Things are definitely getting interesting, if you haven't noticed. Two of the stories that have attracted my interest recently are, firstly, the studies of vaccines conducted in Italy, and (surprise surprise) the Italians found all sorts of ...well... just plain old crud in them.  It's been getting so bizarre than there are actually indications that animal vaccines are cleaner than the vaccines that Big Pharma wants to give you and your kids. Secondly, the other story that has captured my interest was, of course, the rumors that President Trump's administration was considering appointing Reobert F. Kennedy Jr. to chair a panel to investigate the CDC and the alleged science behind the safety of the modern vaccine.  In fact, things are so interesting I don't know whether to categorize this under "Babylon's Banksters" or the "GMO Scrapbook" or "Call it Conspiracy," and you'll see why in a moment.

In any case, I say "alleged science" because it's looking increasingly like there wasn't much of it: corporately approved "science" continues to assure us that all vaccines are safe (and that mercury and aluminum in them isn't harmful and doesn't cause Alzheimers or autism), that all GMOs are safe, that there's no human cost to their consumption, and that it will solve world hunger in spite of real studies of rising costs, falling yields, and increased risks.

Underlying all this, there's a growing revolt against not only Mr. Globaloney, but against his mega-corporations and what appears to be, at best, a consistent policy of profits at any cost, and at worst, a deliberate policy inhumanity designed to depopulate, to strip the middle class of every last breath of their wealth and labor, and to make people perpetually sick and dependent upon them. But there's growing backlash to them. Consider these two stories from that perspective:

Monsanto GMO Seeds in Nigeria, Breaking the Agricultural Cycle, Complicity of UN World Food Program

India has, of course, suffered tremendously under the assaults of "Amerimegacorp" (for want of a better expression). We recall the stories about vaccine experiments from a few years ago being sponsored by said foundation. But the timing of this story with the Italian story I blogged about last week is interesting.  Similarly, Indian farmers were committing suicide a few years ago under the onslaught of GMOs (guess what company was involved?): loans were made to buy GMO seeds, the cycle of Indian agriculture  was disrupted as natural seeds were abandoned. The more expensive seeds ruined many Indian farmers. The study cited by the Indian government captures my fundamental contention that one of the memes of the major cultural paradigm shift we've been entering for the past decade:  big mega-corporations and their ideologies are now under assault, and this, I suspect, is a generalized cultural phenomenon that will not go away. Here's how that study put it:

According to the Global Policy Forum, who’s study was used in India’s decision to cut their ties with the Gates Foundation, BMGF is not always a force for good. In their report, Gated Development – is the Gates Foundation always a force for good? — Mark Curtis explains:

Gated Development demonstrates that the trend to involve business in addressing poverty and inequality is central to the priorities and funding of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. We argue that this is far from a neutral charitable strategy but instead an ideological commitment to promote neoliberal economic policies and corporate globalisation. Big business is directly benefitting, in particular in the fields of agriculture and health, as a result of the foundation’s activities, despite evidence to show that business solutions are not the most effective.


Perhaps what is most striking about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is that despite its aggressive corporate strategy and extraordinary influence across governments, academics and the media, there is an absence of critical voices. Global Justice Now is concerned that the foundation’s influence is so pervasive that many actors in international development, which would otherwise critique the policy and practice of the foundation, are unable to speak out independently as a result of its funding and patronage.

The Nigeria article confirms yet another connection:

It reveals that, Bill Gates and Monsanto in collaboration with the WFP and World Bank are implicated in the carnage created by Boko Haram’. It is inevitable that the poor farmers must buy the new seeds from Monsanto or else they would be out of business. The devastation that awaits the farmers in the Northeast is even greater than the present. The cost of seeds from Monsanto could go as high as 30 times as was the experience in India with Bt Cotton , where 300,000 farmers committed suicide because they could not meet up with costs of seeds.

Despite the false promises and propaganda, the scientific facts show that GMO crops are failing to control pests and weeds, and have instead led to the emergence of superpests and superweeds. 

Monsanto which is owned in part by Bill Gates, the American billionaire who is actively engaged in Nigeria personally, and through several envoys including Melinda Gates, NGOs, and proxies in the World Bank and Africa Development Bank, has worked relentlessly to deceive Africa leaders and trick them into approving GMOs and Hybrid seeds. Bill Gates wants to control the seed market for all foods in Africa’s most populous nation, Nigeria. (Italicized-bold emphasis added).

Now throw in one more context for this emerging trend: the clear involvement of billionaire busibodies like Gates and Soros in formulation of domestic and foreign policy via their privileged  tax exempt foundations. And increasingly, their policies and "science" are revealed not only to be inhuman, but anti-human, regardless of the rationalizations they may tell themselves.

So where am I going with all this? It's time to have a discussion about "charitable foundations" - all of them - and their relationship to governments and the big mega-corporations.  I think it's high time for another Reece committee investigation of foundations. And my suggestion for chief counsel for said committee would Julian Assange. And my suggestion for that putative committee would be to start at the top: Rockefailure, the billionaire busybody Gates,  Darth Soros, the whole lot of them.

Let's call this moment of history, the "Philippe le Bel" moment of history.

Philip was, of course, the King of France who - so the official narrative goes - had so indebted himself and France that he approached the Templar Order for a loan, and was refused. He then decided to shut down the order in a coordinated raid on all their houses and preceptories throughout France, all on one day, via secret and sealed orders. The reason, he wanted to get his hands on the fabled "Templar Treasure" and "ledgers and papers." What he found was nothing. And ever since academics have listed the "fabled Templar Treasure" and "ledgers" as just another conspiracy theory for which there was no evidence. Templar fleets had set sail (so the story goes), perhaps taking their archives and treasure with them.  Academics, of course, miss the point, but it's one that anyone of common sense will understand: the Templar order, the richest in Europe, was involved in banking, in policy making, in warfare. To find the treasure, to know for sure if they were up to sedition against the King, one had to have the key to all that: not the physical stocks of bullion, but the ledgers, the records.  And yet, when Philippe le Bel struck, there was...

... nothing.

Let that sink in for a moment, and while you do, recall that the  chief council for the Reece committee, Rene Wormser, stated in his book about that committee, Foundations, Their Power and Influence, that the modern tax-exempt foundation was but a new form of the old mediaeval military crusading orders, like... the Templars.

So what would such a committee find by summoning and subpoenaing the records of those foundations? Probably nothing... sanitized records, missing records... but that, in itself, would speak volumes.  Especially if those foundations have been penetrated, and copies made...

See you on the flip side...

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. DAVID GOLDMAN on February 18, 2017 at 8:03 pm

    Assange as counsel? C’mon JF, wake up and smell the intelligence cut out:

    “What is Going On with Wikileaks? Assange MIA, MacFadyen Dead and the CIA Honeypot Trying to Tank the Clinton Campaign? What Gives?”


    I’ve been asked on several occasions about what I think is going on with Wikileaks and all these document dumps they are releasing trying to derail the Hillary train, at least in terms of appearances, when in fact we all know that Wikileaks is a CIA honeypot designed to:
    1. aid various regime change propaganda as needed by influencing the more left-wing of the alternative media outlets
    2. serve as a black hole for real leaks from real whistle-blowers when they make the mistake of trusting Wikileaks and sending something to them

    Wikileaks was established in 2006 at a time when real whistle-blowers like William Binney, Russ Tice, Mark Klein (Room 641A ) and a few others were starting to make things really difficult for our glorious leaders who had a totally different world in mind for us to live in. You may also recall in 2004 the story of Abu Ghraib broke complete with leaked photos depicting horrific torture being conducted by our troops who were running the detention center.

    So in 2006 something needed to be done in order to keep real whistle-blowers from getting their stories on the front pages of every news paper and website in the country and thus, Wikileaks was born. The idea of a honeypot was hatched.

    “Wikileaks: a big dangerous US Government Con Job”

    by F. William Engdahl

    The story on the surface makes for a script for a new Oliver Stone Hollywood thriller. However, a closer look at the details of what has so far been carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress that of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to North Korea. The Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet.

    Who is Behind Wikileaks?

    Originally published in December 2010

    “World bankers, by pulling a few simple levers that control the flow of money, can make or break entire economies. By controlling press releases of economic strategies that shape national trends, the power elite are able to not only tighten their stranglehold on this nation’s economic structure, but can extend that control world wide. Those possessing such power would logically want to remain in the background, invisible to the average citizen.” (Aldous Huxley)

    Wikleaks is upheld as a breakthrough in the battle against media disinformation and the lies of the US government.

    Unquestionably, the released documents constitute an important and valuable data bank. The documents have been used by critical researchers since the outset of the Wikileaks project. Wikileaks earlier revelations have focussed on US war crimes in Afghanistan (July 2010) as well as issues pertaining to civil liberties and the “militarization of the Homeland” (see Tom Burghardt, Militarizing the “Homeland” in Response to the Economic and Political Crisis, Global Research, October 11, 2008)

    In October 2010, WikiLeaks was reported to have released some 400,000 classified Iraq war documents, covering events from 2004 to 2009 (Tom Burghardt, The WikiLeaks Release: U.S. Complicity and Cover-Up of Iraq Torture Exposed, Global Research, October 24, 2010). These revelations contained in the Wikileaks Iraq War Logs provide “further evidence of the Pentagon’s role in the systematic torture of Iraqi citizens by the U.S.-installed post-Saddam regime.” (Ibid)
    . . .
    From the outset, Wikileaks’ geopolitical focus on “oppressive regimes” in Eurasia and the Middle East was “appealing” to America’s elites, i.e. it seemingly matched stated US foreign policy objectives. Moreover, the composition of the Wikileaks team (which included Chinese dissidents), not to mention the methodology of “exposing secrets” of foreign governments, were in tune with the practices of US covert operations geared towards triggering “regime change” and fostering “color revolutions” in different parts of the World.

    The Role of the Corporate Media: The Central Role of the New York Times

    Wikileaks is not a typical alternative media initiative. The New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel are directly involved in the editing and selection of leaked documents. The London Economist has also played an important role.

    While the project and its editor Julian Assange reveal a commitment and concern for truth in media, the recent Wikileaks releases of embassy cables have been carefully “redacted” by the mainstream media in liaison with the US government. (See Interview with David E. Sanger, Fresh Air, PBS, December 8, 2010)

    This collaboration between Wikileaks and selected mainstream media is not fortuitous; it was part of an agreement between several major US and European newspapers and Wikileaks’ editor Julian Assange.

    The important question is who controls and oversees the selection, distribution and editing of released documents to the broader public?

    What US foreign policy objectives are being served through this redacting process?
    Is Wikileaks part of an awakening of public opinion, of a battle against the lies and fabrications which appear daily in the print media and on network TV?

    If so, how can this battle against media disinformation be waged with the participation and collaboration of the corporate architects of media disinformation?

    • OrigensChild on February 19, 2017 at 4:52 pm

      Thank you for the insightful links and commentary here. Some of these authors I admire for various reasons–and their insights are often valuable. I learned a long time ago to cast a broad net–and as good as they are, I intend to keep my net broad. You catch more fish that way.

      This hypothesis has been around for a long time–and has a great deal of power for explaining some of the idiosyncrasies associated with the problem that is Wikileaks. Even then, these operations in themselves can be co-opted and refocused. The same honey-pot operation can be used to ensnare its controllers. Did this actually happen? When the agency signed a deal with General Gehlen to integrate his intelligence network into ours, the CIA became a fractured agency suffering from a high degree of MPD. If a nationalist faction decided to co-opt Wikileaks to ensnare and weaken the Nazi/globalist branch embedded within itself and the national security apparatus, would they not have time enough for penetration and intelligence to accomplish this? Would they use Nazi honey trap to trap members of the Nazi front? Why not?

  2. Robert Barricklow on February 18, 2017 at 1:32 pm

    Years ago an acquaintance of mine set up a scam in the property management business. A credit check in which he pocketed the money. Unfortunately, when he left, the monkeys under him continued the practice FOR REAL[not pocketing the funds. They spread through the property empire and it is now standard corporate practice.
    All this to ask: Do these so-called fearless billionaires believe their own press? Have they swallowed their own manufactured truths? Because if they haven’t; than they be Monsters.
    Those old fairy tale monster that children were warned of; have returned as Wolves, And ARE eating children And their grandmothers. It’s not only in the billionaire’s DNA; it’s in the very DNA of they’re Corporate Fascist Foundations.

    • Robert Barricklow on February 18, 2017 at 2:02 pm

      Inspector Bordelli

      ” Good is everything that puts life above all else.
      Evil is everything that runs counter to this assertion.”

      [Death In August by March Vich].

  3. marcos toledo on February 18, 2017 at 11:44 am

    These fools are playing the game Sole Survivor for real they are so cut of from any reality. All they believe in is the illusion of power their most powerful aphrodisiac in what dream world do are elites exist in. They have been pushing the meme that that Earth would be better off without humanity if they believe that they should begin by offing themselves they wouldn’t be missed.

  4. Lost on February 18, 2017 at 10:59 am

    More than a little strange:

    The Times of India is real news paper, and that’s what a Wikipedia search re-directs itself to if one searches “Indian Times”.

    Also no, the website for the Times of India is not IndianTimes dot com.

    Makes one wonder, clearly the IndianTimes website has stories largely about India on the website, but it doesn’t seem to be anything like a major India based news paper–or even just a major website reporting news from India.

    So the fact that a website, LastAmericanVagabond, makes this claim about the Gates Foundation and India but can’t point to more than one source, the IndianTimes in this case, but that source appears to be the only source reporting these claims about the Gates Foundation in India makes the entire claim suspect. And other stories on the IndianTimes website are well sourced and don’t stand out as unsupported.

    So something is wrong here.

      • Lost on February 18, 2017 at 5:10 pm


        Not really my question.

        And the link you posted isn’t about the Gates Foundation stopping the support of vaccines in India.

        Did you mean to post a different link?

        Did you read the link?

        • Bluenose on February 18, 2017 at 7:59 pm

          @Lost The above link was just to show the existence of a “times of India” link. I have another post in moderation with examples of articles by the same author on other websites. I’m wondering about the author’s credibility. Perhaps someone can enlighten me as to whether or not this author and the other websites are worth bothering with once the other comment I made comes out of moderation.

          • Lost on February 19, 2017 at 1:50 am


            Right, I’m well aware of the Times of India.

            The question remains what is the website IndianTimes.

            It exists, it has what look to be normal stories about India, but it is the only source for this claim–at least in English.

            It is NOT the same thing as the Times of India, which as you linked has no mention of this Gates Foundation vaccine story.

            Please re-read my original post. You’ve misunderstood it completely.

    • Bluenose on February 18, 2017 at 3:15 pm

    • Chris P on February 19, 2017 at 8:57 pm

      Where are you getting “Indian Times”? This article links to the Last American Vagabond article, which links to what it calls the “India Times”, which is actually economictimes dot indiatimes dot com if you follow the hyperlink. Per Wikipedia, the publishers of The Times of India also publish The Economic Times, with the web address of, as above, economictimes dot indiatimes dot com, just as the web address of The Times of India is timesofindia dot indiatimes dot com.

  5. Peter Sazonoff on February 18, 2017 at 10:27 am

    As long as I remain silent, the Lord covers my ignorance. As soon as I speak, the covering is removed!

  6. Peter Sazonoff on February 18, 2017 at 10:10 am

    Penetrated by whom? THEY (the Templar/foundations) are the penetrators, are they not? Or are you postulating a ‘breakaway from the breakaway civilization’?

  7. WalkingDead on February 18, 2017 at 7:57 am

    The slow kill and the fast buck. Two of the many strategies employed toward their NWO. Now that they have bankrupted about every government, gutted the middle class, and control most of the food production, drugs, politicians, and soon most of the land itself with their global corporations, they can begin to realize their dream.
    By far, the worst of the lot are the bankers, they risk absolutely nothing in return for everything.
    What makes it even worse is we the people know this and still allow it to happen. Ask and ye shall receive; but be very careful what you ask for.

    • Roger on February 18, 2017 at 10:50 am

      I quit dealing with Banks completely. I don’t know why most low income people still have bank accounts that seem to find more and more inventive ways to penalize a profit from the poor’s accounts with high interest, overdraft fees, and higher and higher fees for writing and cashing checks. Every transaction and mistake is a hidden tax directly to the owners of the Governments.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events