OWNING YOUR DNA…

Regular readers of my books and of this site know that I have maintained there is a connection between the ideas of ancient interplanetary wars, ETs, UFOs, human and animal sacrifice, missing money (in the trillions of dollars), and the idea of a tribute or tithe. The way I see it, these things are linked, and part of a very ancient "agenda" or "policy", if you will. If these memes and ideas don't seem immediately or intuitively related, then consider how some of them - UFOs and abortion, viewed as a sacrifice - for example, merge in the dubious "character" of Hillary Clinton, who like her husband, has an interest in the former and defends the latter. Then add to this mix something that I pointed out at the Secret Space Program conference in Bastrop, Texas in 2015: the proliferation of quick genome sequencing technologies, now taken to the point of allowing sequencing in the field to a certain degree, without having to send samples to labs and wait for the results.

As I pointed out then, the FBI has demonstrated a (understandable) interest in the technology. At Bastrop, I speculated that this interest might stem from a suspicion that our "extraterrestrial cousins", if they exist at all, might be here and walking among us, and that the only way to distinguish them from humans would be genetically. In that context, I also pointed out - specifically - the rise of companies that do sequencing for a fee, and then based on comparisons with known haplogroups, tell you "where you're from", like Ancestry.com.

But during that conference I also raised the issue of patenting of DNA chimeras - literal DNA ownership - that is taking place, a subject I raised in even greater detail in my book Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men. Under current US patent law, which is similar in its standards to most nations' patent law, an object or technique is patentable if it arose from the hand of man(i.e., not the hand of God or natural evolutionary processes), and if it is reproducible by the hand of man by following a precise technique. Under these standards, genetic chimeras - organisms that have been created by genetic engineering and that do not occur naturally - have already been patented.

Yes, that's right: corporations now own certain genetically engineered life forms.

The problem, as I pointed out in Bastrop, and in the book, was that if one takes certain ancient texts literally, such as Genesis 6, or various Mesopotamian texts, then mankind himself arises precisely from such a process of genetic engineering as the "sons of God" mix it up with "the daughters of men" with the result - depending on which version one reads - that one has a race of "giants" or modern homo sapiens sapiens. That, in turn, poses the question, who, under these patent law standards, owns us? (And as I pointed out in Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men, how would they demonstrate standing, and what court would have jurisdiction to hear it? And  what about the "course of performance", since the owner(s) hasn't/haven't pressed a claim for a while... or has/have he/they?)

Now, consider all this context as you contemplate this article which was noticed by a few people this past week:

Ancestry.com takes DNA ownership rights from customers and their relatives

The title of the article might be somewhat misleading, as the actual main text states this:

The family history website Ancestry.com is selling a new DNA testing service called AncestryDNA. But the DNA and genetic data that Ancestry.com collects may be used against “you or a genetic relative.” According to its privacy policies, Ancestry.com takes ownership of your DNA forever. Your ownership of your DNA, on the other hand, is limited in years.

It seems obvious that customers agree to this arrangement, since all of them must “click here to agree” to these terms. But, how many people really read those contacts before clicking to agree? And how many relatives of Ancestry.com customers are also reading?

There are three significant provisions in the AncestryDNA Privacy Policy and Terms of Service to consider on behalf of yourself and your genetic relatives: (1) the perpetual, royalty-free, world-wide license to use your DNA; (2) the warning that DNA information may be used against “you or a genetic relative”; (3) your waiver of legal rights.

The point about number (1) here is that you still own your DNA, but Ancestry.com gets to use it - and sell or rent it - to anyone it pleases, without having to pay you(or your estate) any royalty for doing so. And this implies, under number (3), that it is in cahoots as the DNA database of first resort for the government. Now, before I go on, is it just me, or does anyone else get the firm whiff of Mormonism in the background? Consider the following:

The Ancestry.com DNA testing service promises to analyze approximately 700,000 genetic markers. According to Ancestry.com, the service, “combines advanced DNA science with the world’s largest online family history resource to predict your genetic ethnicity and help you find new family connections.” The results of an AncestryDNA analysis include information about “ethnicity across 26 regions/ethnicities and identifies potential relatives through DNA matching to others who have taken the AncestryDNA test.”

Oh, gee, lookee lookee what Wikipedia says (Ancestry.com):

Ancestry.com LLC is a privately held Internet company based in Lehi, Utah, United States. The largest for-profit genealogy company in the world, it operates a network of genealogical and historical record websites focused on the United States and nine foreign countries

Now consider point number  (3), which puts that ownership thing even more abruptly:

Specifically, by submitting DNA to AncestryDNA, you agree to “grant AncestryDNA and the Ancestry Group Companies a perpetual, royalty-free, world-wide, transferable license to use your DNA, and any DNA you submit for any person from whom you obtained legal authorization as described in this Agreement, and to use, host, sublicense and distribute the resulting analysis to the extent and in the form or context we deem appropriate on or through any media or medium and with any technology or devices now known or hereafter developed or discovered.”

In other words, your DNA becomes perpetual property, and so, presumably, therefore, would anyone cloned from it. In other words, viewed a certain way, the whole operation could be putting together a kind of "ark" of DNA samples, to be "resurrected" via cloning after some catastrophe, in which one's clone becomes chattel property of a corporation. And, incidentally, one could conceivable use DNA samples to "resurrect" - Russian Cosmism style - one's ancestors, who would also be property.

Consider also the insurance nightmare genetic information poses:

For example, a young woman named Theresa Morelli applied for individual disability insurance, consented to release of her medical records through the Medical Information Bureau (a credit reporting agency for medical history), and was approved for coverage. One month later, Morelli’s coverage was cancelled and premiums refunded when the insurer learned her father had Huntington’s disease, a genetic illness.

Startlingly, the Medical Information Bureau (MIB) used Morelli’s broad consent to query her father’s physician, a doctor with whom she had no prior patient relationship. More importantly, the applicant herself wasn’t diagnosed with Huntington’s carrier status, but she suffered exclusion on the basis of a genetic predisposition in her family.

Hovering behind all such abuses, and even ownership claims, is, I suspect, a much older, and far deeper agenda, and the last time I looked, our lives did not come with power of attorney to assign them to someone else. Indeed, if one takes those old texts at their word, there's only One Claimant with legal title, and He didn't sign it over under a power of attorney... all other claimants, including Ancestry.com, are false, and have no standing, and the courts to which they appeal have no jurisdiction in the matter.

See you on the flip side...

 

38 thoughts on “OWNING YOUR DNA…”

  1. I’ve got friends and family who jumped on the ancestry.com train and eagerly sent their DNA off in the mail. I was a lot more skeptical.

    The Mormon’ s have been collecting genealogy records since the 1800’s under the guise of a religious ritual where they baptize the dead. Now they market data, collude with the FBI, and “own” individuals’ DNA.

    Considering their former, and at times current, practice of polygamy, I can’t help but think The Church of LDS wasn’t a kind of eugenics program from it’s inception.

  2. around 9 years ago I looked into 23andme, and I found a similar clause, summarised by George Carlin (RIP) as “they own you”. I discovered the founder of that firm, Anne Wojcicki, to be married to Sergei Brinn, Google (“Google is God” – Jeff Rense) founder… ’nuff said.
    funny at the time they were not taking any customers from NY. perhaps forcing them to go to more kosher , underground, sources, you know, like where they get their vacinnes from with the same old 1/10,000 autism rates, like the rest of us used to have.
    23andme also had just stopped handing out useful information (reports) with their data, just the data dump, which the customer can use as they wish (but they still own you).
    10 to 1 bet that when and if we get affordable sequencers for the home they will make it like 3d printers, currently illegal in australia to own the data to print a gun, or licence of photocopiers in China in the Tianamen era.
    I’d prefer to go with the Bladerunner empathy test, so as not to discriminate against all good people, or just all ‘people’.
    apparently the key is in the mitochondrial DNA anyway.

  3. The more you step-back and ‘feel’ at corporations, the more the energy feels wrong. I do not mean this as with individual corporations; I mean it with the underlying concepts/roots. (Try it sometime. Just relax and ‘feel’ into something with no preconceptions. Surprising results, sometimes. And DO set-up whatever ‘safeguards’ you deem appropriate – beforehand.)

    Something feels really ‘off’ at Source with corporations. It does not feel human-based. Literally. With its lack of in-based moral code and lack of heart and higher values, it appears to be ‘foreign’. Whether this is AI in origin, reptilian or grey in origin, or coming-down from the darkside regions, it feels like a small ‘subroutine’ meant to gradually over-write human values. Subtle, but growing like a cancer in the background. It is a ‘clear and present danger’ to humanity, in my mind…

    Interesting, also, about the location of Ancestry.com LLC – “a privately held Internet company based in Lehi, Utah.” One can speculate on the Mormon/Anunnaki/intelligence connections – and why…

    I suspect that the big push from the PTB to get humans to ‘re-frame’ from a spiritual to a materialist point-of-view is precisely the ownership of the body. From the top-down, ‘ownership’ of the body is from all-God on down through the soul. We are, in effect, ‘channeling God’ with all that implies. From the bottom-up, one can introduce all kinds of smoke-screens about the body being legalistically-owned. No top-down, thank you. Hence, the push to atheism/agnosticism (including through corporate control)…

    Fortunately, when the BIG guys/gals step-in (i.e., high spiritual types), there will be no debate. The fans will be switched-on, and the ‘smoke’ will clear. To the detriment of the smoke-blowers…

  4. The Mormon church began collecting genealogy data soon after it’s beginning in order to “baptize” the unbaptized, or so their mythology goes. I think the myth was to cover up their real eugenic purpose. Ancestory.com is the internet marketing of the LDS eugenics database.

    I was suspicious as soon as they came out with their DNA service, but I’ve got friends and family members who signed up right away.

    From today’s Daily Mail, is a story on billionaire space mogul, Robert Bigelow’s certainty that aliens are among us.

    First, enemies, then asteroids, then space alien enemies. Ka-ching.

  5. And that kind of insidious nosing around in people’s lives is one more reason why corporations should be removed from the healthcare system. They are worse than a dictatorship.

    One way to help pay for healthcare would be to make ALL health expenses tax deductible, including alternative care, for everyone (like corporations already have it).

  6. marcos toledo

    Slavery is the only word that covers this story. Livestock is what our overlords have always thought of the rest of us. Biological objects to be used anyway they please for whatever purpose they desire.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      In the 21st Century version of slavery, one must first serve as an intern. You must suffer all kinds of indignities and pointless errands for them. You’ll be carrying their urine samples to their master’s doctors. Do some of their heavy lifting that will leave you with very severe back pains. All without even slave ages. Very advanced will be our 21st Century.

  7. Law is a rather strange beast which has undergone some radical evolutionary changes due to man and the influence of some absolutely dark powers. Today it ranges from black (do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law) to white (the 10 commandments or common law) and every “color” in between.
    The world now operates under the law merchant or Admiralty Law and “color of law” is used rather than law itself. Everything is now contract law. You have the ability to endlessly contract or endlessly refuse to contract. However, since the “law” has its own language and requires its own dictionary to define what common words mean in legal terms, how are you to know when you have contracted or not. This is by design and those who have designed it do not have your best interests at heart. It all comes down to commerce; commerce is all about the money; and the system used is the ancient Babylonian “money magic”. Those behind it now essentially own the entire earth and they got it for nothing for their “money” comes from thin air and their entire system is based on fraud.
    Christ was right to toss the moneylenders out of the temple, he understood where it would eventually lead.

    1. Phil the Thrill

      Mr. Dead: there are those who point out that the Luciferian Creed is usually only partially quoted. The full quote is, “As long as it harms no one, do what thou wilt.” I share an interesting excerpt from “The Opening of the Way”, by Isha Schwaller de Lubicz. (She was Renee’s research assistant, and later accepted his proposal of marriage.)
      “Man has three levels of consciousness: the Automaton, the Permanent Witness, the Spiritual Witness.
      “The Automaton is the mortal being, physical, emotional, and mental…
      “There are…two witnesses to the existence of this intelligent Automaton, and these are the two nonmortal states of consciousness. These two witnesses record, generally unnoticed by the Automaton, the impressions which affect it, and both provoke reactions whose origin and value are unknown to the Automaton…
      “The Permanent Witness has the aspect of personality…This witness is the Osirian element in man, and must undergo renewal through the cycles of Becoming. As such it desires the continuation of personal experience.
      “The Spiritual Witness has the spiritual aspect of the incarnate being, his spiritual Name, his highest form of consciousness…It is the Horus element in his evolution, because it desires to liberate him from the karmic chains of Becoming by unifying his levels of consciousness.
      “These two immortal witnesses correspond to the two angels which Christian tradition gives a man to advise him, the good or guardian angel and the ‘bad angel.’ The bad angel is the Permanent Witness, the permanent awareness of ‘I’, which witnesses a man’s reactions to the experiences of life and how he resists the control of his higher consciousness…its listening post is in the brain.
      “The second is the Spiritual Witness, which is impartial because it is totally independent of the personality. The personality is only its vehicle of incarnation, and the object of the necessary transmutation to accomplish the task of the Christian and Horian redemption, for this redemption is attained by uniting the divine within the human…its listening post is the occult center called the Spiritual Heart.” (By the by, Stephen Herrod Buhner has written a few books wherein he argues brilliantly that the heart is an organ of perception.)

      I suspect that the warped practice of Satanism has something to do with the errant, wishful apotheosis of the Permanent Witness, to the attempted exclusion of the Spiritual Witness.

      1. @Phil – Careful, you’re confusing Luciferian Doctrine with Thelama. Crowley came from the Masons and created OTO to steal Rosicrusian intiation rites.. Its more about Eygptien black magic and making yourself into a god, than adulating some other ‘greater power’.. Crowley also goes onto to claim that you may harm another, even another Thelamist, if by doing so, you are fulfilling your desire to become a ‘superstar’.
        Even raping a child can be acceptable if its to indoctinate the child into adult life and debarrassing the child of its delusions. However Crowley was an evil man who liked to rape young boys, so you can imagine how he managed to justify his own perversions to himself.
        Luciferian Doctrine is all about your own personal pleasure, the acquisistion of earthly goods and wealth, and pleasure dedicated to.. what ought to be.. (if we read and believe the bible) the only entity who claims to be a God, who’s actually on Earth. It’s also about the denial of the goodness of Yahweh and how Lucifer is the only being who told the truth to Eve.

        Satanism is essentially the practise of worshipping the ‘opponent’ which the Isrealiens were exposed to when they sent packing to Babylon. (which I can understand as slaves poking a hot stick in the eyes of their capters..) Judaism before the exile had no concept of opponent nor ‘evil to be overcome’..
        That’s essentially a Zoroastrianistic concept… along with free will, heaven and hell and the supreme fight good against evil.. Before Nebuchadnezzar’s rampage against Jehoiakim, as I understand it, (which isnt saying much) Judaism.. sorry, 1st temple Judaism.. was essentially a amalgam of caananite religions, influenced by the Eygptien’s coming in with their monotheism. And Caananite religions were pretty big on child sacrifice.. The Moabites were pretty hot for necromancy, divination and burning babies in ovens with bulls heads… and they did it in a place which was called later Hill of Skulls..

        Personally I dont believe in divinities. (its a personal choice and I respect yours) I do believe that our ancestors saw real things that made them believe in magic which later became ritualised dogma, which in turn created priesthoods, which in turn maintained religion.

        However… the real problem is not what I believe. Its what other people believe and how it influences their actions and decisions. Look at how much damage Occultism did to the Nazi Party.. I’d say the modern day equivalence is Thelema for politiciens (and Hollywood ‘superstars’)

    2. Robert Barricklow

      Christ was crucified and…
      The Money Lenders bought the Temple
      & Earth – with money from nothing.

      1. Who do you think will win in the end? There will be no bribing the judge with any amount of money.

    3. It led to the moneylenders ganging up with the priesthood to sell the local terrorist/rebel leader to the Roman Invaders. Thank you Philistines.

  8. Phil the Thrill

    This subject of who owns our bodies is a fascinating one, and fraught with disinformation. The phrase, “sovereign citizen” is one such dis-informational blurbs; this phrase is every bit as oxymoronic as “fiscal accountability” or “government intelligence”.
    This subject is a touchy one as well, as it tends to highlight a rift in the Church that has long been fiercely debated (an understatement): is the Christ the only begotten Son of God, or are we all Sons and Daughters of the Most High, as the Christ seemed to suggest in John chapter 10? I understand that for some, the question has already been settled and to raise it again is a heretical act.
    We have the unlimited right to contract. The Supreme Court recognized this. The folks who brought us covenant/contract law know this. But I didn’t know this until I started looking into the matter. PROOF OF CLAIM is a big deal, and if we politely but firmly request that those who press a claim against us provide such proof, THAT is where we just might find things getting vedy, vedy, intedesting.

    1. Contract law implies some sort of parity between the signatories. But this is seldom the case in relations between the corporate world and the single person.

        1. Robert Barricklow

          Phil, I’m rather thrilled my comment/reply to your post was moderated.
          I sincerely do hope I touched someone’s nerve.

    2. Robert Barricklow

      One the Devos/Prince family would like to see become extremely blurry[Church/State]. Dick DeVos forlornly looks at the many communities in our country where the church has been displaced by the public schools[Thank God!].
      Of course, under Trump, Heavens to Betsy – is trying to set that clock back – to where the Church. is once again, The school across the USA.

    3. I did read some alien abduction story, it does give me a feeling that it is not the body “they” are interested in, there are many story that “they” actually tempering with the human soul.

      Just think about it, if just simply the body is what they seek, human can now reproduce via artificial womb, no surrogate mother is required, then “they” should also capable of massively product those bio-body with our DNA, why haven’t they?

      Why “they” still assign “shepherd” to “herder” the “sheep”, could this soul process has to be done in a natural way? If the Ancients always talked about Sex is sacred, often preform a large sacred ritual during some particular time of the year at a specific place, then the community wide sexual engagement was encouraged after the ritual. Could this activate also a form of Alchemical process of philosopher stone? The Sacred Creation of Life?

      I also hear of story about those so call alien were actually came from the future, because of their technological achievement is extremely advance, they were too depending on it, so the result of them are De-soul, therefore, they are here to seek of solution on human to save their species, etc. etc.

      I have this strange feeling that they can produce or replicate any human body through artificial womb in a factory scale mass production, but all they will produce will be meat robot without a soul, and the funny thing is that they pushing the Robotic like Society agenda, try to make human less and less human like, are they “committing suicide” or what? LOL

      1. Eve, there are several story-lines about humans who were ‘refined’ genetically to where they were no longer viable. The most apropos here is reports about the Greys, who show little emotional ‘body’ or compassion. Some report them as true aliens; some report them as time-traveling humans from our future.

        There is a little gem of a movie called “The Last Mimzi” (2007). In it, far-future humans have edited-out crucial genetics and have sent-back ‘camouflaged’ technical marvels to get DNA samples. One of my favorite movies, and actually POSITIVE!

        There are also the ‘Observers’ from later years of the TV series “Fringe.” These ‘future men’ finally decide to take-over present humanity, as they have no genetic future. They finally find a solution in present-day genetics of a ‘mutant’ that can give them back empathy/compassion.

        There is much in the literature about the necessity of the Soul for human bodies. Test-tube babies have already shown that Souls will go-to test-tube babies (at least, there are no reported ‘differences’). It is assumed that artificial wombs will not impede a Soul who wants to drop-into such a situation. But, what are the limits? Where does a given Soul ‘just say No’ and refuse to enter a body?

        I am assuming that pre-insertion Souls have a ‘briefing’ that tells them their probable future in that body. Then, they make their choice…

        1. I see what you mean, test-tube baby some how will still go back to his/her mother or surrogate mother’s womb, not really out of the artificial womb, if we check out the story regarding the Sumerian making human body, they also use surrogate mother, if the story is real, they also create many monster, I really don’t think those monster were born of the Anunnaki surrogate mother, but then again, why must use Anunnaki Surrogate mother for human? What is the different between an artificial womb and a human surrogate mother?

          I have this feeling, if parents are those very loving and sympathy type, their children should enjoy a loving and happy childhood, which in the future, they will be also very loving and sympathy, I do hear some water researcher said it is the memories in the water carry down generation by generation, rather this is true or not, I have no idea, but loving parents most likely have loving children, not all, but most likely.

          Since many researcher said – Human is a Race who has Alzheimer, then imagine few batch of those artificial womb born babies, are they still capable of loving and sympathy? For “Stormtrooper” maybe, for “goods” delivery? I’m very skeptic.

      2. if aliens ARE abducting us for DNA samples, they’re probably looking at our ‘junk’ DNA which shouldnt be there.. it would be like Alexander the Great mating with Monkey’s when he across India and our Anthopologists today are DNA sampling the descendants…

  9. As frightening as the Ancestry component is, the role of the government three lettered and four lettered acronym bearing agencies are busily collecting massive amounts of DNA from physicians all over the world. Just wait until they open that database to Ancestry for the integration of research opportunities and crime enforcement/prevention services, thus fulfilling the DNA component of PD’s Pre-Crime Division.

    1. Oops. I forgot to select all and click. Here is the full text I intended to post:

      As frightening as the Ancestry component is, the role of the government three lettered and four lettered acronym bearing agencies is just as chilling. According to this article these agencies are busily collecting massive amounts of DNA from physicians all over the world. Just wait until they open that database to Ancestry for the integration of research opportunities and crime enforcement/prevention services, thus fulfilling the DNA component of PD’s Pre-Crime Division.

  10. Yep, but it wasnt the psychotic (kill your son and chop off pieces of your flesh for my covenant…) desert shepard real estate agent (its the promised land..you just have to kill everyone on it in order to have it.) who created us.. It was EA.

    Seeing as there was no ‘copyright’ at the time.. Moral responsability was thrown out the window as Ea and his half-sister (its important that ‘half’) played about with creating freaks and mutants just to see ‘what would happen’.. Makes you wonder why our genus has so many ‘genetic illnesses’

    This article is, if anything, another glorifying hymnn to the power of the Corporation (any corporation.. I’m not trhinking of anyone in particuler) and their ability to completely ignore anything ressembling morals and their capacity to change laws in order to protect themselves. and their products in order to make money.

    Once upon a time, the law existed to protect people. Not corporations..

  11. anakephalaiosis

    Tower of Babble has – by creating Golem Inc. – no power over soul, because quintessence follows a cyclical logic of it’s own, while possessing stargates of friends and foes.

    Allegorically speaking, a fleshed logos is made of four elements, as symbolic operators in analogue computer. Both output and input are quintessential. Soul machine is analogue computer.

    Christianity shows the way: “Analogue computer processes fleshed logos in it’s own linux; in the linux of analogue computer is it processed.” Genesis 1:27.

    1. Speaking of Christianity, I heard the most amazing, very random summary of Russian Christian Orthodoxy on a radio station I’d never heard of this afternoon. It sounded utterly brilliant.
      (I was raised Anglican and can’t bear it.)

  12. Instead of go around randomly took DNA sample from the individual, waiting for the “fish” automatically come into the trap maybe isn’t a all too bad idea, save a lot of money and resource, specially personal consent that attached to it!

    But then again, if an individual is valuable to them, they will collect DNA from that individual with or without that individual’s consent, even murdering that individual is not a big deal to them anyway.

    Often I feel like, these black OP like the “shepherd”, and we as the “sheep”, as long as they deliver their “services” / “goods” to the “master” / “owner”, they are safe, and still on the job, otherwise, who knows what will come to them.

    On the other hand, I do curious about – When they ran out of right type of “sheep”, will the “master” / “owner” accept those artificial one come out of the artificial womb/bag. Scary thought isn’t it? To them of course ROFL!

  13. Though Disney would like patent exclusivity to be forever to protect Mickey & co., there are limits and they do eventually expire and fall into the public domain. Drug patents are very short — under 20 years, IIRC. So these patented DNA sequences are exclusively owned for only a period before becoming public. The idea behind patents is, obviously, to allow the inventor to recoup investment and to make a suitable profit for their innovation and effort.

    No intellectual property can be owned in perpetuity. I hope galactic patent law is similar.

  14. Like space law, this is another frontier of the legal profession. And for the moment, the “dark side” seems to be pushing them.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Even now, here on terra firma, the 21st Century bureaucrats want plaintiffs to submit claims online[w/o biological lawyers, but bots(various software programs); then whatever payments the bot judge[corporate fascist proprietary software] promptly sends -but on the condition he or she waives his rights to litigate and accepts less than what he is owed. The Corporations save both real lawyer fees and litigated insurance payouts, saving on both ends.
      Dana, this new inste too sionel ized bureaucratic autocracy is displacing every democratic accountability that it can get away with – including one’s own DNA.
      This is the new world orders bureaucratic inste too sionel ized DNA.

Comments are closed.