A BACKHANDED ADMISSION ABOUT CHEMTRAILS?

This story from RT was sent by Mr. B., and Mr. K.H. (who echoed almost exactly my own high octane speculations about the article). It's one of those things that just leaves one somewhere in between shock, awe, and dismay, that the hubris of scientismists knows almost no bounds, especially when it comes to "solutions" for "climate change", or "global warming", or whatever the politically correct term for month is. But beyond my personal reaction to the story, there is something that shot my Suspicion Meter right into the red zone for some daily high octane speculation.

Scientismists, according to the article, are at least now openly talking about spraying particulates into the atmosphere to "dim the sun" and avert the dreaded environmental catastrophe. Of course, for most of the regular readership of this and other  alternative research websites, the spraying has been known about, observed, and commented upon for years. But we'll get back to that. Here's RT's version of the story:

https://www.rt.com/news/444762-global-warming-dim-sun/

Before I get into what sent my (and Mr. K.H.'s) Suspicion Meter into the red zone, I  cannot help but make an initial observation about the irony of the story. Ever since chemtrails and spraying became a topic of discussion within the alternative media, being first advanced on the late Art Bell's Coast to Coast AM radio talk show, the idea was met by the lamestream media as just another wacky kooky conspiracy theory. So I have to wonder, when scientismists advance the idea, does that make them wacky and kooky? Or does the idea suddenly become "acceptable" because scientismists have advanced it?

One has to wonder, too, why now? Is this a way merely of covering an activity that has been going on for some time with an acceptable narrative, one which might not be the case at all? After all, if one believes the alternative researchers who have been covering the story for some time, spraying heavy particulate metals into the atmosphere might indeed be a way of dimming the sun and helping to control climate change (or, conversely, making it much worse), but it could also be a  way to increase the electrical conductivity of the atmosphere for far more nefarious purposes.

Indeed, RT itself seems to wonder at the wisdom of such a proposal, and the scientismist hubris behind it:

With all the excitement over the “hypothetical” and “highly uncertain and ambitious” plan, there are no guarantees that it will not actually make things worse in a catastrophic sort of way. There is a suspicious lack of information about what ‘dimming the sun’ could possibly do to those of us who rely on it for basic things – like growing food, or not freezing to death.

Or perhaps the proposal is merely a subtle way to controvert the whole chemtrail meme that is a major topic within the alternative research field. After all, according to the story, no delivery systems currently exist to carry it out:

Instead, the study published in Environmental Research Letters discusses the potential costs and necessary technology to realize the ambitious, if not hubristic, plan. The researchers discuss a variety of potential ways to accomplish the large-scale ‘geoengineering’ project: planes, balloons, or even just shooting chemicals in the air with large guns.

Even apart from that, there’s a fairly serious problem with the proposal: no aircraft currently exists that could actually deliver the payload. Adapting an existing version of SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket has been ruled out, citing the cost.

The proposal suggests a launch could be accomplished within 15 years, with an initial cost of around $3.5 billion, followed by another 15-year running period costing an additional $2.5 billion – a relatively low price given the scale and significance of the project, they argue.

So there you have the subtle message: such a program could not possibly exist because it simply would cost too much (unless, of course, all that missing money might in part be funding such a scheme). But as for lack of delivery systems, frankly, I'm not buying it, and for one very simple reason: when I and two friends were driving up the San Joquin valley in California on our way to the San Mateo Secret Space program conference in 2014, we all saw, and smelled, the spraying being done.

But none of this is yet the part that caught my, and Mr. K.H.'s, eye. What caught our eye was the penultimate paragraph and RT's ever-so-suggestive interpretation:

Dr Phil Williamson, an Honorary Reader at University of East Anglia, critiqued the proposal, saying that nations which “continued to experience extreme climate events” might then “consider that solar geoengineering had been responsible” and would need to be compensated. In other words, cutting the earth off from the heavens might be a real liability issue. (Emphasis added)

With the strange fires in California, liability indeed becomes a problem, both for any prospective defendant, and, for that matter, for the plaintiff; after all, if there is a secret spraying project (as I believe there to be), then who does one sue? How does one identify the culprit, if it is shrouded in classifications and compartmentalization and is a "national security issue"?

But what caught my eye (and Mr. K.H.'s) was that very strange reference, not to dimming the light from the Sun, but rather, "cutting the earth off from the heavens." While the wording could be taken to mean dimming light from the Sun in a round about way, it leaves the door open for the implication that there is another agenda entirely, and that RT knows, or at least suspects, what it is. What that agenda may be, I do not know, but the language is suggestive of a siege mentality: the drawbridge is raised, the parapets are manned, and we wait... for "something"...

See you on the flip side...

36 thoughts on “A BACKHANDED ADMISSION ABOUT CHEMTRAILS?”

  1. How many lies does it take to cover an extremely lucrative “planetcidal” fraud? Ray kurzweil forgot to mention a tiny detail, his event horizon is an extinction event.

  2. Just a precursory look shows research on SRM jet payloads weight could be reduced (by a factor of 2) by production of a sulfer burning jet engine which converts the (elemental/molten) sulfer to H2O4 in the wake of the aircraft….one side effect being a reduction of precipitation over the area sprayed.

  3. Backhanded slap to the face you mean.. 🙂

    Director Brennan Speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations. 29 June 2016

    https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html

    “Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.”

    “An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels.”

    “As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.”

    The very term stratospheric aerosol injection indicates that the aerosols should be put into the stratosphere, otherwise the aerosols will cause heating instead of cooling. Common “chemtrail” lore believes that conventional airplanes are doing the “spraying”, but conventional airplanes cannot fly in the stratosphere.

    Which will addressed in the months to come…apparently its not going to be difficult nor expensive..

    Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment
    Wake Smith1 and Gernot Wagner
    Published 23 November 2018

    http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aae98d

    “After surveying an exhaustive list of potential deployment techniques, we settle upon an aircraft-based delivery system. Unlike the one prior comprehensive study on the topic (McClellan et al 2012 Environ. Res. Lett. 7 034019), we conclude that no existing aircraft design—even with extensive modifications—can reasonably fulfill this mission. However, we also conclude that developing a new, purpose-built high-altitude tanker with substantial payload capabilities would neither be technologically difficult nor prohibitively expensive. We calculate early-year costs of ~$1500 ton−1 of material deployed, resulting in average costs of ~$2.25 billion yr−1 over the first 15 years of deployment. We further calculate the number of flights at ~4000 in year one, linearly increasing by ~4000 yr−1. We conclude by arguing that, while cheap, such an aircraft-based program would unlikely be a secret, given the need for thousands of flights annually by airliner-sized aircraft operating from an international array of bases.”

  4. gander a few times at weatherwar101 videos. main aspects of system are chemtrails metal salts, water vapor generators, microwaves coordinated and heterodyned and not by nexrads and wsrads. i think there’s a 4th aspect that i’m forgetting.

    what else we forgot here is that these ionospheric heating systems can be used to make clouds and precip as well as prevent it. watch the radars before and during cali fires and the clear magick walls holding storms off the cali coast are obvious.

    anyone who can make a storm can also shut them off. instantly. it’s also visible in last years hurricanes that hit and stood there over texas and elsewhere and the ones that loomed and disappeared at the last second.

    1. some other corporati print news source talked about this last week. made it sound futuristic demands on budgets giving details like 300 aircraft making 4000 flights a year.

      as if:
      like that’s not already being done now.

      what was it 5 years ago legislation was passed allowing for such flights on 737’s to be drone operated? hmm. wonder why legislation like that would get put in place so far in advance of any operations that would use that kinda tech?

  5. Do our masters plan to block the heavens from our view. With the pimping of a renewed Flat Earth and this is the universe those of us they keep as their property will exist in a world that will make Zardoz look like paradise.

  6. RBG Santa Monica

    “Cutting the Earth off from the heavens” may also refer to using atmospheric aluminum to block torsion energy (see Kozyrev), including consciousness, keeping cosmic energy and psychic entities out and keeping us trapped.

    1. That is absolutely correct
      Our sun is consciousness
      Our sun is unconditional love.

      There are always only a few people who can bring you into contact with higher consciousness, There are few because not many people are ready for it yet.
      But they are there, when the student is ready, the master appears.
      Love.
      https://www.soundinglight.com/

  7. Six million devils are spraying their body fluids, in protest of heaven, eager to create hell on earth.

    All things contain psychometric imprint. The devils hope, that their odor will drive away the Christians.

    By swamping the sky, they seek to create a mirror of dirt, to worship the fly in the cow pie.

  8. Robert Barricklow

    The lingua franca in the inner circles is: Spray & Zap.
    And here I thought the AI led leadership were the insects.
    As soon as the masses start doubting “the story”; the propaganda machine gets into action to steer the heard into safer pastures.

    Of course, the chemtrails

    1. Robert Barricklow

      … have been around for decades upon decades; even now they’re using nanotechnology to make them invisible to the naked eye[see Elana Freeland videos/books]. First it was for electromagnetic warfare/ionized skies. Then weather warfare. Then biological experiments. Then 5G. Then…? Just how many multilayers of deceptive ops will we have?

      China was building some kind of artificial sun.
      Was that, also, a message that they knew?

  9. Yesterday we were discussing space ports in the Azores. Today we’re discussing global warming and a siege mentality with apocalyptic elements (though I do share some sympathy to what WD is saying.) I cannot help but think western cultures encouraged emigration in the past to reduce their population using whatever means necessary. Every government, no matter the form, will always exploit people’s malcontent as an opportunity to rid themselves of those elements who disagree with their policies. Are there not signs in the historical record where the plight of people, especially the dispossessed and disenfranchised, emigrated from their homes to a “promise land” for a better life in the future? Transhumanism and endentured servitude seem to be perfect mechanisms for civilizing local space with a new human presence. It’s been done before–and still is occurring using a variety of schemes. Human trafficking is a real phenomenon.

    Do I endorse this hypothesis? Not entirely, I’ll admit. It needs to be placed on the table though. We see before us a lot of logistical maneuvering by nations on planet earth to prepare for “something”. We think it may be one thing and focus on a version of it. I’ve often wondered if these logistical maneuvers are intended to address “some things” instead. We’re conditioned to think of threats based on secrecy, the nature of the maneuvers and the myriad versions of the apocalypse that have been planted within our culture. But they may be opportunities disguised as threats instead. We need to be cautious–not stupid.

  10. Global warming is a hoax perpetrated on the idiotocracy for the sole purpose of extracting the carbon tax in order to extract the last amount of profit from the population. It is my belief that they suspected or knew either a Dalton or Maunder minimum was coming and the spraying is to exacerbate the situation making it worse leading to significant population reduction via famine due to loss of crops and shorter growing seasons. This would give them the “plausible deniability they desire due to an act of God or normal long term planetary cycles.
    The Sun is without doubt the primary driving force behind our weather and the planet is at its lowest point of CO2 saturation of the atmosphere for thousands of years. More CO2 equals a greener more fertile Earth. Looking back at the Maunder minimum and the loss of life at that time suggests that what may be coming would be much worse due to many factors and the current world population, especially in the high density population centers where just in time deliveries and a three day supply of food are the norm. World food reserves are at an all time low and sanctions have US farmers leaving crops to rot in the fields as there is no market for them, as well.
    Never let a crisis go to waste. A world wide famine would lead to wars and numerous other unsavory actions by desperate people. Those that can afford it will ride it out underground as they have done before. Hence the push for Continuity of Government and the recent building of shelters for the wealthy. The number of DUMB’s is rumored to be over 100+ now and we’re not invited.

    1. WD, there is scientific data that points to us arriving NOW at the onset of the next Ice Age:

      Examine the Vostok Ice Core data from Antarctica. In the below article, go halfway-down to the graph below the subtitle “Orbital Variations”:
      https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11659-climate-myths-ice-cores-show-co2-increases-lag-behind-temperature-rises-disproving-the-link-to-global-warming/
      Graph only:
      https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/dn11640-1_800.jpg

      Note that the graph encompasses four complete glacial cycles – roughly 100,000-year-long glaciation periods and 10,000-year-long “Interglacial Periods.” (These are sometimes called Milankovitch Cycles.) Observe that this is Much More a glaciated planet than a relatively ice-free planet.

      Note also that Earth is at – or slightly past the end – of the last Interglacial Period (on average). From this data, we should be slowly-entering a 100,000-year-long glaciated period at any time (geologically speaking).

      Ironically, any man-made warming will simply count towards delaying the next 100,000-year-long Ice Age. (If they can melt the ice over the entire Arctic Ocean, that might be enough to short-circuit the plunge…)

      1. i always kinda suspected that’s what the huballa at antarctica was all about. figured the oldest society that survived at least the last ice age by going under is still down there and under and doing just fine inspite of what we consider will be catastrophe for our society. if they are, their continuity will count toward their development. unsure of why they would or would not come out. wonder what they developed and developed into.

  11. “cutting the earth off from the heavens” – it’s quite a common phrase when referring to things up above your noggin’ in the UK.

          1. I think we’re in danger of going a bit Alan Partridge over a comment made innocently enough by an academic from Norwich. Ah haaa!

  12. Cryptocurrencies, the growth in mining, the perceived mania to dumb overdone down…perhaps they are not taking themselves off world but underground instead. It’s my belief that this entire planet is honeycombed in ancient underground cities and perhaps those families in the know have simply gone to ground as they have done many times before.

    1. In H. G. Wells’ 1895 novel The Time Machine,there were the two future post-human races, the Eloi and the Morlocks. H. G. Wells was considered “well connected” at the time. And, the personalities of the PTB and the sheeple are getting more and more like the Morlocks and the Eloi. Perhaps a “gone to ground” forecast, indeed…

      1. HG Wells was an Illuminated. He also described the Martian spaceships exactly as they appeared in the final Phobos II photo before it was destroyed. Gizars need to read up on this man if they havent done so already. He also did a lot of work lauding a New World Order. And his War of the Worlds was used by Orson Welles.. (HG Wells.. Orson Welles..meh) whom we ought to know by now as a pedophile abuser of children (yeh I know.. I dont want to believe it either) to test mass panic effects on the general sheeple..
        A couple of things about Time Machine that I dont like.. The Elite ruling post humans ate the worker class post humans and used them as breeding stock as well if I remember.. And the whole world is ruined because we blew up the moon due to over mining it. (Anything sound familiar here???)

  13. “cutting the earth off from the heavens.”

    ‘Something wicked this way comes’?

    I’m also going to suggest that this might mean cutting off the earth from planetary influences of the other planets in the solar system. Would this not have an affect upon the physical and mental spheres of humanity … in fact all living organic nature?

    1. This is how the phrase struck me too–that perhaps the ionized layer serves to shield the earth from nefarious elements in the solar system, or so they think. With, of course, the added benefits of capture and control.

    1. Sorry I was NOT REPORTING CONTENT – I was trying to AGREE with this poster – sorry I’m still learning the buttons here Dana –

      Mods please ignore the “report” issue but Joseph please chat about this thanks

Comments are closed.