NASA’S NEW ASTEROID DEFENSE PLAN

Mr. R.M. spotted this article and shared it, and I simply have to comment about it, because the document contains a few statements that just seem deliberately designed to provoke our trademark High Octane SpeculationTM. Even if they weren't designed for that, you know me, and I can't resist. Go get your coffee and cigarettes, let the dog outside, put on your slippers, because this one is an intriguing read:

This Is NASA's New Plan to Detect and Destroy Asteroids Before They Hit Earth

Now, before we get started, let's go back to Dr. Carol Rosin, and the "Rosin Affidavit". Dr. Rosin, as many are aware, has been tireless in her effort to head off the militarization and weaponization of space. The effort is praiseworthy: just imagine how much money is being diverted from needed infrastructure repair and construction, on fixing the airports, schools (we need to fire quite a few administrators and completely reform the system... but I'll resist the temptation to rant about Doctors of Pedagogiblither and Edubabble infesting the certification process)... we need to fix roads, we need to fix... well, pretty much everything, and militarizing space could be viewed as detracting from that.

But I'm also a realist: space is the new sea power; it is essential to financial clearing, to global trade, and eventually of course, to any permanent human and commercial presence, and where commercial interests go, the need to protect those assets also goes. And with protection of assets inevitably comes militarization and weaponization.

But this brings us back to the Rosin Affidavit, which, for our purposes in this blog, I want to review once again for those unfamiliar with its astonishing, and astonishingly accurate, contents. When Dr. Rosin first made these claims, she was denounced, detracted from, and in some cases made fun of and her integrity questioned. Nonetheless, she stuck to her guns and, in my opinion, has been profoundly vindicated over time. In 2001, Steven M. Greer, M.D., published an early release copy of his book Disclosure: Military and Government Witnesses Reveal the Greatest Secrets in Modern History. Greer will be familiar to many readers of this website as a Ufologist and an advocate of "disclosure" of government secrets regarding UFOs and alleged "contact" with extra-terrestrials. The book which he edited is a compilation of affidavits from various people with connections to the government, or the UFO issue, or space, or in Dr. Rosin's case, all of the above. When I received my copy of this book, 9/11 had not yet happened, which makes the statements in Rosin's Affidavit all the more intriguing and thought provoking. So, rather than review that affidavit, I reproduce the central claims of that affidavit here. Rosin, after rehearsing her involvement with Fairchild Industries, indicated her involvement with Dr. Werner von Braun from 1974 until his death. We pick up her Affidavit at this point:

As practically a deathbed speech, he educated me about those concepts and who the players were in this game. He gave me the responsibility, since he was dying, of continuing this effort to prevent the weaponization of outer space. When Werner von Braun was dying of cancer, he asked me to be his spokesperson, to appear on occasions when he was too ill to speak. I did this.

What was most interesting to me was a repetitive sentence that he said to me over and over again during the approximately four years that I had the opportunity to work with him. He said the strategy that was being used to educate the public and decision makers was to use scare tactics... That was how we identify an enemy.

The strategy that Wener Von Braun taught me was that first the Russians are going to be considered the enemy. In fact, in 1974, they were the enemy, the identified enemy. We were told they had 'killer satellites'....

Then terrorists would be identified, and that was soon to follow. We heard a lot about terrorism. They we were going to identify third-world country 'crazies.' We now call them Nations of Concern. But he sad that would be the third enemy against whom we would build space-based weapons.

The next enemy was asteroids. Now, at this point he kind of chuckled the first time he said it. Asteroid - against asteroid we are going to build space-based weapons.

And the funniest one of all was what he called aliens, extraterrestrials. That would be the final scare. And over and over and over during the four years that I knew him and was giving speeches for him, he would bring up that last card. "And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We are going to have to build space-based weapons against aliens and all of it is a lie."

....

"The last card that was being held was the extraterrestrial enemy card. The intensity with which he said that, made me realize that he knew something that he was too afraid to mention. He was too afraid to talk about it. He would not tell me the details. I am not sure that I would have absorbed them if he had told me the details or even believed him in 1974. But there was no question that that man knew and had a need to know, I found out later.(Steven M. Greer, M.D., (Ed.), "Testimony of Carol Rosin, December 2000," Disclosure [Crozer, CA: Crossing Point, Inc.: 2001], pp. 255-256).

In the wake of 9/11, we have definitely moved through the "terrorism" phase, to the "Nations of Concern" phase (Iran, North Korea, Iraq), and, beginning in more recent years, an increased "pushing" of the near Earth asteroid and collision memes, and with the Chelyabinsk meteor, or the mysterious, and perhaps mysteriously diverted, Oumuamua comet being the two most "talked about." Indeed, as I've pointed out often on this website, the Chelyabinsk meteor incident was made the more mysterious by the fact that Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev had one month prior to the event talked about the need for a planetary asteroid defense system of international nature, to divert or if necessary "take out" threatening asteroids. If Russia could not gain international cooperation for such a system, then, said Medvedev, it would just have to go it alone and build one itself.

So we appear, definitely, to be in the "asteroid" phase of Rosin's affidavit, which has proven to be astonishingly accurate in its broad sequencing from "terrorism" to Nations of Concern" to asteroids.

In that context, then, certain things about the NASA statement jumped out at me:

Protecting Earth from incoming asteroids will be a huge job, but don't expect astronauts to do it, NASA said. "That's something relegated to the movies — it makes a good movie, but we do not see in our studies any technique that would require the involvement of astronauts," Johnson said, adding that NASA's proposed asteroid-deflection techniques "would all be done by robotic spacecraft." [7 Awesome Sci-Fi Movies Where Asteroids Threaten Earth]

...

In the third objective, NASA is asked to come up with new ways to deflect an asteroid heading toward Earth. This involves developing new technologies for "rapid-response NEO [near-Earth object] reconnaissance missions," in which a spacecraft could launch toward an Earth-bound asteroid and somehow change the space rock's course so that it no longer posed a threat. NASA had plans to attempt this with the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) in 2021, but the Trump administration scrapped that mission in 2017.

However, ARM was not the only asteroid-deflecting mission NASA had up its sleeve. The agency's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), expected to launch in 2021, will be "our first technology demonstration of the kinetic impact technique to deflect an asteroid," Johnson said, and it will encounter the asteroid system Didymos in 2022.  (Emphasis added)

Needless to say, the "first technology demonstration of the kinetic impact technique to deflect an asteroid" has me thinking in all sorts of high octane speculation scenarios. For one thing, it has me recalling those strange Chinese chemical plant explosions a couple of years ago. Certainly under the glorious march of socialism into the dustbin of history, a few chemical plants could blow up. But it will be recalled that there was speculation at the time that they may have been "taken out" by space-based "rods of God", i.e., by kinetic weapons. There was something in favor of that hypothesis, in that one chemical plant's explosion left a very deep crater. Then, before that, there was that very strange "sink hole" affair in Guatemala, with the nearly perfectly circular "sink hole" that appeared more as if it had been bored, rather than being a natural geological feature. That is, if the photographs were to be believed.

Those were highly speculative interpretations, but then there was the strange remark made by General Mattis with respect to the military "options" available to deal with North Korea, prior to the love-in in Singapore earlier this month. A reporter asked specifically if these options included "kinetic weapons," and Mattis' response was basically "Yes."

The upshot of all of this is NASA is now, basically, publicly admitting to the fact that it will launch a space-based kinetic "system" and test its effectiveness for diverting, and one can only assume, destroying, an asteroid. Thus, again, Dr. Rosin's basic claims in the affidavit seventeen years ago have proven to be astonishingly accurate.

But then there's this, which made me think of a whole other use of the "kinetic weapon asteroid blaster":

The second goal listed in the document discusses the improvement of "modeling, prediction and information integration" across U.S. agencies to help predict the probability that an asteroid will hit Earth and determine exactly when and where an incoming asteroid could strike. Emergency-management teams like FEMA would use this information to determine the best course of action when preparing for an asteroid strike and dealing with the consequences after an impact occurs.

There is a school of thought, advanced by Catherine Austin Fitts and others, that the recent California fires north of the San Francisco bay area, were not accidental, but we deliberately done to enable cheap property buy outs of the area, and that the fires were the consequence of the use of deadly exotic energy weapons. Indeed, there were some telltale signs of the presence of microwaves, and some unusual fire "signatures": home burned to the ground, while right next to them, trees, untouched, and unburned, an eerie scene reminiscent of Dr. Judy Wood's "toasted cars" on 9/11, and for me, a sure sign of unusual resonance effects. All of this gives the "deliberate burn out for cheap buy out" scenario some traction. The presence of US Military personnel in the area after the fires only make the treads on that traction much deeper. But why bother, I wonder - and herewith the second part of today's high octane speculation - with deliberate burn-outs? Just threaten an asteroid impact, and have everyone evacuated from their homes. Then fake the impact with some nifty kinetic weapons, and voila, a cheap buy out can be effected and populations can be relocated from "sensitive regions" under the guise of natural catastrophe.

Whatever one makes of that second speculation, however, the fact remains that NASA is now, in a backhanded way, confirming the existence of space-based kinetic weapons systems, and plans to test one for an ostensibly "benign" purpose. And in doing so, has once again vindicated Dr. Rosin's predictions.

See you on the flip side...

 

21 thoughts on “NASA’S NEW ASTEROID DEFENSE PLAN”

  1. One has to chortle a little at an Evil All Powerful “Deep State” actor, using exotic energy weaponry to fry up a country just to get some ‘cheap’ real estate…
    Power up the Pyramid and accelerate the rotation of the Earth and unpark the moon and bring it in closer to get some serious waves and go skinny surfing off the coast of California (private beach now) on waves 300 metres high.. God its good to have the power of a God..

    The only question I have.. Did Dr Braun mean that the Aliens would be the lies.. or that we’d need Weapons BECAUSE of the Aliens, would be the lies..??

  2. . . . Expected, but not anything to ponder nefariously, as one errs on the side of ignoramus-stupidus (Don’t they wish) . . . Satellites, debris, objects, and other items have been monitored by way of the US Air Force Space Command and the other military branches for some time. . . At an earlier time the count for this orbiting debris, inoperative satellites, and other left over or better said, left behind space junk, surpassed 8,000 pieces and that was in the early 90’s. . . Today, it’s more akin to a haze-lo out there in the 10’s of thousands – It’s surprising that there aren’t more failures of functioning equipment. . .

    . . . As for some speculation regarding space borne target testing hardware, where asteroids, junk, and adversarial types are considered, there might have been some recent testing just a few days ago on the 21June2018 over Russian airspace. . .

    http://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-exploded-disintegrated-over-russia-june-21-2018

    . . . Happenstance perhaps, but one still has to factor in a probability, however remote it might be. . . Was that daytime meteor from the Taurid stream, rogue from Ort, just one of THOSE things from the asteroid belt beyond Mars? . . . No matter, it burned up last Thursday morning just like that one in 2013 over Chelyabinsk, but without shattering windows and busting doors down during the winter. . .

    As for NASA, they have some data to come clean with before boasting how they’re going exceed expectations while demanding more dollars for little to nothing and continuing hide findings. . . They, like other intelligence employees may continue to wonder who has the clout to monitor their monitors and downlink their downlinks. . . Some of those folks seem to think that everyone they think not adept are as aloof as a TV show or less than they are when sky monitoring is concerned. . . Private folks have caught on to that governmental treachery and can keep secrets, TOO, because they can. . .

    . . . But back to that article, “Isn’t it just grand that they plan to hunt asteroids after all, just as Werner von Braun suggested decades ago?” How wonderful, but some NASA and intelligence employees as well as presumptive governmental representation, some retired now, are not excused for their past inept policy and decision-making treachery. . . Despite their questionable actions while claiming to be acting on behalf of constituencies, the article does get people to think about what to do pre and post catastrophe, but more importantly those submerging coastline cities east and west. . . There’s a lot of infrastructure to repair, to modify, to move while vastly reducing urban sprawl, concentrating on inland building in the form of spires and towers (like China and Japan already do). . . Arable lands must be used for food production. . .

  3. (Hmmm. Reply to FiatLux has ‘disappeared’ three times now. Let’s try breaking it up: )

    Also interesting is the speech that Sheridan beams to Earth as his forces approach Earth-orbit. Translate the following into SSP-speak (or even Pleiadian-speak) and reflect-on what your gut/intuition tells you:

    1. “This is Captain John Sheridan. We are here on the authority of a multiplanetary force that can no longer stand by and watch one of their greatest allies falling into darkness and despair.”

    2. “We are here on behalf of the thousands of civilians murdered under orders from the current administration, who have no one else to speak for them…”

    3. “…and on behalf of the Earthforce units that have joined us to oppose the tyranny that has darkened Earth ever since President Santiago was assassinated three years ago.”

    4. “We know that many in the government have wanted to act but have been intimidated by threats of retaliation against your families, your friends. You are not alone anymore. We call upon you to rise up and do what’s right. We have drawn their forces away from Earth and disabled them. The time to act is now.”

    5. “This is not the voice of treason. These are your sons, your daughters, whose loyalties have never wavered, whose beliefs in this Alliance has forced us to take extraordinary means. For justice, for peace, for the future, we have come home!”

    6. (And you wonder why B5 was effectively banned from syndication, at least in the US…)

      [Mod/censor apparently did not like the word “Nightw@tch”…]

      1. Robert Barricklow

        LOL!

        I enjoyed the dialogue, as it speaks to many.
        Those whose words may have been very similar,
        had they too, a platform.

  4. Robert Barricklow

    As the former spy betrayed by the country he thought he was serving said[paraphrasing]/A government agency, founded on deception, secrecy, illegal & immoral actions, and disregard for nations & international law, and directed by highly paid people who know how to deceive, lie, manipulate, and hide their misdeeds from the public, might sacrifice American interests & lives for their “own greater good”[or beach front real estate].

    How have “we” ended up here
    playing out this nightmare?

    Keep a tight hand on everything, right down to your soul.
    If your selling, they’re buying.

  5. marcos toledo

    This assumes that asteroid-comets strikes are random events. Could the larger strikes been intentional a la is shown in the 1950s film This Island Earth. As for deliberately starting forest fires to force homeowners to sell would not artificial created lightning strike provide better cover for that purpose.

  6. Space is the ideal place to test wespons, especially if the weapons are not being revealed to the public.. Could this be the primary reason for going into space?? The testing of atomic weapons after WW2 has already poisoned the planet. What better place to test kinetic weapons than the backside of the moon, an uninhabited planet or an asteroid. DART will undoubtedly the first publicized demonstration of an asteroid deflection.

  7. Dr. Farrell–I think your “high octane” speculations are right on target! Every time I hear these increasingly frequent stories about the need for space-based “defense,” I remember the B5 episode that goshawks mentioned in a comment on one of your blog posts. I don’t remember all the details of that B5 episode, but as I recall, the plot was basically this:

    The president of EarthGov goes nuts and plans to point the planetary defense grid weapons down toward the Earth–and he intends to pull the trigger. We learn of the president’s plan from Mr. Edgars(?), CEO of Edgars Industries, which is one of the gigantic corporations, or “megacorps,” of the day. One scene takes place in Edgars Industries’ headquarters on . . . Mars. In that scene, Mr. Edgars explains that “the megacorps have been in control [of Earth] for years” and that they allow the president to run a few things on Earth, just to give the people the illusion that the government is in control.

    Hmm… so a planetary defense grid–no too farfetched. With the crucial point that a space weapon that can be pointed up can also be pointed down. Megacorps have been in control for years? Not too sci-fi in my book either.

    To borrow CAF’s brilliant aphorism: In America, fact is fiction, and fiction is fact!

  8. I noticed that the phrase “build space-based weapons” appeared in the last three fear-mongering categories of Ms Rosin. That’s a pretty telling emphasis. The corresponding increasing-capabilities would be (1) Russians: tech development, (2) terrorists: looking down; defensive, (3) asteroids: looking up; offensive, but non-maneuvering, (4) aliens: looking up; offensive, and maneuvering. Looked at this way, each category is ‘cover’ for a further build-out in capability…

    1. anakephalaiosis

      Some speculate, that satanic Rottenchild wrote “Protocol 1” to mastermind masses, and that Rosin affidavit exposes “Protocol 2”.

  9. anakephalaiosis

    Mathematicians and linguists are having dispute, whether Odin hangs on a “windy tree” or a “windless tree”. Latter being a possible “perpendicular z-axis in Euclidean space”. Linguists are more literature-oriented, and “windy tree” makes more sense to them.

    At core of conflict, there is an archaic negative suffix “-gi”, that mysteriously transfers any given noun into its negation. Probably a Bardic feat.

    Man + gi = mangi (no man).
    Wind + gi = vindgi (no wind).

    Thirteen century author, Snorri Sturlason, writes about primordial void, Ginnungagap, as being so at rest, that it is “windless”. (“Ginnungagap var svo hlætt sem loft vindlaust.”)

    Weaponizing Euclidean space would suggest, that empty mind equals “windless space”. Tesla constructed his machinery in “windless space”.

    Assuming, that Odin hangs on “perpendicular z-axis in Euclidean space”, then Rune rebus opens door into space geometry, revealing pyramid structure, as “four corners” of the world.

Comments are closed.