23 thoughts on “TIDBIT: NEW INTERVIEW WITH DARK JOURNALIST”

  1. Brilliant, as usual. Such a font of knowledge. Really impressive. But . . .

    . . . hasn’t it ever occurred to you that Trump is part of it? I’m MAGA, btw.

  2. Robert Barricklow

    I can’t swallow that “crash & retrieval” drivel.
    Shot down by another alien craft?
    Now there’s a possible window.

    Interestingly, there’s a new sci-fi fiction book that goes into this history of “flying saucer/alien WW11 history w/Truman, Eisenhower, the SS Obergruppenfuhrer Hans Kammler, the silos being turned on/off, the buzzing of DC, and many more.
    Of course, the frame is the vein of the mainstream narratives that are purposely being set-up across numerous mediums.
    Only a couple chapters in:
    Solar Warden: Alien Secrets by Ian Douglas, 2020.

  3. Hey Doc, nothing about the moon is artificial when viewed in the electric universe theory. Of course then, that implies the Russians at least are familiar with and use electric universe theory. And Tesla. And plasma physics. And on.

    Listening further to your comments on ancient memories of catastrophic events – reminds me of Dave Talbott’s work at Thunderbolts.info

  4. Loxie Lou Davie

    Thanks, Doc, for another fabulous interview!! I simply LOVE your political commentaries!! It’s so odd living through this change in the timeline!!

    We must all work to make sure what happened in South Africa, does not happen here!! Dr. Harry Booyens does an excellent job in his book, “AmaBhulu”, explaining what happened there. He & his family had to move to Canada in 2000 because they are white!! And here we all thought Nelson M. was a “good guy”…..guess Fake News was going on at the time too!! 😉

  5. I am most of the way through the interview. Very good!

    I read UFO books/articles from the earliest years. One of the most interesting ‘contradictions’ was from Project Sign (1947) and then Project Grudge (1949). Project Sign was an ‘unpicked’ group of experts who reviewed the evidence and then pronounced that UFOs were real (and advanced). Project Sign literature was then rounded-up and destroyed under the direction of a USAF General. The subsequent ‘study’, Project Grudge, was its antithesis; a ‘picked’ group was Ordered to say that “Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.” (MiB quote.) I will leave it to the Reader as to which was probably the most accurate study…

  6. Excellent review of an interview as it puts some of those details in your books in better perspective one hadn’t considered. Very informative while it filled in some gaps, too.

  7. GREAT interview with DJ again!~ LOVE Dr. Farrell but…….At 2:30:00 Joseph quotes (sort of )Ezekiel 28 and mentions LUCIFER. 1st: Lucifer is NOT mentioned in Ezekiel 28. Ezekiel 28 CLEARLY STATES the passage is about the KING OF TYRE. Just like Isaiah 14 is about a MAN (TRY READING IT) AND THAT MAN IS Nebuchadnezzar. In the Book of Isaiah written around 700 BC the WORD LUCIFER did NOT exist until 328 AD when St Jerome purposefully mistranslated the HEBREW HEYLEL meaning VENUS THE MORNING STAR into Latin for LIGHT BRINGER=VENUS. That is WHY newer Translations say HOW YOU HAVE FALLEN FROM HEAVEN (THE SKY) OH “MORNING STAR, SON OF THE DAWN”…..There Is NO devil named Lucifer and it shocks me Farrell does NOT know that. In the Bible GOD has 2.476,633 recorded kills NOT including the Flood or Sodom and Gomorrah……Satan? has 10…..1st 2 pages of JOB. I am Thoth al Khem !
    https://jdstone.org/cr/files/luciferaproblemforchristianity.html

    1. I don’t recall mentioning Ezekiel 28 specifically… maybe I did in the nervousness and pressure of the interview when I was paraphrasing it. But don’t nitpick too much, Mr. Anderson; I suggest you go back and read the passage carefully: the King of Tyre is the figure for the “cherub that covereth” who was cast down when “iniquity” was found in him; he also was said to walk in Eden. Now… who could that be? Did the King of Tyre walk in Eden? The passage, I respectfully disagree, is MORE about that cherub than the king of Tyre. (And an additional question: Why are the two associated in the passage to begin with?) And yes, I am aware of the meaning of Lucifer and the Morning Star and Venus and the Latin derivation of Lucifer. I respectfully suggest that you need to think much more deeply about that association, rather than string together a bunch of details, and accuse St Jerome of “purposeful mistranslation” and me of a lack of knowledge. The figure that people know as Lucifer, the fallen angel, WHATEVER you wish to call him, is clearly being talked about in the passage. If you want to think otherwise on the basis of a “scholarship” that cannot see the forest for the trees, that’s your business, and I shall not try to persuade you otherwise; during an interview I am nervous enough as it is, and I simply do NOT have the time to go into nitpickery and pettifoggery as you suggest, and must use terms people can understand with some immediacy in order to make the point I was trying to make, which you do not mention at all in your attack. And yes, I am also aware of the “recorded” kills. And I believe that those kills were Yahweh’s, were they not? That point is important. You might want to consider St. John 8:44-45 and 58 (in the Greek) in relationship to it.

      1. Joseph: “Did the King of Tyre walk in Eden?”

        Just possibly… (grin)

        From the near-end, Miles Mathis has traced a group of ‘world-managers’ way back into Mesopotamia and the Levant, whom he refers-to as the Phoenician Navy. Tyre was a main port of the Phoenicians.

        From the far-end, many authors have noted that Sumerian cuneiform tablets refer to a very long-lived ‘species’ labeled the Anunnaki, who started around Mesopotamia (via a male Anunnaki named Enlil) and spread over the land. The Sumerian word for Eden was E.Din – hmmm. (Africa was given to a male Anunnaki named Enki. India/Pakistan was ‘given’ to a female Anunnaki named Inanna.)

        Connecting the dots in the middle, Sumer fell and new monarchies replaced it. The port of Tyre became important and had a respected King. Anunnaki still had loonng lives. Now, think of the Highlander movie and tv series. Could the King of Tyre have actually walked in Eden/E.Din?

  8. Hi Dr.Farrell,

    you never cease to amaze me how finely honed your perceptions are- may God bless you and keep you safe!

    (hey, God, that’s an order!)

    Larry in Germany 🙂

  9. The problem is the puppetmasters in the shadows who labor 24/7 to turn Earth into a hellhole and keep that way forever. To quote OBrian imagine a human face being kicked in forever.

    1. G, I just listened to one of Dmitry Orlov’s latest interviews. He’s back in Russia and sounds happy in a somewhat early retirement. He’s still pushing USSA collapse and Russian rise. It takes less and less effort on that sales pitch. He went a little softer on Putin than I have heard him in the past. That might be a residential issue. What caught my ear is that he is convinced that Russians are much farther along in the project to close the nuke fuel cycle than everyone else. He feels that all the other nations are going to depend more and more on nuke and hence Russia since Russia’s going to put a tight leash on the tech to recycle spent fuel. Reminds me of the attitude toward GE and US nuke tech right after Chernobyl where everyone had to depend more on US tech that didn’t make such horrendous mistakes. (Until of course it did make such mistakes in Japan)

      Just the same how much better does a tech (like recycling spent fuel) have to be to give the owner severe advantages over everyone else?

      1. ZDB, Jim Stone has written extensively on the advantages of using thorium-style reactors to recover the ‘wasted’ fuel from perfectly-good but contaminated-by-waste-products fuel rods. This ‘fuel’ is essentially free. In addition, the waste products from thorium-style reactors are both minimal in volume and are of short-lived isotopes. And, according to JS’ interview with a thorium-style-reactor designer, the cycle & machinery was proved-out before the PTB had it canceled…

        Which leads to a darker development: The fuel-rod ponds were initially designed and fabricated for the closed-cycle ‘recycling’ of fuel rods. They were fail-safe in that the amount of fuel rods in a pond was never going to be greater than could be passively-cooled with the water-pumping-system disabled.

        When the fuel rods were not being ‘recycled’ due to the thorium-style reactors being cancelled, those rods began building-up in the limited number of fuel-rod ponds. At some point, the ponds were no longer fail-safe. If the pumps were disabled, the water would boil-off and the rods would be exposed to the air. Then, there would be a runaway flash-vaporization of the radioactive rods. (Note that this is “only” a radioactive cloud, NOT a nuclear explosion.)

        JS observes that these no longer fail-safe fuel-rod ponds are now bargaining chips, in a nuclear-blackmail sense. “Nice fuel ponds you got there. Shame if something happened to them…” For example, a certain rogue Middle East country could threaten to covertly blow the pumps or breech the tanks if it did not get its way.

        Both JS and I wonder if this was not a main reason for the thorium-style reactors initially being cancelled…

        1. You are not the only ones wondering that. Ya never know what could happen to spent fuel ponds stored on the roof of nuke power plants built on an east coast of Japan known for past huge tsunami. Especially stuxnet subverted power plants.

          Yep, seen more than a few videos (TED talks probably) raving about Thorium. Too common sense.

  10. The book on Kammler: “The Hidden Nazi” by Dean Reuter, Colm Lowery, Keith Chester. Regnery History 2019-11-28, Washington, D.C, 2019.

      1. The Kammler book is on my list and will order it soon, in the meantime why don’t you send in a short review?

Comments are closed.