12 thoughts on “TIDBIT: OBAMA WHITE HOUSE TRACKING LENR DEVELOPMENTS?”

  1. Fracking was initially ginned up to replace the subprime cash cow. The economics of it as we now know we’re never As initially advertised. The smart money pumped it and dumped it strategically.

  2. I have often wondered if a reported scientific breakthrough could not be reproduced because location, location, location was all important. It seems that a basic mistake is to regard the Earth as a dead medium upon which one can do the same thing again and again with the same results in different locations.

    If the geological, geomagnetic, and geoenergetic properties of a location are not taken into account as part of a discovery or nascent technology, then the entire enterprise or experiment is misunderstood. I think of certain matters at Laurentian University which appear not to be repeatable elsewhere that I am convinced has to do with features of the location of the laboratories involved.

    At one end I think of the yield of Castle Bravo and at the other end I think of a host of unrepeatable experiments that appear dead in the water … but if location and its properties is as important as the test then perhaps some things in the scientific dust bin should be revisited.

    These thoughts have made me wonder about Andrea Rossi and his efforts. Could a result achievable in Milano necessarily be achievable elsewhere? Would one not need to reproduce certain environmental conditions as well as the process, technology, or machine?

    If one wished to suppress a discovery for whatever nefarious purpose, would one not simply try to engineer the reproduction of tests and results in locations where such a discovery could not be reproduced…

  3. Just wondering if the government is looking into Lenr e-cat development why are they backing fracking for tar sands oil. And backing that Rube Goldberg project the XL pipeline it’s too long and dangerous and makes no economic sense.

    1. Perhaps fracking isn’t really about oil and gas extraction but something else. Fracking causes earthquakes to become more frequent where they were rare before. They also seem to cause Earthquakes to become less frequent and intense were they used to occur frequently before fracking. If you google Earth all the fracking pads the amount of it is monstrous in every state. Likely we will have new plates form and new mountains and volcanos begin to rise where none were growing before. We will be lucky if the whole planet doesn’t resurface itself as Venus did in the not too distant past geologically speaking. Is this fracking really in preparation for a pole flip or planetary angle shift? An attempt to lessen the geological upheaval that may be associated with such events or a shock absorbing system for CERN and HAARP type systems manipulating the electromagnetic fields, weather, and Earthquakes? Either way the billionaires calling the shots are too old to care if they take the planet out with them if things go wrong. The ego and disposition of some may get a kick out of it.

      1. Some suspect it is really an attempt to poison the under ground aquafers so they can control our freshwater supply and thus us.

        1. this is most definitely an attempt to control our freshwater supplies- read David Icke (horror of horrors!)

          I certainly don’t agree with eyerything Icke states but in this respect I think he’s spot-on-

          Larry in Germany

          1. that’s the problem with icke. he’s a limited hangout. most of the time he’s spot on accurate and ahead of most alternative folk. just the same, he’s a serious blavatsky-ite. he’s always gonna keep something in reserve to drive folk to confusion and/or be a provocateur.

            meanwhile the best we can see as purpose for fracking is to drive down land prices (and water rights prices) to drive small landowners off their land. if weather warfare floods and droughts don’t work, a few million poisoned wells sure will.

Comments are closed.