VACCINE META-ANALYSIS AND “UNKNOWN ETIOLOGIES”

Sometimes an article comes along that is so well-written and stunning in its implications that I hesitate to blog about it at all, and simply put it into the "tidbits" category in the hopes that people will read it.  This article, shared by Mr. V.T., is one of those articles. Yet I think that if I were to do that people might not read it, and that would be bad. The problem is, however, that anything I might say would mar the implications of the article. The article is long, but the implications are wide and profound. In fact, it's an article that I strongly suspect some of you will save, it's that important, and that good. Nevertheless, I do want to say a few things about the article, both by way of introduction, and my usual commentary on one or two key paragraphs. I would ask that the reader read my blog first, or at least the section "About Meta-Analysis", and then the actual article.

Here's the article:

Diseases with Unknown Etiology Trace Back to Mass Vaccination Against Influenza in 1976

About Meta-Analysis:

That the advent of the internet changed everything has become both a mantra and a truism. What is not widely known by the public is that it created a whole new form of data-analysis called "meta-analysis," and a brief overview of this technique is necessary before reading the article, because the main argument of the article depends to a certain extent on this type of analysis, so it is essential to understand it, and what it can do, and cannot do. We all have a general idea of what scientists do when they analyze data. They "crunch the numbers" that result from their experiments, and then publish those results in professional journals, where other people in that field of science read them and debate the conclusions. That, anyway, is more or less how it's supposed to work. The articles are about the hard data. But as the internet arose, and more and more articles were archived and stored digitally, this opened a whole new way of analyzing data, for with this database and the addition of search engines, it became possible to analyze not the data in the articles, but the number of articles published on defined topics.

As a result, it became possible to look not for causes and effects, which would be more or less the purpose of individual articles themselves, but to look for significant and statistically undissmissible, or statistically significant correlations between types of data.  In other words, meta-analysis is not about causes, but about correlations. It's saying "Look at this relationship, it's significant, it needs examination to see if there is a causal connection." Meta-analysis suggests causal relations on the basis of data correlations.  This is quite the crucial point, as the author of this article, James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., does not fall into the trap of deducing causes from correlations. Indeed, as we'll see, he even avoids the trap of saying "Vaccines are bad", but rather suggests that certain compounds and elements found in certain types of vaccines are the real root of the problem (e.g., Thimerosol, aluminum, &c.). One would be hard-pressed to debate that conclusion, for Jenner's small pox vaccine, for example, did not contain Thimerosol and, so far as I'm aware, aluminum or any of the other compounds or elements that have been identified as problematical over the past few years. The technique of vaccination is not the problem; the content of individual vaccines is. With this in mind, we turn to

Lyon-Weiler's Meta-Analysis of Diseases with Unknown Etiology

With these thoughts in mind, here is Lyon-Weiler's basic meta-analysis in his own words:

Crohn’s. Lupus. Autism. ADHD. Food allergies. Celiac disease. Sjögren’s syndrome. Polymyalgia rheumatica. Multiple sclerosis. Anklyosing spondylitis. Type 1 diabetes. Vasculitis. Peripheral neuropathy. The list goes on, and on, and on. We are being increasingly diagnosed with these conditions and diseases of unknown origin, and science has very little to say — why would autoimmune diseases and mysterious diseases of inflammation be so prevalent? When did this increase start?

As an observer and participant in modern biomedical research, and a lover of deep history, I tend to focus not on the immediate or last few years, but look for trends of accumulating risk over longer periods of time. Seeking an answer to the question of “when”, I used Pubmed to estimate, per yer, the number of studies and papers discussing diseases and conditions of unknown origin. I search for the term “unknown causes”, and also for the term “journal” to get some idea of the percentage of studies, papers and editorials discussing disease of unknown causes. I had no idea what to expect.

Lyons-Weiler did two searches, first for articles with the word "journal", and then:

Next I searched for “Unknown Causes”, and calculated the number of articles citing unknown causes per 10,000 articles (again, relative denominator term).

What I found is shocking. Here is a graph of the number of articles per 10,000 discussing “unknown causes” (Y = #articles mentioning “unknown causes” / #articles mentioning “journal”, as in the title of journals).

Because the studies in Pubmed include all sorts of journals studying all sorts of things, the actual number is not as important as the trend. The signature is undeniable. Something changed dramatically in 1976. To the skeptic: the increase is greater if one does not correct for total publications.

Ca. 1975-76, something drastically changed: the number of articles about "new" diseases with unknown origins began a sharp upward rise, as evidenced in Lyons-Weiler's graph, and that trend has continued to this day. The question then, is what happened in that time period that might correlate with this dramatic rise? Lyons-Weiler does not mince words:

What changed was national mass vaccination against influenza.

At this juncture in the article, Lyons-Weiler cites a long excerpt from David Sencer's and J. Donald Millar's "Reflections on the 1976 Swine flu vaccination program." Lyons-Weiler's conclusions tell the whole story:

The “Reflections” article, on the CDC website, shows that knowledge of risk of autoimmune disorders like Guillain-Barré Syndrome and deaths from vaccination was present from the beginning.

Serious side effects in a minority of patients is rationalized by the benefits of the flu vaccine, and vaccine risk denialism perpetuates the regulation of perception necessary for continuation of the view that the benefits outweigh the risks.

But, at a population level, evidence is mounting that, due to numerous reasons, mass influenza vaccination is self-defeating.

He does not leave it there however, and pinpoints specific areas that need careful scientific attention, and I cite only a few of his specific points:

(2) Vaccination with Thimerosal induces immunological damage. Specifically, Thimerosal inhibits the protein ERAP1, which shortens proteins headed for the cell surface of MHC Class 1 [“Stamogiannos et al., 2016 Screening Identifies Thimerosal as a Selective Inhibitor of Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1″]

(3) Vaccination against Influenza with thimerosal-containing vaccines is associated with an increase in non-influenza respiratory infections [“Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine“]

(4) Repeated vaccination at a young age substantially increases the risk of influenza in older age, by a factor ranging between 1. 2 (vaccination after 50 years) to 2. 4 (vaccination from birth) [“Repeated influenza vaccination of healthy children and adults: borrow now, pay later?“]

...

(13) The evidence that heterologous immunity and very limited efficacy makes universal vaccination against the flu will create more disease than it prevents is impressive. [Why do people get the flu after getting the flu shot?]

...

And his conclusions from citing these and other articles is clear and unequivocal:

Repeated calls for addressing these conundrums fall on deaf ears. The explosion of diseases of mysterious origin — the cost of morbidity and mortality — means there is no excuse for sloppy, lazy vaccinology. The changes needed are known, and there is no excuse. Unsafe epitopes that match human proteins must be removed. Thimerosal must be removed. Aluminum exposure must be minimized.

We desperately need a new generation of technologies for artificial immunization, and those products should (a) not be contracted via the CDC at all, (b) subjected to the same rigorous standards of evidence of safety required of drugs with long-term safety outcomes (total health outcome awareness), (c) vaccine risk denialism must be stopped immediately.

To this I can only add that I've seen it with my own eyes, as I've watched family members  "get their flu shot," and then become sick. Every year around this time we are subjected to campaigns from various companies to get jabbed with the latest big pharma cocktails; special booths are set up in major retail outlets to jab their customers; some states have now made it mandatory, and are rescinding the various exemptions that once existed to protect people's right of choice over their own health care. And as Lyons-Weiler himself points out, health care professionals are often required to take these things.

I don't know about you, but I feel like printing off copies of this article, and handing them out to the people manning these booths in the stores.

See you on the flip side...

 

45 thoughts on “VACCINE META-ANALYSIS AND “UNKNOWN ETIOLOGIES””

  1. All this is happening as mainstream attack poodles, newscasters, consistently bark loudly over global warming and climate change, while Deep State ionospheric heaters torque the chemtrails and unnaturally heat the planet, in endless military experiments; while stealthy aflatoxins[ebola and lasa] binary agents, and genetic-targeting pathogens ride as nano-particles into our lungs and bloodstreams, in a long-term fingerprintless campaign.
    The worldwide IT revolution is synonymous with a. command, control, communication companies weapon systems.
    I could go on and on[as most people at this site]; but suffice to conclude: Government insty tu tions mandated to serve the people, are now certainly more alien than our yesteryear dysopian classics, Big Brother/Brave New World, ever imagined!

  2. Aluminum in vaccines pales in comparison to health effects of micronized aluminum drifting about from chemtrail aerosols. It is probably the #1 contributor to sickness syndromes on the planet. Large portions of the planet’s population now live in what is essentially a bauxite mine.

    https://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/326807
    “Aluminum hydroxide is the main content of the bauxite ore, which is 32-52 percent. Excessive exposure of aluminum hydroxide could be detrimental to health as pain and reddening of the nose, coughing, pain and redness of the skin, along with peeling and itching eyes, are among the significant effects of exposure to bauxite dust.

    Studies have shown that these materials could lead to neurological problems such as chronic brain syndrome, anxiety for no reason, forgetfulness, or Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease in adults.”

    1. Oh absolutely, but they are both deadly. The geoengineering is the biggest crime against humanity ever committed, and done by dark forces that have infiltrated our world.

  3. The accumulated poisons in the air we breathe, the food we eat, water we drink and vaccine injections are approaching the tipping point.
    Tptb are evil indeed and need humanity to serve them. I believe they need our body forms for physical tasks but more importantly is our creative minds. Philosopher William Blake “Satan is a reactor, he never acts, but only reacts. He never sees, but has to be shown”. I believe we humans have the ability, the power, imagination and elan vital to create a better, kinder and loving world. I hope to see someday soon where communities like ours use the group multiplier effect to form an “intent” for the good of all, although it does need to be specific.

      1. Zbd, I would think it similar to long distance healing, you would want to be specific as to what body part you want healed and the more people, (energy/thoughts) involved the greater the resonance.

  4. MASONRY COCKTAIL INJECTION

    Dr. Poison Pill’s Halloween vaccine
    is a witches’ brew drooling cuisine
    made of spider-frog-cats
    into a snake oil schnapps
    concocted in moonshine sublime.

  5. Chapter 16 entitled “Lost Remedies” of Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ book “Dissolving Illusions” contains excellent information for treatment and prevention of all the common illnesses.

    From “Lost Remedies”:

    “In 1918 during the flu epidemic when millions died, an outbreak of influenza aboard a ship appeared to have been successfully controlled through the use of colloidal silver applied to the eyes and nose.”

    “During a part of the month of September, 1918, the ship was moored to a dock at Norfolk, Va. An influenza epidemic was in evidence, so the crew was immediately restricted to ship. Plans were devised by the medical officer by which the disease might be retarded in it’s rapid spread. A prophylactic treatment consisting of colloidal silver, 10 per cent in the eyes and nose twice each daily, proved very successful in every way, as the cases developing in the crew diminished rapidly.” ( W. L. Martin, “Susquehanna,” The Supplement of the United States Naval Medical Bulletin, no. 10, July 1919, p. 77)

    Funny, how we have lost so many common cures and the use of herbs. They were too cheap and effective for big pharma.

  6. I rarely got flu shots…last time I got one was in the spring of 2015…by September of 2015 , I had terrible neuropathy. Unknown cause…..
    I have nerve damage in both legs.
    Hmmmm…………

  7. Starting in the 1970’s Glyphosate use has increased worldwide. Our air, water and soil are contaminated with it. Not only humans but also our cats and dog’s now have more diseases. The dose makes the poison.

    1. Actually it’s a bit more complex than the dose makes the poison. Glyphosate is cumulative. It all depends on the ability of the gastrointestinal tract to retain its cell wall integrity at the tight junctures. There are varying degrees of failure and deterioration. Those who have a “leaky gut” are prone to any number of autoimmune illness because of the foreign food proteins that permeate this membrane.

      Glyphosate mimics it chemical cousin glycine the most prevalent amino acid present (20%) in our cellular makeup. Unlike the wisdom of many bonding sites where the preferred molecule is also the best suited for optimum health (example: the thyroid chooses iodine over bromine), a receptor site prefers glyphosate over glycene because of the formers greater electrical potential.

      The surrogate glyphosate thus imbedded into folded proteins plays havoc especially with the brain and dozens of other area in our bodies including the endocrine glands, joint and connective tissue deterioration, acting as a sleep disruptor via the pineal gland, inhibits production of 4 key essential amino acids, and as you noted destroys the immune system, etc.

      Glyphosate is also to blame for the enormous rise in “gluten sensitivity” because it trashes the said membrane causing IBS, celiac disease, crohns disease, liver gall bladder, kidney damage,

      I compare glyphosate to a house with termites. In the short run, unlike a burning house, the buliding will survive but if not remediated it will in time be destroyed from the inside out,

      1. Hi ts,

        Very interesting, do you have a scientific source for this. I would like to see my feeling about this bad chemical confirmed. Thank you very much.

        1. Hello Herrebout

          On youtube watch interviews with Anthony Samsel, Stephanie Seneff, Dr Zach Bush, Don Huber. A.S. & S.S. have collaborated, writing a total of 5 thesis available for reading on her website.

          1. Thank you,
            Although widely debunked, there appears to be no other defense than the standards that are arbitrarily set and there’s no counterproof, i.e. that it’s not glyphosate the culprit.

            I would like to pull this open towards irritation/disease from petrol based persistent chemicals.

          2. Herrabout, what were u saying is debunked? I wasnt sure in ur last comment. Btw searches of key werds glyphosate with natural news n mercola.com n cornucopia n many others gets u a start.

          3. Hi, well debunked in that when you do a search on the scientists you mention, you do get a plethora of rather agressive counter arguments. I do know there is an active ‘sceptic’ movement trying to silence any enemies of the IG Farben clan. So don’t believe anything that’s on the internet also applies to these sceptics.

            I know of Mercola and I think he presents valuable info.

      2. Any suggestions for detoxing from glyphosate? I’ve recently moved to England and was surprised to learn that despite a very low GM presence farmers all us roundup. Organic farming is compromised due to the overwhelming use of it and was a major rural factor in brexit – farmers resisted the proposed European ban on roundup / glyphosate

        1. Reverse osmosis is said to be the best if not only way to eliminate glyphosate from drinking water.

          Wherever possible buy only “organic” or whatever is the label or standard in Great Britain for food grown without herbicides/pesticides.

          Without sound gut health we are doomed because there’s a need for both a well contained G.I. tract and one with a maximum microbial diversity within. A healthy G.I. tract will have as many as 30-40 thousand diverse bacteria species. You can’t achieve that by just taking the usual narrow spectrum of probiotics. Listen to any number of Dr. Zach Bush’s interviews with various hosts. He sells a brand of refined lignite he calls Restore that seals the tight junctures in the gut and the brain’s blood brain barrier.

          Somewhere in her several interviews Stephanie Seneff mentions a 4 ingredient homemade cocktail for Glyphosate infested cows that is effective in reversing their condition. Presumably it might serve humans well too. You’ll have to find it on your own although I believe Dr. Bush’s Restore will get the job done.

          1. Ts. Try reposting it in smaller pcs. And look out to separate letters to keep from using werds that s. Pa. M filters feel triggered by. Even the letters t. It in a row inside a larger werd can set the bots on ur tail.

        2. Begin with reverse osmosis. It’s said to be the best if not only way to eliminate glyphosate from drinking water.

          Wherever possible buy only “organic” or whatever is the label or standard in Great Britain for food grown without herbicides/pesticides.

          Without sound gut health we are doomed because there’s a need for both a well contained G.I. tract and one with a maximum microbial diversity within. A healthy G.I. tract will have as many as 30-40 thousand diverse bacteria species. You can’t achieve that by just taking the usual narrow spectrum of probiotics. Listen to any number of Dr. Zach Bush’s interviews with various hosts. He sells a brand of refined lignite he calls Restore that seals the tight junctures in the gut and the brain’s blood brain barrier.

          Somewhere in her several interviews Stephanie Seneff mentions a 4 ingredient homemade cocktail for Glyphosate infested cows that is effective in reversing their condition. Presumably it might serve humans well too. You’ll have to find it on your own although I believe Dr. Bush’s Restore will get the job done.

  8. If anyone’s looking for a one-stop shop to get started on researching the problems of vaccines (and this area is a mess), Tatyana Obukhanych’s book “Vaccine Illusions” is available free for the next 4 days:
    https://greenmedinfo.clickfunnels.com/optin18722933
    (the usual “we’ll give you something for free if you let us spam you until you unsubscribe” conditions apply)
    I’ve only given it a cursory look, but it seems to cover a lot of ground and at least provides references. Tatyana Obukhanych has a Ph.D. in immunology.

  9. thank you jf and all for this. a long list of folk like rfk jr, andy wakefield, s humphries, joe mercola, have been working on it for decades from various angles. the facts are so obvious, the biggest curiosity is what monsters do we see behind the curtains that stops us all from drawing them back and telling the truth plainly and all the time.

    curious too is the dancing around by various limited hangout pros like deniro, molyneux, a jones,…. even when they do tell the truth, they usually go back to running whatever op they were confusing folk with before.

    so where can we get further ahead with this and all the other false paradigms that are starting to not so slowly cook us while we argue? 5g network much anyone?

    1. ZDB: “…what monsters do we see behind the curtains that stops us all from drawing them back and telling the truth plainly and all the time?”

      Wonder how many too-inquisitive folks get drawn behind the curtain and have a ‘close encounter’ with a gray, reptilian, or such?

  10. Forgot to mention earlier today that autism researcher Dr. Jeff Bradstreet one of the now some 80 “dead doctors” had discovered that the Gc protein inhibiting enzyme called nagalese was being put in vaccines.
    https://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html
    Also, those bad guys must have been worried during the late 1990s when that upward vector started to level off a bit. But not for long: enter glyphosate into vaccines and the trend resumed.

  11. The mass inoculation of 1918 was the cause of the worldwide pandemic.
    This is just history repeating/rhyming once again.
    Soon, they’ll inoculate through chemtrails, through foods, thru coke, through salt & pepper, & through… ?

    Nothing is past these baffoons.

    1. Especially when combined with the scourge of bayer at the time. Alotta them new rockhead docs suggested aspirin to reduce temp against all homeopathic and good sense. Deadly combunation

  12. There’s another correlation with those charts from the Medium piece:

    During later 1970s and in the 1980s in the USA, home/office smoke detectors became something people installed, and those devices became much more prevalent over the last 20 years.

    What’s the problem you say? Almost all smoke detectors use the man-made radioactive element Americium. That definitely stresses subtle fields, much like microwaves.

    Also over the last 30 years use of composite “wood” beams and flooring has vastly increased, and those things outgas for years . Though at least some plywood no longer has formaldehyde in it.

    Just saying there are a lot of other correlations not noted here.

  13. I’ll give the flu shot full credit if goes a long way toward getting people to look at that vaccine critically. If I understand correctly, recent research is finding that the vaccinated (for influenza) release up to 6 times more aerosalyzed viral particulates than non-vaccinated. They appear to have higher risk for non-influenza infections than non-vaccinated, and increased risk for influenza (pandemic or new strains particularly) in succeeding years…and who knows at this point what the long term risks of an annual injection of mercury is (I’m guessing increased risk of alheizmers, dementia, stroke and heart disease, obesity, lots of other “immune-mediated” disorders…).

    FWIW, 1976 is also the year U.S. (I think) dentistry started using high copper mercury “silver” amalgam formulations (reported to release the mercury far more quickly than older formulations).

    And now we’re pulsing these metals in us with increasing amounts EM radiation…

  14. Commendable investigation this, and one for the archives.

    Dr Suzanne Humphries, not a sloppy researcher herself, tells a convincing story that lets the air out of the smallpox and polio sacred cows. Worth a look on youtube.

  15. It’s not directly about the money, it’s about reducing the population. Making us sick and weak so our bodies cannot defend against new diseases.
    There is, however, loads of data that show the MMR is a fraud. So with that one we have lovely adjuvants and the vaccine itself fraudulently administered.
    Then we have big pharma. If 3 jabs don’t do it (MMR) then simply add another jab.
    With Trump’s latest move on vaccines and Mr Kennedy in the game now it looks like the heydays of big pharma are ending.
    As “Q” says in the Qanon blog, how sick can these people get.

  16. Some other thoughts;

    Jenner’s “vaccine” involved essentially surface skin scratching with infectious material, not deep injection into the muscle. It was essentially a way to infect a healthy person in a less serious manner. That is why it “worked” in comparison to other vaccines. It allowed the normal immune system functions to battle the disease in a more normal fashion.

    Deep injection bypasses a large portion of the immune system (most of which is in the human gut, but some of which is in the skin). This is one reason why “modern” vaccines don’t really work, and only serve to over stimulate the immune system in an unhealthy manner, long term. Introducing foreign proteins directly into the blood stream, instead of letting the largest portion of the immune system attack and alter them causes massive problems in the body.

    If one takes the CDC’s own data and graphs it over time, one discovers that most of the infectious diseases vaccinated for have been in a state of decline since the late 1800s. The slope of the curves of that decline did not change after the introduction of the various vaccines for each. Data-wise, that says it all – no change in the slope of the curve means no effect. Period. End of story.

    The “huge drop” in polio the year after the “effective” vaccine was introduced was due not to biological effects, but to the redefining of a whole class of paralytic diseases as encephalitis instead of polio.

    These facts are a matter of public record.

    The other thing which was’t mentioned in the article, but which might have had an impact was the aerial spraying campaigns using “weakened” biological toxins on the American (and Canadian) public in the 1970s, allegedly to test for the spread of biological weapons to “protect” the public. These are also a matter of public record now, as the government did finally admit to doing it.

    They call my generation “Boomers,” but I think that “guinea pigs Gen 1” would be more accurate. I am afraid that the American public has been the subject of much biological experimentation without informed consent. It doesn’t take too much speculation to sort out who is probably behind all that. We are all Tuskeegee subjects now.

    1. Agreed, well stated.

      Thanks Jon!

      PS – As usual, also thanks to ALL of the insightful commenters attracted to Dr Farrell’s sphere of interest. We are educating each other every day and I am so thankful that each of you take the time to impart your thoughts here for our consideration.

  17. Those charts/graphs included in the Medium article correlate real well with increasing use of microwave based radios for short range communication–that’s cellphones and wifi. (Long distance telephone had switched over to digitized microwaves in the later 1960s especially west of Chicago, but those are frequently isolated towers.)

    Another factor not noted: Into the 1970s, in the USA, many more workers were unionized and that on average means better working conditions and breaks. So if you’re exhausted you can take time off without losing your job.

  18. Meta-analysis is an Allegorical instrument bringing dots together. Survey becomes a surfacing image. And recapitulation causes Anagogical transfiguration, that in turn causes changes to the morphogenetic field.

    Coin clippers and well poisoners – in this day and age – print money out the window and put needle under the skin. Devils in skin are boiling frogs in gradual genocide. It is called Stockholm syndrome, when embracing it joyfully.

    To make a stand against time, is to intersect center and axis into entanglement. Basic Euclidean Pyramid & Patristic Exegesis in praxis.

  19. Needless to say, it is all about the money. I have little doubt the long term effects were either known or suspected; and you couldn’t ask for a more profitable business model, especially if you make it mandatory.

  20. The big item here is whether the ‘bad ingredients’ content within (some) vaccines is due to scientific/biological ignorance of the time, or whether it is part of some ‘soft kill’ or ‘disaster capitalism’ modus operandi. Accidental or causal?

    Part of this site’s origin is the hypothesis that there were ‘higher civilizations’ who warred, mostly destroyed each other, and still exist in some clandestine fashion. This includes ‘inherited’ biological knowledge – including DNA knowledge – of human and near-human species, and how to achieve desired results.

    What is the chance that these ‘elites’ did not know of the effects of different vaccine additives? If they did know, what was their agenda?

    My dark thought is that their agenda was to Create large-scale disease in order to mas sively ramp-up the resources dedicated to studying those diseases – and deep biology in general. If you look back at the state of science circa 1976, the decision had just been made to withdraw from manned space exploration. Subsequently, there was a general shift from dollars for space exploration (period) to dollars for DNA research, vast medical databases, and the aggressive ‘pushing’ of inoculations against every conceivable disease. We haven’t been back to the Moon for a half-century, but we have deciphered the human genome and are well on the way to deciphering the epigenetic strata…

    We have to view this ‘shift’ (including vaccines) within the hypothesis of clandestine technologies and agendas…

Comments are closed.