US MISSILE DEFENSE: RUSSIA, CHINA AND THE MOON

When Mr. "B" shared the following article with me, along with his thought-provoking email, I had to read the article. Sure enough, I did so, with his predicted "jaw dropper" reaction:

Russia and China Team up Against US 'Defensive' Expansion

While there have been a spate of articles recently about growing Russo-Chinese defense and security ties, matching their growing financial and economic ties, this one left me stunned, for there was a statement within it that caught my eye, and Mr. B's as well, and I'm sure the reader saw it as well. As one can imagine, this one fueled my "high octane speculation" mode to the nth degree. Here's the statement, and a bit of surrounding context:

Russia and China are tired of Washington's "defensive" military installations in their backyards — and they're already taking action.

According to the Atlantic Council and other responsible thinkers, the Untied States reserves the right to park its missile shields anywhere it wants, whether it be in Europe, East Asia, or the dark side of the Moon. This is because placing missile shields all over the place is an important cornerstone of Washington's ingenious plot to encourage Beijing and Moscow to put aside their differences and form a long-term security and military partnership.

Take for example Washington's decision to deploy Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) systems to South Korea.

The Americans claim that their missile defense systems will defend the free world against North Korea. But do they think Putin and Xi were born yesterday? (Emphasis added)

There is, to be sure, a very  tongue-in-cheek attitude in the article, for example, this statement from the second paragraph quoted above:

This is because placing missile shields all over the place is an important cornerstone of Washington's ingenious plot to encourage Beijing and Moscow to put aside their differences and form a long-term security and military partnership.

But as the article points out, American unipolarism, and its result in pushing Russia and China together, has been a disastrous policy (at least, for the USA):

As China expert Jeff J. Brown explained in an interview:

If the US strikes either China or Russia first, it’s probably World War III and humanity ceases to function as we know it. While there is no announced treaty alliance, we have no way of knowing what Russia and China have agreed to secretly. It is also possible that China and Russia have told NATO back channel to the effect, “You mess with one of us, you deal with us both”. I’ve always wondered if that might be the case, given America’s reluctance to push the pedal to the metal in the Ukraine and the South China Sea.

Now, why am I bothering you with all this. Well, consider, the "tongue-in-cheek" tone appears only once in the article, and that in order to make a very important point about the results of US policy to deploy missile defense systems "all over the place," in other words, the tongue-in-cheek tone refers to a reality, as Russia and China see it.

And that raises the issue Mr. "B" raised in his email with me: there is no distinction made in the article between the US placing missile defense systems in Eastern Europe, Eastern Asia or "the dark side of the Moon."  As he put it, was this a subtle way of Russia and China saying "we know what you have up there?"

Well, perhaps. But while you're pondering that possibility, remember that China wants to have a mission to place satellites around the Moon in such a way as to allow them to permanently monitor the "dark" side of it. Why? Because they actually want to send a manned mission to the Moon to land on the dark side, and in order for that to work, and maintain communications with the homeland, a satellite relay network will have to be constructed first. Did Russia Insider just tell us the motivation for that Chinese plan?

See you on the flip side...

18 thoughts on “US MISSILE DEFENSE: RUSSIA, CHINA AND THE MOON”

  1. I poked around RI for a bit, long enough to be satisfied that it is nothing more than a Russian propaganda site. That said, I can’t help but think that Russia, China and the United States are being maneuvered into a war that will cripple or destroy all three by extra-governmental interests, AKA the Nazi International, to borrow Dr. Farrell’s term. Considering all that order out of chaos B.S. the Bilderbergs, etc. go on about, it would be their style. While the self reliant culture that is still alive in the United States is by far the greatest obstacle to a one world fascist system, the Chinese and Russian man in the street have been getting more and more ‘uppity’ lately. A few rounds of nuclear shock and awe would probably take care of all that, as well as going a long way toward meeting their desired maximum population target of 500 million.

  2. we’ll just have to wait til’ later this year when the Iron Sky II movie comes out or a sequel to Oblivion where there would be no dark side of the moon cause there is no moon.

  3. Robert Barricklow

    Russia & China are leading the way to resistance.
    The tyranny of power is incorporating financial weapons, traditional & exotic weapons, satellite communication warfare, cyber warfare, and host of other methods of destruction; while the BRICS literally CONSTRUCT/BUILD resistance[opposite of destruction] resistance to global/stellar destructive forces.

  4. “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” Two ‘independents’ in a row. Shall I try for a third?
    goshawks – April 7, 2017 at 2:34 pm.

  5. “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” Didn’t like that…
    goshawks – April 7, 2017 at 2:09 pm.

    1. Why do you constantly complain about moderation? And then comment on your own comments re that? It’s getting tiresome

      1. Think of it as a ‘push-back’ on the forces of censorship. Freedom has its price. Sorry you feel tiresome-ed…

  6. (Speaking of tongue in cheek: That would be one h@ll of a MOBILE missile shield to have it stay on “the dark side of the Moon.” This is because the article’s author is unaware of the difference between the ‘far side’ and the ‘dark side’. Ignerent…)

    Long ago, David Icke wrote of the globalist/bankster effort to homogenize the planetary population under their rule. A key ‘interim step’ was the formation of regional areas – European Union, North American Union, etc. One area I ‘blinked at’ was him mentioning the Eurasian Union as a goal.

    Thinking long term, I could see a two-step program:

    First, the globalists/banksters breaking-up the Communist ‘pact’ between the USSR and PRC in order to eventually-subjugate Russia to the bankster’s Central Bank system. Their imposed ‘Fed’ is there to this day…

    China, though, still retains semi-autonomous control of its banking system. This is obviously not-allowable for the banksters. So, the pendulum swings the other way…

    Now, the pressure is on to bring Russia and China together, as mentioned in the article. All the current provocations and demonizing could be simply a long-term plan to get a Eurasian (bankster) Union through ‘forcing’ the two countries together, almost against their respective wills.

    (Perhaps, the plan is to get the Russian ‘Fed’ into the Chinese system. I could also see the British banksters’ [Rothschilds, et al] decision to join the China-backed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank [AIIB] as subsidiary evidence of this move.)

    1. Side comment: I could easily see the current ‘engineered’ political climate in the US as leading to a North American Union…

      As one entity, the US would always dominate any NAU. So, a ‘Union’ would be resisted by Mexico, Canada, et al. However, if the US ‘busted up’ into 3-5 areas, each would be roughly as powerful as Mexico or Canada. This could result in the acceptability of a NAU.

      If this is the plan, watch for a Soros-style escalation of ‘break-away’ movements…

  7. This is a interesting post in light of the USSA strike in Syria and now a bombing in Sweden to add to the St Petersburg train bombing. Gladio must be really be earning it pay orchestrating these attacks.

    1. Interesting coincidence – In May 2013 John McCain made a secret visit to Syria, three months later civilians were hit by chemical attack rockets in Damascus.
      CNN reported another secret trip McCain took to northern Syria Feb. 22, 2017 and 1 1/2 months there’s another chemical attack. What are the odds?

  8. Russia Insider is the cabbage borscht version of WND. They like to strut about with (pseudo?) Russian bravado, so I’d take their articles with a shaker of salt. Their nameless scribes enjoy writing in a brash, know-it-all style particularly suited to talking nonsense out of one’s ear and making bold but unsubstantiated claims never backed up by fact or confirmed by ensuing events.

    1. I think RI is run by american man who’s name I can’t remember. Im not sure if they have any Russian writers in there. So it’s not so much “insider” I think.

  9. I love this website.. Its like looking through a Scrying Pool and seeing the future..

    Small experimental satellite launched by new Chinese rocket
    https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/03/03/small-experimental-satellite-launched-by-new-chinese-rocket/

    “The payload aboard the KT-2 launch was a small satellite named TK-1, the first spacecraft independently developed by CASIC, Xinhua reported. The TK-1 satellite “will be used for remote sensing, >>>>>>telecommunications<<<<<< (O.o) and experiments in minisatellite-based technologies,"

    However.. Whilst the Chinese are nailing it in the Technology Tree… They seem to be having 'birthing difficulties getting the geo stationary orbits in place..

    http://spaceflight101.com/cz-5-maiden-flight/shijian-17-settles-in-geostationary-orbit/

Comments are closed.