BREAKING BRICSA: WASHINGTON TARGETS BRAZIL

BREAKING BRICSA: WASHINGTON TARGETS BRAZIL

The BRICSA bloc, as I call it, more popularly known as BRICS -  Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa - is in Washington's sights, and more particularly, the Republic of Brazil, according to this article shared by many readers here:

F. William Engdahl: Washington Tries to Break Brics: The Rape of Brazil Begins

While normally I would be inclined to parse this article very closely and carefully, especially since it was composed by one of my favorite researchers, F. William Engdahl, today I want to leap directly to some high octane speculations, not only because there is so much detail in Mr. Engdahl's careful survey of the internal politicking in Brazil surrounding the demise of President Rousseff, but because there are larger issues in play. Consider, for example, the equally sudden demise of former Argentine President Christina Fernandez - Kircher, whom, you'll recall, gave a blistering speech to the UN General Assembly a couple years ago on how western hedge fund managers were literally holding her country hostage. She too was toppled and a more pro-Washington President now inhabits the Casa Rosada in Buenos Aires. Shortly after de Kircher's fall, President Obama then journeyed to San Carlos di Bariloche for a summit meeting with the new Argentine President with lots of NASA people in tow.

In Rousseff's case, the manipulation of events by Washington and the Western financial oligarchs was clear:

It’s important to keep in mind that elected President Rousseff was not convicted or even formally charged with any concrete act of corruption, even though the pro-oligarchy mainstream Brazil media, led by O’Globo Group of the billionaire Roberto Irineu Marinho, ran a media defamation campaign creating the basis to railroad Rousseff into formal impeachment before the Senate. The shift took place after the opposition PMDB party of Temer on March 29 broke their coalition with Rousseff’s Workers’ Party, as accusations of Petrobras-linked corruption were made against Rousseff and former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

On August 31, 61 Senators voted to remove her while 20 voted against removal. The formal charge was “manipulation of the state budget” before the 2014 elections to hide the size of the deficit. She vehemently denies the charge. Indeed, the Senate issued its own expert report that concluded there was “no indication of direct or indirect action by Dilma” in any illegal budgetary maneuvers. According to the Associated Press, “Independent auditors hired by Brazil’s Senate said in a report released Monday that suspended President Dilma Rousseff didn’t engage in the creative accounting she was charged with at her impeachment trial.” Under an honest system that would have ended the impeachment then and there. Not in Brazil.

In effect, she was impeached for the dramatic decline in the Brazilian economy, a decline deliberately pushed along as US credit rating agencies downgraded Brazilian debt, and international and mainstream Brazilian media kept the Petrobras corruption allegations in the spotlight. Importantly, the Senate did not ban her from office for 8 years as Washington had hoped, and she has promised an electoral return. The Washington-steered Temer has until end of 2018 to deliver Brazil to Temer’s foreign masters before his term legally ends.

And as Engdahl points out, one has the familiar "NGO" entities hovering in the background:

In 2012 in a joint exploration drilling, Repsol Sinopec Brasil, Norway’s Statoil and Petrobras made a major new discovery in Pão de Açúcar, the third in block BM-C-33, which includes the Seat and Gávea, the latter one of the world’s 10 largest discoveries in 2011. USA and British oil majors were nowhere to be seen.

Biden’s task was to sound out Lula’s successor, Rousseff, about reversing that exclusion of US major oil companies in favor of the Chinese. Biden also met with leading energy companies in Brazil including Petrobras.

While little was publicly said, Rousseff refused to reverse the 2009 oil law in a way that would be suitable to Biden, Washington and US oil majors. Days after Biden’s visit came the Snowden NSA revelations that the US had also spied on Rousseff and top officials of Petrobras. She was livid and denounced the Obama Administration that September before the UN General Assembly for violating international law. She cancelled a planned Washington visit in protest. After that, US-Brazil relations took a dive.

After his May 2013 talks with Rousseff, Biden clearly gave her the kiss of death.

Before Biden’s May 2013 visit Dilma Rousseff had 70% of popularity rating. Less than two weeks after Biden left Brazil, nationwide protests by a very well-organized group called Movimento Passe Livre, over a nominal 10 cent bus fare increase, brought the country virtually to a halt and turned very violent. The protests bore the hallmark of typical “Color Revolution” or Twitter social media destabilizations that seem to follow Biden wherever he makes a presence. Within weeks Rousseff’s popularity plummeted to 30%.

Washington had clearly sent a signal that Rousseff had to change course or face serious problems. The Washington regime change machine, including its entire array of financial warfare operations ranging from a leaked PwC audit of Petrobras to Wall Street credit rating agency Standard & Poors’ downgrade of Brazil public debt to junk in September 2015, went into full action to remove Rousseff, a key backer of the BRICS New Development Bank and of an independent national development strategy for Brazil.

And further in the article the NGO connection is made clear:

Madeline Albright, a Director of the leading US think-tank, Council on Foreign Relations, is also chair of the prime US Government “Color Revolution” NGO, the National Democratic Institute (NDI). Nothing fishy here, or? Nunes reportedly went to Washington to rally backing for Temer and the unfolding judicial coup against Rousseff.

A key player from the side of Washington, Rousseff’s de facto political executioner, was, once again, Vice President Joe Biden, the “Dick Cheney” dirty operator-in-chief in the Obama Administration.

Thus, the two biggest regional powers in South America were, through the usual covert operations and skullduggery, brought back onto Washington's plantation-reservation, and as Engdahl points out, this is particularly true in Brazil's case. So what was Rousseff's ouster all about?

Beyond the obvious concerns of the Anglo-sphere oligarchs to get their hands on Brazil's oil, Mr. Engdahl is suggesting something deeper in his conclusion:

This is Washington’s way, the way of the Wall Street Gods of Money, as I title one of my books. First, destroy any national leadership intent on genuine national development such as Dilma Rousseff. Replace them with a vassal regime willing to do anything for money, including selling the crown jewels of their own nation as people like Anatoli Chubais did in Russia in the 1990’s under Boris Yeltsin’s “shock therapy.” As reward for his behavior, Chubais today sits on the advisory board of JP MorganChase. What will Temer and associates get for their efforts remains to be seen. Washington for now has broken one of the BRICS that ultimately threaten her global hegemony. It is not likely to bring any lasting success if recent history is any guide.

In other words, Ms. Rousseff was simply not a globalist, but acting in what she thought was the best interests of her nation, and where have we heard this before? Increasingly, the BRICSA bloc has been sounding memes that are not marching in lock step with the globalist dogma that multinational (western) corporations should be running the world. And Mr. Engdahl ends on a warning note: the latest coup d'etat in Brazil - for that is in effect what the ouster of Ms. Rousseff was and is - is not likely to end up any better in the long run for the west, than similar ventures in the Ukraine or Syria. The only thing the West is revealing itself to be is a perpetual war machine designed to loot and plunder nations' wealth for its ruling oligarchy. As the West plunders Brazil, expect popular opposition to grow as "austerity" and its effects begin to sink in. And once that happens, the hostility to the USSA and its corporate masters will become hardened and deep seated, and that will spread to Argentina.

And that will open the door, once again, to Chinese diplomacy and investments.

In short, Ms. Rousseff may (for the moment) be gone, but her party is not. And as the West turns Brazil into another Greece, don't expect Brazilians to take it lying down. And in the long run, that means once again that Washington is making long term decisions that will turn yet another powerful friend against it, and isolate it even more.

See you on the flip side...

27 thoughts on “BREAKING BRICSA: WASHINGTON TARGETS BRAZIL”

  1. What may be developing before our eyes are Economic Blocks/zones of economic exclusivity. Trade Zones backed by military might. The economic warfare currently being played out upon the global stage, backed by both hot wars, covert wars, and coup d’etats are establishing their own zones while trying to subvert the others; or gain control of them. If not, sabotage them.

    1. Brazil would be part of the Americas Zone? Then the European Zone and/or Eurasian Zone?
      Perhaps a total of four or five Economic Zones/Blocks?
      But under what economic system?
      Private/Corporate or Public/Living Earth?

  2. A criminal enterprise masquerading as a government is what we are dealing with here. With at least four public rub-outs of it’s of own heads of state as warnings to their successors or they were in on the hits themselves. The financial sector talks of trade but it’s true colors is of conmen, extortionist, stickup artist, vandals would more truly describe them. The sick joke is that these actions make no economic sense in the long run this charade will collapse these fools are too childish to realize or care about the consequences it’s the triumph of cunning over thinking.

  3. Ok , this is a comment based on part of what Dr Farrel said, relating to BO going to Argentina with Nasa after ousting Cristina Fernández. But I understood that she had to leave because she couldnt have a 3rd mandate, not because USA kicked her out..

    Nasa skulking around in Argentina?? Why on earth would Nasa be visiting Argentina with President BO?
    http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/209987/obama-to-extend-trip-to-argentina-with-patagonia-visit

    Visiting old friends? Catching up on der guten alten Zeit?

    http://www.leparisien.fr/flash-actualite-monde/a-bariloche-refuge-andin-de-nazis-l-omerta-reste-de-mise-18-10-2013-3237415.php

    If you dont speek Francais.. “Bein tu n’a qu’a apprendre..” comme diraient nos amis francais..no only joking.. Basically it confirms that the very town that NaZA went to was/is an Ex-Nazi haven..

    Apparently there is another NASA…in Argentina.
    http://www.candu.org/nasa.html

    1. What can you use Cobalt 60 for??…Wiki?

      “Cobalt has been discussed as a “salting” element to add to nuclear weapons, to produce a cobalt bomb, an extremely “dirty” weapon which would contaminate large areas with 60
      Co
      nuclear fallout, rendering them uninhabitable. In one hypothetical design, the tamper of the weapon would be made of 59
      Co
      . When the bomb exploded, the excess neutrons from the nuclear fission would irradiate the cobalt and transmute it into 60
      Co
      . No nation is known to have done any serious development of this type of weapon.”

      1. Lol. Sorry Dr Joseph. I’m behind the times.. Being trying to deep deeper because this NASA/Argentina thing has been tickling the back of my brain all last night.. and I came across your article.. http://gizadeathstar.com/2016/03/president-obama-to-visit-san-carlos-di-bariloche-you-fill-in-the-rest/
        Just give me 7 more months and I’m right behind you.. 🙂 Nice comments from everyone.
        I think that ‘they’ depend on short memories and ignorance to get away with their nefarious plans..

  4. Brazil is just another field to plow on the global plantation.

    One fundamental mistake you make here is that you always say that “Washington” is behind all this. Perhaps it’s from force of habit, but it isn’t Washington that’s doing this, when by “Washington” you mean the US — its government and corporate interests.

    Quite obviously, “Washington” is just a sham at this point, an increasingly obvious paper-mache front for the nexus of globalist / crony corporatist / financial Ponzi racket / NWO / ZioCon / GOD (Guns, Oil & Drugs) mafia that truly runs this planet and which hides behind and manipulates “the West.”

    “Washington” has been hijacked like everything else on the planet, save a few brave outposts, and for proof one need only look dispassionately at the US itself, pillaged and looted — farmed, if you will — by these self-same parasites.

    So, Brazil isn’t special, really; it’s just another farm on the global plantation.

    1. I think we have already established that it is the House of Saud that is behind all this skullduggery so we should be using “Riyadh” instead of “Washington.” My first question is: did the House of Saud put Hitler in power not just to start a world war and thereby boost oil demand, but were they also anticipating all the technological advancement that was to come out of Third Reich with a long range vision of a wahhabi conquest of the galaxy? Second question: could the House of Saud actually be taking orders from the black cube in the center of Mecca and could this black cube be an extension of some off planet artificial intelligence, similar to an amazon echo, which is also black, and which sends and receives messages through an artificial interpreter named Alexa? Is the amazon echo the means by which this galactic artificial intelligence will invade our homes? Is Alexa the name of the artificial intelligence that gives orders to the House of Saud? Hard to believe considering the male chauvinism of the Saudi men but the Saudi women do dress all in black. Maybe this is done not to oppress them but to pay homage to their real deity, Alexa, the artificial intelligence that rules over the House of Saud. Is the color black symbolic or does it facilitate the sending and receiving of messages? Are these vitamin D deprived Saudi women a medieval version of the amazon echo, sending and receiving messages from artificial intelligence inside the Saudi home? Could this lack of vitamin D, and the brain defects it results in, be causing the message to be garbled, thus explaining why the House of Saud acts so nutty in its attempts at world wide conquest on behalf of this artificial intelligence?

      1. Of course the whole of humanity is a victim of skullduggery thru :

        A/ AI
        B/ Aliens

        See, with common core no “human responsability” necessary!!!

Comments are closed.