THE NEXT TRENDY THING: INDUSTRIALIZED SURROGACY

THE NEXT TRENDY THING: INDUSTRIALIZED SURROGACY?

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that we're in a "culture" (if one can call it that) where normal institutions and virtuous behaviors are not only being tossed aside with reckless abandon, they're being murdered like babies in the womb, with the organs of whatever is left of the culture to be harvested and grafted into whatever new chimerical trendy thing that comes along, which is being done "because we can do it". Don't like the sex you (or your child) was born with? Change it; just a little surgery and some hormone treatments, or, for the truly illumined cognoscentus, simply alter a pronoun's gender; after all, gender and sex are the same thing, aren't they?

If you couldn't tell by now, I'm in a grand funk, and in this case, what prompts my grand funk is the following article shared by G.A.C.:

Pressure to have multiple babies putting surrogates 'at risk

Surrogacy, as the article points out, is already a big "business", but there's a dark hint of "more to come":

The Halifax nurse filled out an online application for one of the biggest surrogacy agencies in the country, and within days, her profile was live.

"I didn't quite understand what I was sinking my teeth into. I just knew that I wanted to help people," Roberts said.

In the years since, Roberts has been a surrogate twice. And while her pregnancies have been relatively uneventful, she is now preparing for a hysterectomy, which she believes is because of her back-to-back pregnancies.

Dr. John Kingdom, a high-risk obstetrician at Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital and professor at the University of Toronto, said it's possible that Roberts's complications could have been caused by having pregnancies in quick succession.

But he's even more concerned that Canada does not have mandatory wait times for surrogacies. He said that leaves women like Roberts vulnerable to manipulation.

"I think we should recognize that surrogates are altruistic, kind people who are at risk of power imbalances," Kingdom said.

...

During CBC's three-month investigation into surrogacy, multiple women said their agency sent them new, heart-wrenching parent profiles within days of giving birth. Some of the women said they felt "hounded" to commit to a new couple right away.

The demand for surrogates in Canada far outweighs the number of women willing to carry a baby for someone else, which can cause women to feel pressured to commit to subsequent pregnancies. And there's a financial imperative for the agency — every couple the company connects to a surrogate represents thousands of dollars of revenue from consulting fees. (Emphasis added)

And this attitude is what is public; imagine the horrors of what we've all heard concerning those human trafficking networks, where women are forcibly abducted from their homes in Southeast Asia, or wherever, and literally turned into baby-making slaves, to churn out children for parent want-to-be's, or worse, to produce babies to be slaughtered for organ harvesting, stem cell research, or a host of other modern (that is to say, barbaric) rationalizations. Babies ripped from their arms, causing who knows what kind of deep emotional trauma and sorrow, or, in the case of the surrogate mentioned in the article, a hysterectomy, possibly as a result of some unknown effect of her surrogacies.

But it's those last lines from the article, cited above, that disturb me even more, for they hint of even more to come...

...for sooner or later (and probably more sooner than later), one can expect the inevitable to occur as what is today a "consulting" business becomes magnified to an industrial scale, and those now hidden networks are taken "public" through a variety of "clever marketing schemes". It does not take much imagination to see how those schemes might be accomplished; for example, companies might be formed to offer to relieve monstrous student debt if only one will volunteer to be a surrogate, carrying x number of babies to term for whatever purpose in return for paid-off student loans; mortgage reduction offers will be made for donors of human eggs or sperm for specialized experiments, and so on.  The whole trafficking network could be "legitimized" by promises of a "new life in America" complete with visa entry papers for "consultation" which can be issued in return for x number of babies delivered through surrogacy. One can even imagine scientism and "progressivism" and "ethics committees" from quackademia combining forces, requesting surrogates for children to be raised by someone else to study the long-term social effects both on surrogate mother, parents, and child, and so on, and grants from the big corporate foundations of billionaire busybodies to fund it all, with the blessing of Pope Bergolio and other trendy clergy.

And here's the really sad thing: I'm outraged by all this, and possibly you are too. But the problem is, there's not enough outrage. There are people who would think all of the above developments are a good thing, are "progress." Even sadder is the fact that if you and I can imagine this "industrial scale surrogacy," rest assured the technocratic monsters comprising the advisory council to Mr. Globaloney's "population councils" have too.

Ok, rant over. See you on the flip side...

 

 

 

22 thoughts on “THE NEXT TRENDY THING: INDUSTRIALIZED SURROGACY?”

  1. Knowledge is power – Power to overcome ignorance.

    The lack of pre-pregnancy counseling in an in-vitro-fertilization (IVF) procedure is callous enough without regard to what those hormones put each surrogate candidate through.

    . . . . (from the article) . . . “CBC News spoke with dozens of surrogates as part of an exclusive investigation, and nearly every woman described the intense emotional high they experienced right after giving birth to surrogacy babies, some describing it as addictive.”. . . .

    Apparently, they’re not much concerned about post-partum depression. That condition can be very debilitating, . . for a lifetime, when it takes hold. Adverse cultural and societal changes can occur without notice during a non surrogate chosen pregnancy and that’s with the best of care during it.

    Telling women what or what not to do is not the right course, either, but they deserve appropriate information toward making any choice without the pressure of a NO choice be changed to yes by those insisting or strongly advocating that they donate their body for nine months.

    The endocrine system, ductless glands that secrete hormones necessary for normal growth and development, reproduction, and homeostasis, to name a few things it controls, remains a powerful body system to simply ignore what can occur during normal reproductive sequences. Modern medicine has a great deal of understanding where it is concerned. The amount of vain ignorance some practitioners have acquired is not enough to offset complications from this complex process.

    Women need to, at least, be informed of the variables.

    1. “Telling women what or what not to do is not the right course, either”

      Of course it is. Giving women too many choices is what led to all of this clown world nonsense. Women’s sensibilities only work properly when restricted. In the same way that children aren’t allowed to drove cars or decide their diet, women must have their options limited for society to function in a healthy way.

      Societies that don’t control their women are destroyed by societies that do. See Rome for where this leads.

  2. Thank you, goshawk, for the Annunaki comparison…..history just keeps repeating itself??? Wasn’t one of the “gods” killed to mix with the new ‘creation’?! Which means we have the power within us to rise above what our “creators” were?!!!

    Why has the Epstein story not been explored to point out to mainstream society what exactly was going on there?!! How many women did he have impregnated at the same time??? To what end???

  3. Not sure where to put this, so it goes here:

    “Five Years of Intel CPUs and Chipsets have a concerning Flaw that’s Unfixable.”
    https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/03/5-years-of-intel-cpus-and-chipsets-have-a-concerning-flaw-thats-unfixable/
    “Virtually all Intel chips released in the past five years contain an unfixable flaw that may allow sophisticated attackers to defeat a host of security measures built into the silicon. While Intel has issued patches to lessen the damage of exploits and make them harder, security firm Positive Technologies said the mitigations may not be enough to fully protect systems.

    The flaw resides in the Converged Security and Management Engine , a subsystem inside Intel CPUs and chipsets… Often abbreviated as CSME, this feature implements the firmware-based Trusted Platform Module used for silicon-based encryption, authentication of UEFI BIOS firmware, Microsoft System Guard and BitLocker, and other security features. The bug stems from the failure of the input-output memory management unit – which provides protection preventing the malicious modification of static random-access memory – to implement early enough in the firmware boot process. That failure creates a window of opportunity for other chip components, such as the Integrated Sensor Hub, to execute malicious code that runs very early in the boot process with the highest of system privileges.

    Because the flaw resides in the CSME mask ROM, a piece of silicon that boots the very first piece of CSME firmware, the vulnerability can’t be patched with a firmware update.”

    I wonder if the CSME is a re-naming of Intel’s Management Engine:

    “The Trouble with Intel’s Management Engine”
    https://hackaday.com/2016/01/22/the-trouble-with-intels-management-engine/
    “There are many researchers trying to unlock the secrets of Intel’s Management Engine , and for good reason: it’s a microcontroller that has direct access to everything in a computer. Every computer with an Intel chip made in the last few years has one, and if you’re looking for the perfect vector for an attack, you won’t find anything better than the ME. It is the scariest thing in your computer, and this fear is compounded by our ignorance: no one knows what the ME can actually do. And without being able to audit the code running on the ME, no one knows exactly what will happen when it is broken open.”
    (my italics)

    1. And no, this has nothing to do with various alphabet agencies being able to eavesdrop on all Intel computers at will. How can you think that? Shame on you…

    2. Difference between the CSME and the ME:
      Comment by quantumman42 at Mar 5, 2020 3:56 PM.

      This [CSME problem] has nothing to do with Intel-ME; this is a boot ROM firmware flaw in the processor itself. The ME shows up in the boot process well after the point this flaw has been exploited or not.

      To explain this in a little more detail:
      To facilitate getting all of the peripherals in the CPU initialized, there is code that runs at power-on to setup the basic hardware and start loading more complex software (firmware) to do yet more initialization. This first set of code is physically part of the chip (boot ROM) and is literally part of the silicon.

      The exploit they are talking about here* is that a second controller (ex: sensor hub) is enabled and allowed to influence processor operations before the memory protection unit is initialized. This means that an attacker that can modify the code running on the second controller can have that tamper with the boot flow and firmware loading on the main processor.”

      * https://puri.sm/learn/intel-me/
      “The Intel Management Engine (ME) is a separate independent processor core that is actually embedded inside the Multichip Package (MCP) on Intel CPUs. It operates all-by-itself and separate from the main processor, the BIOS, and the Operating system (OS), but it does interact with the BIOS and OS kernel. It is a black box of mystery code at the lowest level, in ring -2, with complete control over every part of the system.”

  4. This must mean that our elites have failed to create artificial wombs a la the decanting bottles of Aldous Huxley “Brave New World”. If they get that technology right well you know what misuse they will put it to.

  5. Anyone read “The Handmaids Tale” by Canadian author Margaret Atwood, about 15 yrs. ago? Wasn’t it made into a TV show in the last 3-4 yrs.?

  6. surrogacy industrial complex, or just plain S.I.C
    I wonder if this plague, and it’s emergent variants does decimate the populations, who would be the first to name their child Corona or CorVee? COR1,2,3 etc
    Can you test just the extracted organ for corona virus?

  7. Finally a post about the industrial numbers of Mexican baby machines crossing the American States borders; in fact, trinational industrial numbers of baby machines are crossing borders globally/internationally are staggering – some, may even say: weaponized beyond industrial strength.
    Oops!
    Another kind of baby machine geared toward the transnational corporations of the 20th-Waorst Century. Why don’t they just cut to the chase and 3D print babies? Why, the choices of templates would be in the industrial numbers, and the profits would be astronomical. But, where to put the patent number? Instead of spanking the baby’s rear end, they could simply genetically engineer a stamp that is shown only under ultra-violate light.
    Until “they” get the 3D organ market beating-up the Chinese organ black market, things will remain so quaint- so 20th Century.
    As far as sex goes? They can change sex just like the 20th century changed clothes. It’s easy! When in the new-coming, 20th-Worst Century business.

    “I just knew I wanted to help along the inhuman culture.
    [Oops! misquoted]. “I just knew I wanted to help people”.
    “I think we should recognize that surrogates are on the other side of the economic apartheid line…” Oops! [misquoted again!]. “I think we should recognize that surrogates are altruistic, kind people who are at risk of power imbalances”. Or, was that “engineered imbalances”?

    1. Keep them surrogates movin’ Rawhide! Don’t try to understand ’em. Just emotionally rope, and throw and brand ’em. Soon we’ll be inhumanly rich, living high & mighty! My transplanted pig’s heart’s caculatin’.

      The engineered demand for surrogates is wonderfully outperforming our astronomical dollar projections.

      Babies to be produced for organ transplants.
      Yep, the 20th-Worst Century has some mighty fine leadership by design.

      Coming to the Wall Street ticker-tape parade;
      soon be in the the Fortune 500 club.
      Surrogates-R-Us.
      Why, one of these babies may even become a Pope in just a few years; on new 20th-Worst Century fast-track rapid-growth program!

      Yep.
      The new normal
      is coming for you.

      The sad part is; many will believe.
      Will stop thinking w/their hearts
      and just feel their wallets.

      An engineered political/economy?

  8. Communist utopia is total control of the planet, by total control its procreation.

    By sterilizing the planet, humanoids can be grown in factories like potatoes, to fit the narrative.

    In that way, the genome can be altered, to suit the communist paradise.

    Millions of Karl Marx clones.

  9. What most fail to realize is there is a remedy for a great deal of this. You just need to decide who you desire to be and file the necessary documents to place yourself outside of their system of fraud, personage, and identity theft. It is possible to take back your birthright and end your “virtual” slavery. We were never informed of just how this occurred; if we had been we would never have submitted to it in the first place.

    http://annavonreitz.com/basicforms.pdf

  10. Agreed on every point EXCEPT:
    I feel less than no guilt for insufficient outrage. Perhaps that is the purpose of all this evil coming out of their closets. Perhaps the intent is to make me feel guilty for being so jaded. Misplaced guiltifying is one of if not the most evil thing done by evil beings. Nasty gaslighters.

  11. The symbol of the New World Evil is the pentagram; humanity upside down and backward in everything possible. It just hasn’t been rolled out officially yet but is there for anyone who can really see to see.

  12. Joseph: “…churn out children for … stem cell research, or a host of other modern (that is to say, barbaric) rationalizations.”

    Echoes of the past? Morphogenetic Fields of the Dark Side?
    https://www.thesundaytribune.com/2019/02/11/the-secret-origin-of-constructed-eve-the-mother-of-mankind-revealed-neverending-war-of-the-gods-on-earth/
    “Both sides came up with a solution; to create a new workforce by genetic engineering. Enki, with his companion and half-sister, chief scientist Ninhursag, began to genetically manipulate the earth ape-men and through artificial means gave birth to the hybrid man, who was a mix of the earth ape-man and the Anunnaki genes. After the successful creation of these hybrid beings, the Anunnaki females had to deliver these babies in numbers , as the hybrids couldn’t procreate among themselves. They served the Anunnaki as primitive workers to till the land or work in the goldmines.” (my italics)

    There are all kinds of mundane atrocities one can do with an abundance of surrogate mothers. One can even create a new race to suit ‘modern’ times…

    (And contemplate the above in combination with the ‘ownership roster’ of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault…)

Comments are closed.