TIDBIT: INDONESIAN “HOBBITS” NOT DESCENDED FROM HOMO ...

May 7, 2017 / Joseph P. Farrell /

If you've been following the fascinating story about the Indonesian "hobbits", here's one for you:

ANU researchers discount theory Indonesian hobbits evolved from Homo erectus

Posted in Tidbits

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

8 Comments

marcos toledo on May 7, 2017 at 11:06 am

This does bring up the question of when the homo species how and many types of human develop and are these variants were and still are there in existence today.
- marcos toledo on May 7, 2017 at 4:31 pm
  
  Could Homo-floresiensis still be around could only now it’s Orang Pendak?
  - enki-nike on May 13, 2017 at 8:49 am
    
    Gulliver’s travels?
Phil the Thrill on May 7, 2017 at 9:29 am

There is a recent book by Dr. Susan Martinez called “The Mysterious Origins Of Hybrid Man” which some, especially those who admire the amorous exploits of Captain Kirk, may find interesting.
- DanaThomas on May 8, 2017 at 10:51 am
  
  The “Hybrid Man” book sounds interesting.
  - Phil the Thrill on May 8, 2017 at 2:47 pm
    
    It is. Unfortunately, Dr. Martinez suffers from acute credibility due to her credentials from Columbia University. For those who like their sources to be a little more from the wiggy side, I offer this excerpt from Stewart Swerdlow’s “Blue Blood, True Blood” (SS is a self-described Hyperspace Healer, and claims to be a victim of MK Ultra mind control. Super wiggy!):
    “The shapeshifting Reptilian Bluebloods asked the Sirians for help with the daily maintenance of their human forms. The Sirians determined that feeding the (Reptilian-human) hybrids human hormones and blood in an altered animal form would be the easiest way to do it unnoticed by the population.
    “The sacrificial animal used by most Middle Eastern people was the wild boar, so the Sirians chose it as the basis for this new animal hybrid. Human genetics were mixed with those of the wild boar to create the domesticated pig. This animal was served daily to the Bluebloods as a method of temporarily maintaining their human form until they could use an actual human in a sacrificial ceremony.
    “Because the domesticated pig is a combination of human and animal genetics, eating it is a form of cannibalism. This explains why the Hebrews considered it unclean to eat. This is also why the pig is considered to be the most intelligent animal on Earth, why pig skin can be grafted directly onto humans in burn cases, and why pig heart valves can be used in humans with little difficulty…..”
    - Tim H on May 8, 2017 at 3:31 pm
      
      That SS is a French fry short of a Happy Meal. Wasn’t the pig considered unclean because it had a cloven hoof, but didn’t chew the cud ala Leviticus? But then again I suppose Leviticus isn’t much better.
      Anyway go the ANU! I spent way too much time in the bar.
      - Phil the Thrill on May 9, 2017 at 9:32 am
        
        I merely offer Mr. Swerdlow’s words as food for thought, Tim. After all, I myself have forked a lot of pork down my gullet. I have no idea how much, but a reasonable estimate might be, oh….three, or eight……maybe 20, or so, of my porcine friends (cousins?) Now, I don’t mean a whole animal at a time, of course–or even in copious amounts; I’m talkin’ about spread over a lifetime. After all, I’m no pig or anything.