OF FOSSILS AND STRUCTURES AND TIRE TRACKS… IN ANTARCTICA

When Mr. M.S. sent me the link for the following video about the discovery of several  "somethings" in Antarctica, I was, at first, inclined to hit the "delete" button, as I do with about 99% of videos people send me. Sorry folks, it's just the reality of things: I simply do not have the time to watch videos from hundreds of people. But every now and then, one manages to pique my curiosity sufficiently that I have to watch. In this case, I was floored, flabbergasted, stunned, shocked; and there was more than just a queasy anxiety in the pit of my stomach, for if true, then it's definitely confirmation that "something" is "up" down there.

But first, let me hedge today's blog around with multiple riders, caveats, exemptions, exceptions, and cave legentibus: (1) I have no idea of the reliability of the site from which the video came; I did watch several other videos from the same site, just to get a "feel" for it, and I come away with some ambivalence, though I did not detect any intention willingly to dissemble, but that is a purely subjective assessment, and the reader may disagree; (2) the video links yet another video about "high Antarctic strangeness" that I also watched and will link below, which seems to "confirm" the anomalies found in the first video; (3) if true, what is shown in both videos is nothing less than stunning, and it tends to confirm my suspicions - stated most recently for example on the Richard Dolan Show - that the high strangeness going on in Antarctica may be due to the fact that they "found something"; if these videos are showing genuine anomalies, then that hypothesis has just been confirmed, and in spades; (4) this, however, must always be tempered by the fact that in today's digital age, anything can be "photoshopped". The question then becomes, who photoshopped what is seen, and why.  That said, I'd be remiss on a website that specializes in high octane speculation and "the weird" not to pass this along. Finally, an apology to readers: the videos will require about thirty minutes of your time. Again, I pass them along for their intrinsic prima facie interest.

That said, here is the video sent by Mr. M.S.:

And here is the second video that the above video referred that I also investigated:

Now, if you've managed to make it through both videos, there are a number of things that stand out to my mind, and which form the focus of my daily dose of high octane speculation. Again, for the sake of argument, let us assume that the anomalies highlighted in both videos is genuine. What, then, emerges? Firstly, I note that the anomalies for the most part, as far as I can tell, fall within the general regions that were either "invaded" or that were explored by aerial photogrammetry mapping missions by Admiral Richard Byrd in the well-known Operation High Jump, 1946-1947. Let me underscore that once again: they are within the general regions in which Operation High Jump took place. A careful and detailed examination of this correspondence I did not do; and thus this remains a merely qualitative "first glance" assessment.  Secondly, what is also interesting and intriguing to me is that the author of both of these videos, who calls himself "Florida Maquis" and who did a great deal of yeoman's work on these videos, also did yet another video in which he examines other Antarctic anomalies which fall within the general region explored by the 1938-1939 German expedition in the region they called Neuschwabenland, otherwise known as Queen Maud Land. Thirdly, if these anomalies are genuine, then my hypothesis that the reason for all the recent strangeness in Antarctica, from the sudden visit of former Secretrary of State John Kerry to the visit of Patriarch Kiril III of Moscow, to Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin - who incidentally made several strange tweets on his Twitter account both prior to and after his visit, one of which was a tweet that was quickly taken down that what was down there was "pure evil" - assumes a context that they did not have before: they were most probably down there have a first hand look at these anomalies for themselves. The sudden interest of Turkey in Antarctica would also make sense, because if these anomalies are genuinely there, then it stands to reason that there is a lot of quiet discussion taking place in the background by the "powers that be."

The anomalies themselves are worth commenting on: again, if genuine, then they are showing three basic classes of "things" there: (1) structures indicating an intelligent origin; (2) fossil-like remains that are quite large; and (3) anomalies both on or beneath the land surface, and beneath the coastal waters, whose exact nature is unknown, but which in some cases exhibit recurring rectilinearity. With respect to the last class, recall that Russia was going to send elements of its Baltic Fleet to Antarctica, along with a "spy ship" to do coastal explorations off the continent.

To put all this high octane speculation as succinctly as possible: if the anomalies are indeed genuine, than we now have clear evidence that there may once have been some sort of civilization on the continent, but of a very bizarre nature, given the "fossils" displayed in the second video. The author of the videos, "Florida Maquis", also points out that these anomalies are not necessarily visible from a simple Google Earth search, but rather, that one can only view them in the professional version, and even then, only by using the time stamp feature, which, he maintains, is a simple but effective way that "the powers that be" have been hiding things; something might be visible, or hidden, in the year (to pick a date at random) 2011, that will not be visible in the same area if one only looks at 2018, which as he also correctly points out, most people will do.

Which brings me to a second high octane speculation: let us assume - again only for the sake of argument - that the anomalies uncovered by "Florida Maquis" were indeed photoshopped and injected into the Google Earth (pro version) data stream. The question then becomes "who did it" and "why"? Here, I suspect, a team of delinquent hackers playing an elaborate practical joke on the rest of us, while possible, is only barely so. If such occurred, in my opinion it would be much more likely that it would come from "much higher up." The question then becomes "why", and here I suspect that the reason is simply to create both a misdirection, and to keep attention focused on Antarctica, but to misdirect it. Why be concerned, for example, about Lockheed-Martin's presence in Antarctica, if there are large "fossils" of a large "something" to be found there?

When all is said and done, I am left with that same queasy feeling in the pit of my stomach that these pictures may be genuine, rather than a faked deception and misdirection, for if genuine, they explain a lot of the strange history of that continent in the decades immediately prior to World War Two, and ever since. In other words, if one assumes their genuineness, then they explain much of the hidden reasons for the recent strange interests and activities there. If one assumes for the sake of argument that these anomalies are genuine, then they explain the presence and associations of Aldrin, Kiril III, John Kerry, and many others in and with Antarctica. For the moment, my vote is on the genuine side.

See you on the flip side...

1536242536810

52 thoughts on “OF FOSSILS AND STRUCTURES AND TIRE TRACKS… IN ANTARCTICA”

  1. Michael the Unborn

    Something a bit quirky which kind of hit me just now, watching the second video… The ‘drones’ in Stargate Atlantis were designed looking IDENTICAL to the epic massive ‘squid anomaly’ in that second video. Except, of course, in Stargate Atlantis, the drones were tiny, no longer than a baseball bat. Could this populist material from the world of sci-fi be expected to have an impact on our interpretation of these things, if we put the trail of breadcrumbs to the test? Also worth noting is that Atlantis was very firmly & emphatically located ‘beneath the ice’ in Antarctica in the Stargate series. The comment above regarding how we, the conspiracy community, have been ‘set up’ by the anomalous visits by patriarchs & astronauts, almost certainly, in my mind, sets up the Atlantis narrative. Note also that the US Space Command & the US Air Force were heavily involved in the making of all Stargate shows. I suspect we’re supposed to pick up some takeaways here, but I’m not sure of the overall motive or the angle we’re supposed to glean information from. Are we a ‘part of the problematique’ here? Are we supposed to pick up the Atlantis angle & run with it, in support of an as yet unknown purpose? I suspect we are being led a merry dance, for some reason..

    Cheers, MTU.

  2. I remember being totally mesmerized by the novel of H. P. Lovecraft – At the mountains of madness. I was too young for Lovecraft at the time I read his stuff 😉 now I am taken back to the same feeling I had with these stuff published. As Mr. Farrell points it out several times: we have to think, investigate and conclude always on two separate paths at the same time. This stuff can be just an elaborate fraud – as so many things thrown at the so called alternative thinkers – or it can be genuine. But even a lie gives an good informed and awake mind a lot of good information. If it is a lie – it can be only generated to distract from something else even bigger going in there.

  3. http://antiqueprintsblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/terra-australis-incognita.html

    If you click the above link and scroll down and find the Terra Australis Incognita map and zoom in – on the left had side is a big X blob shape to the left of ‘Terra’. This region seems to correspond to the same region showing the large buried structure with the runway on the first google earth pro vid. You can see the mountain range that corresponds on pics of google earth pro and that old map.

  4. Dr. F,

    A thought from the geostrategic point of view. You’ve posted on the covert Israeli presence in southern South America–Antarctica is of seminal importance, apparently. Would these videos, perhaps, give context to the Falklands war? Falklands ~10 deg further south than New Zealand, better ALOC (Air Lines of Communication) to Antarctica. Was Falklands all about access to Antarctica? Nazis seeking to deprive Anglo faction logistical base, perhaps? Explanation for vehemence of British / Thatcher government response.

    Recent Argentine sub sinking?

    Extrapolating, would colonization of S America represent, to some degree, competing mystery schools / occult secret societies seeking to rediscover / recapture logistical springboard to Antarctica?

    This line of thought would seem to parallel your Middle East covert antiquities recovery hypothesis.

  5. That various dignitaries and luminaries went down there in a very showy manner indicates they were there “setting up” something ultimately for public consumption and probably misdirection and deception.

  6. Assuming these images area genuine – can these structures be enough to justify visits from e.g., Kirill or Kerry? I suppose such people would not be moved around for thousands kilometers through horrid snows just to see anomalous ridges and round lakes. There must be something “they” discovered that is much more clearly weird and much more telling than these. Telling enough to require (or summon) the presence of spiritual leaders, crowned heads, contemporary politicians and astronauts.
    PS I don’t think we actually know the entire list of these guests… Who can say Carols is he only king that went there, or Kirill the only religious leader…

  7. I don’t think that’s a massive beached squid lol but I do think that Antarctica was flash-frozen not so long ago along with those famous Siberian mammoths whose meat was edible and with freshly grazed grass preserved in their stomachs. So, assuming it was temperate and populated, then yes there’s a vast amount of well-preserved ancient (Atlantean?) remains down there under the ice that everyone is probing and digging for. I do also think that Sundaland, i.e., the South China Sea (only 150-230 feet deep, far less than the sea level rise upon the end of the last ice age, thus exposing a large, fertile subcontinent) is a far more compelling site for Atlantis than Antarctica.

    The first video looks like one of these excavation sites, that or small mining operation. IDK if it’s true but there are many reports that the US send a portable nuclear reactor down there already decades ago. So much for the lie that Antarctica is some sort of inviolate nature preserve.

    Anyway, Buzz Aldren is a bit of a loose cannon and has a way of blurting out the truth every now and then (*cough* Apollo *cough*), so his comments are extremely interesting re: Antactica.

    1. Basta, a good point in taking a ‘global’ point of view in any explanations. Something happened circa 12K years ago that wiped out all the large mammals (megafaunda) in North America. (Currently, I favor a majority-snowball comet, impacting onto the miles-deep ice sheet.) Why wouldn’t that have affected Antarctica, too?

      On “Sundaland, i.e., the South China Sea (only 150-230 feet deep, far less than the sea level rise upon the end of the last ice age, thus exposing a large, fertile subcontinent)”, my first big “aha!” on that concept was Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of Southeast Asia” by Stephen Oppenheimer (1998). He had some good elevation maps that just made the concept ‘pop out’ at you.

      What tied this together for me with some form of ‘global Atlantean empire’ was The Lost World of Cham: The Transpacific Voyages of the Champa by David Hatcher Childress (2017). While basically a travelogue on anomalous sites (including Nan Madol on Pohnpei Island), Childress points out that it appears a ‘trade route’ started in the mainland of SE Asia and spread east. He puts the rise and collapse of the ‘water’ trade route quite recent (around 0 BCE). However, I wonder if some of the more-anomalous sites dated from an earlier (possibly land) trade route – originating from the non-submerged era or ‘rebuilding’ towards the end of the flooding era (while they still had the technology or consciousness level)…

  8. The first video is intriguing. However, the runway looked like the same length as the 2000 meter stretch he measured below the site. If that is the case, it is a somewhat shorter runway, only capable of landing planes on the smaller side. Hard to get large excavation equipment in with small planes. That said, there was a lot of “beaten down” snow and I would agree that it was a lot of snowmobiling.
    In the second video, I thought of thermal venting when looking at the rounded triangles and circles in the ice. That by itself is fascinating from a geological perspective.
    Just one question remains…do we trust Google now?

  9. I listened to your interview on KGRA with Rich Dolan and agree they “found something” in Antarctica. Personally I think it’s that fossilized transistor radio we’ve been looking for.
    Ancient tech and who knows, maybe that’s where Atlantis wound up there under the ice.

  10. The find in the first video is pretty mind-blowing, but the finds of the second, while very interesting and well worth more digging into (any geologists in the community?), I don’t find absolutely compelling on their own…
    Being a regular user of Google Earth Pro as a part of my trade, I did find quite curious how changing the view-angle would often “unlock” otherwise hidden imagery, including historical images that didn’t appear to be available when looking at the standard straight-down viewpoint.

  11. www dot utube dot com/watch?v=PKPNpsTPd1E&t=509s

    anyone got time to figure out the locations where security got breached earlier this year by people wearing fit bits that were gps’d? looks like they got a particle accelerator down there they haven’t told us about. wonder where quinn’s locations are in comparison to these.

    1. I’ve watched a few things that Quinn has put out there. I never dove in deep enough to determine if he was legit or not. Perhaps I judged a book by its cover?

      1. Theres a lot to dig around in his bio. So far eziest 4 me is listening to him riff on jason goodmans channel. Jasons a good anchor to quinn’s kite on a gale. Good luck in determing his bonafides. Learn to listen at 2x speed. Either way it’ll b interesting tho.

  12. I watched both videos… I live in an area of extreme high strangeness… so I am familiar with the lines, tracks, runway, etc. These videos were about Antartica… other than the ice & snow & being the South Pole, I see similar anomalies on the mountains. These are alien produced. They carve out areas wherever & use these type of shapes & structures. Just this week in my woods, it was discovered Sumerian writings on rocks. So these anomalies are scattered throughout the world & primarily using ley lines when they do their mapping. It would have been intersting if he had researched the ley lines where these were found.

      1. Makes sense. When venus and/or mars came close enuf to cause interplanetary lightning (mountain formation, instant fossils, electric discharge machining / scarring, craters, massive floods,…. earths electromag locked rotation could have reversed a brief time and tilted the required what 22 deg from matching the rest of solxs planets.

  13. Does this remind anyone of John Carpenter’s “The Thing”? Where’s Miskatonic U. when you need them?

  14. I have not looked at the cited videos yet, but Joseph’s “The sudden interest of Turkey in Antarctica would also make sense” jumped out at me. I have been reading a very interesting book by Andrew Collins, Göbekli Tepe, Genesis of the Gods: The Temple of the Watchers and the Discovery of Eden (2014). Much of the book is concerned with discovering the location of the ‘Land of Eden’ (E.Din in Sumerian). Collins connects E.Din with the mountain-encircled Plain of Mush* in eastern Turkey! That area has very ancient “traditions” passed-down by the Armenian people of that region (many massacred by Turkish secularists in 1915).

    How this connects to Antarctica (in my fevered mind) is through the Anunnaki. E.Din was the stomping ground of Enlil, the overall chief of the Anunnaki. If Collin’s book (and others) was read by Turkish leaders, they know that the Anunnaki were a technologically-advanced race who had a very important (for humans) ‘base’ in the Plain of Mush in eastern Turkey – and others worldwide. They may have even investigated that area and found artifacts or remains. (That ‘tradition’ may even be why the present-day Kurds – remnants of pre-Armenian peoples – are putting up such a fight for their ancient homeland.)

    To hear that Antarctica was ‘likely’ a Home Base for the Anunnaki (or for a previous culture that the Anunnaki was later ‘salvaging’) would be incredibly intriguing for Turkish leaders. Particularly if they already had physical proof of their existence from artifacts and skeletons gathered around the Plain of Mush…

    * Collins: “The plain itself lies at a height of just over 4,100 feet (1,250 meters) above sea level and is approximately 40 miles (64 kilometers) in length from east to west and 10 miles (16 kilometers) broad.” (p.237)

    1. If Turkey had found something interesting in Mush, then it may explain Russia’s continued unfaltering support of Erdogan, (even going to the point of giving them weapons for free and forgiving old debts so they could get even more anti AA systems)..seeing as the Russians are implanted in Antartica to the point of having the only.. Church there…
      If the Russians (holding Lake Vostock) had found something (and there are lots of articles now about creatures with totally alien (HANG ON.. I mean different, not extraterrestial..hang on to yer pants..) DNA to anything else that’s been found. (Just near Vostock..)
      Science journals are going crazy at the moment with ‘hidden planets’ flying willy nilly through the solar system at the moment, apparently there’s even a planet hiding behind Neptune as we speak, that’s always been there, but never in our line of sight (Im not a fan of the sun pulling a spiral of planets in a corkscrew fashion behind it theory)
      The Roman Catholic Church is currently imploding under the weight of the child abuse scandals, which may explain why it was only the orthodox Church who was allowed to go to Antarctica and not the Roman Catholic church which was created by Simon the Magus and not by Peter the Apostle..Even Annunaki get punished by raping children (think Enlil and Ninlil when he first met her)
      I vote for an Annunaki sub section in the Community area… 🙂 Lots to talk about..

      1. Kahlypso, very interesting tie-ins with today’s politics. Thanks!

        What was also interesting when I was reading Collins’ book was references to an ancient Christian monastery named Yeghrdut in the southern foothills of the Plains of Mush. This “true foundation point of the Armenian church” (Collins, p.337) was allegedly built over E.Din-era remains. This could have just been a way to entice pilgrims, but it might have some truth to it…

        “Everything pointed toward a long-held tradition suggesting that Yeghrdut’s evergreen tree was seen to mark the site of the terrestrial Tree of Life, planted by Seth either within or upon the skull of Adam, the first man. If correct, then close by was the Cave of Treasures, where Adam and the early patriarchs lived and were buried after the time of the Fall, and the book or books containing the secrets of Adam lay hidden within the Mountain of Victory, located in the land of Shir, or Seir.” (p.338)

        “…in classical times this region of Armenia Major was still classed as Syria, the ancient land of Siriad or Seiris, where Josephus tells us that Seth concealed his pillars of knowledge and his descendants continued to live after this time.” (p. 329) [see Ralph Ellis on Josephus’ ‘identities’…]

        The other thing is Google Earth photos reproduced in Collins’ book of that monastery’s ruins. First, it was huge. Second, it was trashed or dismantled right down to its foundations. (I am not yet in the book-part as to whether this happened from the time the Muslims overran this area, or in-or-after the Young Turks’ Armenian genocide campaign. If the book says at all…)

        Going conspiratorial for a moment, what if ‘someone’ had read about the Adam/Seth remains (and Seth supposedly wrote treatises about all of Adam’s knowledge after Adam died, to record them for prosperity) and desired them? And what if the Armenian church had denied “archeological” permission to said ‘someone’ to dig the grounds? Would that ‘someone’ have instigated the Armenian genocide to gain access to the area? We all know that the PTB have done much worse. The associated deaths would just be ‘collateral damage’. Gives a different ‘flavor’ to the genocide…

  15. Dag from Ringerike

    Very intersting stuff, so to speak. I have been watching both videos and it reminds me about a photo that was brought up by Harry Cooper (and Jeff Rense), a kind of an entrance into a moutain. As we know, Harry Coopers planned expedtion had to be cancelled.

    I mentioned earlier on a thread of this issue about the findings of river silt outside Queen Maud Land. My reference to “Cataclysme” by D.S. Allan and J.B. Delair was wrong. I found it some months ago in the Charles Hapgoods book, “Path of the Pole”. From page 106, he is referring to Dr. Jack Hugh, member of the Byrd Expedition, 47-48, that took bottom samples in the Ross Sea and tested it. The results show us that in a time period fram about 6000 to 15000 years ago there were river silt in the samples This indicate that Queen Maud Land was not extensively covered by a ice sheet. This can also explain the “Piri Reis” map that ancient seafarers mapped it and – it was 4000 years B.C., a least.

    Another interesting thing. we know Carmen Boulter has found three layers of chambers under that Egyptian Pyramide (forgot the name) using geo radar,

    Then I came over a statement from i scientist at Norsk Polar Institutt. They were monitoring the movement of the Antarctic ice sheet by using geo radar. And he said, they could monitore ithe ice moving at mm level. So here we go.

    My humble conclusion is, if there is “something” under the ice cap of Antarctica, “they” know. And for sure, what Charles Hapgood is revealing and also the “Piri Reis” map is showing us; those two clues or indications showing us that there were highly possible human settlements on this continent.

    Why we are not told what the findings are, we can only speculate,; maybe “they” have found out there was a higher civilization that was living there, or – this narrative that our ancesters during some decades or hundreds of years invented, letters, arts, music, farming et cetera can be considered as a big….. if “Antarctica Secret” is revealed.

    The museum guards in many directions are having difficult times at the moment if “something” is coming forward.
    All the Best, Dag.

  16. Robert Barricklow

    You can bet your ass
    “their” interpretation is clueless;
    and “we’ll” pay for it in spades.

  17. Antarctica Unveiled (Pt. 1 of 3) – A conversation with Cliff High
    https://www dot youtube.com/watch?v=GGwtXXw3Kew&t=4s

    This 3 part series was jaw dropping. Cliff discusses Pyramids there as well as having photographic proof. I highly recommend taking the time to listen.

      1. It works for me. Remove “dot” and replace with [.] I try to keep posting the intact link to a minimum on here.

      2. Robert Barricklow

        Tried again
        Used [.] the 1st time.
        This time it went right back to home page.
        They’re playing games?
        Got it permanently attached to my google memory & will continue to play w/it[them].

        Thanks.
        [Not your bad.]

        1. Search for the title above the link. I copy/pasted the title of the video. Its from Forum Borealis channel on YT.

      1. Robert Barricklow

        By the way
        the strangeness of that dot com url address,
        certainly syncs w/the subject matter.
        This digitally created realm certainly mimics
        “their” Black Magick Wickedly Cool Cauldron.

    1. @Ronin last statement of the post. See, and I don’t. There is a lot of discussion in that 3 part series but very little tangible info on the part of Mr. C. High .

  18. Excellent work, Doc. I tend to agree with your read of the images. Looks legit, but as you suggest, you never know.
    Something very Lovecraftian about all this business. “That is not dead which can eternal lie.”
    Cheers

  19. There are things worth looking at though I generally leave it to meritorious persons like the one who made the video to spend hours poring over fields of ice. As Eva says, some of those holes could be archaeological excavations.
    (PS not so sure about the “tentacle” interpretation though; pareidolia?)

    1. Oh boy where to start. Yes, probably pareidolia. I really want to believe in all the artifacts found on the Moon, Mars etc. But the people that make videos like this do not think very rationally when they do so. They fall into what John Michell used to call Megalithomania. I think that’s what Fox Mulder in the X-Files fell into. A sort of “wanting to believe” so much that common sense goes out the window.

      I am extremely open-minded. I have seen strange things happen. I know there ARE strange things out there. BUT … Google Earth only has a certain accuracy. I know because I have worked on stuff to do with the Giza Plateau in Egypt. Also, artifacts can get into the photographs You have to really be hard on yourself when it comes to interpreting such structures. Things from space can look completely different on the ground etc etc etc. I could go on and on.

      To have to stay as grounded as possible, and rule out everything before making judgments on things. People don’t do that because they get caught up in their beliefs. I want to believe that maybe these structures are whatever they are. But to say that thing was a tentacle was a bit of an enormous stretch. Could be a whopping big piece of plastic dropped there by military guys during some exercise. We need boots on the ground before we go racing off into ideas about giant fossils or whatever.

      No wonder the “mainstream” people think we are nuts. We have to be more grounded than this … and it saddens me that people jump to the (possibly) the most ridiculous explanation possible. It may be anomalous, may be not … but that is all it is until we get some one to look at it. It’s a … maybe … anomalous thing. Nothing more.

      1. I have to agree with this comment.
        I thought the first video was good and well worth a watch. The second one i thought was terrible and the sort of thing that gives critically thinking truth seekers a bad name. Not one of the “perfectly round” anomalies was perfectly round and as for his mile long squid… seriously? ? You sure its not a landed “flying spaghetti monster”?
        I have no doubt at all that there is a lot more to Antarctica than we are being told.

    2. yup yup, the time time lapse also interesting, it does give me a feeling like the dig site from totally covered with ice until large amount of ice removed and the physical structure natural or artificial started to show up, fascinating stuff, specially the run way built close to it, it really makes my day 😀

  20. I find it rather interesting that there’s an island off the shores of Antarctica called Rothschild Island.

  21. Very interesting. First vid looks like a giant meat grinder. Plus what he didn’t zoom into looks like a medieval tower to the left of it. Good job I have plans this weekend or I would have whittled it away on google earth pro!!

  22. OHHH my @5:57 the first clip, clearly some kind of excavation there, could be an archaeological dig site, what better than a run way close by.

    @8:16 the second clip, it looks extremely similar like any of ancient city ruin dig site around the world.

    @8:39 second clip, when zoomed out, I see another city ruin like formation to the right side of the turtle shell, much larger as well.

    I totally love that run way, it really makes my day LOL

    1. Why we see the run way at the first possible dig site, but not the second clip dig site? Could it be – Dig site 1 is technologically interest, Dig site 2 just a city ruin, not as significant as the Dig 1, who knows, may be Walter Bosley should take a look at both clip, and has his take on of them, are these reminds him what he been told? I totally don’t mind they found something like Ulduar in WOW ROFL!!!!!

Comments are closed.