I am increasingly alarmed at the amount of power people are willing to surrender to big corporations, and to the GMO-pharmaceutical complex. Over the years I've been attempting to alert people not only to the dangers of these products, but more importantly, to the dangers of the mercantilist policies and corporate-government linkage that has been erected to protect them. Recently, one commentator on one of my blogs on this subject pointed out that one of my blogs contained an error: I had maintained a speculative scenario in which big pharma could be sued. The individual pointed out that vaccine makers cannot be sued under current law. Well, to be frank, I knew that, though I was not clear about that in my blog. But the commentator raised the point I was trying to make anyway: such a policy enshrined as a "law" is another case of the same mercantilism at work; and in the absence of the protection of law, and without recourse in complaints before the courts, phramceutical companies can, in effect, put whatever they please into their vaccines (and it appears they've been doing just that), and turn entire populations into their lab rats. They then control the discussion through control of journals and paid-for "science", and work to mandate vaccinations in the general population.

The question is why? What's the purpose, beyond keeping people sick and selling pharmaceutical "cures" to problems which they very well may have created (think of the vaccines-autism link)? Many would argue it's because vaccines are viewed as a surreptitious way of enforcing population control, and indeed, there are some suggestive statements from vaccine advocates to this effect:


It's hard to follow Mr. Gates' logic here: he seems, on the one hand, to be genuinely concerned to reduce childhood mortality from illnesses via vaccinations, but at the same time is heard advocating "reproductive health services," a convenient euphemism for you-know-what, and is also heard implying that this will cut down on population growth. To be sure, in areas where infant and childhood mortality is high, people tend to have more children. And this appears to be Mr. Gates' real point, taken out of context in the video clips. Nonetheless, when billionaire busybodies smile reassuringly, I tend to shudder, for like it or not, he does couple vaccination with population reduction.  In any case, I use these remarks merely to illustrate what many out there believe the real covert agenda to be: population control and reduction through vaccination, and that implies covert ingredients to do just that. Another theory is that vaccines are being used as a wealth-harvesting mechanism: make people sick - with autism for example - and then harvest that family's wealth thereafter by selling the expensive drugs that "treat" the condition.

However, there may be yet another agenda, suggested to me for today's high octane speculation by the following article by Mr. Jon Rappaport, and shared by Mr. S.F.:


Mr. Rappaport states something quite profound, and quite disturbing:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was nearly two years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, doesn’t it follow that he/she will pass on that change to the next generation of children, and so on, down the line? (Emphases added)

So where's my high octane speculation? In my book Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men I pointed out that the prospect of genetic engineering and the current legal practice literally allows corporations to own their genetic patents. I argued that, because of this, it is conceivable that someone receiving or experiencing a genetic modification to their DNA via one of these patented programs could, conceivably, end up having to pay for the privilege of such modification by becoming a permanent rentier of the modification, paying, in effect, a royalty or license fee to the company that owned the patent on it, for as long as that person exhibited the modification, and potentially for the rest of their lives. Think of it as the genetic version of what the GMO companies have managed to do with their seeds. Add to this the possibility that this modification could be passed to their children, and one gets the idea. A massive system of serfdom and wealth-harvesting could be introduced via gene-altering vaccines. Such a draconian system would, in effect, make everyone vassals to the company for their modifications; indeed, it is conceivable that so long as their DNA alterations exhibit the patented modifications, that they in effect become the property of the patent-holder.

Call it: "Slavery through genetic modification via vaccines."

As Mr. Rappaport says at the end of his article:

If you’re going to alter humans, for example, to make many of them more docile and weak, and some of them stronger, in order to restructure society, you want everyone under the umbrella. No exceptions. No exemptions.

The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.

And I would argue, that the sinister toad squatting in the middle of all of this is precisely current patent law, and what that might imply for the long-term goals of billionaire busybodies and their vaccine advocacy: it's another way of "perfecting slavery collateral" in reducing everyone to feudal vassals, and increasing their own wealth. But this is all high octane speculation, to be sure. We'll know if it's true if, in fact, these billionaire busybodies and pharmaceutical companies start talking about "individual health care savings accounts" - which will be mandated of course - to pay for long term medical care and fees, which would cover payments of permanent royalty fees for the privilege of having one's DNA modified by (mandated) vaccines.

What's next to roll off the assembly line of designer drugs, therapies, and humans? Watch for it: cannibalism: in the form of stem cells being included in vaccines. And while we're at it, let's make them oral vaccines, just for good measure.

See you on the flip side...

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Michelle on March 10, 2017 at 12:57 am

    I’m new to this site, but am very please to see how many “thinking” humans we have here on this subject. Always be clear, there are NO Safe Vaccines. That is inherently impossible. The science doesn’t back it and neither does our biology. The vaccine history is corrupt from the start with manipulation and flawed science (not really science even for that time period). Keeping this brief, but again, it is positive to read your many replies. I hope you all remember, to make your voices heard in whatever place you are from and don’t become part of the complacent herd this world is creating.

  2. Pellevoisin on February 28, 2017 at 1:17 pm

    I am reminded that in the drafting the USA’s Constitution (or perhaps the Articles of Confederation) there was a doctor, a physician, who strenuously argued that the Constitution (or perhaps it was the Bill of Rights) should include the civil right of each citizen to choose out his own form of health treatment and care. He argued that if given the opportunity the medical doctors would organise themselves so as to put other forms of healthcare such as homeopathy out of business. It may have been James McClurg who argued this or perhaps another medical doctor who was involved in the process.

    My point is that every governing document of every nation including the UN Charter needs to enshrine the individual right to choose one own’s health care and the right to refuse any imposed treatment, intervention, or medical or surgical (read: knife, needle).

    Only when there is such a right enshrined in law in every nation and the UN Charter do we stand a chance against the medical-pharmaceutical cabal with its talons stuck into every aspect of government and the lives of citizens. It is the necessary groundwork for legal challenges to forced vaccination and forced “treatment” of any kind.

  3. mesolad on February 27, 2017 at 2:52 am

    And I was thinking, actually it can be more nuanced than what I just said : let us not forget Richard Hoagland and what he was saying in his recent shows : that there is an intensification of the global energy : as a consequence, he used to say : “the bad are getting worse, and the good are getting better” : so, we know that the bad are getting worse; apart from that, I don’t know for you all but I am definitely getting better : so …

  4. goshawks on February 27, 2017 at 2:29 am

    The most profound question of this article is:
    “The question is why? What’s the purpose, beyond keeping people sick and selling pharmaceutical ‘cures’ to problems which they very well may have created?”

    I know this is an intellect-based blog, but I just have to mention the elephant in the room. A long tradition – across many different cultures and religions – stresses that there are elements in the Unseen that are inimical to mankind. You can take the actual ‘form’ of this opposition in the way that best suits you.

    As an engineer, I wish that laws were the answer to our problems. However, I believe the ‘battlefield’ is in a wholly-different place…

  5. John Dunlap on February 27, 2017 at 2:20 am

    When I consider the various seemingly unrelated avenues of genetic research being pursued today, I get the impression that we’re in a lot more trouble than even Mr. Rappaport has posited. Let’s connect some dots.

    Consider research being done at MIT, engineering neurons in adult mice to be photo sensitive:


    The technique allows researchers to alter and control aspects of the test mouse’s behavior. At the moment, this requires physical insertion of a light source into the animal’s skull, but what if mammalian neurons can be altered to respond to more penetrative electromagnetic wavelengths? If so, then it becomes a simple matter of introducing the necessary genetic changes to a population, perhaps with an aerosol dispersed RNA virus, though mandatory vaccination is another possible avenue. Just like that, people’s behavior can be altered and controlled remotely.

    Even crude control, such as shutting off specific cognitive functions, could be quite useful (it places those ‘silly’ zombie training scenarios the U.S. Army engaged in a little more than a year ago in a more sinister light). Since anything we are allowed to see in academic research can be assumed to be about twenty years behind what’s being done in classified labs, I suspect we ought to be worried.

  6. mesolad on February 27, 2017 at 2:07 am

    If this genetic twisting happens on a large scale, most probably this will go out of control in the future generations, on a large scale too. Dr Farrell already said that today’s elites are kind of dumbbed down themselves. What about tomorrow’s elites ? Either there is a very smart plan at work, with science and technologies we have no idea about, which will efficiently protect the elites’ lineage for generations to come, or they are completely short-sighted (and psychopathic), and life on Earth is doomed in the next centuries.
    Beginning (?) with the cosmic war, which broke our solar system, to the spiritual wound resulting from this war, which laid down (in part) the foundation for today’s collective madness, it seems we are determined to inflict some additional wound(s) of our own to the species and life at large …
    I will try to carry some hope anyway : as there has always been positive people, people headed toward light and working for light rather than darkness – across all the ordeals the species has gone through, we are still here and resisting – we will continue, one way or another …

  7. Cate on February 26, 2017 at 9:29 pm

    As far as maintaining good-to-excellent health is concerned:
    I have been experimenting for the last ten years and the following systems work against the toxic load to the point of not so much as a common cold;
    1. 2007 Iodine Protocol
    2. High Dose Vitamin C, (aka Ascorbic Acid)
    3. AIP (auto-immune protocol) “Paleo” diet, (aka Victorian diet, the old-fashioned way of eating goes my many names).
    Good health to you all folks.

  8. Aridzonan_13 on February 26, 2017 at 6:16 pm

    The Atlantean Scientist part deux is upon us.. Couple these new “vaccines” with the bombardment of WiFi and other dubious EM signals and you have a very interesting large scale lab experiment. My suggestion is, to all: “Resonate with the positive things in your lives”.. Becuz, we live in a sea of negative invention. Which is attempting to harvest us all.. Cultivating P(Mental), P(Emotional), P(Spiritual)Attitudes are more important than ever before..

  9. OrigensChild on February 26, 2017 at 2:57 pm

    Folks, it gets worse. Imagine what happens when this taints our blood supply and one requires a transfusion… Does this mean we now have to save our own blood for transfusions?

    We really need to get a handle on this and soon.

    • OrigensChild on February 26, 2017 at 3:06 pm

      While we’re at it, this issue will someday create a whole new reason for organ harvesting using parts from persons who did not have access to these vaccination regimes. The elite now have an even greater incentive to keep these markets open for those who can afford it.

  10. bdw000 on February 26, 2017 at 2:56 pm

    Another issue that needs mentioning: if muscle cells start making antibodies, that means at least some of the resources of those cells will be diverted from their normal use: being able to produce movement.

    I am no expert here, but the feeling I get is that there would be a significant trade-off in terms of muscle strength (throughout the body, or just one place, such as one leg???) if muscle cells are co-opted to produce antibodies.

  11. Kita on February 26, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    I have some bad news here – vaccines and any medical products that have used mice in their production are already heavily contaminated with gamma retroviruses which have recombined with human tissues and have infected a huge swath of the population. Retroviruses by definition insert themselves into the human genome, thus changing our DNA.

    This has likely been going on since mice have been used in labs. Oh, and the other bad news is that some of these retroviruses are now transmissible through the air.

    If you’re interested in learning more about this check out the work of Dr. Judy Mikovits. She has co-written a book “Plague” outlining part of this story. The website is: plaguethebook.com.

  12. Robert Barricklow on February 26, 2017 at 12:12 pm

    Puts on a wicked twist to:
    germ lines & Synthetic Terrorism.

    • Robert Barricklow on February 26, 2017 at 5:17 pm

      Chem-trails being sowed today for the coming toxically plagued environments; reaped by an auspicious, just-in-time genetically altered products, for the dystopian-engineered lands of tomorrow.
      Dictated by the all consuming profits.

      • Robert Barricklow on February 27, 2017 at 11:28 am

        Product[engineered humans]
        making profit of GMOs
        making profit off human
        Products making profits of each other w/o living beings is the future?

  13. marcos toledo on February 26, 2017 at 11:46 am

    Feudalism and Slavery are two different systems though they look similar. In feudalism both the lord and serf owe each other certain duties and services. In slavery the master owes the slave nothing the slave is a beast of burden to be used anyway the masters pleases no rights. In a feudal society a serf has a stake in the society no matter how small a slave on the other a slave unless they are house slave or hold high positions in that society have nothing to lose if their society falls. In fact may profit if that society fails in the long run even not immediately.

    • Roger on February 26, 2017 at 11:41 pm

      Only in the fairy tales of Disney is there a difference. In practice there is no difference between a slave and a serf.

  14. emlong on February 26, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Let’s not forget the aerosol or “chemtrail” op’s enormous ability to deliver experimental, oral vaccines along with who knows what else on the side. As a “citizen observer” of this ongoing op over the pat 16 years or so I have watched it grow in scale and density. Was hoping that The Donald might notice the stealth line item of the op in Pentagon budgets.
    My theory is that a great deal of the “missing trillions” is devoted to this enormous operation equivalent to a Manhattan Project and protected from formal discovery as such by a designation of “national security.”

  15. WalkingDead on February 26, 2017 at 10:27 am

    “As in the days of Noah, so shall it be at the coming of the Lord.” Tinkering with the genetic makeup of mankind is what brought about the flood, according to one ancient text, along with the evil which it brought with it. In some respects, the Sumerian account is accurate. When the “gods” (fallen angels, Nephilim, ET’s, whatever you wish to call them) walked among men and interbred with mankind it brought about a near extinction event. These beings also existed afterwards though not in large numbers and were eventually mostly hunted down and destroyed by mankind; those that remained scattered throughout the earth and their remains have been found on every continent. It’s not really surprising that the history of the earth has been suppressed; and we seem to be destined to repeat it again.
    You would have to be nearly brain dead not to realize that everything today is designed for the slow kill or total domination and that evil has multiplied on the face of the earth to the point where it is absolutely in your face. It’s as if the Protocols of the Elders of Sion and the book of Revelation are being used as blueprints to bring about their NWO. Agenda 2030, TPIP, and the cashless economy are the endgame and once implemented they will have total control over everything. They sense their victory is at hand and the pace toward that goal is accelerating logarithmicly.
    We most definitely live in interesting times.

    • cosmicasuality on February 26, 2017 at 4:59 pm

      If the Olivet prophecy can be believed, the imminent extinction of humankind at the end of the world (aeon, age) triggers the intervention of the Father. Extinction of humankind could be by physical death of all individuals or by profound alteration of that which makes us distinctly human. Unlike Jay-ho-va, the Father works silently and invisibly, like the wind.

  16. Lost on February 26, 2017 at 9:30 am

    What a shock, not, Rappaport misrepresents something as a vaccine, when the technique is a kind of gene therapy.

    Happily, genes are hardly the only thing to life.

    Is this quite possibly a bad idea? Sure. Has gene therapy on fully developed mammal had a good record of actually doing what was proposed? No.

    “They” already seem to have all sorts of ways of making humanity go along with counterproductive ideas.

    • Phil the Thrill on February 26, 2017 at 12:21 pm

      Lost: Your comments on this site have established the fact that you are a vaccine proponent. Please direct me to the peer-reviewed studies which support the claim that being injected with a sample of a disease helps a body develop immunity to that disease. I would like to see the cold, hard evidence that supports your claim that we all should embrace mandatory injections of this stuff, made by corporations who enjoy legal immunity from being prosecuted for damages caused by this stuff.

      • Lost on February 26, 2017 at 7:27 pm


        “Lost: Your comments on this site have established the fact that you are a vaccine proponent.”

        You don’t appear to have read my posts, including the one you replied to.

        The problem is Rappaport isn’t discussing vaccination. So why are you bringing it up?

        Vaccination goes back to ancient China.

        Nowhere have I said anything like “all modern vaccines are safe and effective”. Don’t play the game of making up statements I’ve never made and then basing an ersatz line of argument on that invention.

    • Chris P on February 27, 2017 at 2:05 am

      “…misrepresents something as a vaccine, when the technique is a kind of gene therapy.” Yes, a kind of gene “therapy” meant to act as a vaccine, and one which maintains elements of current vaccines: “Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.” (injecting viruses into muscle to produce antibodies)

      Also, if you go to Jon’s article, you find that he quotes from the NYT article “Protection Without a Vaccine”, which, despite the title, has a Dr. Baltimore saying “he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.” The point is that it’s a continuation of “vaccination strategy” and the vaccination paradigm, but merged with genetic engineering. Referring to “new vaccines” in the title is hardly misrepresentation — to say so is grasping at something to criticize.

      P.S. To Dr. Farrell et al. It’s Rappoport not Rappaport.

  17. Neru on February 26, 2017 at 9:14 am

    It is a small miracle people function at all if you are aware of the onslaught physical and psychological in today’s world. And yes, it is getting increasingly more difficult to avoid the toxic onslaught of any sort.

    For me, it is mind boggling from where I started out 61 years ago and where we are at now. My biggest concern is not to be scared in today’s world so I don’t go nuts, let alone what the future holds for the younger generations near and dear to my/our hearts.

  18. chimera on February 26, 2017 at 8:46 am

    Wasn’t Hillary trained as a PATENT LAWYER??

    • Lost on February 26, 2017 at 10:04 am


      Well, not any more than any other Yale Law graduate.

      Nor did Hillary Clinton work as a patent lawyer after law school.

      More importantly, and a big clue that she was never a practicing patent lawyer: Hillary Clinton doesn’t have an engineering degree of any sort.

      A lot of patent lawyers have degrees in other fields–in the 20 years those fields have started to include genetic engineering.

      • Robert Barricklow on February 26, 2017 at 12:28 pm

        She was part of the Watergate team of lawyers.

        • Lost on February 26, 2017 at 7:38 pm


          That was hardly Hillary Clinton’s (Rodham’s) only job directly after law school.

          • Robert Barricklow on February 26, 2017 at 7:48 pm

            Of course…

  19. romanmel on February 26, 2017 at 7:05 am

    Those of us that are retirement age must face the constant pressure from our doctors to all types of vaccines. I refuse them all. The flu shot is a joke. The same percentage exists of those who get the flu that have taken the shot compared to the general population that don’t. All strains of flu mutate quickly. Thus the formula used in the current flu shots are only effective on the flu as it was before mutation. I am 70 years old and have not had the flu or even a slight cold over the last 10 years. I take 5,000 ID of vitamin D3 each and every day. Most people are deficient in Vitamin D levels. A medical test can be done to determine your viyamin D level. Other side benefits of proper levels of vitamin D are:
    Maintain the health of bones and teeth
    Support the health of the immune system, brain and nervous system
    Regulate insulin levels and aid diabetes management
    Support lung function and cardiovascular health
    Influence the expression of genes involved in cancer development.
    —Taken from: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/161618.php

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events