26 thoughts on “NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM JUNE 2 2016”

  1. Vomito Blanco

    Could the Hadron Collider ultimately be Europe’s war decisive weapon against the west? Could this have possible been a hidden motive for CERN from the get go? Would a continent shattering high tech super collider be equal to a no tech western engineered implosion of Nigeria and the millions upon millions of swarthy refugees who will cross the Mediterranean and descend on Europe and thereby shatter the European continent?

  2. I doubt that ridiculous drunken clown will be sober enough to even speak coherently. What an absolute embarrassment he is and indicative of the useless puppets that front these hollowed out and corrupted “institutions.”

    All you need to do is to watch the latest YouTube video of him doing a sloppy jig, merrily face slapping, and playing with so-called world leaders’ ties.

  3. When the devil asks for a state visit, one should assume the devil sees either a problem to address or an advantage to press … or both.

    Putin should have the Russian Church’s best exorcist in the room with him when he meets with JCJ even if JCJ is merely a pawn of other powers.

    1. It is interesting to see someone pushing the meme that Jean-Claude Juncker is a reckless drunk. There is a video going about showing him obviously drunk at an official photo op.

        1. ya think they drunked him so they could get that on him?

          or is he worse than yeltzin was.

          wait, he’d have to be way worse. as drunk as yeltsin was, his public control was never anyone’s problem. same with cheney, cept that one time hunting with quail when his oldest friends face jumped in front of the barrel.

          so perhaps that’s what mr global’s got on jcj.

        2. maybe mr global will do to jcj eventually what they did to jorg haider. remember when he drunk drove to death after or on his way to his mother’s birthday party and it turned out a couple days later that jorg’s lover, the #2 nazi in austria came out about their relationship?

          that was the story that flipped my partner’s opinion about the costs of our subscription to the wsj.

  4. my first comment was to say that their stated organizations and goals are distractions and pointless. jcj’s meeting itself, let alone its stated goals, is also pointless. except maybe as an announcement/publicity stunt that some change has occurred.

    you’re right goshawks, they’re sure to have epsteined jcj. word on the street is that epstein’s woes are not quite buried. he’s paid off 32 pedophilia complainants in court settlements so far. slick willie and andrew were two of his closest most frequent customers. apparently he kept video on everyone. including donald. so look for a sudden unfortunate accident to happen to dershowitz soon. apparently alan was epstein’s closest of all customers and is most legally vulnerable. dershowitz may not turn and out anyone directly or intentionally. evidence brought forward in his trials is damning all around though. and there’s way too many of these little girls (now women) and their families stepping forward credibly to just ignore or silence.

    neo cons libs and zio’s can not let this go much farther.

    http://gawker.com/here-is-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epsteins-little-b-1681383992

    what they’re gonna have to do to stop it is going to make the dc madam deal pale in comparison. this looks way worse for the puppets than the franklin scandal. the roths et al gotta be chuckling all over on this

    so yeh, the roths et al can control anyone. and anyone they can’t control is probably not going to get on our horizon nor stay there long. given the control they have on trump, i’m no longer sure what the election kerfluffle is about. the vibe i’ve got is killery is not going to be allowed her share of slick willie’s teflon. indictments are coming.

    been wondering all along why bernie’s been allowed (more like groomed) to get this far. watched him ever since his first big public appearances with al franken and ed schultz on air america. bernie was more kucinich than kucinich. and like kucinich he knows how far he can go before the end of his leash.

    so from this couch it looks like the ussa is going to get 4 or 8 years of a taste of social democracy (ahem er rather a simulacrum) and probably some small improvements. that’s the only way to splain donald’s antics being allowed this far either. after that, look for jeb to close out the socialist/jesuit reduction that bernie and the pope bring. jeb will bring his own version of what pinochet did in chile? if not jeb then the likes of weld and johnson with plenty o koch cash (who btw were close to epstein too).

    or mr global could go for huger profits and huger debts and bring on new tech and new energy that allows them to extend and consolidate their exclusionary hold on economics and tech in a manner that brings back mfg to the ussa and all sorts of lower paying jobs but jobs none the less while they consolidate control on bigger debt based currency controls.

    remember reading a couple places over the decades that the same folk who financed and ran the last 10 or 20 genocidal wars (including wwI and wwII) are still in power and still running such ops and that apparently they took a lesson from wwII that running the genocide down to that extreme of chaos, cuts too much into their own profits. they did consolidate wealth in those processes but not as fast as when they crush the masses a little softer and a little slower. which is how we’ve gotten all these smaller dirtier wars (ahem police actions with freedom fighters).

    so what is mr global playing at with putin the good guy pitted against all these other owned punks. is putin the only guy epstein’s owners weren’t blackmailing? or is he the one guy they’re guiding everyone to believing is the next white knight? what exactly is the imaginable scenario with putin and bernie putting up mr global’s public face for how the world’s run?

    1. there gosh and robert
      feel better?

      zendogbreath says:
      June 2, 2016 at 10:24 pm
      Your comment is awaiting moderation.

      1. maybe it’s got to do with length of comment. or the length of time logged in making the comment.

    2. ZDB, congratulations or commiserations, depending on the viewpoint! (I don’t think it is time-based, because one time I opened a comment-box, wrote a few paragraphs, got called-away for a few hours, got back and posted it, and it went-through fine…)

      BTW, a good comment. However, I couldn’t make out whether you were opining Donald was the next prez or Bernie had the shoo-in. Please elucidate (wanted to slip that strange word in for awhile *grin*).

      1. elucidating:
        can’t think why how whatever mr global pushed donald forward at all let alone this far. unless of course to make someone else more plausible. which worked for hillary for awhile. then again what would be the point of killery unless and of course to make jeb more plausible. but then,…..

        had to wonder from the start what was the deal with letting bernie even show up. he’s such an easy blow out win for the popular vote as facts and beliefs come out. guys like bernie, kucinich, nader,…. never had a chance even and especially when they looked like they had a chance.

        so had to suspect somethings up when bernie made it past the first primary. and now watching the digression of the corporati media, it’s clear bernie’s been sheltered and protected even and especially by those pravda branches that are opposed to bernie. these were similar iterations bringing obama to the whitehome. look back at the time line and remember how fast and hard that young man made it through the entire system from naught to everything. it was easier to figure barry obusha ahead of time given his father’s and mother’s careers, schools, nations, past employers,….

        bernie’s background is a little less obviously part of the wurlitzer. but it’s not like they couldn’t forcibly recruit a well intended fairly virtuous common man.

        1. one irony of all that is imagine the joint chiefs. think about this awhile. yeh bernie sir. mr bernie. sir, yeh. i mean yes, sir, mr, ahhhhh. ah man. i can’t do this. mr president? really. come on. we did what to who how many times and we gotta carry this charade off for how long?

          jeez man. remember wm colby? too bad he backed the investigator most leveraged bringing out the franklin scandal – right before he got disappeared right out of his own kitchen and found days later naked and bloated nearby. and that was a retired dci who was well known for his handling of vietnam cia phoenix,…

          can you imagine the specops general who ran cobly’s silencing talking with mr president bernie sanders? it makes about as much sense as the bishop who oversaw the masses of a viciously tyrannically crushed south american country becoming the socialist savior of the world’s poor becoming one of the most popular world leaders.

          but as ever, this is how guys like john rendon and webster hubble earn their keep. or not as webster may have shown.

        2. ZDB, I have always (since digging into his ‘background’) thought of Barack as a hidden explosive. A shaped-charge into either the Democratic Party or America in general. Such chaos and recriminations would occur if the Truth is ever ‘dumped’ onto the American public.

          Fortunately or unfortunately, that potential is time-limited. Come November (or January), Barack is no longer our Commander in Chief. Revealment becomes more historical than in-your-face. This situation, of course, tempts the PTB to use it rather than lose it. (Or even Putin & Co., if they are independent of the PTB.)

          This brings up Bernie. As an ‘outsider’ candidate, he is much more likely to be embraced by the public if the Barack ‘bombshell’ is used before the Democratic Convention. Hillary is apt to be viewed as part of the system and therefore part of the cover-up. So, Bernie may get a ‘push’ at just the right moment. We’ll see.

          (I do get shivers up and down my spine when I consider just how likely Bernie is to be an ardent Zionist…)

          1. good points. yeh it’s hard to tell. my guess is bernie’s gonna go along with whoever is in charge. given his bio and long publicly held beliefs, i bet he’s not going to be as enthusiastic as say bill kristol. he probably will do as he’s told though. my guess is that the fact that his political affiliation is getting its turn shows a sea change in the color of the velvet over the iron fist. same as the papal shift from a nazi brown shirt wearing $700 red shoes to such a fine young man of the people living in such humble digs.

            in terms of after the fact usage of barry, don’t be so sure. my wag is they’ll do a kind of jimmy saville on him. they’ll use him to legitimize and normalize behaviors the masses currently consider aberrant. remember jimmy saville. the folk who brought you such as that were immediately and still are working on legislation and nfp’s to make pedophilia legal and acceptable when done right.

            next they’ll out andrew and tell us how elizabeth trained him to be epstein’s close personal friend.

          2. so the guess now is that sometime after 2016, barry, michelle and kaitlin jenner will all visit north carolina to teach the world proper bathroom ettiquette. perhaps then bruce springsteen and the nba will bring their entertainment millions back to north carolina.

  5. JCJ has little recourse but to go along with the long-emplaced Zionist plans. I suspect that any major public official has blackmail-material available on him/her/it. Each is allowed an acceptable ‘circle’ to walk in, but woe to anyone going out-of-bounds.

    I actually expect the St. Petersburg meeting has come about because of the recent Trump overthrow (Republican voter overthrow) of the bought-and-paid-for Republican candidates. Now, the race (God help us) is down to Donald and Hillary, with Hillary being vulnerable due to the email-server scandal. The Roths and Black Nobility probably sent JCJ over to Putin to ‘consult’ on a Trump presidency. Shock and awe, indeed…

  6. So JCJ wants to go to Russia, what’s the big deal here. You only have to watch MSM regarding the EU, these bureaucrats fly around in private jets “just to have meetings FCS”, they are obsessed with meetings. So Mr. JCJ, what are you going to talk about with Mr. Putin, certainly not sanctions because they are in concrete, but I suspect that the topic will be …..drum roll please…..NATO, and there you have it folks.

  7. Robert Barricklow

    From my perspective there is no “public” face. There is a corporate news face representing various private interest that coagulate into a so-called nation state. The genuine democracy public face is non-existent. A genuine news organization is non-existent. There are private ones, whose allegiance are to their owners.
    [A wider… means for an extremely narrow ownership class].
    Yes, it is in the best interest of the owners to get a piece of the new silk road and break-away from the U.S. industrial strength ball-and-chain structural adjustments.
    Whether true Nation-States can become a reality under the BRICS[hopefully with Brazil soon breaking their recently attached U.S. ball-an-chain presidential coup] is another matter. The E.U. certainly doesn’t speak for, to, or of, its citizens – except from the context as the EU’s political prisoners.
    This, at its heart, is then, really a battle of;
    public power versus private power.
    Private power has the camera and the voice.
    What you see & hear then, is what you get: corporatocracy.
    Where are the Republics?

  8. marcos toledo

    What European Union then let them explain the Turks in Anatolia. And their back stabbing of Eastern Europe especially Russia. As for the CSA that’s Western Europe creation what the old saying you broke you own it. O well the CSA will do it’s duty and soon fall on it’s sword the fools useful idiots.

  9. The eur-oligarchs – especially the German-based ones – have been impoverishing the people of Europe (Germans included, though to a lesser extent) under the banner of “austerity”. Now unlike other countries the French are not being so acquiescent to the removal of the few remaining workers’ rights. The same so-called elite was to varying degrees backing thee Soros-financed coup in Kiev (“Lebensraum-Nostalgie”?). Followed by anti-Russian sanctions which have not affected the players with more clout (i.e. German industry). Add to this the growing anti-European Union feeling throughout the continent.
    What it looks like to me is that – as we have seen time and again – the people causing the problems for the rest of us are now trying to regoup in view of a “different world order”. In other words, a rear-guard action, in the hope that a policy adjustment and the retirement of people like Merkel who have outlasted their stay, will enable the real behind-the-scenes heavy-weights to stay on. The Nazi International comes to mind here. People who would do anything they thought necessary tihold on to power, albeit with apparent changes in policy.
    But this is not 1914 nor is it 1939; people are at least slightly more awake thanks to the increasing spread of real information.

  10. DAVID GOLDMAN

    Juncker was Merkel´s political creation because she sheilded him from a tax scandal in his native Liechtenstein. But Merkel has been severely weakened by her refugee policy. Juncker now has more room to distance himself from Merkel.

    The Russians are unlikely to accept words as policy. Putin has announced that Russia will respond to the establishment of NATO missle bases in Romania and Poland. I speculate these bases will be rendered inoperable one way or another before the Russian Duma election on 9-18-16.

    Putin has also said the shelling in E.Ukraine by the Kievan forces must stop. Again, EU words won´t do the trick.

  11. the propaganda by its nature gets progressively less tenable as it goes on

    the foundation of the whole idea sometimes get lost in layers of gafla

    for example, what exactly is the eu? is it a group of nations who would not work with each other if not for their public declaration and agreement to work with each other? or is it a group of nations who already work with each other making a declaration that they do so to the exclusion of other nations that are not in that publicly stated group?

    ie, nations work with each other as they need to work with each other. with or without declarations. a pretense that russia can let alone is excluded is simply that – a pretense. saying this or other propaganda over and over does not make it so. nor does it make it more believable. nor less obviously a lie.

    and it follows on for statements about blaming victims by predators

Comments are closed.