NEW FEDERAL GRAND JURY ON 9/11 EVIDENCE… BUT DON’T GET ...

One of the stories that made the top of the list in the many articles I received was this one, and many of you who shared some version of it were asking what I thought about it. We'll get back to that, and my concerns, but first a couple versions of the many articles that were sent; these two versions are courtesy of Mr. V.t. and Mr. S.D.:

Federal Grand Jury To Hear Evidence That 9/11 Was A Controlled Demolition

Federal Grand Jury Will Finally Hear Evidence Of A Controlled Demolition On 9/11

Many people, when sharing their versions of this story, expressed the hope that finally maybe something would be done to correct and revise the "official narrative" of burning airplane fuel being the mechanism that brought down the world Trade Center twin towers. Sadly, I think that, as usual, another agenda may be afoot, such is my cynicism at this juncture of all things having to do with fedgoobernment.  Here's a paragraph from the second article that zeroes in on my concerns:

For years, hundreds of thousands of people have been calling upon the US government to investigate 9/11, and now progress is finally being made. On April 10th of this year, the non-profit Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry filed a petition with the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York, Manhattan, requesting that he present to a grand jury the extensive evidence of federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center high rises on 9/11. The petition cited conclusive evidence, providing proof of explosives and incendiaries employed at ground zero to bring down the twin towers as well as the WTC building #7.

Now, beyond the fact that grand juries are seldom allowed to exercise their right of direct interrogation of witnesses, rather than simply allow the prosecutor to 'steer' the jury with his or her own questions, the key here for my high octane speculation today is the fact that according to the article, the filing states that only certain kinds of controlled demolitions will be considered, namely, the most conventional kind, i.e., that involving pre-planted explosives, demolition wiring, and so on. A brief nod is made to other theories of controlled demolition with the inclusion of the word "incendiaries" which doubtless may refer to the "nano-thermite" theory first advanced by Dr. Steven Jones. Granted, Dr. Jones' theory was the first alternative theory to emerge from the 9/11 "truth community" that did not highlight conventional explosives-drive controlled demolition. But it emerged during a time that many people were arguing, on the basis of other more anomalous evidence, that other mechanisms might have been involved. The presence of unusual nuclear residue and high background radiation counts of tritium and deuterium in the neighborhood of ground zero, plus the fact of stubborn fires that continued to burn hotly for several days (if not weeks) afterward, plus the presence of clean-up crews dressed in hazmat and apparent radiation protection clothing... all of this led some people to posit the "mini-nukes" theory of the towers' demolition. Other even more anomalous evidence - the near total pulverization of the towers' material, the fact that some material burnt while other (lots of paper) did not, and the fact that several vehicles, some as much as a mile away from ground zero, were also burnt, and burnt in equally highly anomalous fashion with burned out wheel rims or engines, while the rest of the vehicle showed little signs of burning - all of this led still others, such as Jim Hoffmann and Dr. Judy Wood to posit some sort of directed and/or exotic energy weapon was in play.

There are thus four models of  controlled demolition that have been advanced in the 9/11 truth research field:

  1. conventional controlled demolition by use of conventional, pre-planted explosives and synchronized detonation thereof;
  2. the nano-thermite theory, similar to the above, but using military-grade incendiary nano-thermite, but also requiring pre-planting and synchronized detonation;
  3. the "mini-nukes" theory, which may or may not, depending on the version on reads, require pre-planting within the structures; and finally,
  4. the "exotic energy weapon" theory, which again, according to which version of the theory one reads, may (Hoffmann's theory) or may not (Wood's theory), require access to the structures.

The question is important, because as I pointed out in my book Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery, the "mechanism" or "murder weapon" is a key factor in determining who was responsible for the crime, the much more so in this case, as access to the buildings is a prerequisite in the first two theories, and may not be in the case of the last two. Additionally, as I also pointed out in my book, not only does each theory have a certain body of evidence that can be adduced in support of it, each theory runs afoul of contra-indicating evidence. Oddly enough, the theory that seems to make sense of most of the evidence in my opinion is the fourth, the exotic energy weapons theory. But as I also pointed out, if one looks at the implications of who was involved from the point of view of each of these theories, as one ascends from theory 1  to theory 4, the circle of people with access to such technologies grows considerably narrower. Finally, as I also pointed out in my book, most if not all proponents of various theories seem to operate with the implicit assumption that one, and only one, mechanism may be involved. But as I pointed out in that book, it could be the case that one is looking at several mechanisms, each of which might imply different actors being involved, so that one might be looking at a kind of Agatha Christie Murder on the Orient Express where Hercule Poirot is confronted with a similar dilemma: multiple murder weapons, and several different perpetrators, each with their own motivations and agendas for committing the crime. In the case of 9/11, by the time one gets to the "exotic energy weapons" hypothesis, one is looking at a very restricted group that would have access to such technologies, and they may not be state actors at all; consider only the deep corporatization of the "deep state" and its near total control over advanced technologies, and that point should hit home with especial force.

Which brings us back to the filing: it will be noted that the filing appears to consider only the first two theories, and to reject the last two, and in doing so, it may be rejecting evidence leading to the deepest "players" in the foul crime. And hence, the exercise could be seen, not as an exercise to "get to the truth," but rather, as a "limited hang out", since many people simply no longer accept the official airplane fuel narrative.

The question is: why the limited hang-out, and why put it forward now? The answer to these questions may be the most disturbing aspect of today's high octane speculation. In the recent spate of anomalous fires in California, many people have posted pictures of anomalous fire damage: houses are burnt, while nearby shrubbery and trees are not; plastic playground equipment is intact, while all around has been burned to the ground; vehicles show the same type of damage that Dr. Judy Wood laboriously assembled in her research; and perhaps most importantly (and the most important neglected point), some people are simply missing from those death lists: they are neither dead, nor listed in any other category; they're simply gone. To put it country simple: there are evidential parallels between what happened in New York City on September 11, 2001, and what we've been seeing in California. That may indicate that the same, or similar, technology is in play, and lest we draw attention to that curious fact, best to advanced a limited hangout, gain control of the narrative once again, and deflect attention away from consideration, not just of 9/11, but of those fires as well.

See you on the flip side...

 

41 thoughts on “ NEW FEDERAL GRAND JURY ON 9/11 EVIDENCE… BUT DON’T GET ...”

  1. no planes, nose cones cannot come outside intact when a bird can wreck them.

    5. Kazomov’s underground directed nuke theory.
    6. Hollow towers theory, it was basically paper mache being machetied. dust was gyprock only floors.

    any case, the question is why the inquiry halted at just before the towers came down and did not ask… ummmm… why? how? who? we know why!

  2. In addition to the salient points Dr. Farrell makes concerning Grand Juries, etc., and the fact the petition was filed with the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York, Manhattan — the SDNY is owned by the Banks from the roof to sidewalk. Sorry, merely an expensive fuzzy warming exercise for a winter’s day and profits for the private court.

  3. heard judy wood interviewed after cali fires. up in arms and calling people stupid for comparing cali to 911 and using the dew term. she insists otherwise and purely natural wildfires. she was a little too emphatic.

    weird

  4. Go back to 1942 crash in New York I think it was a B24 bomber it flew into the Empire State building. It made a big hole but it didn’t bring the building down and the building was completed about 1929. Unless the building were made of paper mache the should have withstood the crashes.

    1. it was specifically designed to support an aircraft crashing into it.. that’s why thay put a big steel cage around the outside…..ah… I see ZDB got there first.. The darn building was designed to take a plane!!!! hang on.. one more time… plane crashing into building.. it was designed to take it…(sigh)

      1. Not to mention, the 9/11 planes did not hit exactly on the center of the two buildings. The collisions sprayed engines and landing gear toward one side, taking-out beams & girders as they went. So, structural support should have been weaker toward one side. Any reduction in structural strength through aviation fuel fires (hah!) should also have been concentrated towards that side.

        Therefore, if the structural collapse had anything to do with the collision & fire, the upper-floor section should have given way asymmetrically (toward the weakened side). This should have tipped the upper floors into the buildings & streets on that side, and caused enormous damage and casualties outside the towers…

  5. Happy New Years To Everybody.

    Some personal thoughts about 911. First I will give you some revelations, as a kid 10 or 12 years old, we were great pyrotechnicians. Made rockets with natriumclorat (my father was a gardener and used it as a weed killer) and managed to obtain stuff from german ammunition dumps. We were using milk cannes for the rockets and tried to hit seegulls flying over. Great fun, great displays when they exploded.. Today I would imagine we would be have been trolled into government care and treated with some great medical stuff and my parents would have been loosing us as kids.

    From joke to revolver, when you look at when the twin towers , the start, it is what I call as a former pyrothechnician wet dream, it is like a New Years rocket display. It is puffing all away sideways and upwards.

    My background is from process metallurgy and mineral ore dressing. I know how difficult it is, or how much energy that is needed to pulverize concrete in a experimental mill. I saw a calculation years ago that the pulverization of the twin towers concrete demanded 10 times of the gravitianal energy. For me, this is science and also common sense. Else, there would have been slabs on the ground if they were falling from free fall, but no big heap of slabs have been showed.

    And this ridiculous argument that 4000 gallons of kerozene can melt 20.000 tonns of steel. This whack science.

    An important observation, I noticed in a Norwegian debate program some years ago, even the the far left promoted the false narrative about 911. Then you know the whole political system is false, it is bought of.

    It is called the consesus reality. I think this event can be a making of a crack in the wall of silence in BSM, if it is coming forward, at least for the families with their loss of their relatives.

    All the Best,
    Dag

  6. Joseph has chosen to focus on the ‘weapons used’ angle. Yes, that is needed. (I am more in favor of the ‘nuke’ hypothesis – a ‘squelched-yield’ fusion weapon, initiated with the minimum-possible uranium/plutonium.)

    However, I choose to approach the Why Now? of the Federal Grand Jury aspect from a “Who Benefits?” perspective. My opinion is that the Federal Grand Jury will hear the evidence that 9/11 and indeed reach a conclusion: that the Saudis were the masterminds.

    In the nearly two decades since 9/11, the “Dancing Israelis” meme has taken root. A growing number of the populace now feel that an unholy combination of the Tribe, a rogue part of the intel community, and the neocons were the prime movers of 9/11. So, what to do?

    Fortunately, the Saudis were set-up as the Lee Harvey Oswald of 9/11 from the start. A bit of financing. Mohamed Atta and his crew. Osama bin Laden in his cave. Enough ‘evidence’ to swing the American sheeple away from the “Dancing Israelis” image. The higher-ups intend to throw the Saudis under the bus, to save their own skins. The Federal Grand Jury is likely where it will happen…

    (Look at how the MSM has propagandized against the Saudis over the last few years. Not that that was hard, the House of Saud being what it is. I even suspect that MbS is an agent of the PTB. As a result, the American sheeple carry a simmering anger against the House of Saud. That will now be ‘triggered’ for another controlled demolition.)

    1. it’s a controlled demolition of the OLD guys of saud. mbs is the new sherriff with jared kushner’s help. the propaganda is already turning hard against bin talal alwaleed and his few hundred closest friends. you know: that crew invited to stay indefinitely for talks in the riyahd ritz the day after they emptied the ritz out. and the day before they brought in blackwater and dismissed the saudi regular troops?

      so that makes mbs at worst the jack ruby of the deal. and the rump will be a hero for averting economic terrism at the hands of alwaleed. remember when micheal moore told us how the saudi’s were going to pull 700 B outta wall street in farhenheit 911?

    2. between q, a few pedo prosecutions and this plato cave theatre, seems like the rump is untouchable. it’s almost like barry sortero telling us we got keep looking forward instead of prosecuting any bankers and war criminals.

  7. As an optimist with experience, I can’t hold out a lot of hope in having the clear and complete truth of the situation come out. Heck, think of how long it’s been since Pearl Harbor before we can consider suggesting that it was LIHOP.

    On a different note, I was trying to recall which book had references to the significance to measurements (anglo and metric). I want to say that a foot or yard corresponded to the earth’s circumference(?) This is what happens when you don’t have Dr Farrell handing out quizzes to solidify ones knowledge of a chapter 😉
    Also, was there some mention of standards that would suggest interplanetary trade considerations?

    1. hi Qbert… I used to play you when I was about 10 or something…. memories….
      The earth is 131477280 feet in circumference.. This is a good book concerning the importance of measurement.
      Thoth, Architect of the Universe: Stonehenge and Giza are maps
      by Ralph Ellis.

      1. Also recommend the Thoth book.

        In addition, Ralph Ellis’ K2, Quest of the Gods: The location of the legendary Hall of Records (2001) is recommended. Half the book is Ellis traveling to the base of K2 and finding nothing but rock; unsurprising…

        To me, the real gem in K2 is Ellis’ treatment of Alexander the Great. Alexander was an amazing man. He faced-down one of the world’s greatest (or at least most sizable) armies in it’s own territory – and won, repeatedly.

        Then, rather than settling down with his spoils of war (two of the world’s richest and most cultured countries), Alexander basically took off into one of the planet’s most barren and inhospitable areas: the ever-rising, mountainous foothills by the Afghanistan-Pakistan borders. (Interesting that American patrols are ‘scouting’ that region now, for conspiracy buffs.) When Alexander could go no further, only then did he turn south into India…
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great#/media/File:Alejandro_Magno_campaign_3_battles_of_Alexander_The_Great.jpg

        Ellis does an excellent job of explaining this strange behavior by weaving evidence that Alexander was actually on a purposeful quest. He wanted to discover a ‘base of the gods’ (with immortality techniques), which was disclosed by old-religion Egyptian priests during Alexander’s mysterious, hurried ‘side-trip’ to Siwa Oasis in western Egypt.

        Since Alexander was obviously extremely intelligent and purpose driven, he was unlikely to be ‘rattling around’ such an impoverished, mountainous area with an entire Macedonian army just for fun. Ellis provides a plausible scenario for Alexander’s presence there – and a good read, to boot.

        (In my mind, the main question is whether the priests gave accurate information to Alexander as best they could or simply devised a plan to send Alexander [their conqueror] off, as far away and as long as they could.)

  8. “ Insurance” as it was worth more demolished .
    Plus they just renewed the insurance policy and took out a 99 year lease I believe .
    And in doing so create more wealth and Further the agenda and find some Organization or group to blame
    For all we know that the planes we’re controlled piloted like a drone .
    There is evidence The same manipulation Was used for the Titanic switching boats for insurance and popping of some influential bankers At the same time.

  9. No doubt all four methods of demolition were used during 9/11. No doubt.

    The pic that fascinates me about the California fires is of the football field where one half of it was burned to a crisp and the other half was not touched.

  10. There’s a history of rewriting of fables/story tales.
    Our most recent potent example: JFK.
    Fist off 9/11 should have been investigated as a criminal act. The Mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani, immediately had the evidence removed at the scene of the crime.
    Dr. Farrell has the perfect analogy applied herein: The Murder On the Orient Express; plus, that the crime scene resembles those the California fire crime scenes.
    As in other fables/fairy tales being rewritten; it is rewritten by those who want to reframe the picture, albeit w/the criminals out nowhere to be seen, except perhaps in benevolent roles[w/halos photoshopped].
    Mimicking the very crime itself, with layers of hidden patsies, lined-up like stove-piped Matryoshka dolls waiting to be unpackage by corporate media poodles.

  11. And so the events of this day appear to be a post-modern version of the Tower of Babel moment. Rather than having our “languages” scrambled, those “august” social engineers and their overlords are trying to bury their malefactions by altered memories… Hmm… These are the practices of (self-)righteous god-men. (Men who would be gods.)

  12. I dont think that you even have to prove that explosives were used (you can hear the explosions in most videos)..
    Everyone can say that, yes the fires caused the steel to ‘bend’ ‘ or leave precise 45 degree section cuts with black metal slag that’s run off then cooled.. https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/upload_2018-1-27_13-52-44-png.31319/
    but in any case… even if the top half of the building’s structual support was entirely made out of A36 steel ..(which it wasnt…) it still doesnt explain why the top half of the building crushed the bottom half of the building (that wasnt on fire and therefore wasnt weakened by the flames 30 floors above..) without any resistance… The top of the building isnt heavier than the bottom of the building…
    Im surprised that no one is talking about the explosions in the vaults that were heard.. no reason for explosions in the vaults…….

  13. The papal-masonic narrative, called the USA, started with a tea party and ended with a twin tower. Game over. To have masons looking into other masons, produces only more masonic swamp. It is an epistemological paradox.

    This particular masonic gunpowder plot, uses many different technologies simultaneously, to be able to control multiple narratives afterwards. A wild-goose chase in a room of mirrors was the purpose, not the consequence. It is the Tower of Babel.

    Americans do not see it, because of their existential blind faith in their masonic founding fathers – a blind spot – not seeing the wood for the trees. A new matrix is needed, achieved by rewriting the source code of reality, with multidimensional symbols. Druidic rebus.

      1. In 2014, when Russia and rest of Europe accused Norwegians of systematically targeting young families with psychological warfare, the Norwegian masons staged their own controlled opposition.

        When I caught them red-handed, I have never seen anyone run that fast. The papal strategy spans millennia, and it always creates controlled oppositions to itself. Papacy is parasite instinct by protocol.

        Understandably, Americans reject the idea, that USA is a masonic design, that has outlived its usefulness, in a papal millennium plan. Two world wars was the original plan, to destroy Europe. Patton had second thoughts in the end, so he was done away with.

  14. Another strange aspect of these events and the abortion issue is the “sacrifice” angle. I seriously doubt that those behind these atrocities believe in either Satan or God but are more than willing to use such useful idiots for their purposes. Relying on our corrupt justice system to investigate this is akin to allowing the foxes to guard the hen house. We will get no useful information from this at all despite the fact that it should be obvious to even the most brain dead that these were controlled demolitions and the murder of thousands by people with an inhuman lack of empathy for both profit and their agenda’s.

Comments are closed.