IT'S DEFINITE: RFK JR TO LEAD VACCINE SAFETY PANEL

IT’S DEFINITE: RFK JR TO LEAD VACCINE SAFETY PANEL

This has been an unusual week for blogging. Normally, as most know, I schedule blogs on the Thursday or Friday preceding the week they appear. But this week has been unusual in many respects, not the least of which is because it has been very difficult to make a selection among the articles I have received. So, I'm "behind schedule", but this one from Mr. G.F. caught my eye, and I decided to blog about it, because of another friend of mine.

And I have to stop and tell this story about that friend, even though I do not like to engage in anecdotes or personal stories on this website: Monday morning, after being awake all night as usual, I received a phone call from that friend. I had been getting concerned, as I had not heard from him in a few weeks. Needless to say, I was worried. What had happened? He proceeded to inform me that he had been in the hospital for a couple of weeks, and had only been released about a week ago. What had happened? My friend, who had never taken a flu vaccine in his life, was persuaded to get one. He ended up collapsing at a sports event, ended up in an ICU on a respirator and in a coma... the reason? He had contracted the corona virus, a.k.a., SARS, a respiratory flu common to birds.  He informed me his doctors had put him on a regime of "shock and awe" anti-biotics.

Needless to say, there's now a lawsuit from him, and from the hospital, against the manufacturer of the vaccine. His experience, I'm afraid, is not unique among those in my circle of friends and acquaintances. My own mother would always "get her flu shot,"... and end up tired and vaguely sick.

Now, what has all this to do with today's blog? it's because it now seems definite that Robert F. Kennedy Jr has accepted President Trump's request to chair a panel on vaccine safety:

Anti-vaxxer RFK Jr says he is definitely still leading a Trump investigation into vaccine safety- and claims president is willing to take on Big Pharma over issue

Of course, the preceding article presents the usual spin we've come to expect from corporate controlled media: vaccines are "scientific" and opposing science and scientists are simply ignored or tossed aside. And perish the thought we rely on actual testimony such as my friend's experience. Recall just a few weeks ago I blogged about a study that was based on hundreds of such stories that was presented in a paper to a major medical journal, accepted for publication... until, that is, big pharma stepped in and quashed the paper, and therewith, the science. Its objection? The paper was based on anecdotal stories and not hard research. I pointed out at the time that the patients' stories are the basis on which, under normal circumstances, the diagnostic process begins. And at a certain point, stories of "my child was fine, then was vaccinated, and now she's autistic" cease being a coincidence and start being a pattern. It's that pattern that big pharma is fighting so hard to dispel through a variety of conjurations from discrete legal and medical grimoires. But in the end, it remains deception dressed in verbiage: I know what I see in those around me and what they experienced from their crud-filled vaccines.

Then comes the "it's not a significant statistical amount of the vaccinated population" argument. Readers of my and my co-author's book Rotten to the (Common) Core will recognize this as the "statistics show" argument, so useful to the corporations behind standardized testing. It is, in effect, not only an argument from authority but a limited hangout: so what if a tiny minority react adversely to vaccines(or, in its standardized testing context, "so what if a few questions on a test are bad? It's the overall Gestalt of the test that matters" &c &c). Vaccines are "still effective against the majority," &c &c.

Notice that what's avoided here is any real understanding of why that is so, and that means there's no scientific search on for the explanation. To do that would be a huge admission that those statistics could change... and we don't want that.

The problem is: juries are not panels of "scientists" bought and paid for by big pharma.

Now, I have no doubt that Mr. Kennedy's skepticism toward vaccines is sincere. But let's assume, just for the sake of argument, that it is not. Or let's assume that big pharma will use other methods of pressure to get an "acceptable" result from the panel (and we all know with billions of dollars at stake, they're perfectly capable of tossing articles and debate aside - after all, they're already involved in the lobbying- story suppression business - and reaching into the "Bag of Very Dirty Tricks," the blackmail control files, the wet works operators, and so on). The possibility arises that a government panel headed by a vaccine skeptic could issue a glowing report on the wonders of vaccines and the glories of Big Pharma. In that case, watch the pressure build for forced vaccination not as state policy, but national policy.

Personal experience and anecdotes be damned.

But my bet is, you'll now see a campaign of "limited hangouts" by big pharma to buy time... and lawyer up.

See you on the flip side...

8 thoughts on “IT’S DEFINITE: RFK JR TO LEAD VACCINE SAFETY PANEL”

  1. It will be extremely difficult to get good statistics on vaccine damage, for several reasons:

    One, medical professionals are trained to attribute vaccine reactions to other things. There is a huge push to deny vaccine damage in medical education (big surprise), and even though most nurses and doctors care about their patient’s health, they have been given very poor training as regards the realities of human health.

    Reporting vaccine reactions is difficult. There is a special agency you have to report to, and most doctors don’t know about that. I would also doubt that the medical records systems have an actual code for vaccine damage (being made by large medical corporations), so you probably can’t chart them even if they are recognized.

    Some laws have been changed. There is a federal law protecting Big Pharma from being held accountable for vaccine damage. Also, guidelines have been altered in some cases so that a vaccine reaction has to occur within 48 hours, or it is not considered a vaccine reaction. Given that most viruses have incubation times of 72 hours to two weeks, and that heavy metal damage is cumulative, that is a ridiculous medical constraint useful only for corporations to weasel out of responsibility.

    Hospitals are loathe to admit medication errors of any kind, and try very hard to make something else look responsible. Since they are in charge of your medical records, and no one audits or holds them accountable for correctness (except for the so-called accrediting groups, which are pretty much a joke), they stand a very good chance of killing you and getting away with it.

    An anecdote of my own: in a local assisted care facility (most of which have mandatory vaccine policies), all the patients were given flu vaccines. Within one week, every single person had the flu and was quite sick, yet this was never reported as vaccine reactions or med error. In fact, to my knowledge, it was never reported as anything at all. (I knew someone who worked there and someone who had a relative there.) Needless to say, it certainly never made the news.

    There is a reason why 80 percent of doctors and nurses do not take flu shots – they have seen first hand that the dangers from flu vaccines of Guillion-barre syndrome and Espstien Barr are far worse than the flu, even if the vaccines were somehow to actually work (which even the CDC admits they don’t).

    You can’t have honest research when the data is not collected or is knowingly corrupted. Our medical system kills more people each year than any other cause of death, a fact that CDC refuses to report. Peer reviewed studies (Starfield in particular), have the allopathic system as the 3rd leading cause of death, with Gary Null’s research putting it at number 1.

    It’s time for the light of truth to shine on this ridiculously overpriced death machine, a Frankenstein creation of the Rockefellers and their ilk.

    Now that said, there are a lot of sincere, caring people in health care. Some even manage to save their patient’s lives by bending the system when needed. Most are simply ill-informed by our pathetic education system, but many end up figuring out how to serve their patients despite it all.

    Allopathic medicine’s one saving grace is in the vast improvements in trauma care. Much of that is due to our constant wars, but they are quite good at physically putting back together broken bodies. I always give them credit there.

  2. Big Pharma makes the drug lords of the underworld look like pillars of society in comparison. They give new meaning to the words scum and villain they are the real walking dead cannibals devouring all that lives.

  3. Robert Barricklow

    You can not oppose God…, er science as interpreted by discipleship/news. Plus these vaccines/pharmaceuticals are still extremely effective @ culling out the population @ significant profits.
    Another Warren Commission in the making where the smoking gun is a syringe/pill being pulled by Big Pharma?
    Another Playhouse 90 being staged by the corporate fascists?

  4. I had a dream the other night where autistics took over the world, led by an idiot savant named Baron who could communicate telepathically to other autistics. They were able to re-program all the world computers and turn them against the “norm brains” as the autistic insurgents would call us.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Just today Bill Gates @ rt.com/Robots that take human jobs should pay taxes.
      …and no doubt will soon vote.
      …just as corporations do with they’re zillions.

Comments are closed.