When Mr. B.H. shared the following article published in 2016, I had to say "you're kidding" out loud to my otherwise empty office, for it seems the proverbial "they" have found yet another way around the growing movement to question just why we need all those vaccines: just spray it from airplanes (copy and paste into your browser: http://yournewswire.com/australia-to-forcibly-vaccinate-citizens-via-chemtrails/ ).
Now, I have to admit that while I have not blogged much on this website concerning the subject of chemtrails, and what their ultimate purpose may be, I can say in all honesty that (1) I do believe that the phenomenon is real, and (2) that it represents some sort of covert agenda, or perhaps several agendas, on the part of "them." The following paragraphs from the article - which I am assuming to be true for the sake of my speculation of the day - provide at least one clue:
In 2006 Michael Greenwood wrote an article for the Yale School of Public Health entitled, “Aerial Spraying Effectively Reduces Incidence of West Nile Virus (WNV) in Humans.” The article stated that the incidence of human West Nile virus cases can be significantly reduced through large scale aerial spraying that targets adult mosquitoes, according to research by the Yale School of Public Health and the California Department of Public Health.
Under the mandate for aerial spraying for specific vectors that pose a threat to human health, aerial vaccines known as DNA Vaccine Enhancements and Recombinant Vaccine against WNV may be tested or used to “protect” the people from vector infection exposures. DNA vaccine enhancements specifically use Epstein-Barr viral capside’s with multi human complement class II activators to neutralize antibodies. The recombinant vaccines against WNV use Rabbit Beta-globulin or the poly (A) signal of the SV40 virus. In early studies of DNA vaccines it was found that the negative result studies would go into the category of future developmental research projects in gene therapy. During the studies of poly (A) signaling of the SV40 for WNV vaccines, it was observed that WNV will lie dormant in individuals who were exposed to chicken pox, thus upon exposure to WNV aerial vaccines the potential for the release of chicken pox virus would cause a greater risk to having adult onset Shingles.
CALIFORNIA AERIAL SPRAYING for WNV and SV40
In February 2009 to present date, aerial spraying for the WNV occurred in major cities within the State of California. During spraying of Anaheim, CA a Caucasian female (age 50) was exposed to heavy spraying, while doing her daily exercise of walking several miles. Heavy helicopter activity occurred for several days in this area. After spraying, she experienced light headedness, nausea, muscle aches and increased low back pain. She was evaluated for toxicological mechanisms that were associated with pesticide exposure due to aerial spraying utilizing advanced biological monitoring testing. The test results which included protein band testing utilizing Protein Coupled Response (PCR) methods were positive for KD-45. KD-45 is the protein band for SV-40 Simian Green Monkey virus. Additional tests were performed for Epstein-Barr virus capside and Cytomeglia virus which are used in bioengineering for gene delivery systems through viral protein envelope and adenoviral protein envelope technology. The individual was positive for both; indicating a highly probable exposure to a DNA vaccination delivery system through nasal inhalation.
In other words, if you cannot prevail in the court of public opinion, then simply spray the public without their consent. What's of interest here is that (1) the article confirms the reality of spraying, (2) shows a rather provocative picture of an airplane in "spraying mode", which defies the dismissive explanation of simple "condensation contrails", and (3) most importantly, offers details of what is contained in the chemicals being sprayed, and thus (4) suggests that at least one agenda concerns experimentation on vaccination and genetic modification via spraying involuntary subjects.
Other researchers who are far more informed on the subject of chemtrails than I have suggested other possibilities for the spraying, from increasing the electrical conductivity of the atmospheric cavity as a component of exotic energy defense (or offense) systems, to comprehensive efforts to geo-engineer either the atmosphere, the Earth itself, or both, to actual genetic manipulation of large swaths of the human population.
Throw in involuntary vaccination and one has quite a list of even more extended possibilities.
Herewith my first high octane speculation on the subject: given all the enumerated possibilities that various people have proposed for this activity, I suspect that the phenomenon must be viewed whole, i.e., that all the various hypotheses - terraforming and geoengineering of the environment (including weather modification), genetic modification, vaccination, and so on - serve some common over-arching agenda. The scale and enormity of the project plus the fact that it arose rather quickly in past years suggest - at least to me - that the activity is being provoked by some perceived threat. I suspect, though not being terribly familiar with the subject, without much evidence, that perhaps this means it is being done under some sort of duress. And I strongly suspect, again without evidence, that this might have something to do with space, and perhaps even with the strange events we've seen taking place in Antarctica (recall that many visitors to the polar continent have had to be medically evacuated and briefly quarantined). The latter thought is provoked by the strange coincidence of the rise of spraying in the years that strange events were allegedly occurring at the Russian Antarctic mission exploring Lake Vostok some years ago, and also more or less concurrently with President Clinton's well known announcement of the possible discovery of fossilized microbial life from Mars allegedly discovered in a meteor from... Antarctica. Many have speculated that this activity is part of some vast de-population agenda, but that hypothesis I don't think has much traction, since the spraying began years ago and continues, with no overall reduction in the rate of population.
I fully realize I'm connecting quite a few dots here as I'm "thinking out loud" and speculating on the subject. But I cannot help the feeling that the Australian project and the public explanation for it is just that, a public explanation for an activity, that may conceal a very different one.
But in the meantime, the details of the article seem, at least to my mind, to confirm one thing: the phenomenon is real, and it is serious.
See you on the flip side...