MORE ON MALAYSIA AIR FLIGHT 370: ACOUSTIC RECORDINGS, AND DRILLS

I've been fascinated by the story of the disappearance (and presumed crash) of Malaysia Air Flight 370 ever since it disappeared (and presumably crashed) on March 8, 2014. The mere fact that this story remains unresolved is an indicator, perhaps, that something is very amiss, and that something very strange might be going on with the story. Within a week or so of the story breaking, I interviewed with the late George Ann Hughes on The Byte Show, and outline the emerging theories, and came to my first hypothesis that the aircraft had simply gone "poof" and that it may have been the victim of a "Bermuda triangle" like phenomenon, or the victim of some sort of exotic energy technology. That may seem like quite a stretch, until one considers the other theories being floated at the time: it was shot down by missiles (which would have left radar and other clues), it was crashed deliberately by a crazy pilot (or copilot). These were quickly shunted aside, as character witnesses came forward to dispute that the pilot was either depressed or of low character. Missile shootdowns would have left debris.

Then came the stories that the aircraft had diverted from its flight path, flew back over the Malay Peninsula, heading roughly in the south westerly direction. Some eyewitnesses seemed to corroborate this story. Thus arose more theories that made the rounds on television and the internet. There was the "Diego Garcia" theory, that the plane had been diverted and actually landed at the super-secret US-UK base on the island. Then an American general - I forget his name - appeared on a major American lamestream media network and advanced an even kookier theory that he had "inside information" to the effect that the flight had been diverted to Iran, with the help of the always-byzantine-never-to-be-trusted-Russians and their evil-criminal-super-genius-mastermind Vladimir Putin, where it would be repainted and used in a subsequent terrorist act. Supposedly, in the general's scenario, the aircraft flew through Indian airspace, and avoided detection by Indian air defense radar by flying closely behind another civilian airliner.

It was in that context of nuttiness that I advanced my own "outrageous" theory.  Then came the stories of it flying more or less due south, and crashing in the Indian Ocean somewhere off the coast of western Australia, and searches immediately commenced, and found... nothing. When I interviewed with George Ann Hughes, I cautioned - long before the Indian Ocean crash theory emerged - that if a crash site was advanced in the Indian Ocean, to be suspicious, because that ocean is very deep, and only a few countries possessed the technology to do deep sea searches. I even warned, in that interview, against the possibility of "salting" a debris field.

Then alleged debris began to wash up in French colonial islands off the east coast of Africa. Case settled, and I moved to the position that the flight might indeed, after all, have crashed in the Indian Ocean. But then one of the regular readers of this site in Australia, and a pilot, began to email me pointing out discrepancies in some of the alleged debris. I'm not a pilot, and as most people know, I don't go anywhere near airplanes. So I'm not in a position to evaluate those claims. But shortly after this, the Malaysian ambassador, who was tasked with collecting this debris and returning it to Malaysia, was murdered. Had he seen something to suggest a hostile takedown? or a takedown by exotic means? Or conversely, had he seen something to suggest that the alleged debris really was not debris from the flight? Again, we don't know. But with those additional "facts" added to the story, I moved back to entertaining my "it just went 'poof'" hypothesis, by the above-mentioned means.

So now we come to the most recent twist in this strange saga, in the following shared by Mr. D.W.:

’Missing’ data foils new MH370 lead

Missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 was ‘shot down in military training exercise’ claims first book released about lost jet

The first article seems to account for the discovery of alleged debris off of Madagascar and other French islands in the western Indian Ocean:

WHEN you drop a pebble in a pond, you hear a 'plop' and see ripples begin to expand across its surface. If you were beneath the surface of the pond, you'd hear a slightly different 'plop'. All involve waves. And all radiate outwards from the source. So if you can hear it, you can learn a lot about the rock that dropped.

It's a technique used by the world's militaries to track and identify submarines and warships over great distances. It's also a key component in sensing nuclear weapons tests, which is why a worldwide network of hydroacoustic (under water microphones) has been in operation for decades.

Two of these ocean acoustics recorders were in a position to pick up MH370's impact with the Indian Ocean. But only one, based in Australia, has supplied reliable data.

The other was positioned at the secret US defence facility at Diego Garcia, in the heart of the Indian Ocean. Much of its data from the relevant time frame is distorted. And 25 minutes of it is inexplicably missing.

What emerges from these recordings is something intriguing in and of itself, for they pinpoint not one, but two potential crash zones:

Writing in The Conversation , Kadri explains an attempt was made to use recordings of underwater acoustic waves to locate the aircraft in 2017. Noises potentially associated with the crash were detected by hydrophones off Cape Leeuwin, Western Australia, and another at the secret US military facility at Diego Garcia, in the central Indian Ocean.

...

One puts the crash site further north in the Indian Ocean than previously believed.

The other points to a flight course taking MH370 closer to Madegascar(sic).

The second article linked above outlines yet another theory that the aircraft may have been downed during a military exercise, to crash in the Gulf of Thailand.

So where are we now? More or less where we were in the first weeks after the flight's disappearance: We don't know where it went down, we don't know why it went down, and we don't know the motivation (if any) of those who brought it down. .

What I do suspect, however, is that someone knows what happened to Flight 370, and they seem eager to avoid any resolution of the story. It is perhaps even possible, to extend my speculations, that this latest round of evidence is another attempt at obfuscation.

See you on the slip side...

 

 

 

29 thoughts on “MORE ON MALAYSIA AIR FLIGHT 370: ACOUSTIC RECORDINGS, AND DRILLS”

  1. Completely agree with others about the Rolls Royce engines still pinging for hours and Inmarsat withholding what they know… To say that nobody knows anything is total cuckoo nonsense. A crime against the people onboard, their families and the rest of humanity. This is on par with the magic-bullet theory that killed JFK and attacking Afghanistan to get Saddam’s non-existent WMD stockpiles and somebody else already mentioned 9/11, two jets hit two skyscrapers in NYC but 3 skyscrapers completely fall down. The only place with more surveillance cameras than London, is the Pentagon, and they can’t find even one clear shot of what happened? This is so much more than just a simple fleecing–what is so GDI that the rest of us can’t know?!!

    We’re living in the age of a twilight zone.

  2. There were 20 Freescale Semiconductor employees on MH370, 4 of whom were listed on the patent for a radar cloaking device. Freescale is owned by Blackstone Capital (Jacob Rothschild), who was the 5th and sole remaining patent holder when the plane “crashed.” Any talk of radar with regards to this plane should be tossed given this info, however the engines still ping a GPS signature for maintanence records (GE/PW/RR). Additionally, the 777 is Boeing’s first fly-by-wire airplane, and has world record range and speed. I would be absolutely shocked if it couldn’t be flown remotely (9/11), so the pilot probably is not relevant either. MH370 has the tail # of M9-MRO, while MH17 had a tail number of M9-MRD, which was probably changed by a 6 year old with a sharpie, and leads me to my super obvious speculation of the day.
    The easiest way to hide a Boeing 777 is to shoot it down, say it was a different plane, blame it on the Russians, and keep the radar cloaking tech that allowed for the action in the first place (win win win win.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-malaysia-airlines-freescale-idUSBREA280T020140309

    https://patents.google.com/patent/US8671381B1/en

    1. What better way to advertise your stealth/cloaking technology than to have your showcase plane ‘disappear’ – all emphasised by the presence of Freescale Semiconductor personnel on board. Now everyone can have a stealth bomber for a price, please speak to Mr Rothschild in our showroom.

  3. What or who was on that plane to cause all of this to happen? At this point that might be the place to backtrack to and start over. But based on the signals from the rolls Royce’s engines, I bet it made it to dg.

  4. doc, ya left out the downed malay air flight in ukraine. the one where locals got like 20 min of video out on youtube before they got ignored (kinda like the natives near diego garcia’s line of light that saw one). the video showed the crash scene with plenty of bodies that were all old bloated and no fresh blood. they spoke on the video about the stink of formaldahyde. and all the bodies were strangely small and asian – as opposed to the long list of top of their heap scientists who were listed on the flight’s seating chart. it was supposed to be all of the best scientists on the planet expert in hiv-aids research. oh yeh, and drone arial shots showed the fuselage in parts next to some empty old farm sheds next to an old gravel road that made it look like someone trucked in a wreck and dumped it off to the side.

    who knows? i might have dreamt all that up. or some amazing youtubers might have. hard to tell with so many versions floating around out there. none of ya think that kinda confusion might be by design, do ya?

    1. I did read something similar in an article but not sure if I saved it as it was sick – painting a picture that the IP of the Engineer/Scientists was the key reason and that the rest were used for organ harvesting – no kidding – I read it and may have had to shut it down due to the need to throw up. I will se if I saved it anywhere and report back if I can find it.

      Who knows but something definitely amiss.

    1. ha and double ha. that’s the first time i ever noticed that. subtle doc subtle. visual nlp, right?

  5. Unfortunately Joseph, through his “Then came the stories that the aircraft had diverted from its flight path, flew back over the Malay Peninsula, heading roughly in the south westerly direction. Some eyewitnesses seemed to corroborate this story” [my italics] has unintentionally fallen into obfuscation himself…

    Fact #1 (not Story): MH370 made a U-turn shortly after its onboard transponder ceased operating. Loss of the transponder broadcast (aircraft ID, altitude, speed, etc.) rendered it hard to identify within the crowded skies by civilian – not military – radar. The aircraft’s ‘skin paint’ reflection was tracked by Malaysian military radar roughly between SW and WSW, until it finally flew out of range of the military radar. This is a fact,not a ‘story’. The data tapes were released and are available to this day:
    http://mh370.radiantphysics.com/2018/04/11/the-civilian-radar-data-for-mh370/

    Fact #2 (not Story): Maldives eyewitnesses saw a low-flying, large aircraft in a Malaysian Airlines paint-job heading south. There were several credible reports, all shouted-down after MH370 disappeared. Then, the MSM ‘black-hole-ed’ those reports to this day, meanwhile promoting (loudly) every conceivable obfuscation. From the below URL, note that the air travel distance from Malaysia to Maldives is roughly WSW for 2,000 miles (~3,200 km). If you travel at jet aircraft cruise speed (assume 560 miles per hour) from Maldives to Malaysia, It takes around 3.5 hours to arrive.
    distancefromto dot net/distance-from-maldives-to-malaysia

    There is an ex-British airbase at the southern tip of the Maldives (an interesting scenario that no-one examines), but the only other ‘destination’ in roughly that direction is Diego Garcia. Note that DG is roughly 500-800 miles (Addu City & Malé) south of the Maldives. An easy flight. This makes the Maldives (possibly with a location update via the ex-British airbase) very interesting as a pre-planned ‘waypoint’…
    en dot wikipedia dot org/wiki/Addu_City
    en dot wikipedia dot org/wiki/Malé

    On today’s blog article:
    “Two of these ocean acoustics recorders were in a position to pick up MH370’s impact with the Indian Ocean. But only one, based in Australia, has supplied reliable data. The other was positioned at the secret US defence facility at Diego Garcia, in the heart of the Indian Ocean. Much of its data from the relevant time frame is distorted. And 25 minutes of it is inexplicably missing.”

    Aussie military had/has an over-the-horizon radar that must have tracked the 777. OTH radars do not have the ‘discrimination’ that ping-style radars enjoy, but they are VERY good at showing a general vicinity. That radar should have known where the 777 flew. (A Boeing 777 is a BIG radar target; OTH radars can pick-up much-smaller fighters.) So, why were the OTH radar records for that day not immediately made public?

    In addition, there were several other ‘conventional’ radars in the area, ranging from possibly one on the Maldives’ southernmost airport to the Diego Garcia long-range base-radar itself. So, where were their radar records for that day?

    Therefore: Should we rely on the data from “ocean acoustics recorders” owned/managed by the two countries who refused to share vital radar imagery on MH370? Bah…

    (The ‘shot down in military training exercise’ is too stupid to even examine…)

    For more info on the FACT that Inmarsat confirmed that MH370’s engines remained running for seven hours , about the right total-time to get to DG, see:
    https://gizadeathstar.com/2018/08/the-malaysia-air-370-just-took-another-very-strange-turn/#comment-83768

    Also interesting:
    wavelengthmag dot com/curious-case-diego-garcia/

    1. i don’t mean to step on your big toe of expertise here but afterall, we do have wiki’s version of events to rely on:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_370

      and yep, rolls royce had signals for 6.5 hours more of flight. and remember when boeing used to have autopilots they could take over and control and track anywhere anytime? you know, the one luftansa required disabled?

      almost forgot the other aspect of this that smells the loudest. freescale semiconductor becoming a wholly owned (and unholy owned) rottenchild subsidiary in one day?

      1. ZDB, I never even thought to look at the Wikipedia page on MH370. Multiple people have noted how ‘non-political’ pages are accurate, but ‘charged’ topics are carefully massaged to fit into MSM standards. MH370 would be one of the latter…

  6. I am Rod Serling welcome tonight The Twilight Zone tonight episode will tell the story of flight M-370 sit back and enjoy the show.

  7. While it is very interesting to piece together all the facts we can, one unavoidable problem remains.

    Does anyone really think that the US military does not track everything from the surface of the earth up to at least GEO orbit in real time? What about the Russians, the Chinese, the Indians, UK, EU, etc.?

    What about the company that holds the paper (or the company that insures that paper) on the airplane? Would you not have a fool proof tracking devise on your $300M investment that moves around the world on a daily basis?

    There is a Fletcher Prouty interview out there where he states that the US Navy was tracking every surface contact in the world in real time by the mid 1980s.

    I offer that at least a half dozen militaries around the world know exactly what happened to that 777.

    I’m an airline pilot and I’ve heard a first hand account of someone directly asking a Boeing 777 test pilot about how you lose track of a 777. He just looked down and mumbled, “It’s impossible”.

    1. I would say that is a fair assessment of the capabilities of numerous nations with spy and other satellites in orbit. The question is, why has no one come forward with information regarding this aircraft. Why has everyone agreed to pretend they know nothing.
      Who or what was on that aircraft that required the deaths of all aboard?

      1. IMO, the answer is simple, it’s the same as with 9/11.
        There is a higher, global entity that controls the information/narrative here, not bound to any specific nation or state.
        On the operational side, the name would start with “Mo”, on the “who benefits” side, it goes higher up, but probably starts with “Z”. Of which Mr Roth Schild is a prominent member.

      2. The theory out on the net is that the Scientists/Engineers had advanced IP/Technology that the Chinese wanted so they were taken to a landing zone as others have called out here and then kidnapped for their IP. The rest were harvested for organs…not my theory but has floated out there on the net in an article or two. The articles pulled in a lot of what has been said here with the horrific net result described above.

        Let me see if I can find the sources and post back.

    2. remember all the various satellite controlling and air traffic controlling govts at the time throwing quotes of no data? as impressive as the lack of videos available when a missile hit the pentagon. think that list included australia, ussa, china and a few more right?

  8. Robert Barricklow

    Discovering this acoustic rethink sub angle is akin to Sandusky resentencing rethink. Both are highly suspicious; both stink of high-obfuscation and both are covering-up information that speak to Hollywood’s message to the public in A Few Good Men:
    “You can’t handle the truth!”.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      The truth is that “we” can make this world much better for 100% of us; but, it would come at an unacceptable cost – and that’s an unacceptable expense – at least for those little-minded, selfish, less than .01%.

      You know, the same species that crucified Christ.
      [… and forgive them their debts.
      by Michael Hudson]

  9. My suspicious meter on the missing data from Diego Garcia tells me that when you find the ghost of Rosemary Woods, you will find that missing data.

    1. alright daniel, if we cannot get a like button can we at least shop around for a “ha” button?

  10. anakephalaiosis

    Satanic evil pours out of Washington’s apron. Transatlantic masonic handshake is global squid tentacle. Contract killing is business.

    Clandestine bureaucrats in unison look to uncle Sam’s superpower, for absolution, moral high ground and grotesque justification.

    Washington’s apron is poisonous needle embroidery, in papal sewing club swamp, breeding brainwashed orcs in overseas colonies.

    1. I wouldn’t put this solely at the feet of Washington DC. They are just puppets in higher hands, wading through their swamp, with the Trojan Horse at the front of the charade.

Comments are closed.