Babylon's Bankers

MERKEL: FROM SCHAUBLE TO GOLDMAN SACHS

While we're talking about Germany and the European Union, Mr. H.B. also spotted this story and passed it along, and it's worth passing along to you. Remember all the hoopla a few years ago between Germany and Greece, and how Goldman Sachs was being accused as the real architect of the austerity policies that were wrecking the Greek economy? It was a case then that the runaway socialist policies of southern Europe were having the bill footed by Germany and the stronger northern European economies. The result was actual seizure of assets, in some cases. It is as if we were watching a process where the Parthenon had become private property, and the Greeks, rightly, were not too happy about it, but (not rightly) were not prepared to examine how their own domestic policies had led to the situation.

That, of course, is a dramatic over-simplification, but now there's a new internal struggle shaping up.

The catalsysts? The recent Italian elections, and the appointment of a Goldman Sachs man to be Germany's deputy finance minister, and this appointment has potentially huge significance:

Goldman Sachs Banker Named Germany's Deputy Finance Minister

Having populated most central banks with its alumni, Goldman is now aiming even higher: right at sovereign governments, and on Monday morning, a spokesman for Germany's finance ministry said that the co-head of Goldman Sachs in Germany, Joerg Kukies, will become deputy finance minister in the new German government.

According to Reuters, Kukies will be responsible for financial market policy and Europe in his new role, the spokesman said. In other words, with Mario Draghi - another Goldman alum - potentially resigning from the ECB, Goldman is loathe to give up its control on key European policy developments and has made its move.

Kukies served as the Managing Director of Goldman Sachs and served as its Co-Head of Germany since October 2014. Kukies oversaw the equities and fixed income division in Germany and Austria for Goldman.

What does this signify? My high octane speculation here has two components. Firstly, it symbolizes yet another retreat from reality, and a clear signal of "more of the same" as far as the European Union goes and the policy of austerity that Merkel's previous government pursued vis-a-vis Greece, and it's a symbol that there is a showdown coming between the EU, Germany, and Italy. Why is it a retreat from reality? Because recall that Frau Merkel's previous finance minister, Wolfgang Schauble, in the midst of the growing EU crisis, stated to a meeting of the top economic powers of the world in China, that the "debt growth model" was over: finance capitalism and paper profits had run their course, and that there was "no way forward that is not a reform."

Notably, Schauble is gone, and Goldman Sachs has a heavy presence in Merkel's new "coalition," and that means there will be "more of the same".  And that in turn will serve to weaken her government even more, as it will eventually fuel commentary and criticism that her government is nothing but a branch office of the firm itself. It's an echo of the previous Greek crisis, but this time on a much larger stage with much larger players, which brings us to point number two:

Secondly, the appointment comes in the wake of the Italian elections, whose importance under the circumstances can hardly be overestimated. In Italy there are already calls for modifications to the Italian constitution to allow public votes on approval of any future treaty, and also calls for a return to a national currency and withdrawal of Italy from the Eurozone. Rome has drawn a line in the sand, and Berlin has responded with one of its own. Goldman Sachs wants a seat at the table, and Ms. Merkel has handed it to them.

In short, the next few months are going to be very interesting. As I said before, watch Italy.

See you on the flip side...

9 thoughts on “MERKEL: FROM SCHAUBLE TO GOLDMAN SACHS”

  1. It is interesting the European Elites have begun to devour Europe like they have the rest of the World. A case of the chickens coming home to roost or the dragon devouring itself.

  2. I seem to remember some Sumerian cuneiform tablets that spoke of the creation of a slave race; their only reason for existence was to perform labor for the ‘gods’ and to worship them. Hmmm, sounds familiar somehow…

  3. To simple people it is indubitable that the nearest cause of enslavement of one class of men by another is money. They know that it is possible to cause more trouble w/a rouble than w/a club; it is only political economy that does not want to know it
    Leo Tolstoy, What Shall We Do Then? (1888)

    1. This is but another dot that comprises the ongoing picture of the enclosure of the commons. Russians called it grabitization – privatization by officials well-connected insiders who view the public sector as the source of enterprises and natural resources to be privatized and financialized.
      Wall Street, the City of London, Frankfurt and other financial centers have replaced governments to become our epoch’s central planners.
      Today’s banksters and bondholders are expropriating property owners in ways not anticipated a century ago, when people worried that socialism might play this role. Instead it is foreclosing creditors that are the greatest threat to owner-occupants, who are asserting their rights to expropriate indebted owners.
      Besides, debt service typically rises to the point where it absorbs the full rental equivalent; instead of governments receiving the rental income of land and natural resources as would occur under classical economics.
      We are seeing the dots connecting a resurgence of primitive accumulation[feudalism/chattel slavery] by debt creation, foreclosure and privatization.

    2. Pro-creditor deceptions require censoring the economic history of how financial dynamics actually have evolved. Exponentially rising debt service creates a chain reaction that weighs down the economy until it collapses into an inert leaden state.
      Where are the economists?
      Only a few like Michael Hudson or Steve Keen are sounding the alarm.
      Something wicked comes this way.

  4. When you own something (even by fraud), you get to put your representatives on the board.

    The fiat endgame is here, along with the Zappa moment; they’ve dropped all pretense of puppeteering from the shadows and you are being shown the back of the theatre.

  5. The German-Sachs agent is doubling down, holding out in the bunker, while the financial Bormanns and Hitlers implement their evacuation plans…

Comments are closed.