As I sit down to start combing through this weeks' "finals box" and going through articles to blog about, the weather is again turning nasty, dumping yet more rain on completely water-sogged soil. So naturally this one jumped right to the head of the list, because I'm living in the middle of weather modification, and someone is doing it. There's a catch, though: that "someone" may not be God, because after decades of chemtrail spraying, dumping heavy metals and "other stuff" into the atmosphere, and the creation of a few large ionospheric heaters around the world, as Elana Freeland said to me in her interview on this site in the members' area, "there's no such thing as completely natural weather."

It wasn't, however, just my interest this week, as I received a quite number of "weather-control-related" articles. The problem was picking which ones to talk about. And two popped right to the head of the list. And one of them brought back a memory. On June 9, 1972 I was on summer vacation, fifteen years old, and ready to start my sophomore year in high school in the fall semester. The news that day carried the story of a tragedy: Rapid City, on the other side of the state from Sioux Falls and the state's second  largest city, and the largest city in what South Dakotans call "West River", the part of the state west of the Missouri River, had experienced a sudden torrential rain, and a flash flood. Lives were lost, houses were swept away, and the state was stunned.

Flash floods just do not happen in Rapid City. Anyone who has been there and is familiar with the topography of the city can easily understand why floods are rare, particularly the deluge the city suffered. A flood in Rapid City was almost as unthinkable as a tornado in Nome, Alaska. Then it emerged that the state had been engaged in its own weather modification program, seeding  clouds to create rain, and lessen chances of hail. Studies had been done by the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, coincidentally located in Rapid City. (The following article is courtesy of R.B. and many others):

The Impact of the Rapid City Flood on Public Opinion about Weather Modification

While this article includes only the first  paragraph of the paper, it is that first paragraph that concerns us here, for it forms part of my high octane speculation:

It is out of the juxtaposition of four events that this paper has emerged: (1) Early in 1972, South Dakota planned for the first season of a state weather management program to increase precipitation and suppress hail. (2) At the same time, field research on cloud seeding was being carried on by the Institute of Atmospheric Sciences (IAS), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, under contract to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. (3) A sociological study of the response of South Dakotans to weather modification was undertaken with initial interviewing begun in January of 1972. (4) On June 9, 1972, Rapid City, South Dakota experienced a disastrous flood. Cloud seeding by the IAS had been carried out in the area as the storm began. (Emphasis added)

What caught my eye here was the statement, italicized in the quotation above, that this study was conducted under a contract of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, which basically manages the country's water resources, dams, and so on. But I have to wonder - and herewith my high octane speculation of the day - if this program was not, perhaps, a "beta test" for another kind of reclamation altogether, namely, causing disasters, and then picking up land on the cheap, while extending centralized authority. The assumption and narrative has always been that the Rapid City flood was an accident, but with the fires in California, and the recent flooding in the American heartland, one has to wonder. Whatever the possibilities here, the other disturbing implication of this article is that any speculation about who my be engaged in weather modification must not only include nation-states, but anyone with access to the technology to do so, and cloud seeding is one such comparatively simple technology. Corporate actors, or states and provinces themselves, could be engaged in the activity.

The implication of this is that with several potential actors on stage, each with their own purposes for whatever weather modification they may be engaged in, the overall cumulative results to the total system cannot be gauged accurately. The potential  for unpredictable results thus grows. To give a simplistic example, suppose Country A wants to steer a hurricane into Country B's coastal areas in order to disrupt crucial manufacturing and infrastructure, but Country C doesn't want this, and intervenes and attempts to steer the hurricane in a completely different direction. The result of the two agendas is that Country D is hit with the hurricane, which was not a target of either actor. The result is "natural" in so far as it is what happens when systems interact, but it was not natural in that the result may not have happened without the human manipulation.

The inevitable result of this possibility will be an attempt to centralize control of all weather modification technologies and projects into a global system of regulation and control. And ponder, for a moment, the implications of that: a region or area of the world not going along with the diktats of that central authority could be subjected to wither droughts, or leveling floods and storms.

And that, it seems, was the agenda all along, if one listens carefully to this speech at the United Nations General Assembly in September 1961 by President John F. Kennedy(and thanks to K.S. and many others who passed this along):

Of course, the creation of such a central and global authority has been and will remain elusive, as nations and groups with access to the technologies - and particularly the more exotic technologies - will balk at surrendering their capabilities to a central authority that they perceive as being under the influence of potential adversaries, and that's the rub, for it means for the foreseeable future that we will remain in the situation of many "weather control actors", with all the potential consequences I've speculated on today.

See you on the flip side...




Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Pierre on June 27, 2019 at 1:18 am

    As hamlet said,
    To be or not to be
    Weather it is nobler…..To take up cheap umbrellas against a sea of storms….

    Mark Twain said everybody complains about the weather but nobody does anything about it…
    Now we complain about them doing something with it but nobody does anything about it.

  2. zendogbreath on June 25, 2019 at 6:36 pm

    we might be misunderestimating how organized organized crime is as well as the number and size of the ionic heaters stationed and mobile planet wide. nice catch doc.

  3. Richard on June 24, 2019 at 8:58 pm

    If one didn’t know better one would have thought you were complaining about the weather again. (just kidding) But *reclamation* is not to far off from a different point of view as it implies something of the general water cycle. When dealing with the weather, uneven heat distribution, is probably closer for influencing it. Some meteorologists would suggest that this uneven global heating of land-air-sea as a primary source. But only if it were so simple.

    The water cycle on a global scale and most, if not all, of its effects on adjacent matter, not just the life forms dependent on it, as humankind understands it, has an enormous claim to most of the complaints about the weather. That’s not to say there are no mad geniuses bent on taking property, resources, and wealth from others with the latest exah-tech-ah. Just where is Captain Proton or Flash Gordon when you need them to fend off the evil Dr Chaotica, mad ruler of the universe or his bride, Queen Arachnia or from takeover by Ming the Merciless and his re-Edgemihkation-donation camps, anyway. The writer might have met with a keen edge of a swift blade, or had their program stolen, never to finish those cliff hangers. Instead, humankind seems to be drowning in science mis-know-how, clepto-finance, and a kind of resourcist plague having to support the presumptive greed of exotica-technica and weapons extraordinaire. Perhaps. But where is that deviant intent and the hardware of causality a noble prosecutor would need to know so that they might ignore it, in a chosen courtroom populated by talented design? Seems to be the drama that plays out in that real world one has heard rumored. The prosecutor might just be court shopping for all the accoutrements and special operatives of choice. Then again, those are matters of fiction, aren’t they? Some said the same of George, you know, Orwell and his novel, 1984.

    At any rate, since 1972, things have not only changed but have cleared up a bit. Like that nasty brown haze of LA and other major mobile auto congested metropolises where the local folks unaware were inhaling blood lead levels exceeding safe limits many times causing early derangement syndrome. Now, many of them, rumor has it, in political office or activist of the latest fickle and fad from whatever side they happen to turn. Unless in Michigan where that lead brew is made famous from the pipes. Not the only deteriorating plumbing, by the way.

    Personally, one has not ruled out a more subtle and insidious source of broader weather pattern changes. From the oceans’ waves and ocean currents, of course, where labeled ocean gyres meet global ocean currents. Some gyres do not just collect floating debris to form those plastic garbage patches near the top of the water, but exchange heat energy further down as they swirl around the planet. Not unlike the winds that carry volcanic ash or pollutants aloft the deep currents carry warmed and cooled liquid water seeking moderation between temperature extremes as they heat the gases of the air above it as it flows. Rising and falling water vapor is the sneaky one as it cannot be seen, but will occasionally manifest its presence in hail balls, snowflakes, raindrops, and fog when it reaches a preferred dew point while it still blows in the wind unseen. There is that other uncertainty, the unnatural manipulator, you know who, the one that thinks it can count.

  4. OrigensChild on June 24, 2019 at 8:17 pm

    Weather? What is that? It’s been so long since I’ve seen real weather I’m not sure what it was like. I used to love standing in the rain and feeling the clean water washing away the grit and grime of youth. Trees no longer respond to rain like they used. Leaves no longer shudder with anticipation as they prepare to satiate their raging thirst. Instead leaves recoil as if under assault from some noxious fluid as if in pain or extreme discomfort. Even now the rain feels different on my own skin–as if it’s unwholesome and sickly. Weather is now only a memory. What we receive now is a gross caricature of the real thing. And they expect us to all to enjoy it and be grateful for what they are willing to give! For the past 40 years Mother Earth has been groaning and writhing in pain over what these “monsters” have done to her. On Judgement Day her chorus shall be added to all of ours–the victims of these diseased and tortured minds who govern us with such disdain and disrespect.

  5. Robert Barricklow on June 24, 2019 at 1:31 pm

    The controlling levers: money, energy, food, and weather?
    In cyber-space are the brothers & sisters of PROMIS in control? AS times progresses; are individuals loosing more & more independence? Are factors of their lives under control beyond control? Is there an inherent drive within space to organize/control? Is there a continuous battle between entropy and information? Is information’s very nature to organize itself into ever-tighter-bonds of control. In other words, the opposite of entropy/emptiness/no information?
    This symbolic battle is going on in our very selves. Between the individual freedom/group control.

    Weather was bound to become subject to control.
    Back to the groups vying for control of weather.
    Groups vying for control of the other levers of power; known & unknown.
    All in order to be in tighter order control
    not to be under control; any control?
    [excuse my rambling incoherent stream of thought as I type]
    And when this cuts to the chase/quantum level is there no control except through observer thought? then, is/are there groups[et’s] that are vying for control of nothing?
    [couldn’t resist a play on words/weather as a metaphor for the chaos; the quantum fluctuations of the no-thing sets?]?

    • Robert Barricklow on June 24, 2019 at 1:49 pm

      Unless there are multiple[approaching infinity>]universes
      … that spring out of nothing
      … via observer thought/s.

      An inherent built-in quantum escape clause?

      The sci-fi novels you could spin from this get way too bizarre; too complicated; instead of 3D chess you, have a number [approaching infinity D] chess.


      I hope so.

      There’s already too many of me.

  6. USA.091939 on June 24, 2019 at 10:39 am

    Great linking of historical events to contemporary reality. Mercantilism of everything needed to live.

  7. anakephalaiosis on June 24, 2019 at 10:28 am


    Question: What did Bill Clinton say to his rape victims?

    Answer: If I can’t probe you with drone, I’m gonna bomb you.

  8. enki-nike on June 24, 2019 at 9:41 am

    Weather is a tradable commodity. It is quantified, indexed and packaged for traders on weather derivative markets worth at least $8 billion. Exchange traded weather futures and options on futures were introduced on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in 1999.

    • Wlfgang on June 28, 2019 at 6:03 pm

      Weather for Nothin…Humans for Free (Slaves) controlled by a totalitarian Mob…is the grand design it seems.

  9. Detroit Dirt Bikes on June 24, 2019 at 8:02 am

    Excellent post, Dr. Farrell. Under the scenario you so astutely describe, a sovereign nation attempting to mitigate the effects of geoengineering to feed it’s population may be casus belli to the globalists. The technology to do so is likely the true WMD that leads to ‘regime change’. As you have been pointing out for decades now, everything else is ‘old stuff’.

    • OrigensChild on June 24, 2019 at 8:20 pm

      I completely and whole heartedly agree. This blog is a most excellent post! Like button a few times…

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events