“CLIMATE CHANGE” BOTHERING YOU? JUST MOVE THE EARTH'S ORBIT

“CLIMATE CHANGE” BOTHERING YOU? JUST MOVE THE ...

G.P. noticed this article, and sent it to me, and when I saw what the title of it was, I thought to myself, "You've got to be kidding." But no, they're not kidding. Now, before we get started on all that, let me lay my cards on the table: I am not a believer in climate change, at least, not of the standard narrative which has John Q Farmer or Susy Q Homemaker creating all of it by running a cattle ranch or the vacuum cleaner and causing a looming environmental apocalypse. In fact, you can call me crazy (many already do, so you'll have lots of company), but I've always found it a bit "odd" and  perhaps a little too coincidental that all this concern about "the environment" and the looming apocalypse began right around the same time that "they" began writing papers back in the 1950s about seriously tinkering with the physics of the entire planet, which of course includes weather modification. For those old enough to remember, the first "climate change" meme was "the coming ice age," then it became "global warming", but now they've wised up and are covering all bases with "climate change." In short, it always struck me as just remotely possible that all the "environmental concern" was simply about creating a narrative to distract people from what the technocrats and black projects boys were doing to the environment by trying to weaponize it. It's the old "blame someone else" tactic. The same holds true in this article: it wants to talk about "climate change" without any mention of the technologies - seeding, chemical spraying, ionospheric heaters and a host of other technologies - that are probably creating a lot more of it than John Q Farmer or Susy Q Homemaker. "Climate change" is to this technology what "swamp gas" and "temperature inversions" are to the UFO: a convenient explain-nothing narrative to prevent people from looking too closely at off-the-books technologies like high flying reconnaissance aircraft or people experimenting with the electrical cavity and conductivity of the entire planet.

But oddly enough, as G.P. said in the email I received, one can read between the lines in the article, and when one does so, it becomes "creepy":

Earth EXODUS: Plan to alter Earth’s ORBIT to escape being eaten by dying Sun

And in case you missed it, the article starts out with a bow to the altar of "climate change" without so much as one mention of the insane technocrats most likely behind it:

Man-made climate change is an immediate concern, meaning a global warming apocalypse appears increasingly likely. However the planet’s long-term prognosis is even more dire, because the sun will one day run out of fuel and expand, most likely destroying the Earth in five billion years. Moving the Earth to a wider orbit to escape this fiery oblivion may seem like a far-fetched solution, but an engineer has now outlined several theories for escaping this fate.

Now, before you call me completely crazy (please at least wait to the end of the blog before you do that), what's noteworthy here is that in this article we notice something very unusual, indeed, a "first" as far as I can tell: the coupling of the "climate change" meme to that of our Sun going nova. What that is designed to do (if indeed there was any design at all) is to couple the climate change meme to the feeling of helplessness: after all, we cannot control when or how the Sun goes nova, can we? It's all "an inevitable process."

Except, as I've argued many times, when one is tinkering with little things like ionospheric heaters and spraying metals into the atmosphere to increase the electrical conductivity of the planet, and then playing with the planet's magnetic field, one is inevitably tinkering with not just the weather (an electromagnetic phenomenon in itself), but one can, perhaps,  via the planet's magnetosphere which is coupled with that of the Sun, introduce resonance effects in the Sun itself. Pointing your little toy horseshoe magnet at the Sun probably isn't going to affect it much, nor are your flatulating cows. "Pointing" the Earth's magnetosphere at it is a different matter.

But... back to the article. What to do when your planetary-scaled geoengineering experiments begin to backfire, and John Q Farmer and Susy Q Homemaker are no longer as easily persuaded that they're to blame for all the "climate change"? Why, point to the "inevitable physics" of the Sun, and then propose, in true technocratic fashion, to solve the problem by shunting the orbit of the planet "out there" a little bit further:

However, in an extreme case of future planning, University of Glasgow space engineer Dr Matteo Ceriotti has proposed some radical solutions to help Earth change orbit.

The proposals have to be extreme as, for example, the Earth’s mass is so large we do not have enough power to move the planet using conventional rocket propulsion.

The radical ideas are loosely based on current technologies, although it is safe to assume any surviving humans will have significantly advanced science by then.

...

One such idea is targeting asteroids which pass by Earth’s vicinity and then using the space rocks’ gravitational attraction to pull the orbit of the Earth away from its current location.

Dr Ceriotti told Express.co.uk: “With this idea we would need a huge number of spacecraft to be able to fly to asteroids and then divert the asteroids into an orbit that passes within Earth’s vicinity.

In other words, simply go "out there" and lasso enough asteroids, position them near enough to the Earth that their gravitational pull drags the Earth from its current orbit and parks it near that of Mars (hmmm....). And, please note, that's more or less doable now with current technology, though obviously extremely expensive. But the key here is that they're thinking in terms not just of geoengineering the planet (Farrell Corollary to the Kardashev Class I civilization) but of geoengineering the solar system and its gravitational mechanics(Farrell Corollary to the Kardashev Class II civilization: rather than use the energy of an entire planet or star, demonstrate the capability of engineering systems of those scales). For those who remember the reference from my book Giza Death Star Destroyed and The Cosmic War, it is sort of like Marduk "remeasuring the structure of the deep" after having destroyed the planet Tiamat.

But wait, there's more:

“So we may, for example be able to move an asteroid into Earth’s vicinity and then be able to extract its material.

“And then using automated 3D printing in space, you can use the resulting material to create a solar sail in space.”

And final project proposed is the construction of huge solar power plants capable of convert the light of the Sun into electric power, and then this power could be converted into lasers, which would then be shot into space in order to move the Earth.

...

"This is not something which is going to change in the next billions years, and although new technologies may be developed, the physics is not gong to change."

I don't know about you, but my suspicion meter is in the red zone here: why bother about something that will only happen in a few billion years (the Sun going nova), unless your chemtrail-ionospheric heater experiments have "tickled" the Sun "a little too much" via magnetic resonance and you suspect that "nature's timetable" may have been moved up a bit?  And while we're at it, all this talk about using asteroids to create gravity wells to move the Earth around not only sounds like Marduk "remeasuring the structure of the deep" but actually tinkering with it. Thus, if one couples this whole article with what we in the alternative research field have suspected and been writing about for years, that there is a whole off-the-books-physics and technology, not to mention an off-the-books finance system that helped to create it, and if DARPA and NASA want to have the USA "warp capable" within the next century (and that's nothing but a manipulation of gravity too), then perhaps the idea of lassoing asteroids and moving planets may be "a little further along" than we suspect.

There will inevitably be some who will write all of this off as my usual high octane speculation, and indeed, it is. But there's one final, very disturbing little statement in this article:

“But in the future we may develop technologies in which we can actually built(sic) structures direct(sic) in space.

“And some of this research is actually being conducted here in Glasgow University." (emphasis added)

Yes, you read that correctly; they're studying how to move asteroids and planets around (among many other things) at the University of Glasgow, doubtless in the Faculty of Asteroid and Planetary Portation faculty in the Gravity Manipulation and Engineering Department.

Once again, I don't know about you but have have this sinking feeling that this isn't the usual "academic nonsense" to burn up a research grant. They've moved beyond talking about mining of asteroids, but actually using them to move planets (ours) around. They're talking about not just measuring the structure of the deep, but actually engineering it...

...Chelyabinsk, anyone?

See you on the flip side...

 

39 thoughts on “ “CLIMATE CHANGE” BOTHERING YOU? JUST MOVE THE ...”

  1. “the physics is not gong(sic) to change.”
    though isn’t the gong the thing the sun does after the fat lady sings, with resonance?

  2. Well my first reaction is that any right-minded scientist would publicly suggest this idea. And as already mentioned the Chinese have already made a movie called the ”wandering earth” where they attempt to move the earth to a new star system using rockets.
    However, while the sun does provide necessary elements for life on earth, it also represents a serious threat to life on earth some of these have been in sci-fi movies and books.
    The sun is double edge sword it cuts both ways so it is not so surprising they are actually researching the potential dangers especially since our level of technology is nearing that of class 2 civilization

  3. Oh my, I just watched this little dutch docu about a guy measuring sunrises for 50 years and put it into a graph and it shows a wobble and every year there is a reverse in direction there are manny Earthquakes and such, and the wobbles expose the poles to more sunlight causing more melting, and permafrostmelt releasing CO2.
    I highly advise to watch this docu with generated subs if you cant understand dutch, it is a new research not done before and much of the animations speak for themself.
    https://youtu.be/RrcGQWeO3Jw

  4. a point to consider?
    the sun is an electric capacitor receiving energy from the center of the galaxy (through the poles i think) and passing that energy out to the solar system out to the edge of the heliosphere. the planets take that energy in and channel it into various and sundry forms. best i guess is that all matter derives from energy. so rather than lightning in electrical storms resulting from static build up of rain drops and particulate matter, it’s the other way around. lightning in storms occurs as the earth and sun exchange discharges and balance electrical charges. water is formed by the plasma discharges. it’s the same to explain the huge water (brand new water according to astrophysicists analyses) jets coming out of comets as they flair.

    from all that beautiful theorizing, i’m willing to take it farther and guess that the planets in this system were, are and are being formed from the sun’s not so steady discharge.

    aka, we are completely dependent on and literally made by and literally a part of that star. we are stardust is an understatement.

    it’s not sun worship. get some vitamin d generated on your skin and don’t wash it off for 48 hours so it has time to be absorbed. check out how much better you’ll feel. and stop getting cancer from the new margarine – sunscreen. imagine. these are the same knuckleheads who want to provide a protective screen for us from the sun.

    1. zdb, regarding the sun I think you’re on the right path.
      Eric Dollard covers it in this presentation, “Eric Dollard – History and Theory of Electricity” on the YTubes. It’s almost 3.5hrs long, but well worth the time.
      Anyone that uses Tesla, Heaviside, Steinmetz, et all (I’ll add Leedskalnin to that list as well) as their source has my full attention.
      Add to that the research by Ken Wheeler who uses the same resources as Dollard (including Dollard himself) with a good dose of Platonism thrown in for good measure.
      Both Dollard and Wheeler presented at the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference, the post-discussion is available for free on YT.

      The universe is all about magnetism/dielectricity working as a conjugate system (as with our sun).
      One jaw-dropper for me is that magnets do not “attract” towards each other, but are “pressured” towards a central point between them in counter-space. Same goes for “repulsion”.
      Where a professor such as the late Eric Laithwaite (who has my full respect) was unable to explain magnetism (by his own admission), here is Ken Wheeler explaining it in detail, and all the associated phenomena we see around us.
      Magnetism is the thorus, the dielectricity is the hyperboloid; these geometric shapes are each other’s inverse (duality…). Together they form a sphere.
      The Flower of Life pattern is right there in the magnetic/dielectric lines of force, visible under the ferrocell.

      True unification of all forces on the physical plane.known to man, from electricity to what we call “gravity”.
      As you can tell, I’m sold, unless evidence on the contrary is provided.

      1. And of course, I should not forget the good Dr Farrell himself, who introduced me to some of those names mentioned above. Gabriel Kron being another that comes to mind.
        It’s all greatly appreciated and part of the journey.

      2. my next questions: how and where does one go to school now to learn pertinent tech to put these ideas to use on a personal basis? leedskalnin did it and from all indications he did it fairly safely. apparently he mastered discretion as well as these techs. oh yeh. and it’d be nice to know who to study. gotten a little tired of researching wise guys who are almost or are on to good ideas only to get dragged down by detailed analysis as to why commoners like us can’t do anything meaningful. remind one of our mainstream media much? or most of our poser alt media?

        btw, anyone hear how much money alphabet, vice and thinkprogress are dissolving?

        www dot bit chute dot com/video/vhqWCn-9vOc/
        THE ESTABLISHMENT MAIN STREAM MEDIA IS IN MAJOR TROUBLE

        not that the mockingbirds won’t make a valiant effort to usurp and co-opt the entire rest of whatever media we can work up.

  5. Not one to add a flash point to your “high-octane speculation,” although one is tempted. Folks who might’ve had some courses in meteorology for the interesting credits it provides as a diversion from other intense studies could tell of how one of the major drivers of weather formation (mild-extreme; large-small; short term-long term) and weather systems (planetary – solar system – celestial) is the [uneven heat distribution] of those planet-Sol system-celestial regions.

    What is surprising is how quite a few tenured academicians insist on remaining in their nasty tar pits of paradigm and often do not consider terrestrial sources of uneven heat dissipation of air-land-sea volumes. It almost seems as though they’ve teamed up with the wrong group of billionaires’ like several politicians’ do as if greedy in type for monetary rewards. One will not venture into the realm of the trillionaire’s domain preferring to keep the low end of a DSL subscription intact, for now.

    One would suggest that you’re quite right in referring “to-read-between-the-lines” with much of its implications, though not all, as one should retain a margin of error for the sake of being fallible. You could add quantum level frequencies and their coaxed interactions as if deliberately persuading the sub-atomic levels instead of as current theory suggests are random. Call it another non-terrestrial physics course for the sake of ranting I suppose. At this time, proofs are not allowed anyway.

    With a few kudo’s toward technology there has been fewer emissions from internal combustion engines along with lower particulate pollutants and airborne lead-based toxins. Easily pluses toward a cleaner environment. Science has had some successes this way. Often self-reminded that it is *curiosity* and *imagination* that makes good science NOT repeated lies to gather a gullible following with an expectant cash reward or frequent omissions for the convenience of narration control that do.

    One might ask, “What ever happened to the method of falsification (falsifying a hypothesis or proving it is false) working along with verification of a hypothesis while using controlled experiments instead of jumping to writer’s advocate by way of political correctness to get published for repetition?” The later almost sounds as if an undetected disease has spawned in modernity. There are limits to this lengthy, linear, and imprecise word wrestling one refers to as the language conundrum just as there are limitations to mathematical and experimental expertise. Tar pits of paradigm to be avoided.

    “Uneven heat dissipation” has several sources, if not causes, as well as consequences on a planetary scale that are all too often ignored. Underwater volcanism and deep ocean basin rifts (Mid Atlantic Rift Valley Ridge, one of them) that irregularly heat seawater with its “smokers” that enter the global ocean gyre affecting distant seas, land, and air masses above. Volcanism also rapidly melts glacial ice formations from beneath, heats the surrounding ocean basin when not erupting underwater like the Hawaiian chain has. In 2012 there was evidence of a massive underwater eruption in the Pacific that resulted in a floating pumice island drifting in eastern Pacific. Seasonal changes alter weather to extremes, too, but so does precessional tilt of axial rotation in orbit on a more subtle level over time. The term *climate* is way far too ambiguous for exacting calculations and monetary sums to correct its presumed course when the correct climate ain’t to be had in the first place.

    Frequent meteoric bombardment contributes to an increasing global mass that’s estimated between 50 – 150 tons per day depending on what meteor stream or shower the planet is passing through on any given day of the year. That mass increases shifts as well as balances, while the planet rotates, while in precessional motion, as it orbits Sol, as the Moon orbits the planet tugging on it, while doing the rest mentioned all in a days celestial motion while the Sol system rotates within the galaxy as the galaxy rotates – and there’s more motion yet to mention, but one assumes (heaven forbid political incorrectness assuming) most folks get the idea that’s there’s a great deal of shake, rocking, rolling, and motion going on that’s conveniently taken for granted, but shouldn’t be. Through all of this moving around are the effects of Barycenter motion of most, if not all, celestial masses.

    What might be better is that those folks who insist on riding some horse of the apocalypse for profit that they get off of it before getting bucked off and beaned-squarely-in-the-noggin with a mighty hoof that shows them where bucking really stops.

  6. We should crash Venus into Mars and create a new Earth with a new Moon. In 5 billion years as the Sun expands it should be quite comfy.

    1. If we calculate the correct English for the shot just right we can knock the new world and moon closer to the asteroid belt for easier mining.

  7. Yet more “scientific” mumbo-jumbo speak of our technocratic overlords that seek to take us ever further away from Mother Nature and the spiritual laws that govern Her.
    All in their futile attempts to conserve this materialistic world in its present aeon, an aeon that will come to an end, no matter what technological might they’re trying to throw at it.
    Reminds me of those ignorant people that have their physical bodies cryogenically frozen in an attempt to preserve it for future re-animation. Seems they’re effectively trying to do the same with our entire planet.
    Utterly failing to realize (do they?) that the *soul* is the vessel for ascension back to The All (The Creator, The Great Vishnu, call it what you will). Our true and only salvation.
    Eternity simply does not exist in the material world, it’s impossible.

    A question I do have though is this: Does the destruction of the physical realm at the end of an aeon (as intended by The All) involve the entire universe (in case moving this planet anywhere is indeed futile) or does it perhaps take place one galaxy, one constellation, one solar system or even one planet at the time. If the three latter, moving the Earth (re-measuring/engineering the deep) may indeed be of benefit (depending on your point of view) and ancient stories of this (how we came from the stars, be it somewhere in Orion or from Aldebaran (the Zodiac comes to mind)) may confirm it too.
    IMO, preserving anything for too long is not a good thing, from food to positions of power, or anything else. Starting with a blank canvas every now and then is a good thing, like a painter starting a new work.
    Just as it says in ancient texts, destruction is as much part of creation as creation itself.

    Going back to the article.
    If they want to prevent Earth from being destroyed by the sun if the sun goes super-nova, then they would have to move the Earth one heck of a long way, well outside the solar system. And besides, there are opinions – I believe Carl Sagan among them – that our sun is too small to go nova, instead it will turn into a dwarf, basically turning off. So this whole premise of having to move the Earth because the sun going nova may not even be true at all. Meaning there’s another reason…
    There’s more to our sun than we’re being told. The energy point between space and counter-space…

    A long rambling, just thinking out loud.

    1. A vast amount of astronomical theory and observation determines core-collapse supernovae to weigh-in at a minimum around ten solar masses (initial mass of star). So, our Sun is far too small to supernova. It will simply puff-up to a Red Giant at the end of its ‘normal’ life and then collapse into a White Dwarf – an Earth-sized, slowly-cooling ‘cinder’.

      If one was to do an Earth-moving scenario to save our ecosystem, Earth would have to be ultra-slowly moved outward as the Sun warmed, then fairly quickly to around a Mars distance as the Sun went Red Giant, then back closer to the Sun as it collapsed into a White Dwarf. But, that is Billions of years in the future…

  8. Absolute insanity. There is a chinese movie out that has this particular theme. We have to migrate the whole planet to “save ourselves” and obviously its all our fault etc… nuts and probably not very doable.

  9. To clear up Joseph’s use of the word nova with our Sun: It cannot happen. (Barring ultra-techno causation.) Novas mostly occur because of the close interactions between binary stars; often sucking material from one to another or resulting from a near pass. Since our Sun is not a binary (barring some distant brown dwarf), a nova cannot happen to our Sun.

    There are two ‘cataclysms’ that can happen to Earth via our Sun: First, our Sun is slowly growing hotter, courtesy of hydrogen converted into helium over the aeons. Eventually, the ‘habitable zone’ will pass beyond Earth. In about 1.75 billion years, Earth will start to look like Venus.
    https://www.nature.com/news/earth-s-days-are-numbered-1.13788

    Second, in 5.4 billion years or so, the Sun will have exhausted the hydrogen in its core. The core will shrink under gravity, and heat-up until helium can fuse. This will cause the Sun to expand into a Red Giant, ‘eating up’ Mercury, Venus, and perhaps Earth. This is what the cited article is focusing-on, not a “nova”.
    https://www.universetoday.com/18847/life-of-the-sun/

    The above ‘cataclysms’ are so beyond human time-scales that speculating on Earth-moving is pointless. Humans will be long extinct, or will have progressed into advanced beings. Either way, ‘primitive’ engineering will not happen.

    I do agree that all this scientific ‘hand waving’ is designed to keep the public occupied and distracted, so whatever is “behind the curtains” is not noticed…

    1. goshawks, There is evidence that our sun is in a binary with Sirius. Look at the research of Walter Cruttenden which is based on passages in ancient Hindu texts.

      1. BetelgeuseT-1, I seem to remember reading something around that theory. If so, it would be a very loose, very unstable binary. Sirius (A & B) is 8.60 ± 0.04 light-years away and is the fifth closest stellar system to the Sun. For comparison, the Alpha Centauri group is around 4 ly away. Anything could disrupt that ‘orbit’…

        I primarily wanted to put the “nova” designation to rest. It would take another star almost moving into our Solar System to transfer mass and induce a nova. And, Sirius A is twice the mass of our Sun. (Sirius B is about our Sun’s mass.) If Sun & Sirius (A & B) were a binary, in the far distant future Sirius A would be drawing mass from our Sun into it. So, Sirius A would be going nova, not our Sun…

        1. goshawks, I guess it depends what the consensus is as to what is the cause of a star going nova.
          From what I’ve read, if a star is big enough (Betelgeuse is apparently one of them, which is far bigger than our sun) and they start to “burn out”, then their enormous mass causes them to go nova. Our sun is simply not big enough for it to go nova. This is the mainstream accepted theory as far as I know.

          Then again, what we “officially” know at present may not be the full story anyway. If they can’t explain the workings of our universe (because that taboo concept is not allowed), then anything goes really.

          1. BetelgeuseT-1, I suspect you are confusing nova with supernova. They are entirely different kinds of events.

            A nova is just the fusion-burning of accumulated hydrogen on the surface of a star. Afterwards, the star remains essentially the same. It is like a ‘burp’. One star can have many nova events, over time.

            A core-collapse supernova (there are several kinds of supernova) is when a massive star (like Betelgeuse) runs through its energy-positive fusion fuels, its core collapses and then rebounds, and the shockwave blows the entire outer star to smithereens. The remaining core becomes a neutron star or black hole, depending on mass. It is a one-time, ultra-catastrophic event.

            From an earlier comment: https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/

            “Which of the following would be brighter, in terms of the amount of energy delivered to your retina:

            A supernova, seen from as far away as the Sun is from the Earth, or

            The detonation of a hydrogen bomb pressed against your eyeball?

            Applying the physicist rule of thumb suggests that the supernova is brighter. And indeed, it is … by nine orders of magnitude.”

          2. goshawks, thanks for correcting me. Obviously my chosen “nova” short-hand for super-nova was incorrect since super-nova is actually what I meant.

  10. it’s all electric and phenomenally finely balanced. and phase locked. it’s gonna take electromag tech (cern much?) on a scale and hidden tech beyond our pay grade to do. more likely, it’s gonna bring on disaster that only capitalists can love on scales that the wealthiest guy on earth (wgoe) can desire.

    didn’t tesla publicly state in the paper of record that he could split the earth and more with the tech he claimed (just before tunguska)?

    1. feels like the point not made clearly enough is that the wgoe (and that can be plural wealthiest guys on earth), well those guys rant and rave with mockingbird media that wealth is built with positive pro-human ideas and that very few bad apples build wealth with anti-social psycho ideas (wars? banksters? exploitive / explosive based tech? tech that attempts to usurp deity? and on)

      more and more what we see everyday and all day is increasing evidence that all the wgoe’s wealth on earth is stolen from the rest of us on earth. in the name of this or that emergency that who could have predicted????????????

      1. btw, anyone seen brendon o’connell’s last few on youtube. long but fairly good outline of how steve bannon et al are producing a white nationalist party and platform outta all the alt-right folk who just got purged off of alphabet platforms while. so can we look forward to alphabet gobbling up all the failing networks into a huge crazy aoc alt left social justice warrior platform to do battle with an as yet unnamed crazy alt right kekistan platform run by intel ops from cia and mossad preaching hate to the left?

        and hm that group in the middle, um lets call them SANE PEOPLE???? gets stuck in what between these two warring factions? does this sound like dejavu much? kinda like a jk rowling script?

        btw wasn’t bannon one of seinfeld’s producers? how is it possible that such a huge group of people can be labeled and produce such self labeling hate groups that target, um the group that they come from?

        reminds me of when trump was labeled with “trump may not love racists but racists sure do love trump.” look for adam green to run on the david duke party in cali soon. ironic that he’ll be running against some corrupt dem.

  11. WTF! You’ve GOT to be kidding me….what if the Earth’s orbit gets a bit too far out there from the sun?
    We have no idea how the Earth and the solar system even works, much less how to “tweak” it. That’s been my argument against “climate change”; the Earth is a self-correcting organism. Anything we do to achieve an “effect” could be the polar opposite of what the planet itself has in mind, resulting in doomsday.
    Maybe that’s what really happened on Mars?

  12. This global warming; changed by commercial lingo specialists from this & that, to climate change, to a long diabolical history of outright lies and ever-present obfuscation. In short, it’s a op; albeit, a long running one.

    Whoa Nelly!
    Plan to alter Earth’s orbit! ????
    Look out Mercury!
    Cause our tech-cowboys are dead-eye keystone gun-slingers of asteroids, gravitational mechanics, gravity wells, laser cannons, you-name-Earth moving technologies – we count on those keystone wannabe-cowboy-gods to fix their honest-to-goodness mistake$?
    What a picture!!! ?
    Deja Vu or Here We Go Again?
    Like a Rocky/Bullwinkle script of on-going blunder after blunder; leading to more & more blunders, and crazy titled adventure after adventure…

    Can they measure how deep a hole “they’re” digging?
    Or is it, our living Earth’s grave “they’re” digging?

  13. I have two responses to “a space faring earth”.
    1. From 1950 to 1962, James Blish authored the quadrillogy “Cities in Flight”. Earth cities took to space faring powered by engines called Spin Dizzies (torque anyone?).
    Eventually, New York City takes possession of the Planet “He” and turns the whole planet “space faring” with Spin Dizzies.

    2. Revelation 21 English Standard Version (ESV) “The New Jerusalem and the New Earth” 23 And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb. 24 By its light will the nations walk, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it, 25 and its gates will never be shut by day—and there will be no night there. ”
    If no need of sun or moon for “the New Jerusalem that has descended out of heaven on the New Earth” that there probably is no sun or moon. Also there “is no more sea” on the New Earth. I conject that the New Earth is free and space faring. I also conject that Yahweh & Jesus will use this as a base to maraude through the galaxy destroying worlds and making the inhabitant’s his slaves (I meant servants) or harvesting their blood as described in Revealtion 14. Ambrosia anyone? (https://www.businessinsider.com/researchers-say-ambrosia-young-blood-transfusion-startup-putting-lives-at-risk-2018-9). Or how about shades of movie “Jupiter Jones”.

    At Jesus return he smashes earth to smithereens. Probably why he needs a new earth. Revelation 16 English Standard Version (ESV) “The Seventh Bowl”
    17 The seventh angel poured out his bowl into the air, and a loud voice came out of the temple, from the throne, saying, “It is done!” 18 And there were flashes of lightning, rumblings,[c] peals of thunder, and a great earthquake such as there had never been since man was on the earth, so great was that earthquake. 19 The great city was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell, and God remembered Babylon the great, to make her drain the cup of the wine of the fury of his wrath. 20 And every island fled away, and no mountains were to be found. 21 And great hailstones, about one hundred pounds[d] each, fell from heaven on people; and they cursed God for the plague of the hail, because the plague was so severe.

    Jesus and Yahweh are monsters.

    1. ‘And Jesus was a sailor , when he walked upon the water,and he spent a long time watching from his lonely wooden tower
      And he knew for certain only drowning men could see him
      He said all men shall be sailors then until the sea shall free them
      But he himself was broken long before the sky would open
      Forsaken almost human he sank beneath your wisdom like a stone
      And you want to travel with him
      And you want to travel blind
      And you think you maybe trust him’ cause he’s touched your perfect body
      With his mind
      Thank you Leonard the CoHen!

  14. I conjecture that these people believe that they can use the Planet as a “bio-ship” to traverse at the very least, the Solar System. One has to wonder what the malevolent oligarchy has planned and to what end. Regardless, it is unfortunate that so many people have had their Human OS overridden by Transhuman OS 1.0 (most submitted through their own volition – but think that it is their choice through their “epiphanies” of egalitarian altruism). I find it amusing that there are a plethora of “educated” individuals that refuse to look at this synthetic reality and live in their drug induced fervor of “sugar and rainbows” and “sunshine and lollipops”. Dr. Farrell delineates precisely what is possible (i.e., manipulation of this Solar System as if it were some grand toy) and the hubris, avarice, and complete antipathy that these oligarchs have towards this Planet, Humanity, and God the Creator. CERN/HAARP/Ionospheric Heavy Metal Sprays/Magnetic Resonance Manipulation/5G and the IoT…such folly…such destruction…And for what? Some fleeting acquisition of power and dominion? To me, it does not matter if you live thirty (years) or thirty million years, you will die. It is inevitable. You cannot escape that certainty as it is a part of this journey. They cannot win. They do not have the ability to create anything from their own hands (they utilize the instruments and creations of God the Creator – to create and manipulate – however, they cannot create anything from their own creation mechanization(s) because it is impossible to utilize anything in this Universe that is not uniquely God the Creators’. PERIOD.). I digress…I remain tepidly optimistic for our collective future – this story makes it seem more apparent that my optimism is unfounded. If only there was a infinitesimal positive found in the news at present, but alas, nothing. The narrative continues to be spun and people are becoming more obtuse, ignorant, and iniquitous. They (“our benefactors”) are winning a game that at first blush seems to be rigged in their favor. The caveat for them is US AS A COLLECTIVE. However, if we fail to unify and comprehend that these people are our “collective” enemy, then all will be lost.

  15. Sarcasm alert…..
    I got a sneaking suspicion the real mission comes from the MIC …. navigate ole’ mother-ship earth right to the edge of the heliopause, pop thru, and go find a nice little solar system that needs em’ some democracy!….and of course, all of democracy’s deadly accoutrements……..just think of all the new customers!! Yippee!

  16. I have a better solution, let’s move those meddling manipulators off-world, since that’s where they appear to want to be, and let the rest of us get on with life!

Comments are closed.