RUSSIANS CLAIM TRANSMUTATION

RUSSIANS CLAIM TRANSMUTATION

With all the geopolitical news going on lately, especially with the BREXIT and the attempted "coup" in Turkey - a coup like no other since it doesn't look ike anything one would learn in "coup school" (as Mr. Hoagland put it on his radio show last week) - one might think there has been nothing else going on, and while all my instincts want to continue to speculate about who or what may be behind it, there has been other noews that's worth bringing to your attention.

One of the stories that a great number of people have sent to me concerns a recent Russian press conference in which scientists allegedly have found a new method of transmuation:

Russian Scientists Produce A SHOCKING Technology That Can Transmute Any Element Into Another!

Well, color me extremely skeptical here, for Russia has been coming out with all sorts of claims lately, and we'll get back to those in some future blogs, but here, for the moment, let's assume that this story and its claims are indeed true, and indulge in a bit of high octane speculation and a bit of dot-connecting. According to the information-starved article, Russian scientists are claiming the technology to engineer elemental transmutation by altering the nuclear structure of atoms directly, proton by proton. Here's the article in its entirety:

Even though it sounds like science fiction IT’S NOT! A couple of days ago Russian scientists successfully created a technology that can alter the protons of an atom and change the atom itself making one element from another.

This (possibly historical) discovery was made public after a couple of successful tests in which chemical elements were transmuted to become other elements. This concludes a dinasty of researches trying to turn “lead into gold”

The scientists are focused not on turning “lead into gold” but creating a certain element which can only be superficially created for the purpose of fueling spacecraft. However, this can be a revolution in almost every industry considering this technology can be tweaked to turn any element into any other. However, we’ll see what politics will make of this.

The reference to turning lead into gold is, of course, the old dream of exoteric (outer) alchemy, a process that esoteric (inner) alchemy always maintained had to be pursued by those of a "pure heart" or "mind", by those who had renounced the leaden dross of human vices into the gold of virtues. In any case, the reference and implication of the Russian claims are clear: if a means has been found to transmute elemts proton by proton, so to speak, then indeed one might be looking at a breathrough with huge implications of materials science, and for the financial system:

Russian Scientists Announce Historic Discovery Rendering the Entire System Obsolete

In this article the connection is made to the sweeping geopolitical changes occuring because of the BRICSA challenge to the western financial system, its markets rigging, and its current virtual monopoly on international financial clearing:

Barely a few weeks ago, a conference was held in Geneva, Switzerland, purposely to announce the discovery of a method to transmute any element into another element in the periodic table, and beyond.

This discovery was made possible by two Russian theoretical and experimental scientists who were trying to figure out how to fuel a spacecraft using any element found in space. Now, that’s a good scientific excuse, indeed.

The transmutation process does not involve nuclear reaction and heavy water. The economic consequence of the industrial scale of such a process cannot be projected at this point, they say.\

Note that connection to space; if such a technology is real, then one obvious potential use is precisely using raw materials encountered in space and "transmuting" them into sources of fuel. And, if that's possible (continuing our high octane speculation), then one might conceivably have a technology that would also be a nuclear proliferation nightmare. Imagine, for example, "transmuting" a base metal like tin into, say, plutonium 239, or ordinary tap water into water laced with high amounts of deuterium or, even worse, tritium. One would no longer need access to uranium fields for feedstock for conversion via neutron bombardment into plutonium.

But there's a catch: is this story genuine or not? The scientists in question are making an astonishing claim, for their transmutation efforts are focussed not on standard nuclear transmutation methods - fission and fusion - but something else entirely:

Vladislav Karabanov: “Today, here in Geneva, we are making public a discovery and a technology which without any exaggeration could be of historic significance.

The essence of this discovery and the technology boils down to the development of an industrial method for the transformation of chemical elements into other elements and their isotopes.

What we’ll have to show you today is the transmutation without nuclear reactors, without heavy water, or anything of the kind, to obtain a transmutation of elements. Our approach to transmutation of chemical elements is biochemical in nature.

It is still too early to fully grasp the economic and civilization significance of this technology. It would not be an exaggeration to say that this discovery is a veritable revolution that’s going to open a new chapter in our technological progress. Unlikely as it may sound, this is a fact.

And the claim here is not only about biological transmutations, but about applicability "on an industrial scale":

What is most important to bear in mind is that what we are talking about here is a ready-made industrial approach that will be capable of producing target products in industrial quantities in a matter of months. With respect to the economic aspects of this discovery I am going to brief you about that later . . .”

Moreover, this process, claim the Russians, is tied to the use of nuclear waste materials, and produces the following elements:

“The invention relates to the field of biotechnology and chemical transmutation. Radioactive feedstock containing radioactive chemical elements or isotopes, treated with an aqueous suspension of bacteria of the genus Thiobacillus, in the presence of variable valence elements. As the use of radioactive materials or ore radioactive waste nuclear fuel cycle. The process leads to obtaining polonium, radon, France, radium, actinium, thorium, protactinium, uranium, neptunium, americium, nickel, manganese, bromine, hafnium, ytterbium, mercury, gold, platinum, and their isotopes. The invention allows to obtain valuable radioactive elements, to carry out the inactivation of nuclear waste from the conversion of waste radioactive isotopes of elements into stable isotopes. 2 ZP f-ly, 18 ill., 5 tab., 9 pr.

The invention relates to chemical transmutation of radioactive isotopes and transformation, that is to artificially produce some chemical elements from other elements. In particular, the method allows to obtain rare and valuable elements: polonium, radon, francium, radium, and actinides – actinium, thorium, protactinium, uranium, neptunium, and various isotopes of these and other elements. (Emphasis added)

As the second article avers, is all this is genuine and can be made a commercially viable and industrial scaled technology, then it's a game changer:

There’s no doubt that there will be a creative explosion all over the planet when all of these technologies and equipments are made available on the market soon.

When there’s an oversupply of any element, naturally the price of that element will go down to the point of insignificance, the anathema to the scarcity based economic system that we are forced to swallow.

Beside its scientifically groundbreaking significance, the conference was also held in the headquarter of the global banking industry and political epicenter of the West, which should repel all notion of it being just a mere Russian propaganda, or

… that turning iron or lead into gold is not fringe science at all, but real and replicable, and the technology to do it is officially available to the world.

I cannot help but recall that story a few years back about the little bacterium that eats various things, and (to be indelicate) literally defecates minute amounts gold.(See

CATCHING THE GOLD BUG: AN ALCHEMICAL BACTERIUM

This also reminds me of those alchemical texts that indicate transmutation cannot occur unless it occurs in "putrefying dung", a statement indicating that at least some sort of biological process is involved.

The real zinger here is that the Russians have made this announcement in a very carefully chosen place and time: in Geneva, headquarters for CERN, and of course in Switzerland, a major epicenter of the West's financial system. And given the stated claims, the Russians are pointing out the potential proliferation problems it implies, so, contrary to the enthusiasm of the article, don't look for this technology to be sold to just anyone. The place and timing were shots across the bow of the West, and since they occurred prior to Mr. Ketchup Kerry's visit to Moscow, and the apparent agreement to coordinate American and Russian anti-terrorism efforts, and thus occurred also before the attempted "coup" against Sultan Erdogan, this announcement may indeed have sent geopolitical and financial shockwaves through the West. The implication of this "new alchemy" is that nuclear fuels can be made (or for that matter, unmade) from scratch, as it were, and that precious bullions themselves can be made, again, from "scratch" as it were.

And it's not the only thing the Russians have been talking about, or doing, as the rest of the world has been focussed on Ketchup Kerry and Sultan Erdogan, but for that, we'll have to wait until tomorrow...

See you on the flip side...

53 thoughts on “RUSSIANS CLAIM TRANSMUTATION”

  1. Someone should have informed the Annunaki. All this way to obtain gold and go to the trouble of creating a worker race when the solution was so easy to invent even an evolved ape could do it.

  2. marcos toledo

    This looks like a scenario out of Fullmetal Alchemist a real philosopher stone. This would greatly help in the nuclear waste problem turning a liability into a asset. I hope this turns out to be a legit story this technology is long overdue.

  3. Seems to me that if this is at all real, it’s not a new invention by some smart Russians, and more importantly it portends a very different biology, in fact something far more important than better methods of making rocket fuel or nozzles.

    1. You might be interested in a book that was published in 2010 titled Nuclear Transmutation of Stable and Radioactive Isotopes in Biological Systems by Vladimir I. Vysotskii and Alla A. Kornilova. Apparently this type of research has been going on in Russia for some time.

      1. Thank you.

        As mentioned above, there’s Kervan.

        Then of course there’s W. Reich.

        Not a surprise that the English language version of that Russian book is published in India.

  4. “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” This is kind of funny, as my comment here is completely non-controversial. goshawks – July 20, 2016 at 4:41 am.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Goshawks,
      Annoying as bothering flies.
      Parasitical censorship botflies.

      [Jim Fetzer is experiencing censorship with new book::
      Nobody Died At Sandy Hook.]

        1. Robert Barricklow

          Lost
          Civil lawsuits totaling over a trillion dollars in the U.S, District Court for the District of Connecticut against several news corporations regarding they’re spreading the hoax of mass shooting deaths at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

        2. Robert Barricklow

          Annual crime statistics released by the F.B.I. last fall indicate that nobody was murdered in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012.
          Overwhelming evidence shows
          Nobody Was Killed at Sandy Hook.

          1. Robert,

            You still haven’t addressed my question one little bit, try reading it again.

            The bogus claims are out there, no one is suppressing them. Laughing sadly at them more like. They are akin to the former Iranian president saying no one died at the World Trade Towers.

          2. Robert Barricklow

            Lost,
            Or someone trying to explain something to someone that even a 5-yr old could understand. And yet, that someone is so lost he can’t comprehend the meaning; so the lost sets out to find a 5 yr old to explain it to him.

            From Groucho Marx’s DUCK SOUP

          3. Robert,

            Still not answering my question I see.

            I’ll repeat it, has Fetzer been prevented from publishing his claims?

            Answer, no.

            Freedom to publish does not mean that whatever is published will be treated seriously or make it into the mainstream. How hard is this to follow?

          4. No, Robert, the question is whether Fetzer has been stopped from making his claims.

            And the answer is still no.

            It’s about the level of the claims that no one was killed in the Boston Marathon bombing, not credible.

            If you have the FBI crime stats for Newton, Connecticut, and have confirmed that includes Sandy Hook, then link that information.

            No, overwhelming evidence shows that dozens of kids were killed in Sandy Hook. Kinda of like the back of JFK’s head flying off.

          5. Robert Barricklow

            Lost,
            Amazon Censored It!
            As a platform monopoly this is setting a private, unaccountable precedent.
            The Boston was also theatre. It was a stage set for the premiere of Marshall Law. Some of the audience was lost in the red, white, and blue performance of spectacle. Because lost in all this is:
            Imagery from today’s terror wars enforces non-combatants’ role as pure spectators and as potential collateral damage, thus propelling the logic for increasing surveillance, militarization, lockdown, and violence.

          6. Robert Barricklow

            The spectacle is fully weaponized with the target on all sides is both civilian society and the humanity that animates it. Images of state terror now serve less to indict the perpetrators than to instill fear, destroy the capacity for holding power accountable, and to send the message/This Could Happen To You.

          7. Robert,

            Amazon refusing to sell a book is not censorship.

            By that logic a “Christian” bookstore not selling the Koran is censorship.

            You’ve cited claims about no killings, not proof, and such claims or the killings really didn’t have anything to do with my question.

            No, Fetzer was not censored.

          8. RB, you are correct. Amazon refusing to sell THIS book is censorship. Just ‘plausible deniability’ censorship. Look who owns Amazon as to why…

            (Lost is just toeing his master’s line; ignore him.)

          9. really robert. as usual g-hawk is not only smart here, he’s wise here.

            lost. you’re far too easy
            lets take a little walk through boston’s bombing as long as you brought it up.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=F0cdYR7kXrc

            vs

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Arredondo

            and this doesn’t even address the scapegoats and their chechin families relationship through marriage to a well known cia asset in chechnya before they were judas goated to slaughter into the ussa.

            lost,
            willful ignorance is not going to get it here

            wait a minute robert, i think i just did what i advocated you stop doing.
            hm
            oh well it was easy and kinda fun
            have at it
            guess we’d have far less fun here without someone like lost asking for obvious lies to get exposed.

          10. goshawks,

            No matter how much you wish it, you can’t redefine the word censorship to suit your needs. You’re neither GWBush and company, nor a French postmodern “philosopher”.

            Amazon refusing to sell a book is far from censorship.

            zendog:

            Since you seem to have missed this entirely, I’ll point it out with explicit language: Nowhere did I say a thing about whom I thought bombed the finish line of the Boston Marathon.

          11. Robert Barricklow

            Lost,
            Your stance brings to mind:
            War Is Peace
            Freedom Is Slavery
            Ignorance Is Strength

          12. RB

            All you’ve done is demonstrate that you didn’t pay attention to what I wrote, and are more interested in pushing an agenda about the likes of Sandy Hook than in discovering problems with your narrative.

            Fetzer was not censored.

            Wilhelm Reich was.

          13. RB,

            Regarding that Project “Censored” link: All of the stories on the main webpage are widely known.

            That’s not censorship. You and the website mean stories that have to a certain extent been suppressed or sidelined.

            The abuse of language can be a very dangerous and slippery slope.

      1. lost,
        it’s all relative is what i’m getting from you here. censorship is relative. “widely known” is relative.

        as to your claims of how much damage or casualties or whatever in any and all of these false flags, it gets harder and harder to say with each one.

        standard operating procedure has become destroy all evidence as quickly as possible.

        wanna see a video of charlie hebdo’s policeman NOT being shot at point blank range by an ak47 firing obvious blanks? you can if you search enough for mirrored vids of the original vids posted livestreamed from witness’ phones. but you won’t see it if you look at any mainstream corporate site for news or media. and you probably won’t be able to bring up mirrored vids from youtube of the original much longer.

        in the end it won’t matter anyway with the computer generated graphics they can insert into anything. similarly bad special effects were used and laughed at on youtube in the dallas shooting last week.

        now here’s your question. is the fact that these videos that clearly demonstrate mainstream corporate media lying about obvious false flags not readily available to all of us – is that fact censorship?

        when dh lawrence was shipbound en route to ussa he found out that lady chatterley’s lover was banned in ussa. he allegedly rejoiced reassured with the knowledge that the book would sell out because of the ban. just the same is that censorship?

        1. ZenDog:

          “relative” makes a huge difference.

          No one is prosecuting Fetzer for his comments.

          The Charlie Hebdo shootings occurred. I have no idea what each and every claimed video shows. Who did the shooting is a bit more of mystery in that case.

          Right, Lawrence was censored. In fact the government censor would read Lawrence in Britain prior to publication and excise racy bits.

    2. Please be PATIENT with me. For whatever reason the automatic system flags some comments for moderation, and as I’m only one person and sometimes actually take some time off for myself, comments sometimes pile up.

  5. If this proves out, it could be interesting from a scarcity standpoint. Gold, silver, platinum, etc., were chosen as the base of a financial system because of their scarceness. Once a process is in-place to remove the scarceness attribute, that element can no longer function in that capacity.

    (Remember how aluminum had a run at being such a commodity? Titanic’s captain had an aluminum megaphone as a status symbol. Breakthroughs in processing technology caused a dramatic reduction in the cost of aluminum, short-circuiting it as a gold-substitute.)

    If all elements can be easily synthesized, something new will have to be inserted as the scarcity-object. This assumes that we will not have moved into a StarTrek-like society, where accumulating wealth is not the center of the universe…

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Is Star Trek society Militarized?
      Fascist?
      Inverted Totalitarian?

      Or, something else?

      1. RB, Star Trek society has a military component (Star Fleet) because of Romulans, Cardassians, etc. To be purely pacifist is to ultimately be someone’s vassal planet (or worse: Borg). Most of the society has only distant connections to the military.

        What made Star Trek society possible was advanced technology like food synthesizers, transporters, etc. There was no need for centralization of power, or accumulating ‘things’ for survival. Mankind could devote itself in freedom to whatever interested each person – petty or sublime. Probably its closest analogue would be somewhere between democracy and socialism.

        That said, there were a few episodes concerning ‘deep state’ organizations that had to be ferreted-out and neutralized or reformed…

        1. Robert Barricklow

          I like your version Goshawks.
          Mine was different; however, there was a component of the Deep State where the trek-like society had to be ever vigilant. Because democracy is too important to be left to the whims of those in power, who may, like today – turn the principles of self-governance into an excuse for tyranny.

      2. RB, I tried to reply, but “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” Stupid, as it was only describing Star Trek society… goshawks – July 21, 2016 at 6:48 pm.

  6. The ways the Russians have been announcing that they are in the driver’s seat has been fascinating. The announcement at CERN I would think would completely deflate the NATO/CIA plans to go to war with Russia soon. It seems to be a declaration to wit, should you try to harm us, we will dump this and boatloads more ending your hegemony and transmuting your plans to dust.

    1. good point pellevoisin.

      and if i were next level powerful, i hope i’d be as kind, careful and gradual in letting my much less powerful overly aggressive little brother know to cool down and relax, i got it from here.

      still makes me wonder if putin is still a roth/rock owned dog. and if not how not?

  7. Could it also have repercussions to traditional warfare?
    Just sending out a bug to eat (transmute) the shiny hardware into dust.
    War = over before it starts?

    1. If this is so then the traditional war industries will go the way of East Germany.

  8. Probably very real, based on the Nikolai Kozyrev & Mehran Keshe stuff (from, e.g., “Philosopher’s Stone”) — and other breakthrough Russian science. SSP whistleblowers also say that alchemy-type stuff is real.

  9. Well, we do have the transmutations in cold fusion, the transmutations mentioned by Gerlach, and numerous Soviet advances in materials science, such as their discovery of how to make a fiberglass-like substance out of basalt, which is cheaper, safer, and far more useful (think rebar substitute with the same thermal expansion as concrete – no cracking – and an asbestos substitute which is very safe for living beings).

    They also supposedly developed a method of cold forming titanium for submarine hulls which was quite radical (and still classified, I think).

    Then there’s Bearden’s information regarding the Russian work on virtual “templates” and biological cells. Could be they discovered some pretty amazing things. Perhaps there is a matter equivalent of stem cells – something which can be re-arranged to developed into any kind of matter.

    I have no doubt it is possible, and it would certainly be interesting if true. That would also explain part of the sudden shift back to the Cold War view of Russia, and NATO’s war-mongering posture

    1. rossi’s e-cat’s kinda gotta be a version of such transmutation – aka cold fusion, right?

  10. Dr. F.,

    Does this not attack the breakaway civilization’s hidden system of finance, given that this is assessed to be founded upon the hypothecation of space mineral resources? Why bother mining asteroids or Mars given this new technology?

    1. Good point. It will make us dream bigger and work harder to find ways of conquering intersteller travel. Super conducting along super conducting connections between nearby stars with our Sun and star hopping from star to star might work to terraform or settle other inhabitable worlds. Imagine the power of the electro-magnetic power stored and generated by the Sun and other stars. Imagine the light from our Sun to a nearby star creates a potentially superconducting connecting bridge when they connect with one and another. Imagine figuring out how to create the field or conditions necessary to be pulled and super conducted along this connection between two stars. Don’t need to harness the power of both stars just need to figure out how to surf the powerful connections already linking them. Galaxy to Galaxy might be possible because the energy contained by two galaxies would be great enough to span their distance just as quickly and faster than light. Speed might be relative to the energy output of the power source vs distance of their connection. Thus the time from one pole of our galaxy to the pole of another galaxy might be near the same time of travel from pole of our Sun to its nearest neighbor.

  11. Robert Barricklow

    Talk about a GAME CHANGER!
    A paradigm shift!
    The Wicked Witch[controlled markets?] is dead!

    1. So.. Russians can now transmutate nuclear waste into water.. Are we looking at a way to push past element 137? http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2010/November/ColumnThecrucible.asp? Can we turn Carbon Dioxide into Nitrogen and Argon and (more) Oxygen? Can we turn Iron Oxide and heavy metals into soil and water? Sorry went off on a Mars trip… with an SLS strapped to my bum.. This could be the ‘real’ terraforming technology we need to make Space Travel and terraforming an actual reality.. If these claims are correct.. And also we need more gold to be transformed into mono-atomic white powder and thrown into the sky as chem-trails in order to repair that big hole in the sky over Australia.. Apparently its working.

Comments are closed.