It's been quite some time since we've had any stories about the ongoing debate about GMOs, but M.W. found and shared this article (thank you!) and I have to talk about it, because it raises once again a disturbing trend in modern society that I've talked about before, but only in a round-about way. Today I want to address it more directly (hopefully), because there's something in this article that fell on me like an Acme anvil in a Road Runner cartoon. Here's the article:

Glyphosate Girl on the Bayer Roundup/cancer settlement

Here's the central point of the matter: Bayer, whom we less-than-respectfully refer to on this site as I.G. Farbensanto, apparently bought more than just Monsanto's GMO patents and seeds; it also bought Monsanto's "business model" and "playbook," not that Bayer needed any instruction on ethically questionable  business practices. But hey, the Trafficantes might learn a trick or two from the Gambinos if the two families merged. IN this case, Bayer has employed the Monsanto-Agent Orange model to buy its way out of a multitude of lawsuits:

$10.9 Billion of Bayer’s capital will be forked over to resolve the Roundup-NHL litigation, but Bayer admits no wrongdoing. There will be no warning labels. $8.8-9.6 Billion will cover current cases, except Johnson, Hardeman and Pilliod, which will continue through an appeals process.

In something of a surprise, $1.25 Billion will be set aside for a separate class agreement aimed to address potential future litigation and provide medical outreach for underserved communities to detect and treat NHL that MAY have been caused by Roundup. The attorneys involved in the class action are different than the core Plaintiff attorneys who originally worked for years on the litigation (Baum Hedlund, Miller Group, etc). The original attorneys could not be pleased with this tag-on settlement term.

So one might wonder, who will decide a verdict on this class action lawsuit? Who will ultimately determine if Roundup causes cancer or not? (A reminder: It is overwhelmingly clear that it does.)

And wow, it gets juicy in the worst of ways. The class action component appears to totally undermine the original work performed in the first three trials. The determination of who wins that class action battle will no longer come from a jury, but rather a “Science Panel”.

On a press release, Bayer writes:

"Both the class and company will be bound by the Science Panel’s determination on this question of general causation, taking this decision out of the jury trial setting and putting it back in the hands of expert scientists. If the Class Science Panel determines that a causal connection between Roundup™ and NHL is not established, class members will be barred from claiming otherwise in any future litigation against the company."


Remember, thanks to the diligent work of the attorneys and plaintiffs in all of the trials leading up to this moment, the general causality was ALREADY SETTLED in court THREE TIMES. (Italicized emphasis added)

And how convenient, too, that everyone's attention is focused on the Fauci-Lieber-Wuhan-Baal Gates virus-and-"vaccine" scam/plandemic. But wait, there's more, because it's not entirely clear how that "independent panel" will be selected:

All class action litigation will be put on pause for several years while the Scientific Panel makes its decision on general causality.

To construct this panel, a mutually decided upon third party will select the members. Because that sounds insanely sketchy, the other option is that both sides will select two scientists, and those four scientists can agree upon a fifth scientist to complete the panel. Apparently, the analysis of the existing public research will take FOUR YEARS to sift through. They also may file an extension if they need more time. At that time, the panel will decide once and for all if Roundup causes cancer.

I’m hearing echoes of Winning Wisner calling out the “independent” Intertek Panel, the hired group of scientists who facilitated Monsanto’s ghostwriting of a research paper in rebuttal to the IARC classification.

My gears are grinding thinking of Monsanto’s perpetual, unfounded rebuttal that no one but them seems to understand the science, and that science is the weakness in the Plaintiff arguments. The juries called foul on that claim three times. It should be game over for that argument based on science.

Now, if you read between the lines a bit, what's really being said here is that ordinary juries composed of ordinary people are not allowed to have opinions, much less make findings of fact, in trials involving "science." With that, we have the erection of "authority," in this case, "science," and in the case of GMOs, the entire history of the discussion has been between corporate-funded "science," which of course concluded that there was no problem with glyphosate herbicides and GMOs in general, versus independent scientists and studies that said there were. (Recall for example, that University of Iowa study on GMOS that concluded GMO yields per acre actually fell over time as costs to plant it rose:

We see much the same pattern currently, with the corporate propatainment media (and government) promoting a narrative about the Fauci-Lieber-Wuhan-Baal Gates plan-/scam-demic, versus independent voices questioning the whole narrative regarding masks, the virus itself, the way statistics have been manipulated, and now, the almost complete lack of mention of declining death rates while the media continues to hype rising numbers of diagnoses, the need for a "vaccine" while it trashes the use of hydroxychloroquine (which is, of course, a cheap drug and not an expensive "vaccine") , the on-and-off-and-on again "reopening" of certain states or localities in response to every little twitch or wiggle on "diagnosed" covid cases.

So what's going on?

To be succinct, and entirely serious, what's going on is the death of civilization. Not just western civilization, but civilization itself. Why? Because science, and the free and open discussion of it, is being killed. Only approved authorities are to be considered. We are now in a state of affairs where ideology and narrative drives everything. And remarkably, there are aspects of what is happening that resemble the quackery of the "sciences in socialism", be it Stalin's Russia or Hitler's Germany. Imagine, for a moment, that a really big country with a lot of people - say, China, for example - decides that GMOs are "ok" because it needs to feed its people. The chairman of the Socialist Peoples' Parasite and Piracy Party, Wahn Beeg Rhat (thank you Uncle Scrooge and Karl Barks) and faithful lackeys, Woe Phat (thank you, Hawaii Five-O) and Zhi Ping Pong, having bet on GMOs, silence the voices of scientists raising troublesome and inconvenient "issues." The result is little different in the socialist paradise than it is in the crony crapitalist paradise world of I.G. Farbensanto, or Baal Gates: dissent, opposing viewpoints or science, is to be suppressed to maintain the narrative and "authorities and experts" promoting it. We suffered no casualties in the border clash with India, and the dam and GMOs are entirely safe because the science is settled, because our scientists have said so. There is no link between vaccines and autism. Hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. We say so. Ignore the people who say or think otherwise.

When civilization reaches this stage, where authority trumps discussion and science, it begins to die. Think of Isaac Asimov's Foundation series and the death of the Galactic Empire through incompetence and authority.

Bayer, like the Socialist Peoples' Parasite and Piracy Party, thinks that it can buy truth, or at least enough voices to shout it down. The convergence of crony crapitalism and the  Peoples' socialism is amazing.

Civilization, on the contrary, requires truth, and truth requires integrity, something that I.G. Farbensanto, Wahn Beeg Raht and Zhi Ping Pong et al do not have.

And I didn't even talk about the banksters, crypto-currencies, and how they're not even currencies at all... but that's for Monday.

In the meantime, not all is gloom and doom, for the judge involved in the case, while not a scientist, is passingly familiar with the law(one may assume, although these days this too is questionable), and may not be buying what Bayer is selling, according to this article shared by G.B.:

American Judge Says He Is "Tentatively Inclined" To Reject Bayer's Monsanto Settlement

See you on the flip side...


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Sandygirl on July 12, 2020 at 9:29 pm

    The WHO and big pharma make the rules, they learned a lot from the tobacco settlements, the same marijuana and alcohol script; they will save you from yourselves.
    1992 – In the ruling, Judge William L. Osteen Sr. of Federal District Court in Greensboro, N.C., held that E.P.A. officials made significant mistakes when the agency brought together scientists to study secondhand smoke.
    Judge Osteen found that the composition of the study panel was flawed because, among other things, none of its representatives were drawn from industry. But in a far more damning finding, Judge Osteen held that agency researchers, rather than rigorously proving their case, frequently shifted theories and selected the data they wanted in order to reach a preordained conclusion.

  2. Harold Blais on July 12, 2020 at 10:17 am

    Thanks for another great article.
    If you haven’t seen Amazing Polly new YouTube video on Epstein, Maxwell and science as it further connects the dots!

    Best, H

  3. Pierre on July 11, 2020 at 11:49 pm

    (qualifying that I am not calling COVID a scam, just suss as heck) adding that the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, said not to use it for viruses. and Jim Stone today ( postulating that putting that swab stick right up ones nose gets whatever into the brain. no other tests require that degree of intrusiveness.
    What we have here is Athens vs Jerusalem (Gilad Atzmon), Libido Dominandi vs Logos Rising (E Michael Jones) , City of Men vs City of God (also quoted by EMJ) and the Logan’s Run Carousel Rapture Play’s Last Scene vs The Resurrection (for the believers).
    old degrees (say Oxford) were mostly religious.

  4. zendogbreath on July 11, 2020 at 5:09 pm

    Um. Peter Thiel is coming out full Baal Gates?
    Most Dangerous $40 Billion Company Files IPO

    and they are going full minority report.

  5. FiatLux on July 10, 2020 at 9:51 pm

    Kudos once again, Dr. Farrell, on your insights. How often have we heard the meme “we’re going to follow the science” or “the science is settled” on controversial issues in recent times? In other words, we’re being force-fed a pure appeal to authority, which–irony of ironies–is the very opposite of science! Science that admits of no challenge is no science at all.

    In a world where the “experts” and “authorities” are bought and paid for, devoid of all integrity; in a world where the most “prestigious” medical journals can stoop so low as to publish blatantly faked studies so governments can use them to ban a treatment that might have saved many lives and avoided the economic devastation of lockdowns (I’m thinking the Lancet and hydroxycholorquine); well, society has sunk to levels of depravity that defy description.

    Appeals to authority, and high priesthoods that punish dissent, have been part of human civilizations for a long time. But I’m splitting hairs. The point is you’re right–our current civilization is hitting a new, inhuman low.

    • Sandygirl on July 12, 2020 at 9:51 pm

      Yes read the monthly Lancet journal for future plans. They don’t try to hide their goals in the least. Although I did find this Lancet article as, maybe hopefully there are big changes happening.

      “May 21, 2020, at a special session of the Executive Committee of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), WHO Regional Office for the Americas, Carissa Etienne, Regional Director, declared that due to non-payment of Member States’ contributions, PAHO stands on the brink of insolvency.1 As of April 30, 2020, most of the non-payment is attributable to the USA (67%); however, late payments are outstanding from Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, and others, to a total of US$164·6 million. This includes an unprecedented $63·8 million (57%) of 2019 assessed contributions.
      This financial crisis could not have occurred at a worse time. The Americas have recorded the greatest COVID-19 morbidity and mortality of any region. As of June 25, 2020, the COVID-19 Information System for the Region of the Americas has recorded 4·6 million cases and 230 400 deaths in 54 countries. The trajectory is worsening.
      • Health security in the western hemisphere would be severely threatened without a functioning PAHO. Reserve funds will be exhausted by September, 2020. PAHO faces dire actions, including executing borrowing options and possible implementation of key staff furlough measures.

  6. marcos toledo on July 10, 2020 at 7:53 pm

    What your writing of Dr.Farrell should be called Scientology but that word was taken as the name of a pseudo-religion. So we are left with having to use the word scientism turning a word that should mean a way to learn the truth into another belief system chained to dogma as enslaving as religion or politics. Science has become another word to serve as a smokescreen behind which great crimes can be committed.

  7. XAydMary on July 10, 2020 at 2:55 pm

    I hope “Tentatively inclined” to reject isn’t code for “I need a big enough bribe to retire on after I put my name on this piece of horse pucky”,

  8. Bluenose on July 10, 2020 at 11:44 am

    If “they” want to cull “us” why do “they” worry about feeding (gmo’s) and keeping “us” alive (vaccines)? It can’t be money since they can print, manipulate markets invent financial tools etc at will. There must be an off planet connection that some of the “theys” are worried about, maybe? A date perhaps? Any other ideas anyone?

    • FiatLux on July 10, 2020 at 9:18 pm

      Well, if the food and vaccines they’re giving us make us chronically ill, lower life expectancy, and decrease fertility rates, that’s a step toward thinning the population. And it’s a step that’s easier to get away with than just eliminating people by the hundreds of millions all at once–think of the logistics and cost involved in that kind of enterprise!

      On the other hand, if you can reduce the population’s health, lifespan, and fertility gradually, while owning a monopoly on the products that do it (GMOs, vaccines, drugs, whatever), you can have your cake and eat it too: Make huge profits selling them the stuff that slowly kills them off. You actually get the population to pay you for eliminating them. It’s genius. An unspeakably evil sort of genius, to be sure.

      • FiatLux on July 10, 2020 at 9:56 pm

        Robert Barricklow and others commenters have basically said what I just did…

      • zendogbreath on July 12, 2020 at 10:05 pm

        RFK2 and Andy Wakefield were just talking about that in one of their latest interviews (to sell Wakefield’s latest movie “1986: The Act”). Kennedy puts it at $50B in profits for vaccines and $500B in profits from drugs sold to treat the chronic diseases resulting over a lifetime from the vaccines. Plausible. If RFK2 is saying it, the documentation is likely to come out from a number of sites in the next week or so.

    • goshawks on July 10, 2020 at 9:57 pm

      Bluenose, I am going to go with what I said before. Humanity stagnated for millennia (with ups and downs) until the last century or two. Then, we ‘had’ an incredible upswing, reaching the Moon and beyond with advanced tech. Was it just us, or did we have help? And why, after being carefully stagnated for all these years?

      My complete guess is that “an other” has entered the picture. I commented here on that prospect:

      Now, humanity is “valuable” as arms-producers and cannon fodder. Unfortunately, we may end-up fighting for the wrong side…

  9. Robert Barricklow on July 10, 2020 at 11:33 am

    Unlike covid1984, GMO’s are a serious threat. But like covid1984; the state’s media machine made covid1984 a substantial equivalence for a bad flu, that apparently came from never never land, as it never never dies.
    So in the above; a GMO template has been established to make the fake real through the states media apparatuses, including its respected quackademia stand-in-stooges.
    Now Roundup, a deadly poison that should be classified as a toxic war weapon, is now safe all around; from the farm to your plate. Your deadly GMO food, spiced-up w/a deadly war toxin.
    Your a very special lab rat; whose slow kill is extremely profitable in the new globalized killing fields: global health care. From covid1984, to GMO’s, to round humans all up in a deadly profitable killing agenda of depopulation 20Th-Worst century style.

    • Robert Barricklow on July 10, 2020 at 11:43 am

      This is a new kind of warfare not only against the individual; but against the nation state, cultures, religion, and beat goes on. More sophisticated than conventional warfare, more insidious than industrial warfare, a war that the public is unaware of.
      For example, has the public heard of the war of law?
      Experts at the Center for Analysis of Terrorism have described this new type of warfare, known as ‘law war’, which consists of using the legal system[the law] against the enemy.

      White Rabbit

      • Robert Barricklow on July 10, 2020 at 6:21 pm

        WOW! Death of civilization. Yet, there are many civilizations that have come and gone; I guessing you mean them all in this time zone: Earth?
        As far as science goes; it’s back to the better than science bet; flip a coin.
        A real coin.
        Not the scientific 20th-Worst Century coin: heads you lose; tails corporations win coin.
        Of course, “they’ll redefine civilization; like they’re redefining master bedroom and master bathroom.
        So far herein, the franca lingua is still spoken by human and read by human.

        AI now speaks, reads, writes, and maybe; redefining civilization as “we” speak.

      • zendogbreath on July 11, 2020 at 6:10 pm


    • Billy Bob on July 10, 2020 at 7:23 pm

      BINGO…don’t take it personal. It’s just business. The model is taught to most Oxford Rhodes Scholars and their brethren (not the religious ones).
      Profits in preventing birth, profits in vaccines at birth if unable to prevent one, profits making otherwise healthy humans ill, profits in social engineering….the list goes on and on…

  10. Doug Bowersox on July 10, 2020 at 8:15 am

    Yes, a scientific expert panel can be manipulated. But, having a non-expert jury decide scientific veracity is madness. In both realms, the “truth” is determined by the “charismatic” with gymnastic-like verbal skills. They can vomit words with hurricane force that is so contradictory that it produces epileptic shock in the listener. Those “charismatic” individuals are right brained with little logical skill. Almost all that passes for truth is not and the crowd is always wrong.

    What is the solution?????

    • anakephalaiosis on July 10, 2020 at 10:22 am

      It is a language war, where Latin kills English, and it has been going on since the Middle Ages. Old English and Old Norse were considered same language once.

      English did not evolve naturally, into modern lingua franca. English was destroyed, by design, and that is Tower of Babel, when words are twisted, into gaslighting.

      Today, one must redefine words, by using principles, that define the original social contract. These principles were embedded into nursery rhymes, in the sixth century.

      Linguistic Affektenlehre is war decisive.

      • Allen S on July 10, 2020 at 11:41 am

        Hear hear!

        First they come for the language.

        Customer becomes consumer, speech becomes scripted political correctness (“you’re too white”).

        “We are not racist. What is your race? [ in order to receive this, that, and the other thing].

        You cannot even have “normal” interactions at a grocery store (“do you want your receipt? I.e., so I will not notice when I was charged for a six pack instead of a single beverage, repeatedly, even after notifications to the store, repeatedly…

        Allen S

  11. Guinevere on July 10, 2020 at 8:01 am

    Thank you Dr. Farrell for providing this forum that lays out the decline and fall of life on earth. One could only hope that Hillary Clinton and Baal Gates end up sharing a bunk in the same cell. Maybe they could play a game of Russian Roulette together while they wait for that spiral staircase to take them directly to hell.

  12. OrigensChild on July 10, 2020 at 7:33 am

    So, you’re saying “In science when contradictions become discriminations, science initiates unimpeachable policy.” How convenient for them; how tragic for us. I’ve done cursory readings about the legal arguments underpinning the vaccination debate. It’s the same game.

    In corporate law justice is too expensive. “We will settle for legal caps or not produce at all, but mankind will suffer in the vacancy.” Once again, I hear the faint echos of John Stuart Mill’s enshrinement of Jeremy Bentham’s famous maxim within public policy: “Happiness is the greatest good for the greatest number of people.” Using this a detergent corporations can was away a multitude of sins and treat the statistical outliers as unfortunate biological factors. Within this comes eugenics in yet another form.

    In this context the word discrimination has several meanings and contexts. I feel generous. Pick any one as they all apply. The plural form exists to denote both multiple in species and many instances of the same within any one of the species.

    • OrigensChild on July 10, 2020 at 7:36 am

      …can wash away… I did edit this before posting… Maybe I read what I meant rather than what my fingers said.

    • zendogbreath on July 11, 2020 at 5:51 pm

      Choices given lately is over government oppressing in the name of safety or government imposing austerity to pay for debts incurred by past profligate governments. And John Galt justifies all. Either starve for lack of food or suffer horrific chronic deneration with overfeeding of bad food. Wasn’t this the approach used to submit Ireland in 1800’s? And just about everywhere else?

  13. Melodi on July 10, 2020 at 7:31 am

    Until recently, we really had a Chinese “Take Away” (take out) in a nearby village called: SOO FATT DUCK, they recently changed the name, I wonder why?

    I thought it was hilarious and yep it is almost certainly owned by someone Chinese, almost every village in Ireland has that one family that owns the local “chipper.”

  14. anakephalaiosis on July 10, 2020 at 6:36 am

    Law is Law, in its own right, not technical legalities of wormy loopholes, in cases versus cases. Originally, Law is Old English “lagu”, that calms waves in oceans of people. (Lagu has dual meaning of sea and law.)

    Behind brands and empty suits, there is a ghost in the machine, a revolutionary spirit of revolt, against natural order. The most important sentence, in the modern age, is that Old English Ryne is Latin religō. It dispels the papal deception.

    Because, as the stairway to heaven spirals upwards, God descends in spiral, downward into creation. That is the sundial worldview, of the rotating sun cross, in Druidry.

    As above, so below:

    • Stan Del Carlo on July 11, 2020 at 11:56 am

      ……………. descending on a big cracking current,
      That passes through my coil, until I glow and burn
      Like the torch of Baphomet, forever now blazing
      Across my brow; but that was then and this is now.
      Being that I am the Spark that roared, I dwell in
      The silence, in the eye of the storm, overshadowed by….

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events