November 22, 2016 By Joseph P. Farrell

Most readers of this website are acutely aware of the dangers of vaccines, and particularly of the vaccine cocktails now being given, and in some cases, mandated for infants and small children, when just a few years ago, doctors hesitated to do this, knowing that that the immune system of children could suffer as a result. There have been other stories lately of the dangers of vaccines, some coupling them - in my opinion unmistakably - to the rise in autism, and in a more recent story, to the strange appearance of polio-like symptoms in some children. Then we have the usual autumnal flu scares - swine flu, SARS, bird flu - and the push for everyone to go "get your flu shot." Add to all of this the nearly constant bombardment of this state or that state - think only of always wacky and one-party-state California - mandating vaccines. At best, they have a checkered history: no one doubts Jenner's success with small pox, the history of the Salk vs Sabin polio vaccine is yet another story of both failure and success. Now, however, it seems they're inventing vaccines faster than there are diseases being discovered to vaccinate against.

In other words, it's vaccination for vaccination's sake, and that simply means, its vaccination for the sake of ongoing profits for Big Pharma, whether or not there is a real disease threat, and whether or not there is reasonable testing and science behind them. Just think of the GMO issue, and the revolving door of personnel flowing back and forth between I.G Farbensanto and the supposedly "independent" and "unbiased" Food and Drug (Mis)Administration.

All of this, of course, has spawned a focus on the issues of whole health, alternative and preventive medicine,  health freedom, and the mercantilist policies of a run-amok government doing nothing but kowtowing to this or that corporate interest. The result, of course, has been a focus in the free and alternative media on vaccines, while globalist corporate media continues to run commercials from Big Pharma about the newest wonder drug that can cure everything from male penile dyslexia to female mammary disperkia, and restore your clear white smile and end male (or female) pattern baldness, restore natural hair growth, and end toenail fungus, all at the same time! Aren't drugs wonderful? Particularly the expensive kind you have to get from your doctor. You all know the commercials I'm talking about; they're the ones that begin with slow soothing music of attractive women bounding through flower strewn fields in slow motion, holding the hands of their presumptive lover (who now has a clear white smile and no longer suffers from the previous maladies), and end with thirty seconds of legalese, caveats, exceptions, and wherefores, read in a rapid  auctioneer staccato blitz, warning you of a host of side effects, up to and usually including stroke, dementia, heart attack, or death from other side effects including suicide in a certain narrow percentage of the population. Consult with your physician, &c &c.

The backlash has of course been health freedom, and a healthy skepticism in the free and independent media about all these newest wonder drugs and vaccines which many in government want to force everyone to take. Well, the scientists at I.G. Pharmasanto (a sister company to I.G. Farbensanto, with many shared and interlocking personnel on their boards of directors) may now have found away around the whole problem of persuading various states, provinces, federal governments, or their corrupt bureaucracies, to force people to take vaccines: enter the "transmissible vaccine," and this article shared by Mr. A:

New Transmissible Vaccine Spreads Like Virus, No Consent Necessary

How devilishly clever of I.G. Pharmasanto to come up with this idea:

As governments move forward in their attempts to force their citizens into vaccination, whether they want it or not, researchers are now moving forward with what may become the future of forced vaccination – transmissible vaccines.

This is an area of research that scientists have been interested in for quite some time but that is only now becoming feasible.

The idea behind these vaccines are that they would themselves be infectious, passing along the vaccine from one person to another as if it were a virus.

Thus, it would be possible to vaccinate a small number of people manually, but as a result of the vaccine’s self-transmission, actually vaccinate a very high number of people.

And, oh yea, let's not forget, they discovered this wondrous possibility in the way that - you guessed it - those  polio vaccines spread, via such transmission, in the 1960s to parts of the population that weren't vaccinated:

But transmissible vaccines pose a special risk, essentially, they could become a virus themselves and spread rapidly amongst the population that was vaccinated. This has already happened with the oral polio vaccine and both the 1960s and the 2000s, but with a transmissible vaccine, the danger of spread of a disease would become even more dangerous since spread and transmission are what the vaccines are designed to do.

Now, reading a bit between the lines here, as diseases themselves mutate and are able to become stronger and override the triggered immuno-response to a disease that vaccines are designed to trigger(wow, talk about circular, but that's the "mind" of I.G. Pharmasanto), what the transmissible vaccine may end up doing is to provide an environment which compels the disease to adapt and become strong enough to overcome those immune systems which the vaccine triggers! What a cash cow! This one can be milked to death!

Now, we've heard all of this before, but here comes the kicker, and see if this doesn't remind you of the arguments we all heard about Frankenfoods, i.e., about GMOs:

Scott Nuismer, a Professor of Biological Sciences and Mathematics at the University of Idaho and co-author of a study on transmissible vaccines published this year in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, stated,

Obviously this is a controversial and potentially risky endeavor, so we wanted to figure out, is the potential benefit actually worth the risk?(Emphasis in the original)

Why, of course it's worth the risk... we can all hear the death-rattle of scientific experts even now muting their minds, and accepting those big government and/or corporate grants to churn out studies designed to reassure the public that there's no danger here, nothing to see, nothing to fear, move along. We're the government, and we're here to help you.

Stop and think about this: you could be inoculated against a whole panoply of diseases (real or otherwise) whether you like it or not, by simply exposing a small segment of the population to the vaccines for them. Breathe the fresh air, smell the flowers, inhale the thimerosol(which, according to the Potion and Drug Admini...er... the FOOD and Drug Administration, is a preservative... yes, I don't know about you, but the first thing I think of when I think of the element mercury is its wonderful use as a preservative)...

So, rather than high octane speculation today, I want to offer a suggestion to I.G. Pharmasanto: could you please come up with a transmissible vaccine, an inoculation, against metastasizing government, the virus of corrupt corporations, the globaloney flu, and chronic collectivism? Oh wait, I forgot, you're a part of all that.


See you on the flip side...