Daily News

GASSED SPIES, BOMBED SYRIA, AND A FEW “PROBLEMS”…

As you can imagine, the talk of the week is still the "West's" bombing of Syria, over the most threadbare of pretexts. Since the bombing, it has emerged that (1) Syria invited the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to Syria to review the scene of the crime of the alleged chemical attacks. This is significant because this is the internationally recognized body that supposedly oversees the dismantling of chemical weapons. Syria had issued the visas, but, alas, the "West" struck and bombed Syria anyway, before the OPCW could conduct any investigation. Thus (2) the
"proof" that the "West" supposedly has has not come from any internationally recognized body.

Now, what this means, it seems to me, is perfectly clear: the "West" struck a foreign sovereign nation, based on allegations, without offering any sufficient proof or cause that Mr. Assad had gassed his people. Some sources indicate that one of the places targeted by the "West's" missile strikes was precisely the scene of the alleged crime. If this is true, then once again one recognizes the familiar pattern of the "West" destroying a crime scene before any real investigation can be conducted: think Waco, Oklahoma City, the World Trade center after 9/11.

Predictably, Russia is blaming the "West" for having set up the whole false narrative as a false flag:

Russia Has "Irrefutable Evidence" UK Staged Syrian Chemical Attack

Here's the claim:

As the blame game over the alleged chemical attack in Syria escalates ahead of what is expected to be an imminent, if contained, air strike campaign by the US, UK and/or France against Syria, on Friday morning, Russia's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow had "irrefutable evidence" that the attack - which allegedly killed more than 40 people in an April 7 chemical weapons strike on the former rebel outpost of Douma  -was staged with the help of a foreign secret service.

"We have irrefutable evidence that this was another staged event, and that the secret services of a certain state that is now at the forefront of a Russophobic campaign was involved in this staged event," he said during a press conference according to AFP.

Speculation that said "certain state" was the UK was confirmed shortly after, when Russia's defense ministry alleged that Britain was involved in the suspected chemical attack. According to defense ministry spokesman, Major General Igor Konashenkov, the Kremlin has evidence that Britain was behind the attack.

Quoted by Reuters, he said: "We have... evidence that proves Britain was directly involved in organising this provocation."

As RT further adds, the Russian Defense Ministry presented what it says is "proof that the reported chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged."

It also accused the British government of pressuring the perpetrators to speed up the “provocation.” During a briefing on Friday, the ministry showed interviews with two people, who, it said, are medical professionals working in the only hospital operating in Douma, a town near the Syrian capital, Damascus.

During a briefing on Friday, the ministry showed interviews with two people, who, it said, are medical professionals working in the only hospital operating in Douma, a town near the Syrian capital, Damascus.

In the interviews released to the media, the two men reported how footage was shot of people dousing each other with water and treating children, which was claimed to show the aftermath of the April 7 chemical weapons attack. The patients shown in the video suffered from smoke poisoning and the water was poured on them by their relatives after a false claim that chemical weapons were used, the ministry said.

“Please, notice. These people do not hide their names. These are not some faceless claims on the social media by anonymous activists. They took part in taking that footage,” said Konashenkov.

Now, at least the Russians are trying to back up their claims, and of course, Great Britain is denying the whole accusation and calling it all a pack of lies.

Which it could very well be. After all, the Russians are just as perfectly capable of hiring "crisis actors" and "interviewing them" on television as the "West" is. So who to believe?

Well, Mr. H.B. and many others found this article and passed it along; an independent Swiss chemicals laboratory, which tested the "nerve agent" used on the Skripals, has concluded that the agent most likely was produced in the UK or the USA:

Independent Swiss Lab Says 'BZ Toxin' Used In Skripal Poisoning; US/UK-Produced, Not Russian

Here's the upshot:

Remember how we were told my the politicians (not the scientists) that a deadly Novichok nerve agent - produced by Russia - was used in the attempted assassination of the Skripals? Remember the 50 questions (here and here) we had surrounding the 'facts' as Theresa May had laid them out? Ever wonder why, given how utterly deadly we were told this chemical was, the Skripals wondered around for a few hours after being 'infected' and then days later, survived with no chronic damage?

Well those doubts may well have just been answered as according to the independent Swiss state Spiez lab, the substance used on Sergei Skripal was an agent called BZ, which was never produced in Russia, but was in service in the US, UK, and other NATO states.

RT reports that Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said, citing the results of the examination conducted by a Swiss chemical lab that worked with the samples that London handed over to the Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons (OPCW), that Sergei Skripal, a former Russian double agent, and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with an incapacitating toxin known as 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate or BZ.

The Swiss center sent the results to the OPCW.

To paraphrase I Love Lucy, "Theresa, you got some 'splainin to do!" Remember, we were "assured" that the evidence was all but overwhelming that Russia had tried to poison the Skripals with a nerve agent, a story that looks increasingly threadbare (along the lines of the Emperor's "new clothes"), since they have survived the attack. Now it turns out that the chemical agent resembles weapons, not in the Russian arsenal, but the "West's". So on the preponderance of evidence in the Syria case, who are we inclined to believe?

The Bush Administration and the Blair Government lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; now it appears we have at least a large scale lie in the case of the Skripals; and a bombing campaign day before the OPCW was due to arrive in Syria and conduct an investigation... ponder that a moment: a bombing strike was launched prior to the arrival of the UN's official agency in charge of chemical weapons investigations, and thus prior to any real independent investigation.

So let me put country simple to all the kelptocrats, technocrats, plutocrats, and oligarchs of the "West":

I do not believe you.

 

26 thoughts on “GASSED SPIES, BOMBED SYRIA, AND A FEW “PROBLEMS”…”

  1. And while we are talking about gassing and poisoning here is the official Russian response to the Skripal case:

    http://thesaker.is/statement-of-a-shulgin-at-the-opcw-ec/

    They refer to the allegations quite bluntly as “Lie #1”, “Lie #2”, etc. The Russians are through being polite. They are publicly calling PM May and the whole UK government liars to their face!

    Popcorn time!!!

  2. “Syrian War Report – April 19, 2018: Journalists find Boy Filmed in Staged Video of Chemical Attack in Douma”
    http://thesaker.is/syrian-war-report-april-19-2018-journalists-find-boy-filmed-in-staged-video-of-chemical-attack-in-douma/

    “A group of Russian correspondents led by Evgeny Poddubny has found a boy filmed by the White Helmets in their video showing people ‘affected’ by the alleged chemical attack in Douma on April 7. According to Poddubny:
    * 11-year-old Hassan Diab is fine;
    * He suffered no injures from the ‘chemical attack’ because there was no attack (at least then and there);
    * The boy participated in the video for food (rice, dates and cookies).

    Poddubny also contacted Hassan’s father – he also said that there was no chemical attack in the town.”

    (That boy better be well-guarded, or ‘accidents’ might happen…)

    1. http://tass.com/world/1000645
      “DAMASCUS, April 19. /TASS/. Two cruise missiles found unexploded by the Syrian military after the US missile strike on April 14 have been handed over to Russia, a source in the Syrian defense ministry told TASS on Thursday.

      ‘Two cruise missiles that did not detonate during the US missile strike on Syria overnight to April 14 were found by the Syrian military. Both are in rather good condition. These missiles were handed over to Russian officer the day before yesterday (April 17)’ the source said, adding that both ‘were sent to Russia by plane yesterday (April 18)’.”

      (If you think Russian EW techniques were good on Apr 14th, wait until they have fully ana lyzed those intact cruise missiles…)

  3. The author of Eaters Of The Dead pointed out in that novel that the West always valued a good story over the facts. These two incidents are tied together in that they’re a testament to the fantasy world the West resides in.

    1. didn’t michael crichton die of cancer rather suddenly and soon after visiting g w bush in the white house – invited there because w loved his last book “state of fear”?

      which had crichton reversing decades of realistic idealistic writing to have heroes who were aggressive mic members protecting the world from high tech environmental terrorists?

      apparently he found it hard to make this stuff up. if fish don’t know what water is, then we probably don’t know what lies are. it’s what we were raised in. and apparently it’s what’s for dinner.

  4. the other night, I had dinner with an American acquaintance who spent most of his life in the Boston area, and he had just read a book on the sinking of the Lusitania before his flight, and so was happy to report about all the ins and outs of that particular false flag over dinner.

    So I said matter-of-factly, well yes, and of course the USS Maine, too, blown up in Havana Harbor. And of course 911…

    And of course there was where conspiracy talk ended, just as the main course arrived.

    Ignoring the recalcitrance, I blithely recounted the saga of the Five Dancing Israelis at Fort Lee (Mossad); the sublimating steel of the vanishing spire (mini-nukes); the still-classified building plans (this was an architect after all, so I said, “of course you of all people know that the buildings couldn’t collapse as reported, because they exploded “), and the USGS analysis of the water drawn from the bathtub, which had wild amounts of tritium (again, nukes) in it, and micronized copper from vaporized wiring. As I am fond of doing, I pointed out that, if this was a mechanical collapse, you could drop a bit of copper wire from the height of 108 stories from now until the end of time and it would never become micronized, so how did it end up like that in the water of the ‘bathtub,’ other than being disassociated by a nuke (with all the other ancillary evidence)?
    ______________________________________

    Long story short, if they can nuke lower Manhattan (twice) to take down the WTC, they can — and will — do this stuff in Syria.

    I’d also add that at this point I’ve become convinced that the Malaysia flight shot down over Ukraine was the same MA 117 flight they made vanish, with the same decomposing bodies on board. One wonders what they must have threatened the government of Malaysia with to keep them quiet about this.

    All to say, these alpha psychopathic monsters will stop at nothing to further their insane objectives, so Syria? Yeah, whatever.

    1. Yep, yep, and yep. Not to mention the ‘decorative’ pools and waterfalls just-over the Tower basements. Good for recirculating heat from the radioactive-decay products, as well as keeping pesky investigators away from Ground Zero. Good design…

      (How did your “American acquaintance” respond to your pesky observations?)

      1. Yes water is a moderator of nuclear reactions, that’s why you surround the cores of nuclear reactors with water and put spent fuel rods in pools — and why they poured water on the smoldering, 1000+ degree C wreckage of ground zero for three+ months. That’s also why we call ground zero ground zero, and as you pointed out, why they have the pools of water there now, still.

        As for the reaction, he is Jewish and at the outset of the dinner made a comment/dropped a marker about Bostonians all being awful anti-semites, so the Dancing Israelis was quite some news to him. Oh well, clearly reality is racist and antisemitic; that’s why programmed Americans are so afraid of it.

        1. that main course had to have felt good if it didn’t feel immediately productive basta. wonder what the odds are that you planted seeds that will grow and make your architect friend come round to reality later. you just barely touched the tips of a few icebergs. if he can cop to reality over the lusitania how many years later, perhaps he can come round to more modern times soon.

          and yeh, the video on the ground after that ukraine crash were amazingly obvious. no blood anywhere with butchered bodies in the crash. even the placement of the wreckage was telling. that plane was put there, not shot down above there.

          so the flight that dissappeared mystically was loaded with all the patent holders of the mic’s latest darling war tech and the flight that was allegedly shot down was loaded with the worlds leading experts on hiv? wonder what happened to all that working knowledge. does mr global really not care what happens to his talent pool?

          1. ZDB, I agree that MH17 was probably MH370 ‘reborn’, with at least some refrigerated and formaldehyde-ed passengers from MH370. (A statement about the inhumanity of the Players.)

            However, at the time, I carefully reviewed the plane’s probable breakup-sequence on the way down and compared it to the wreckage locations which were spread over several villages. (Totally p!ssed me off…) That 777 “came down” rather than being “planted”, guaranteed – from an aero engineer who worked at Boeing. Damn them.

            (Actually, ‘we’ got lucky in one respect. The baddies were likely counting-on the 777 arrowing-in from 30,000 ft, with nothing but tangled wreckage and scattered body parts. Instead, the front was blown off [damn them] and then part of the tail came off from the resulting G’s [damn them]. The remainder went into a ‘falling leaf’ type of descent. If there was anybody alive on that plane, it must have been terrifying. It was purely chance – or divine help – that the mostly-intact remainder happened to hit the ground almost at a ‘flare’ point in the falling-leaf descent. That left a lot of the plane and passengers intact for the first-responders to inspect…)

      2. gizadeathstarcommentator

        This is what I heard though I have no way of verifying it:
        The WTC complex was brought down by a variety of methods.
        They include three thermo-nuclear demolition devices which Controlled Demolition Inc placed under 3 of the skyscrapers when the complex was being built;
        and a black ops weapon which Judy Woods called a molecular dissociation device; and
        micro nukes high up the skyscrapers.

        I was told that 9/11 was the 1st time the molecular disruptor was used and those idiots didn’t have a clue how to stop it after they got it started.
        They took the device away after the deed was done, but because of the holographic nature of this reality, the beam kept on firing!!
        This is what happens when babies learn how to light matches.
        It was one of those Tesla resonance machines.
        It was a long time before they could erect another building because every time they put something up, it would crumble away.
        Eventually the ETs turned it off, which is why there’s a new complex there now.
        Those pools were to absorb the energy from the removed molecular disruptor.

        Even though the 1st responders have been dying of chronic radiation sickness, the pools of water were not about reducing the radioactivity. Most of the radioactive stuff was removed by 2 ( or was it one?) hurricanes at the time which sucked the radioactive particles away and dumped them somewhere around the vicinity of Greenland.

        I can tell you something about 9/11 to show the extraordinary efforts the cabal went to, in order to keep the nuclear aspect out of public consciousness.

        If you have an old dictionary at home, look up the meaning of ‘ground zero’. You’ll find that there would only be one definition and it’s what you call a place that has been nuked.

        After 9/11, the cabal sent people to every bookshop and public library on the planet to replace ALL the dictionaries. The replacements differed only in the definition of ‘ground zero’ and they show extra meanings for that term, to obfuscate the original single meaning.

        For example, if you have a genuine old Merriam-Webster dictionary, you would see this:
        ground zero n (1946) : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs.

        The replacement books (even of old editions) of the Merriam-Webster dictionaries show two extra definitions and this is what you’ll see:
        ground zero n (1946) 1 : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs. 2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change 3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE

        How they laugh at us! They have shouted from the rooftops that the WTC was nuked by the very language that was used. However, they obfuscated the meaning of the term ‘ground zero’ so the sheep never connected the dots. By doing it this way, they can claim that they told us the truth and it’s not their fault that we did nothing with the information. It’s a karma thingy where they deflect the fault back to us. Sorry cabal critters – that excuse won’t wash with the karma courts.

        It’s nothing new. They’ve always re-written the books. Fomenko (History: Fiction or Science?) did not trust written texts but instead looked for information from carvings on buildings and structure which are much harder to edit or replace.

    2. I think you’re correct. This vile bunch perpetrating these events goes all the way back to at least WWII. Think Pearl Harbor, the atomic bomb, JFK & RFK murders….the beat goes on.

  5. In the background to all this are rumors that Rus/Syria (whihc I take to mean Spetznas) took caption more than 10 UK special chemical weapons officers in Syria and the Syrians now have them. This is, I suspect, the “incontrovertible evidence” Lavrov mentioned. If true, this would give Rus some good leverage. Just imagine a perp walk with all 10, or 20 or whatever, UK war criminals would look like. Of course, the problem is that psychopaths with their collective tits in the wringer will immediately seek relief in new and bigger false flag. So i would agree with Dr. Farrell’s previous post. The Rus either remove them from power or they await the next and possibly even more dangerous provocation.

  6. Robert Barricklow

    As sick as it is:
    It’s all about the Money & the Power.
    Truth is the first casualty, there will be blood.

  7. anakephalaiosis

    PYRAMID HAIKU 37
    Sovereign smart flag.
    Giza gas chamber roulette.
    Rubicon casino.

    Netizens of Rome cannot fathom another tyrant, as catacombs have become alive.

    Senate is breaking Doomsday, and bewildered bureaucrats find no rock to hide under.

    Bloody Liberty Bell declares independence, as grassroots accept no king but King Jesus. 1776.

    1. Nannie, you beat me to it! Thanks. (Glad I read the comments first, this time.) Yes, the “famed war correspondent” Robert Fisk – who raced-ahead and interviewed doctors and residents – basically said that the chemical attack did not occur, and that nearby residents had never heard of a chemical attack. The video was ‘real’ but was an intentional misinterpretation of ongoing-treatment of hypoxia due to dust from conventional bombing plus ‘White Hats’ bursting-in and proclaiming a chemical attack. Pretty damning to the narrative…

      Now, there is news that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) investigative party has been ‘stalled’ by gunfire in the region. No ‘official’ investigation. The obvious question is: Who would benefit from the stalling?

  8. Mr Lavrov points out that there are direct contacts between US and Russian military both in their respective capitals and on the ground in Syria.
    H.O.S.: might we expect a repeat of the N. Korean exploit, with “enemy” President Assad suddenly being considered Amerika’s Best Buddy?

    1. Who knows? We’ll have to wait and see after the next Bariloche or Antartica visit 🙂

    1. @swimsinocean, thanks for the link.
      How Mr Lavrov could stay calm sitting in front of that moronic idiot is a testament to his diplomatic skill and superior intellect.
      Watching this interview is exactly the reason why I haven’t watched (or listened to) MSM news of any kind for many years. It really was torture every time that interviewer opened his mouth, endlessly regurgitating the script that was handed to him, not listening to a word Lavrov was saying.

      That interviewer is the exact embodiment of everything that is wrong with western media and western government propaganda, not to mention provocations. No doubt he was provoking Lavrov into a harsh response.
      You failed Mr Sacker, miserably.
      Now crawl back into the hole you came out of.

      1. “How Mr Lavrov could stay calm sitting in front of that moronic idiot is a testament to his diplomatic skill and superior intellect” – agreed. Civility and diplomacy springs from intelligence.

Comments are closed.