IT’S TIME FOR SOME UNDERWATER FUN AND HIGH OCTANE…
If you're tired of hearing about that story that no one - including me - wants to talk about, but that we're all thinking about and talking about anyway, and if you're wanting to have a little high octane speculative fun and look at "cool and suggestive pictures" with lots of "implications," then read this article that was submitted by S.A.:
Now let's assume for the sake of argument and high octane speculation that the pictures linked in the article are legitimate and true. Indeed, some of them appear to have come from U.S. government sources. If you're like me, you clicked on those links and had a look at the pictures.
And they are, well, stunning and very provocative, whatever one makes of the article's hypothesis that "someone" is "mining" the ocean floor, at very great depth. But if you're like me, you noticed other "oddities" in some of those pictures, rectilinear "structures" that look like pyramids or steles or obelisks "top-down", so to speak. In fact, one thing that struck me was that if one did not "know" this was the ocean floor, one might be tempted to think one was looking at certain well-known areas on the surface of the Planet Mars.
That observation brings me to my first high octane speculation of the day. If you're familiar with the various researchers who've looked at and dissected the Cydonia region of Mars and its celebrated and well-known "Face" - Richard Hoagland, Dr. Mark Carlotto, Pozos and many others - one of the things many of them point out are the celestial alignments of the structures at Cydonia. Indeed, Dr. Carlotto published a whole book about it. Dr. Errol Torrun and Mr. Hoagland also did an analysis of the internal alignments of those features decades ago. Whatever one makes of those analyses, the fact that they were done at all indicates there were enough people who were willing to entertain the "artificiality" hypothesis.
So one might make a predictive high octane speculation: might these pictures eventually lead to researchers making those types of analyses? Answer: probably, given enough interest in the subject.
That brings me to my second high octane speculation of the day. What if, in those putative analyses, people discover connections between what is going on "down there" at the bottom of the ocean, and "up there" at the top of the abyss of space? If the connection sounds too difficult to believe or too tenuous, it's worth recalling that there are ancient myths of "wisdom gods" appearing from the sea. The Babylonian historian-priest Berossus, for example, recounted for Alexander the Great the story of the "fish-man" Oannes who appeared from the ocean to give civilizing arts to the ancient peoples of Iraq.
There's a third high octane speculation to offer here. What if we're looking at the activity of that "breakaway civilization?" The standard view of this theory is that beginning in the post-war period in the late 1940s and 1950s, a breakaway group began to emerge, funded secretly with massive amounts of money, to study the UFO phenomenon and develop technologies that could emulate its performance characteristics. Most readers of this site are probably aware of the vast amount of research and lore that has emerged in the alternative research field in this connection, for example, the alleged statements of former Lockheed-Martian... er... Lockheed-Martin skunkworks director Ben Rich: "We found an error in the equations and now we can take ET home," and so on. In this theory, after decades of massive funding and secret research in black projects, some believe - myself included - that this group has pulled far ahead of "public science" and technology, perhaps by decades. In support of this theory, various "drips" of information are used as loose corroborating evidence: Lockheed-Martin's revelation of a small spherical "fusion reactor" revelation a few years ago, a reactor that looks like a scaled up version of Philo Farnsworth's 1960s "Fusors" and "Plasmator" patents for ITT, or DARPA's and NASA's century goal to make the USA "warp capable", the Nazi Bell story, and so on. Part of this theory involves the creation of massive underground infrastructure to support the project, and keep it well hidden from prying eyes.
By parity of reasoning, the abyssal deeps of the oceans would afford such cover, and even more so, and provide additional benefits that resources that lie beneath the ocean floors could be tapped, and the oceans themselves as food sources, could be tapped if we but had the requisite technology. And if one is willing to entertain the idea of a breakaway civilization that emerged from those covert and secret UFO study groups of the 1940s and 1950s, then rest assured, the reports of USOs, Unidentified Submersible Objects, with their vast underwater speeds, their ability to transit from submarine to aerial operations, their known shadowing of American and other naval vessels, would be an obvious area of interest and study for such a group.
See you on the flip side...
16 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
?? this story is true – and for me it’s a very big ?? – then I would suggest the activity is human.
The suggestion is frequently made that all those missing trillions are going into secret space programs of some sort.
Well, why could (some of) these trillions not be spent on mining the ocean floors with advanced, unknown-to-the-public, massive technology.
A few trillion buys ? ??? of technological know-how and the means to build it.
Just wait for our fraud Elon Musk to announce that he’s going to mine the Mariana Trench.
Starting next year. Investors, sign here.
James Cameron took a one man vessel down to the Mariana Trench.
There’s video of it.
Obviously nothing is showing as what’s in those alleged google earth photos
but nevertheless,
if he can get down there with public technology to build that special sea horse sub to go down there,
Most of the advanced industrialized countries have much more and can stay down there for longer periods of time.
it would be nice to see another set of pictures from another source than Google Earth.
They are very eye opening and amazing images. Real, fake, or part of a bigger narrative that we don’t understand yet.
Brings to mind, also, the sea creatures encountered by Russian divers in Lake Baikal that they were not allowed to talk about?!!! Hmmmmm…..
Has anybody read the book “Invisible Residents” by Ivan T. Sanderson came out the late 1960s. It dealt with the idea we were not the only technological species on this planet.
Yep. Read it and have it.
That book and several others by philosophical scientist and trained zoologist, physical anthropologist, botanist and geologist Sanderson are available at Adventures Unlimited Press, Dr. Farrell’s former publisher.
Recommended.
UFOs from space involving distances and travel time spans that are enormous, unless there’s some different type of physics than Einstein envisioned.
Why couldn’t they have an on earth source from intelligence that evolved here on earth?
If we’re going to spend a lot of money on exploration, why prioritize outer space instead of the oceans, which have a great deal more, and more immediate, impact on human life than Mars etc.?
I’m going w/#3.
The Breakaway civilization is definitely in the picture/but, only w/close and keen observations; as “they” prefer anonymity[probably kill to insure it].
No doubt this is the model they prefer.
So, when space is being structure; is it too being geared for two space programs.
So, is it like everything else: there’s real world;
and the one we’re being told/taught to believe in?
Bring on those USOs!
And those Saipan megaliths…
“Civilization” and “nation” are imperial terms, to control provinces, from a Latin perspective. Nation, from “natio” (birth), is Roman slaves being popped out, within regional provinces.
Original Old English terms are “folc” and “þeod”. The former is basically a concept of man in plural. The latter is being “bound together”, by social contract of þing-assembly.
The idea, of “sea people” bringing “civilization”, sounds more like Miles Mathis’ definition of fake Phoenicians bringing bad news, from planet Usurius. They call it regime change.
Who financed the local bumpkins – in Scandinavia – into building Viking ships, to destroy Druidic Britain? Cui bono.
http://mileswmathis.com/phoenper.pdf
Old English “þeod/þeodan” is reflected in various other tongues, as a “band”, that is “bound”, with Tir’s lasso – around wolf’s-head – that ate the handshake. -> Social contract.
tjóð -ar -ir
nation, people; føroyska tjóðin the Faroepeople, the Faroese; íslendingar eru serstøk tjóð Icelanders are a distinctive people; Sameindu tjóðir, (st. ST) United Nations, (st. UN)
tjóðra -aði
tether, tie up (cattle) with tether; hann tjóðraði hundin við hælin he tied up the dog to the stake; neytini stóðu tjóðrað the cattle were tethered.
Source: https://sprotin.fo/dictionaries
There have been attempts, to reduce Latin in modern English, because slavery is using the terms of the usurpers.
The Runes provide a breakthrough, in that regard, because one always adapts terminology to principles.
Natural principles have extreme gravity, because they are backed up by natural laws, in logic of reason.
Therefore rynstafas spell doom of Satanic papacy, that seeks to burn Notre Dame.
Good question, anak!!! Hadn’t thought of it in those terms!!! In my mind’s eye, I also keep seeing pictures showing the “fish outfit” worn by some in the Sumerian texts; you know……like fish hats worn by those in the R. C. Church??? 😉
Operations in the Mariana Trench would require force fields of tremendous strength. In turn, this would require power sources of tremendous strength. It would not be just incremental improvements on today’s technology, but several orders-of-magnitude difference.
The other part is like the old question of why ancient master-builders preferred to work in stones weighing in hundreds of tons, rather than in bricks or blocks like today: The answer is, they did it that way because it was easy for them.
So, if there is ‘activity’ in high-crush areas of oceans, they work in those areas because it is easy for them…
BINGO! Thanks much for the comments!
Yes. My thoughts exactly. I don’t particularly favor any of the options over each other as I suspect there is something to be said about all three. Indeed, variations of the same technologies could be used to colonize Mars, Venus or Pluto–assuming there are other resources to harvest which could act as a foundation for provisioning energy, food and vitamins requisite to sapien life. It’s a matter of priority in probability–not possibility. The older the culture’s scientific advancement the greater the probability among each of the three. In my opinion the first option includes those whose presence was “near” but not necessarily “here”.