Take this for what it's worth: the BIlderberger website has apparently been hacked by Anonymous:


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. zendogbreath on January 4, 2017 at 1:37 am

    anyone remember when alex jones snuck into bohemian grove and revealed the cross dressing and frolicking in front of the owl? what a journalist, eh?

    darth journalist.

    what’s up with that background music he’s always running? isn’t that from star wars too?

    • zendogbreath on January 4, 2017 at 1:38 am

      joe rogan’s got some stories about partying with alex jones. he’s trying to get lee camp to join them for a fun night out some time.

  2. goshawks on January 3, 2017 at 11:29 pm

    From what I’ve read about the BIlderberg ‘makeup’, there are the plentiful Useful Idiots who are the exterior movers-and-shakers and a small, secretive inner-circle who issue the marching-orders to the outer ranks. The usual Pyramidal Hierarchy.

    Even if one hacked the Bilderberg website, one would only be ‘counting coup’. (Good for you.) There would be no posted-info on the ‘orders’ issued by the inner-circle (unless in code words)…

    • goshawks on January 3, 2017 at 11:46 pm

      Aboard the “Akagi” bridge, an officer reads to Admiral Nagumo a message passed down from the radio room:
      “From Commander-in-Chief, Combined Fleet to Commander, Third Fleet: Climb Mount Niitaka, 1208.”
      (Code-confirmation of the go-ahead for the Pearl Harbor attack from headquarters.)

      Commander Mitsuo Fuchida to “Akagi”: “Tora! Tora! Tora!”
      (Code-confirmation to the admirals that the attack had been a total surprise to the Americans.)

  3. WalkingDead on January 3, 2017 at 7:48 pm

    I used to follow Infowars until I figured out he is most likely controlled opposition. Haven’t visited his site since. For the more important issues and events, he pretty much toes the MSM line lately. I never cared for his “style” of rabid reporting.
    There are also certain “topics” he simply will not touch upon, another indicator of

    • Robert Barricklow on January 3, 2017 at 8:55 pm

      I’ve always suspected their organization: 1) distribution that grew exponentially[granted there was a HUGE unfulfilled market] 2) funding that spoke of deep pockets 3) access to info/people that speaks: connections. I figured the Rottenchilds; who also are funding the intercept.com, a vehicle for Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill, & Matt Taibbi. [Pierre Ohidyar/e-bay is in the mix as well.] These platform monopolies are highly suspect in my mind’s eye as they are monopolies that are swallowing up competitors and stifling innovatioin. All about control. And information is the key to keep it; or unwind it.

      Matt Taibbi bowed out. He’s not talking much beyond manage disputes. But I suspect he smelled something Rotten[see above].

    • Robert Barricklow on January 3, 2017 at 8:59 pm

      My reply to Walking didn’t bend enough…
      to bar moderation limbo.

  4. marcos toledo on January 2, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    Infowars is now looking like the The Onion as a real news website it’s a madhouse on the internet. What is fake news and what really a fake news site anyway.

  5. Neru on January 2, 2017 at 10:44 am

    “Hacked” the new meme boogyman of 2017.
    Probably a lot coupled with these words too “Russia, China” and every other fiend that shows up at US doorstep. To be copied sure by the EU elites that can’t navigate without proper software delivered from the US.

    • Robert Barricklow on January 2, 2017 at 8:57 pm

      Obama’s favorite blame game is:
      Blame it on Putin.

  6. Bluenose on January 2, 2017 at 8:20 am

    Has Bilderberg become the show ponies for this group? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_for_National_Policy

    • justawhoaman on January 2, 2017 at 1:02 pm

      In a word: NO. The list of members of the Council are all conservatives whereas the list of probable Bilderberger oligarchs are about power and world control which spans the political spectrum.

      • goshawks on January 2, 2017 at 7:03 pm

        Well said!

      • Bluenose on January 2, 2017 at 7:53 pm

        Thank you!

    • Chris P on January 3, 2017 at 12:12 am

      I’m surprised to see the CNP mentioned here (or anywhere). I wonder what brought about your question, and where did you hear of the group? I’ve been following a researcher named Josh Reeves who created a pair of films on the CNP called The Secret Right, volumes I and II. He had a lot to do with making the group known (to the extent it is, anyway). His conclusion is basically that it’s a creation of the same power elite behind groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International Affairs.

  7. DanaThomas on January 2, 2017 at 6:50 am

    Sounds like a controlled release of information, surely no semi-secret society is so stupid as to run a website and expect no untoward consequences?

    • Robert Barricklow on January 2, 2017 at 8:59 pm

      Specialized & target bait.
      [Any specialized fishes out there ?]

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events