theory.”

    are you telling us you think it’s difficult to get a long list of folk to keep their mouths shut for life? seen any stats on banker suicide/deaths lately? that’s just one example.

    1. Lost,
      the Red Cross is also not for profit. Perhaps you wanna consider Elizabeth’s Dole salary when she took it over a few years back? Not for profit implies nothing other than tax position.

      in terms of power and tactical relevance, please slow the roll and take it easier on us all. the banks private shareholders own controling interests in the public bank. which means the fed is owned by private individuals shielded from public view by their ownership in their private banks. now who do you think controls those private banks? and who do you think controls the fed? the president? congress? or the shareholder banks who OWN the fed? secrets don’t have to be so secret to be effective. in fact obvious truths labeled as secrets are usually more effective.

      nanothermite or whatever. do you have any doubt who profited the most from 911? the longest? and continues to?

      1. All you’ve done is dress up the claims of “owed by certain banks” in other terms, you’ve shown nothing new.

        There are big not profits that pay their directors quite well, Harvard University springs to mind, I’m sure you can think of others.

  7. Another thing to add…. So basically the planet is bankrupt… Time for them to set up shop in another country, oh wait there aren’t any left. Time to melt the ice caps and/or form a colony on the Moon and Mars. The black nobility goes interplanetary.

        1. and they see that as opportunity, not their problem.

          now it’s our opportunity to do the same conversion.

          so anytime anyone is bankrupt, it requires them to be in debt beyond their ability to pay. for anyone to be in debt there must be a counterparty – aka someone who owns the debt – aka a creditor.

          if the world is broke, it can’t be to itself. if we all literally owe all of us everything, then pass the debt paper, let it balance out and poof, we’re all back to zero debt and even.

          the only way it does not work out this way is if there is any entity or entities on the planet who owes no debt to anyone and owns anyone’s (more likely everyone’s) debt.

          now, given debt based systems, who’s likely, who’s left and who could have controlled so much for so long to accrue so much over the last i dunno, let’s say 103 years?

          1. i love this stuff

            zendogbreath says:
            June 7, 2016 at 12:38 am
            Your comment is awaiting moderation.

            g-hawk
            maybe it goes to attitude percieved?

          2. ZDB, I believe your comment was modded because it was ‘dangerous’. It would either lead to a debt Jubilee (like the ancient Egyptians) or an identification of the ultimate debt-holder…

            BTW, I just saw that Members get Comments, but the non-member area only gets Opinions (grin).

            Another recent change to the Postings area is that there are only five, count them five, Opinions shown. By coincidence, this allows any controversial Comments – excuse me, Opinions – to quickly disappear off of the visible page. Daniel, if you did this, you are playing into the hands of the PTB…

          3. ghawks
            this one said on my screen posted 6/8/2016 at 1934

            these conversations are getting long enough we might wanna figure a way to go longer or broader somehow. good luck on that one daniel.

        1. CHECK THIS OUT BEFORE ITS GONE FROM THIS SITE. HE EVEN MENTIONS THE MEETING IN Switzerland IN WHICH HE WAS TO MEET VINCE FOSTER AND IT WAS THWARTED. REMEMBER VINCE?? db

  8. I tried to find corroboration for the above story but could not, though it does makes sense that last month’s OpIcarus would culminate in such an attack. Normally Anon posts it’s exploits to their various Twitter accounts, but I could not find any reference there either. It looks like this was either a blackmail type of news release or a hoax. It will be telling if they do or do not release the data as to who they represent. All of the email account hacks over the last month were likely in an attempt to find a door into the Fed’s main computer servers. Chances are in the thousands of emails they would of obtained there must of been at least one person they could use to spoof access.

    According to AnonHQ news there have been splits in the hacker group as of last year, splintering it into multiple subgroups due to concern over the reckless behavior of the parent group. This month marks the start of OpSilence, undertaken by one such splinter group, GhostSquad, with crosshairs set on mainstream news corporations for their bias. Particularly how they’ve ignored the latest Israeli/Palestanian issues, which, in my opinion, is an odd and telling issue to highlight.

    The following article from huff post discusses breaches in the Federal reserve over the last five years, noting that the hacking activities seem to correlate with the Fed’s bond buying activity. Curiously enough it turns out that the Fed’s cyber security HQ is located in East Rutherford, NJ. I wonder if there is any connection between all of the above and the 2014 death of JP Morgan’s Exec director of Global Network Operations, who worked at their cyber HQ in Whippany, NJ. Though I realize most bank cyber HQ’s are in NJ due to the close proximity to NY, I have an intuitive sense there is some type of connection here. It’s also interesting considering where Trump and his primary backers are coming from.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hackers-breach-federal-reserve-50-times_us_574ee0d5e4b0757eaeb1194c

    1. Doc doesn’t have time to check sources of everything he posts hence some lower order derivatives sneaking through however the overall gist is vastly impressive. They who would have you believe they own the world own nothing but illusion – how do you own disorder, to quote SOAD.

      1. Oh I don’t fault him at all, rather I think it supports his blackmail interpretation. There have been a few sensational unverifiable stories in the past that fit the pattern but are quickly retracted or proven false. Usually that means there is a game being played in background, It would make sense for this to be the culmination of OpIcarus after all. I can only hope that OpSilence will result in them hijacking the news channels for their own broadcast. I’ve often wondered why we don’t see more of that, one would think if they could hack the federal reserve they could hack tv broadcasts.

        1. when we see them do some decentralized cancer therapy in the system that gets folk like jeremy hammond helped and folk like the cretins who sentenced him less powerful, i’ll start smoking the same hopium. until them, hmm. wonder who exactly we’re looking at in this process.

          a fact that makes the point for me here:
          ever notice all the ever optimistic determined ows protesters wearing their guy fawkes masks? who owns the rights to v? and hence to those masks? how much did those idealistic kids pay for their masks? how much of that went to disney? warner? whoever? and that’s not taking into account the accurate history behind guy fawkes.

  9. There is an episode in “The X-Files” where a hacker downloads a very classified file on, shall we say, the real space program. The resources of the entire deep state (or the Eye of Sauron) are immediately focused upon him. Naturally, he has no chance…

    I am beginning to sway over to the side of Anonymous as a front group for Russia or China (unless Anonymous is really out of this world, or an AI), as even a loose group of citizen hackers would have no chance of surviving the bees’ nest which they have just kicked. This would also fit the modus operandi of Putin and the Chinese, which is low-drama, carefully-focused, and long-range in intent.

    We will know in a little while, because the ‘chase pattern’ is different for a minor ‘prey’ than for a state-backed, protected asset…

    1. Good point..The fact that Anonymous is still alive and well with most of it’s fingers and toes speaks to the fact they have serious and or State backing.

  10. I like your theory.
    Basically a continuation of WW1 & WW11 & the Cold War & on & on to today.
    I speaking of those that have been financing the West’s wars.
    They may have TKO’d out the early German faction;
    but that faction has evolved.
    They are still in the war for power.

      1. So?

        It’s not a for profit company with stock holders like FedEX.

        Go right ahead and invoke some secret banking system with hidden bonds, credit and currency and off the books (public) profits, but that’s undocumented, and nothing like that showed up in the Paul-Sanders audit of the Fed.

        1. What isn’t a for profit company? The Federal Reserve? Come on Lost, now you’re just picking fights. Of course a hidden system wouldn’t show up in the audit, it’s kept hidden for a reason, and I would argue that it IS documented in some fashion… I mean Farrell has authored a few books on the topic, not to mention the Seagraves’, Gold Warriors, Estulin’s multiple books, and all the various books that follow the PROMIS/drug trafficking trail. Besides monetary profits are not all the company traffics in, they traffic in power, and political deals aren’t detailed in their accounting books.

          1. It’s a non-profit, there’s no dispute about this. (It has for-profit member banks, for which it can do massive favors.)

            If you want to posit some hidden system, it may not be the Fed’s hidden system.

            No, Farrell has documented no such thing as a for-profit Federal Reserve.

            He has pointed out other things. A bit too metals focused, given how easy it is to make gold from mercury.

          2. Possibly why gold quickly became code for drugs. They needed some medium of exchange to keep the whole thing afloat and drugs probably have one of the highest demands. It might not be the Fed’s system in the end, but they are aware of and perpetuate it’s continued existence, whether with a gun to their heads or otherwise.

          3. Guy,

            Drugs is on the list, but I think it’s something else, about which Farrell does write. That would be the suppression of much better physics, biology, and yes the true history of the solar system (no it was not massively disrupted in 1450 BCE a al Velikovsky, but he has his points, it’s much more radical than that).

            Such a physics obviates the need for trade in monies, it’s a threat to systems of control.

        2. Lost,
          Don’t loose the forest for the trees.
          By that I mean there is something DEEP herein; a concept, where the whole is much, much, more than the sum of its parts.
          Here is a video that attempts to bridge that gap in the forest; where many different of view exist. Yet, when viewed from a certain perspective – you see the whole forest of views as one:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPeondgbfDM

  11. But this brings up the question for whom does the NAZI International and Mafia work for or front. Who is the ring master of the viscous circus Cui Bono and does anyone with half a brain want to promote the idea of a cashless society there is no real financial security in digital electronic transactions.

  12. If the Fed is actually under attack, all I can say is Bravo!! Exposing their owners would definitely shine light on a very dark place. But, I’d of thought that the Fed and Level 3 / the Break-Away group were in like flint. Anonymous, IMHO is too well funded to be a totaly independent, grass roots hacker community. To be filed under we’ll see.

    1. who’s to say who anonymous is? is it the fed pooching themselves to provide an excuse? is it a break-away group from within the break-away group shaking out some of their own ?

  13. It’s a stretch to call the Fed privately owned.

    Ostensibly it’s a big public/private non-profit, with private member banks.

    It can do massive favors for member banks.

    But as you know it’s pure speculation about the Fed trading in some secret bonds–or currency. The books of the Fed which are publicly available don’t give it enough money to by half of some giant corporation’s stock. About all it can do is issue credit to banks for garbage derivatives, the banks can trade in this credit and there are most certainly favored banks.

      1. RB:

        Fed Ex is a public company with stock and for profit.

        The Sanders-Paul audit of the Fed turned up all sorts of lending but not owners.

        If you want to speculate on some hidden/secret system of credit and currency go right ahead, but it’s speculation, and for such a system to work many people not simply say 20 would have to keep their mouths shut for life. It’s akin to the problems with the idea that nano-thermite destroyed the WTC.

Comments are closed.