Now that the election in the USA is over, it's worth looking back on that hacking meme. And it is "safe" to do so now, aside from the hysteria that was taking place. As I watched all of it, it struck me as extremely odd that the whole hacking meme seemed disturbingly contrived. We were supposed to believe that "Russia did it," an idea I found ridiculous then and still do. Then, there was the murder of Democratic national committee staffer Seth Rich. Many theorized that he was behind some of the damning leaks to Wikileaks, and there was the usual amount of conspiracy theory that the unfortunate Mr. Rich was yet another victim in the long list of dead bodies that seem to follow the Clintons around; it was another "Arkancide." Well, I have my doubts about that too (though I certainly don't have any doubts about the criminality and corruption of the Clintons). Why? For the simple reason that "offing people" when in the middle of a presidential campaign would be too risky. Best to wait until after the election, and dump the body in a park in Washington DC and claim it was suicide.

To put it as bluntly as possible, there was an element of theater to all this I found very disturbing; it was all... well, too convenient. The real goal, it seemed to me, was not to favor Darth Hillary or "The Donald," but rather, to work up USA-Russia tensions into a fine frothy lather of hysteria. It looked, if I may put it even more bluntly, very much like the pattern of the alleged postwar Nazi document, The Madrid Circular, that I reviewed in my book The Third Way: create maximum maneuvering room for your merry band of postwar Fascist buddies by maximizing tensions between Russia and the USA. The Clinton-Trump-Putin theater looked and felt too contrived to me.

In that regard, consider the following article shared by G.L.R.:

Mr. G.L.R. drew my attention to these passages, and I pass this focus along to you:

The FSB press release published on July 30 dealt more specifically with the issue of cyberattacks and cyber-espionage.[4] In fact, it reported that the FSB specialists were able to uncover an especially damaging virus program infiltrated into the network of more than 20 organizations on the territory of Russia. These organizations included the Russian government, military, and academic institutions and even the sectors of the Russian military-industrial complex.

The FSB did not comment as to where this malicious software could have come from. It just stated that it resembled the software found in other cyberattacks around the world. In my opinion, the description of the way that the virus infected the victims’ computers and the damage it caused resembled very much the hacks perpetrated in the U.S., both on the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and on Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta. Considering the timing of the release (the end of July), just after the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia was over and the full extent of the U.S. hacks became publicly known, it definitely raises several very significant questions.

First, was this massive hacking of the Russian “critical infrastructure” a retaliation by the U.S. intelligence agencies for the DNC and Podesta hacks allegedly perpetrated by the Russian military intelligence agency (GRU)? And if so, will the hacked emails and information be made publicly available? Will be we soon be reading the embarrassing details of the Russian government and military officials’ undercover dealings?

Or, alternatively, was this perhaps done by a third party which also hacked the DNC and Podesta? Following in the footsteps of the James Bond classic “From Russia, with Love,” is there perhaps a secret (criminal) network which uses the rogue elements of different intelligence communities to amplify the confrontation between the U.S. and Russia? To get the U.S. to blame Russia and, likewise, Russia to blame the U.S. for criminal deeds actually perpetrated by this hidden network. This of course is a mere speculation. But the coincidence of the almost simultaneous cyber-attacks cannot be denied. (Emphasis added)

In other words, while the corporate controlled media in the USSA was howling about Russian hacking of the Clinton campaign and wringing its hands over Russian influence on the election(overlooking, conveniently, Frau Merkel's contributions to Darth Hillary's campaign), Russia itself was being hacked at exactly the same time.

Notably, the FSB(Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezhopaznosmu) is admitting not only the hacks, but their extensive nature, but not indicating any point of origin. We may take this as either the (1) FSB is deliberately withholding the fact that they might have originated in America and inside the US's intelligence community, and it is doing so as another example of restraint until it can deal with the new Trump Administration, or (2) that they don't know, or (3) that they know that its origin is entirely elsewhere, and that they are withholding that information either from fear of the consequences of its exposure, or that exposing it may not actually be believed.

While it is heartening in a certain sense to see that someone else out there besides me suspected that a "third force" - an extraterritorial entity - might have been behind the hacking, I do not dismiss it as "mere speculation." It is speculation to be sure, but speculation with a bit of ground traction and history behind it, for recall from my last book Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery: 9/11 and the Fascist International, that the Russian economist Dr Tatiana Koryagana stated in Pravda in July 2001, weeks ahead of the 9/11 attacks, that America would be attacked on its own soil by a rogue group, a "global network" with assets in excess of $300 trillion dollars. And the odd statements coming out of Russia since then haven't abated. Sergei Glazyev, as I have pointed out on numerous occasions, stated - not simply rhetorically - that Russia's problem wasn't with the Nazis in Kiev, it was with the Nazis in Washington.

I suspect that when Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump finally meet, that they're going to have a lot to talk about...

See you on the flip side...


Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. emlong on January 27, 2017 at 1:19 am

    The Emails Putin really Hacked

    “The real email scandal lies neither within the Democrat party nor in the careless confines of John Podesta’s G-mail account. The real scandal is buried inside the emails sent by Hillary Clinton over her home-brew server. The FBI quietly released a number of documents detailing their investigation into Hillary’s emails and it reveals what Vladimir Putin must already know, that the Secretary of State provided Moscow with a plethora of fine intelligence information.
    “The FBI report noted that the kind of classified information Russia certainly obtained involved SECRET details from the CIA, NSA, Dept. of Defense, FBI, and the “National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency”. This last little known agency provides photos and intercepts of foreign communications obtained by the trillion dollar network of US satellites.
    Thus, Hillary’s emails gave the Kremlin crucial details to foil our satellites, blinding them from imagery and making them deaf to high-level communications intercepts. The Russians are certainly already making use of this information and US intelligence officials are also certainly aware that the Clinton leaks are the root cause to their suddenly deaf, dumb and blind space-based assets.”
    “Now let’s make your eyes really water. Clinton did not know her login and password to get into her email account so she relied on her staff to enter the data onto her Blackberry. Not only did the 13 missing devices have her login information but so did most of her staff. She also shared her login and password with her staff to print emails that she requested. So Hillary’s email account was logged into from various locations by various people at various times, further compounding an already ridiculous security nightmare.”

  2. TRM on January 25, 2017 at 9:41 pm

  3. Rad on January 25, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    I am sorry if I will be a sort of devil advocate here (I also think a bit of opposition and clash of ideas make things to advance better).
    But I think the simplest explanation and the most probable is that Russians did it. If you go by the ancient cui prodest or cui bono words, Putin profits the most. And had the means to do it.
    Trump is either somehow controlled or blackmailed by him, or straight up paid (Russians just sold not long ago some 19% of Rosneft, to some Qatar company that soon after heavily invested huge amounts of money in US), or Trump is simply considered a less capable president. Or a combinations of these.

    Also Russia profit the most from US steering in a clash course with China, all this while seemingly Trump try to weaken NATO, get a bit confrontational with EU and abandon some US position as world premier power, and being quite friendly with Russia.

    As Putin and his KGB-oligarchy gang cling to power by any means possible (lets not go to who actually kills opposition and journalists) they need a respite. They also cannot allowed Ukraine to leave their sphere of influence, and that wasn’t only because imperialism but because an Ukraine with some success and better life in EU camp than in Russia camp will have made Russian ordinary people to want the same, and start question the Russian elite over there. And obviously they don’t want that

    • Don B on January 26, 2017 at 11:23 am

      Good points. We should always be vigilant when it comes to politicians. db

  4. Sandra Klein on January 25, 2017 at 3:45 pm

    Absolutely must see day 94. He brings in evidence found by CAF on dynecorp.

    • emlong on January 25, 2017 at 4:54 pm

      Yeah, there is quite a trove of fascinating and hair-raising Charles Webb Youtubes on the real story of Haiti.

      Ex-CIA officer Robert Steele has a theory about why Obama didn’t pardon Hillary and why Trump might leave her and foundation alone as long as they promise to pack up and go away forever, but just looking at Webb’s allegations it would be hard for an attorney general to turn the other cheek.

    • Don B on January 26, 2017 at 1:19 pm

      Sandra, 94 is good also with information provided by C. A. Fitts. The lady does some good work. db

  5. basta on January 25, 2017 at 12:33 pm

    From the cited article:

    >>>> “This of course is a mere speculation.” <<<<

    But, even if the overwhelming preponderance of evidence indicates the Usual Suspects are simply doing what they do best (HRC Arkanciding and blame shifting, Obama laying anti-Russian landmines for Trump, Trump being smeared as a Russian agent, the CIA and MIC ratcheting up Cold War 2.0 for fun and profit, NATO warmongering, etc.), if there is even the barest hint of a Nazi in the shrubbery, then by golly, Nazis it is!


  6. emlong on January 25, 2017 at 12:23 pm

    Of course they would murder Seth Rich… to stop the bleeding. Their choices were to let the leaks continue or stop them in their tracks and risk the fallout from the obvious timing of the assassination. They had no choice but to take the risk., and they knew the mass media would be compliant enough to look the other way. Allowing the leaks to continue was too obviously going to sink their ship very quickly – that was by far the greater “risk.”
    This doesn’t necessarily negate the “third party” scenario though. We don’t know what Rich leaked exactly – it could have been a fragment of the total Wiki archive on the DNC. The DNC probably didn’t know exactly what Rich has leaked either, but they did know he was leaking “something.”

    • OrigensChild on January 25, 2017 at 2:06 pm

      One of the reasons I do not directly lay this at HRC’s feet is the shenanigans with the Republican side too. We had at least one death tied to the Bush/Cruz/Zapata Oil nexus plus the odd arrest and release of a gentleman in Trump tower, whose last name is Bush, who died in the performance of duty only to resurface this past year with a weapon of foreign manufacture without serial numbers. Unless the Nazi’s have learned the subtle art of resurrecting the dead, this Bush was repurposed for different work. IMHO, it appears the American branch of Nazi’s have more motive, more means and more opportunity to do these things than the HRC cartel. This activity seems to fit the purposes of the Gehlen faction in the CIA better than anyone else. They need her innocent of any connection to install her safely within the White House. Such innocence would also be necessary if the Republican candidate were Bush–as I believe they intended before his campaign was shipwrecked.

      Thank you, Dr. Farrell, for this post. This one does lend credence to some of the speculative analysis conducted within members of my little circle of friends–and possibly others familiar with your work at Forum Borealis.

      • Joseph P. Farrell on January 25, 2017 at 4:05 pm

        Let’s not forget the Republithug shenanigans in the 200 election in Florida, where, in my opinion, they stole the election from Al Gore.

        • Nidster - on January 27, 2017 at 3:27 am

          According to a comprehensive ballot review of the 2000 presidential election result in Florida conducted on behalf of a consortium of eight news media organizations, Bush retained a small vote lead when all “acceptable” ballots had been manually recounted in the four predominantly Democratic counties named in Gore’s lawsuit. Of course that did not prevent speculation by the consortium to suppose Mr. Gore might have won if a statewide recount was made of all acceptable ballots. Thanks!

          My thoughts go beyond the consortium’s speculations. If you will remember it was the news organizations who announced Mr. Gore to be the WINNER of Florida’s electoral votes about 8 pm Eastern time. To me that was an obvious attempt on their part to suppress votes in Florida’s Central time zone where by all accounts Mr. Bush was heavily favored to win, and those voters had about another hour to cast their votes. So I see this as an example of the Principle of Unintended Consequences where the news organizations wanted to suppress votes for Bush, but their blatant connivance actually enhanced the Bush votes.

          Hey folks, this is by no means an endorsement for or against Bush, or Gore. It is not for or against any political party or any political figure. Nor is it meant as any sort of personal attack. This is written solely to present my opinion and make an observation that the 2000 presidential election result in Florida appears to be a good example of what could happen when the Principle of Unintended Consequences creates unexpected results.

  7. TraceElement on January 25, 2017 at 11:28 am

    The FASCIST internationaI did not hack DNC. If Bosely is right, then there has been a 20 year plan to restore the country from the FI.

    We will never know, but my guess is that it was the counter-coup “group” referred to be by Dr. Steve P. Cui Bono.

    This set of events has been nothing but bad news for the, wait for this, Anglo-German Nazi cabal.

  8. chimera on January 25, 2017 at 6:08 am

    Joseph, you absolutely have to watch DAY 94 Parts 1, 2 3 of the George Webb videos on YouTube. He is former FBI , turned citizen journalist. It is stunning the info he ties together from proven sources.

    • chimera on January 25, 2017 at 6:11 am

      • marcos toledo on January 25, 2017 at 1:23 pm

        Thanks for link chimera and the USSA is crying over the supposable hack of it’s elections. Meanwhile it’s doing what to Russia and other nations around the World has it no shame.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events