20 thoughts on “TIDBIT: BERNARD GROVER’S LASTEST ANALYSIS OF THE Q PHENOMENON”

  1. Robert Barricklow

    Unfortunately, both on my computer & my laptop I’m unable to access this site.
    Censorship is my latest bossa nova
    [blame it on the bossa nova].
    It would be ironic if the Keystone cops are censoring themselves. The right hand censoring the left hand.

  2. Yet another strange thing about Q is the absence voice/sound. I often use my intuition by their tone and inflections and facial expression when in person. “Q” uses questions which is how we communicate with each other, to understand where someone is coming from. “Questions” are foundations of communicating. And here we are, giving a personality to the “typed out questions” strange indeed!

  3. couple possibilities – remember how far along noise canceling tech has come? now it’s way beyond that. the system senses the wave form and puts out in sufficient time a wave form to cancel that one? imagine another step up in a system that can answer with whatever wave form to heterodyne and make whatever signal they want to come out and seem to come out from whatever source they want it to come out of. how’s that for specific?

    picture this. a helicopter is flying toward you with sound systems mounted to broadcast sound ahead of the craft so that you hear no sound even as the chopper approaches and hovers over you. ok now take it a step further. that system now broadcasts so that all you hear as chopper approaches is well whatever sound they want you to hear. and perhaps from whatever angle they want you to perceive it as coming from.

    ok now take that concept and apply it to society. via digital noise. he’s right q doesn’t have to be an ai trying to appear human. it’s almost certainly ai incorporated though.

    quinn micheals still has interesting advocacy of tyler as being his fave ai. and q and anon as being weak psy ops fighting each other to draw us in. curiouser that tyler isn’t another op? what comes to mind is that i’m hard pressed to think up one thang we have been told, shown, taught, …. that isn’t an op. what makes anyone think that what we’re getting now isn’t all intended to play us. including this conversation.

    ok let’s move on. if we’re being played what’s the wisest choice? is it necessarily to not do anything? or is it to continue with the limited knowledge we’re given and be played as positively as possible? and/or learn from those learning us?

    i wonder. i do know that i do disdain the smell of hegellian dialectics. curiouser and curiouser to see where the various ops go in their jabs at each other. it does look like anonymous is more and more a clinton/bush character while q is a trump ette.

    1. “Including this conversation” just as I was reading that, I looked outside my window and the morning sun lighting was so inviting and peaceful that I decided to unhook myself from the matrix and float into another reality for awhile. I think it’s a decision and a choice we make every day.

  4. stay a skeptic at all cost .your open minded appearance depends on it .there is no reckoning. No conclusion.No coherent path..?sound mighty productive ? over engineering is one hell of a psych opp..neil strong thought it was a great strategy.

  5. My first thought on reading the cited article was that this was a combination of Isaac Asimov’s “Psychohistory” and the advanced collation/tracking tracking systems displayed/exposed in the later “Bourne” movies…

    Isaac Asimov’s three-volume Foundation Series was an eye-opener in the use of NSA-strength intel and human psychology to shape the future of mankind. In the series, the deeply-secret Psychohistorians had a positive goal: the shortening of the time between the falling of the current Galactic Empire and the rise of the next GE. Even actions which could be seen as negative in the series’ present were positive if they could shorten the inevitable era of chaos. In current SF-speak, the series was about covert Timeline Shaping

    I could make a case that WE are in a time of the falling of the current AngloZionist Empire (to use The Saker’s terminology) and the rise of the next Great Empire (or whatever term you choose). There may indeed be a version of higher-level ‘Psychohistorians’ who recognize this, and are trying to shorten/mitigate the time of OUR chaos. Bernard Grover may have put his finger on the subtle ‘guiding’ aspects of OUR psychohistorians. (I truly hope that this is the case, rather than our current Bad Guys still being in the ultimate driver’s seat.)

    Seen in this manner, “Q” would indeed be just as Grover states: deep data mining and synthesis, followed by dissemination of ‘routing’ memes toward whatever future OUR psychohistorians envision…

    (Note that the Foundation Series viewed ESP and higher abilities as a ‘distraction’ rather than a positive, and also the FS had no use for higher-level Beings or spirituality. The FS occurred purely in a ‘humans are only meatbags’ universe.)

  6. Typical article from a respected “pundit” who ignores important information in order to make a point. Focus on the coincidences. Research them. Then tell me if you think Q is some kind of fake.
    The paraglider which flew over the Trump Scottish golf course had a banner which stated “322” on it. Look into this and the actions that followed. Too many coincidences. And don’t be timid aboiut digging into Gematria. Enjoy the show!

    1. I invite you to read the other articles in the series, as they combine to create a full picture.

      As for the para-glider, the banner did not “state” 322, it was inferred from a complex series of calculations, not all of which are logical and obvious to the casual observer.

      In honor of the Illuminati bloodlines, I am addressing this very incident in my 13th post on Q, coming up next. I invite you to come back for the analysis.

      Thank you!

      1. I tuned out Q immediately. I happened to be on 8chan when the Anon person(s) rolled out their AMA’s in the /pol forum the summer before the election. It was very interesting and a great rehearsal for Q, which has been enormously successful but also transparent to those with a broader perspective of history and politics (which (I now have thanks to people like JPF). I really liked the augenguy’s blogs on Q.

        “In fact, the only thing truly remarkable here is that so many people resist so strongly the suggestion that they are being controlled and led by a completely unknown entity towards some end that they really have no idea how to clearly define.”
        —-This does not surprise me. 96% of MSM is owned by 4-5 conglomerates. We don’t have a free press–we have a nearly all-encompassing propaganda mind-control machine “informing” the masses for decades. Our entire political system is a psyops conducted by the MSM “intelligence” cartel.

        “And no, taking down the “Deep State” and draining “The Swamp” are not clearly defined goals….Yes, I am aware of Peter Dale Scott’s definition of “Deep State,” but that has little or nothing to do with its current manifestations in Q Lore. The definition has become so broad and fluid as to be almost meaningless.”
        —-which is by design. Opposition control FTW.

  7. An incisive article on the data collation and manipulation under way through the “social” networks…. ” Lather. Rinse. Repeat. Add new phrases like, “Trust The Plan,” or “The Great Awakening,” or “red pilled.” Pick any number of tidy phrases and let the AI model determine the best place to drop it based on probability that it will spread to the entire network.”

    1. The plan – taking Alex Jones and many other alt sites off You tube and face book. Does it wake people up or rile them up? “They” know human psychology well and plan ahead by decades.

      1. Robert Barricklow

        An in-your-face-censorship.
        This, all along w/the other IYF[corporate speak for in your face] they love to initialize everything[in every sense of the word; or, to securitize everything in every cents of the word.]
        So, what else is new… ?
        [meaning, it’s business as usual for them.]

Comments are closed.