DARPA’S TRANSHUMANIST PLANS

This story is such an odd one, and so pregnant with implications, and was sent by so many people, that I have to blog about it. The problem is, I don't know where to start. So I'm including Zero Hedge's summary of the article as well, since it outlines some of the implications:

Dialing Up the Body’s Defenses Against Public Health and National Security Threats

Resident Evil? DARPA Unveils Genetic "Tuning" To Fight Chemical, Radiation Attacks

First in the list of things that piqued my interest in this story was the back-handed admission that GMOs might not be as safe as the GMO "agribusiness" industry would like to convince us. I've blogged endlessly about this issue on this site, so there is no need to rehearse once again what those concerns are. The USA's version of Nazi Germany's Kammlerstab, the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency - or as we like to call it here, following a suggestion of Mr. J.B., the Diabolically Apocalyptic Research Projects Agency - now wants to "genetically tune" humanity to withstand a host of ills, including, it seems, GMOs. Got your microchip implant? Good, then line up for your anti-GMO vaccine.

In other words, DARPA's approach is not to fix the problem, but rather, to buttress the defenses of the ultimate target, humanity itself.

The approach is illustrative of the out-of-the-box thinking that is a requirement at the agency (and incidentally, which was also a requirement of the Kammlerstab). Rather than indulge in high octane speculation today (after all, DARPA is already doing that at taxpayer expense), I want to propose a Gedankenexperiment, a thought experiment, for the purposes of illustrating the implications of what they're "up to." Imagine a situation in which the world is confronted with a whole plethora of thermonuclear powers, and not just the "superpowers" of the Cold War, the USSR and the USA. Back then, of course, we were told that the doctrine of MAD, or "Mutually Assured Destruction" was what kept the world from blowing itself up in an orgy of hydrogen bomb bombardments. Using the weapons would guarantee their use by the opposing power, and if the gigantic explosions didn't get you, the radioactive fallout would. Major wars were unthinkable because they were unwinnable, and movies like War Games with Dabney Coleman and Matthew Broderick drove home the point.

The nuclear club has expanded rather dramatically since then, with new thermonuclear powers, Great Britain, France, and China, joining the very exclusive club of nations that could with the push of a button destroy the world. Since then, other nuclear nations - Pakistan, India, and yes, North Korea - have joined the club, and they each have the capability of going for the "big bomb", the hydrogen bomb. Add to this list the list of "turnkey" nuclear and thermonuclear powers, i.e., nations with the capability to become nuclear or thermonuclear powers almost overnight if they wanted to - nations such as Germany, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, Japan, even Canada and South Africa and Sweden and Israel and Iran - and you get the idea: in spite of the best intentions of the Cold War superpowers and great powers, the nuclear genie is out of the bottle and everyone wants "the Bomb." One recalls, in this respect, the satirical song of 1960s and 1970s political satirist Tom Lehrer, who complained of Alabama even getting the bomb at the height of the civil rights struggle. (And for reasons I've articulated elsewhere, I believe Israel, South Africa, and Germany have already joined that nuclear club and are not simply "turnkey" nuclear powers; and there's suggestive evidence that Japan has as well.)

This began the search for ways to do an end run around the MADness: for new weapons that could render nuclear bombs and ICBMs and bombers obsolete: Reagan's "Star Wars" was born, and the search for directed energy defensive (and offensive) weapons, for kinetic bombardment weapons or "rods of God", began. (and again, in the USA's case, that search actually began under Eisenhower. Reagan merely made it "public". Similarly, the Soviet search for an end run around the MADness began under Stalin.) Those efforts, I suspect, were much more successful than we've been told. After all, scientists working on elements of those projects back then had a disconcerting habit of dying under mysterious circumstances. Everyone then, as now, blamed the Russians for this, and viewed it as a last ditch effort to forestall Star Wars and save the Soviet Union from economic collapse. No one wanted to consider the Kammlerstab alternative that the scientists were murdered by their project overlords to "keep their mouths shut."

But there was another way around the MADness, and it appears, with this press release, that DARPA has finally admitted to pursuing it, though I don't believe for a moment that it is just beginning the effort. Indeed, if one follows the procedures of the Kammlerstab, after which I believe DARPA was modeled, or the procedures of Nazi Germany in general, such authorizations or announcements do not begin the process, the merely herald or acknowledge a process long under way. The V-2 rockets, for example, which rained down on London in 1944 and 1945, were under development before the war even broke out, so when Hitler authorized the program in 1942 by decree, he merely was recognizing something already underway, and prioritizing its development as the "proof of concept" had already been amply demonstrated.

So what is that "other way" around the MADness? In typical military fashion, it's to "harden the target," i.e., humanity itself, by making it impervious to the effects of a general nuclear war, to make it impervious to what are now lethal doses of radiation. The utility for application to manned space travel is thus also apparent. Indeed, there is suggestive evidence both from Israel and from the former Soviet Union that those countries were engaged in similar research, and may have found ways to reverse the organic effects of radiation, if not to reverse radiation itself, so to speak. The goal? To ensure that humanity itself survives amid the radioactive rubble, howsoever that rubble may have come about: hydrogen bombs, or "rods of God."

Put the two approaches together, and an even bigger picture emerges, because such an "impervious humanity" could conceivably or potentially survive directed energy weapon attacks by particle beams and so on through the simple expedient of medical nano-bots repairing cells at the cellular level.

The implication? Wars are "fightable" and winnable again, and that means, in my opinion, that "they" are preparing for "something."

See you on the flip side...

24 thoughts on “DARPA’S TRANSHUMANIST PLANS”

  1. Infected with Darkjournalist hypothesis of an eighth planet all dualists please go to that prepared realm and play your dark/light side games there, please.

    I want to see this beautiful blue marble and its inhabitants working to a win win situation that CAF talks about.

    And yes, I do think all individuals today live on the edge of an important bifurcation choise.

  2. It’s hardly surprising that the nuclear club has grown. If one’s country, say, Iran, were on the seven-countres-in-five-years list of The Project For a New American Century, one would be negligent in not trying as hard as one could to acquire whatever-it-takes to neutralise the threat from the US as quickly as possible. It’s called the right to self defence.
    As for hardening the human species to withstand radiation, could not this be more to do with off-planet factors (such as the grand solar minimum, UVC radiation and an atmosphere clogged with volcanic dust) than with man’s inhumanity to man? desperate times call for desperate measures. It may not be general nuclear war to which they wish to make humanity impervious, but our cosmic circumstances? The current mission may actually be a response to a threat assessment with a wider scope than merely earthly and/or man-made factors.

    1. Taking the positive viewpoint for a moment, “hardening the human species to withstand radiation” could have to do with the current weakening of the planetary magnetic field, prior to its possible ‘vanishing’ and reappearance in a reversed polarity (over the next thousand years). During this time, more solar radiation (UVB is especially harmful) and more charged particles from extra-solar sources will get through. Most experts regard this long-term event as simply a slightly-higher cancer risk, mutation risk, etc., but maybe the SSP folk know more than the general public…

      1. Or, again on the ‘positive’ side, perhaps some higher-ups have read the Sumerian cuneiform tablets, have taken their info seriously, and are planning to reverse the genetic damage done to humanity by editing-out the editing-ins. Remember, the objective was an uncomplaining, ‘worker’ race. (One can scramble a whole DNA sequence – render it inoperative – by simply inserting or deleting a few ‘letters’. If you know the pre-op sequence, it might not be too hard to ‘reenable’ that DNA with advanced editing tools.) This would apply more to generations born from reedited sperm and egg…

        1. I’m not a scientist, but IIRC UVC has been showing up in readings taken from the surface of the planet, too, recently. Nasty stuff!
          An uncomplaining worker race was indeed The Emperor’s original spec; but it’s now accepted that, while feral on this planet (during its term as a prison), humanity developed into something altogether more formidable. Hence the insistence that, even though the role of prison planet is coming to an end, we must now remain incarcerated in quarantine, on probation until we can prove ourselves a fit and proper species to join the galactic family of civilizations.

  3. Many people have said that conditions now are similar to those prior to WW2, and predicted WW3. You are saying that because of directed energy weapons, or some other exotic technology, wars are winnable, but against whom? Those who have those technologies can fight back, and those who do not, well … Except for Germans and Russians who have shown to be GUTSY people (historically) and have taken on big targets, unlike the Anglo/American/Zionist who feed only on much weaker prey. Why has the US not won a single war (since WW2, and even then, it was the Russians who did the heavy lifting) except against Granada. They do not want to show what they have?

    So, based on the above, you are basically saying that the US is going to attack some third world country (perhaps Iran) using energy beams and will shoot down their missiles before they can lift off … the Congress has voted for an amendment that does not authorize war against Iran (but I guess that will not stop Trump).

    So, who will start war except Trump? You are saying Trump needs a war to get re-elected?

    And what about unintended consequences of the kind of hubris that comes off this article? Do you think Americans can kill and genocide weaker nations forever and get away with it?

    If not, then what? Destroy the planet, kill everyone, and move the “Ubermenschen” to Mars or the Moon?

    Everyone knows that the big powers have much more advanced tech than they show, but why have they not used that power so far? Are you saying Trump, as a member of the Nazi International, can get Lockheed Martin to deploy exotic weapons to intimidate someone?

    1. Actually, the “US” (United Sionists) has won several wars in the past decades. You just have to know the real criteria for winning. The true masters of the “US” (not the general US population) have a yardstick called the Oded Yinon Plan. This long-range plan has as its goal the neutralization of (and possibly occupation of) the nations in a huge area from the Nile to the Euphrates. The pressure has been relentless in pursuit of this plan, and it has almost succeeded…

      Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia have been compromised and/or coopted without a fight. Libya was destroyed by a ‘guided’ NATO (minor US) force.

      The big-deal country, Iraq, had the Bush I neocons win one (Oded Yinon Plan) war, post fake 9/11 ‘op’. Then, the Bush II and Cheney/Rumsfeld neocons won a second (Oded Yinon Plan) war, in the name of fake WMD claims. In terms of the Oded Yinon Plan, the “US” (United Sionists) definitely won those wars. Iraq’s ability to threaten Israel was/is utterly gone. You just have to know the real criteria for winning…

      Syria was/is also included in the Oded Yinon Plan. The “US” was right on the verge of winning that war, too, before the Russians stepped-in. Some experts believed the Syrian army was weeks or months away from a total collapse. Now, the “US” has changed its plans to a ‘parti tioning’ [hah!] of Syria, with the Kurds having a de facto mini-country under “US” control. That would also count as a ‘win’ according to the Oded Yinon Plan.

      To see that the “US” has been winning wars, big-time, one simply has to correctly-apply the time-honored expression, Cui bono, or “Who Benefits?” to these wars…

      1. Oops, should read:
        “The big-deal country, Iraq, had the Bush I neocons win one (Oded Yinon Plan) war, after suckering Saddam Hussein into invading Kuwait. Then, the Bush II and Cheney/Rumsfeld neocons won a second (Oded Yinon Plan) war, post fake 9/11 ‘op’ in the name of fake WMD claims.”

        1. Robert Barricklow

          MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
          They’re just not telling the cannon fodder sheeple what the mission was/is.
          All they get fed is mainstream B.S.

      2. Yes, that is a good take on things, and that is also what I have been saying too, namely that success is not defined by the normal criteria we think of (or in this case, the brainwashed journalists believe on faith). The real criterion is not to make a country an American bastion — when you know the people hate you and will hate you for centuries to come, it is not realistic — but rather knowing that this is not possible, to break and crush the spine of the other country so hard that it can not stand up for decades on its own feet (so-called “creative chaos” of neocons). Thus Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan (and periodically Lebanon, when Israel “mows the lawn” so-to-speak) can viewed as success stories.

    2. “Many people have said that conditions now are similar to those prior to WW2, and predicted WW3.“

      Also of note is the celestial/astrological situations that you precede/coincide with these huge world events.

  4. Rather than ‘hardening’ humanity for Armageddon-like circumstances, I suspect the “Genetic Tuning” is more for control purposes. Two instances from SF-land:

    In Star Trek: Deep Space 9, the Changelings – who ruled the Dominion – ‘adjusted’ the genetics of their subject warrior-race, the Jem’Hadar, to knock-out production of some needed biological component. Now, the Jem’Hadar were beholden for their very survival to the Changelings supplying this substance…

    (I have also wondered how Vitamin C production was disabled in humanity. Other higher species have this capability. It seems that such a valuable trait would be ‘conserved’ by Nature. Of course, if we were Jem’Hadar-ed, that would explain it…)

    In Babylon 5, arch-plotter Londo Mollari slipped his political rival, Lord Antono Refa, a ‘substance’ (not sure if genetics-based or simply chemical) that was half of a deadly duo. This substance was innocuous as long as it was not combined with another ‘paired’ component – also innocuous. Together, they formed a potent killing-device. Londo had Refa at his mercy…

    Both these SF-examples indicate ways “Genetic Tuning” may be turned to the darkside…

    1. You got it! And, as it often is, science “fiction” has been uncannily prescient. I don’t believe for a moment that the Kammlerstab is developing anything to help humanity. Geez, it would be a little more entertaining if (like sci-fi writers) they varied the narrative from time to time . . . How many times are they going to use a flu scare as cover?

  5. marcos toledo

    Is anyone reading the Borg of Star Trek or the Cybermen-Dalek of Dr.Who the Pod people of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Then there the State Alchemists of Fullmetal Alchemist which would better describe DARPA mindset.

  6. Doug Bowersox

    OR maybe Darpa is preparing defense against YHWH’s coming attack.
    Revelation 14 English Standard Version (ESV)
    The Harvest of the Earth
    14 Then I looked, and behold, a white cloud, and seated on the cloud one like a son of man, with a golden crown on his head, and a sharp sickle in his hand. 15 And another angel came out of the temple, calling with a loud voice to him who sat on the cloud, “Put in your sickle, and reap, for the hour to reap has come, for the harvest of the earth is fully ripe.” 16 So he who sat on the cloud swung his sickle across the earth, and the earth was reaped.

    17 Then another angel came out of the temple in heaven, and he too had a sharp sickle. 18 And another angel came out from the altar, the angel who has authority over the fire, and he called with a loud voice to the one who had the sharp sickle, “Put in your sickle and gather the clusters from the vine of the earth, for its grapes are ripe.” 19 So the angel swung his sickle across the earth and gathered the grape harvest of the earth and threw it into the great winepress of the wrath of God. 20 And the winepress was trodden outside the city, and blood flowed from the winepress, as high as a horse’s bridle, for 1,600 stadia.[c]

    1. Hmmm, 1600 stadia x 607 feet (length of one stadia in Roman/Greek measurments) / 5280 feet (one mile) = 183.94 miles. That’s a LOT of blood…

  7. Robert Barricklow

    To get to point C we have to get Alice to chase the white rabbit[in intelligence lingo/leading a target down a path of misinformation(substantial equivalence) or information overload]. The professors/scientist who then blew the whistle on GMOs got the: The White Knight Talks Backwards Trickery/a means to confuse a subject, discredit him if they tell anyone, and make them believe in an omnipotent force where no secrets can be hidden; Or do the: Humpty Dumpty Script/about breaking the targets mind to pieces; or, simply they get “menticized”.

    So they get you to eat GMOs; to get you to take “their” solution”[both literally & figuratively]. Now your at point B. All of these exercises were started, knowing where point A was. To get there “socially” they start at some point, like C.
    As a whistle blower said/It has enormous ramifications to all social order, a new world order of electronically controlled[in tune] humans without their knowledge or consent.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Now “we” swim in a world of electromagnetically charged Tesla particles/waves & other nefarious harmful wifi. The bees are “our” canaries[the birds & the bees]. No need for the radioactive explosions. The explosion of these other nefarious technologies is much more deadly; in that they kill without our knowledge and/or consent.

      [as I read I post].

      1. Robert Barricklow

        In other words, the rat populations of Earth. Oops !. I mean human populations are the guinea pigs; or food, to be supersized. Oops! I mean cannon fodder to be super-rats. Oops! I mean super-transhumans.
        Or, why not strip the bio and go strictly hardware:
        super-bots.

        Have we lost “our” minds?
        No!
        But “they” have!

      2. That’s why I see the potential for society to one day completely dismantle all the major control grids and voluntarily go into a Mad Max future to escape and destroy the power of the Satanic world order.

  8. Preparing or already prepared? This may be in readiness for the great reset or culling as per the Georgia Guidestones. While the majority perish due to thermonuclear war the elites hunker down in their DUMBS while the surface regenerates and ride itself of radiation.

  9. DARPA considers the whole planet as it’s laboratory. They see this as necessary for the human race to move off-world to other planets and environments. GMO’s, genetics, terraforming, et. al..: all are requisite technologies required for the human race to move and thrive off-world for resettlement. To ensure loyalty to the hive world, huh, home-world, they also require internal safety mechanisms to maintain control over that population, or to quarantine that population if those safety measures fail. Now, where in the ancient historical record have we seen such thinking?

Comments are closed.