OF (ANTARCTIC) ICE CUBES AND (MARTIAN) CLOUD PLUMES: PART TWO

Yesterday I blogged about all the conspiracy theories floating around about that cloud plume that recently formed on Mars, the apparent effect of outgassing from a "dormant" Martian volcano, and the questions its raises about the atmospheric conditions on that planet. Today, we take a look at another story, also one involving NASA, and one involving those strange, nearly perfectly rectilinear "icebergs" that NASA allegedly photographed off the coast of Antarctica.

I say "allegedly", because you'll recall that yesterday I made my "bit of mental reservation" about the photographs clear. Anyone - including NASA - can photoshop anything. So I'm speculating on in my usual fashion: let's assume the story is true, and that "they" are not having a bit of fun at "our" expense, and speculate on the implications. Again, so many people sent me this article that I have to extend my "generic thanks" to all of you who did so:

NASA scientists discover 'photogenic' iceberg with almost perfect right angles and a flat top

Now, I'm hardly an icebergologist, or whatever they call experts in icebergs. All I know about them is that you don't want to board ocean liners from Southhampton to New York while they're hanging around. But I chose this particular version of the story from Australia because there is a very short video clip at the beginning of the article, prior to the actual picture of what sure looks like a very rectilinear iceberg with four almost perfectly perpendicular corners, and four almost perfectly straight edges, almost like it had been cut from the ice sheet. We'll get back to that.

At the beginning of the video, however, as the airplane is flying over a bunch of other icebergs, one notices something...well... a little peculiar: a bunch of other icebergs, again, with nearly perfect rectilinear features, all looking that they had been fit together like jigsaw pieces in some gigantic iceberg puzzle, and had fractured apart.  Again, I'm not an "icebergologist," but I do know that when I drop icecubes on my floor, and they shatter into lots of little pieces that Shiloh instantly gobbles up, that they're rarely if ever in the form of perfectly formed rectilinear little shards of ice.

Once again, we get the "nothing to see here move along" explanation:

According to scientists, the iceberg's sharp angles and flat surface are an indication that it had probably recently broken off the ice shelf.

"I often see icebergs with relatively straight edges, but I've not really seen one before with two corners at such right angles like this one," Operation IceBridge senior support scientist Jeremy Harbeck said.

And then there's the explanation for snapping the photograph itself:

"I was actually more interested in capturing the A68 iceberg that we were about to fly over, but I thought this rectangular iceberg was visually interesting and fairly photogenic, so on a lark, I just took a couple of photos," Mr Harbeck said.

The rectangular iceberg appeared to be freshly calved from Larsen C, which in July 2017 released the massive A68 iceberg, a chunk of ice about 5,000 square kilometres.

Uh huh. You decide "on a lark" to take a picture of a rectangular iceberg which is 5000 square kilometers in size, and it just happened to break off from the ice sheet in a perfectly rectilinear form. It happens all the time.

So in addition to all the strange people associated with Antarctica - and just for kicks, let's remember who some of them are:

  • Reichmarschall Hermann Goering
  • Kiril III, Patriarch of Moscow
  • US Secretary of State John Kerrey
  • Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin
  • Admiral Richard Byrd
  • Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz
  • US Secretary of the Navy John Forrestal
  • Rudolf Hess
  • King Juan Carlos
  • and some British Royals
  • And Sultan Tayipp Erdogan
  • and so on...
  • ...oh and let's not forget Lockheed-Martin

- there have been persistent internet stories of strange things being found on Google Earth, and whatever one thinks of those stories, now we have a rectangular iceberg that was photopgraphed "on a lark."

Now, if you're like me, you're probably thinking, "there's something wrong with this picture." Why, for example, is NASA involved with Antarctica, and why is it flying planes over icerbergs to snap pictures of a rectangular iceberg "on a lark"?

In other words, it's time for some of our well-known High Octane Speculation. First speculation: NASA is snapping photos and doing overflies of rectangular icebergs because its cadre of icerbergologists has told NASA that "rectangular icebergs" just aren't normal. Speculation number two: The iceberg looks like it has been cut from the ice shelf, which raises two very important questions: (1) by whom? and (2) how? As regards the latter, one could certainly drill and plant explosives (lots of explosives) and "cut" the ice that way, but that might not result in the regularity we actually see. And who would have the time and money to do it? And why?And while we're at it, such a procedure would not account for the apparently flat top of said iceberg. But since NASA is involved, it's not unreasonable to assume that perhaps the professional icebergology community at NASA might suspect that it has something to do with space, and perhaps a space-based technology what would allow cutting a rectangular iceberg by "other means." Again, by whom? And why?

Well, one answer to the "why" might be "Lookee at what we can do with our nifty technology." (At least they didn't name the iceberg the Titanic or Olympic or Lusitania.)

When one packages all of this together - the strange people involved with the place, the strange photos that some allege they've found of "strange stuff" down there, and now the oddly geometrical "icebergs" - it seems clear to me (I don't know about you), that something mighty strange is going on down there, that "insiders" from Goering to Byrd to ...well, see the above list ... might know about it or at least some of it, and that they're keeping it secret from the rest of us.

See you on the flip side...

21 thoughts on “OF (ANTARCTIC) ICE CUBES AND (MARTIAN) CLOUD PLUMES: PART TWO”

  1. Seems obvious that this is just someone’s way to call attention to Antarctica associating it with something unusual as a prelude to revealing something more.

  2. It just.. fell off the Icesheet… OK….
    One thing that needs to be recognised here… Whenever ancient structures are found, they are recognised as being ‘man-made’ due to it having straight lines, and right angle corners. (Its what GooglemapArcheologists ™ are looking for all the time seeing as they dont use/ have access to LIDAR)
    Even NASA uses the straight lines and ‘un-natural’ qualities to identify and collaborate ancient sites.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/03/science/nasa-adds-to-evidence-of-mysterious-ancient-earthworks.html
    So.. their Icecube for Titans proves two things..
    The capacity exists to cut lines into the ground.. long straight lines. (Think Nasca lines.. float a satellite up a few thousand metres and burn pictures into the ground.)
    So.. does the capacity for cutting Ice with lasers exist?? Well flabbadabbadoo…. ITS THE RUSSIANS!!!
    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/schwabe.htm
    “The ultimate goal, to which Russian scientists are moving, should be the creation of a ship laser installation with a capacity of 200 kilowatts. “

    1. So if the Russians can make it.. other people can steal the idea and make their own..Does anyone think that IF they’re talking about it in popular press.. that THEY already have the ‘Fonctional and fully Operational Death Star’.. (in an Emperor voice…) version in an underground bunker somewhere and they’re already working on the 3rd generation version before commercialising the 1st generation version to pay for the 4th generation research teams…. (because I certainly do….)

      https://breakingdefense.com/2015/05/lasers-on-a-plane-air-force-wants-fighter-firing-100-kilowatts-by-2022/

      Oh.. and California Fires as well.. We dont need an Akira style Laser weapons platform to shoot some pew pews..

      1. And the second thing.. lol.
        Someone is cutting the ice away from Antartica.
        Which leads to the questions..
        Who? – Russians have the tech.. So does everyone else…
        Why? – Accelerate the Ice Dispersal to get to the goodies underneath.. or cut away areas of interest in order to capture and melt at private locations to ensure anything ‘in the ice’ is contained and controlled.. Be that…. Ancient civilisations with technologies included.. Crashed Aeronerfs from Earthbound civilisations, or UFOs (not going to call them UAP.. screw you Clintons and Podestas and Deloghnes (satanic the lot of them)). Basically anything in the Ice. Cut up and towed to Rothschild Island…

        1. There is an interesting aspect to that. The sea level has risen around three hundred feet since the ending of the last Ice Age. If ancient folks were like present day folks, the most interesting sites would be off the now-submerged coasts of Antarctica. (Ancient cities now off the coast of NW & SE India have recently been re-found, for example.) While any installations may have been buried under the dirt/gravel from melting icebergs, they may not have been ground to bits like any structure under a moving glacial on land. (Ice Shelves are mostly floating.)

          Looking for the Good Stuff? Get rid of the Ice Shelves and deploy some ground-penetrating radar…

  3. wonder what the underside of that berg looks like. wonder how easily a drone mounted plasma canon could cut it (and how much nano metal sprayed into that ice it’d take to burn with a plasma canon – (directed energy weapon).

  4. Article: “The rectangular iceberg appeared to be freshly calved from Larsen C, which in July 2017 released the massive A68 iceberg, a chunk of ice about 5,000 square kilometers.”

    Joseph: “You decide ‘on a lark’ to take a picture of a rectangular iceberg which is 5000 square kilometers in size, and it just happened to break off from the ice sheet in a perfectly rectilinear form.”

    A bit of misapprehension by Joseph here: Ice Shelf Larsen C released the A68 iceberg. A68 is about 5,000 square kilometers in size. (Big!) The rectangular iceberg is of unstated size in the article, but looks to be only a few square kilometers in size.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/10/this-iceberg-is-perfectly-rectangular-explained/
    “Senior research scientist Ted Scambos with the University of Colorado at Boulder says the iceberg is in the ballpark of 130 feet tall and anywhere from a mile or two long.”

    (All the other ‘weirdness’ around Antarctica still stands…)

  5. Could this be the twenty-first-century equivalent of crop circles? Or is this the first shipment of ice to the Arabian peninsula that idea has been kicking around for years just a thought.

  6. Fire & Ice.
    Fires in California[and elsewhere].
    Ice cubes in Antarctica.
    Both cut from space?

    I would posit – not by whom;
    but, how many have this technology;
    or, are near to achieving it?

  7. This one appears to be a trial balloon. Some psychiatrists and psychologists from various think tanks and alphabet soup agencies are interested in seeing who is paying attention, who will buy this–and who will not. They cannot build superior propaganda without running some experiments first. If space is as weird as we think it is you need people looking in the other direction.

    1. This does not discount anything Dr. Farrell has written above, but amplifies it further as far as I’m concerned. I wasn’t dismissive–but simply adding to the narrative. The piece itself was the thing in view–and this one was written to divide the social space.

  8. Some have speculated that in order to further their “Global Warming” religion, it would be necessary to “prove” the ice sheets are “breaking up”. They seem to lack any ingenuity if this is the case, as perfectly straight lines and perfectly square corners do not typically occur in nature. In this case it serves multiple agenda’s: the “look what we can do”, “global warming”, and “weird occurrences in Antarctica meme”.
    Maybe it wasn’t a lark, maybe it was one persons attempt at pointing out something weird is going on “down there”.
    We may never know. NASA was set up, more or less, as a “Nazi Reservation” within the USSA and explains why you never get a straight answer from them,

    1. WD, let us just say there were a lot of German speaking people at the space center in the 60s and 70s and many spoke such good English you wouldn’t know they were German. Many lived on the base at Patrick AFB including Herr Debus. db

  9. In poetic realm, space cigars and ice cubes on whiskey planets exist, along with six million penguins inside Giza gas chamber.

    Secret masonic handshake is a room of mirrors, in creation of alternative realities, to herd cattle inside bureaucratic fences.

    When way, truth and life are sequential, logical and cyclical, then patristic exegesis is the tool, that breaks the spell of the matrix.

    TRICK OR TREAT 18
    Birch is winged sprout, 
    spreading its lovely leaves,
    touching heaven.

Comments are closed.