CERN ADMITS IT, SEEKS “CONTACT” WITH PARALLEL UNIVERSES

CERN ADMITS IT, SEEKS “CONTACT” WITH PARALLEL UNIVERSES

T.S. spotted this one, and if you like me have suspected there is something more going on at CERN than just to discover more particles in the particle pantheon of quantum mechanics, then this is the article for you:

Researchers At Large Hadron Collider Are Confident To Make Contact With Parallel Universe In Days

Now, I point out this article because it's very interesting to track the collider's public announcements over time, because I don't know about you, but to me they appear to shift slightly each time certain subjects come up. From the outset, in looking at the design of the overall design of the collider, I suspected it was about more than particle  physics and that it was about torsion and hyper-dimensionality and magnetic resonances and all sorts of other stuff too. Particles were, well, sort of a cover story. People emailed me - including an individual claiming to have worked on several accelerators including the large hadron collider- telling me I was nuts. I may well be nuts, but I'm sticking to my nuttiness. I had the impression that its design made it as much about torsion, hyper-dimensionality, magnetic resonance, piezo-electrics and a whole lot of other stuff including, even, social engineering. I wasn't alone in my nuttiness (though I was not and am not one of those proposing that the collider was part of some Saturnalian plot to open portals to Saturn and let demons come tumbling through). Others were afraid it would create mini-black holes that would eventually gobble up the Earth (and everything else), and initiated lawsuits to prevent it from being turned on. To their surprise, that's when they found out no courts had any jurisdiction to hear the cases, since CERN and its toy were sovereign entities. That was a big "hhhmmmm...."

Then they fed the squirrels in the fly-wheels at CERN and turned it on; the squirrels ran, belts and gears turned turned and the great machine clanked and huffed and puffed, little packets of information called protons whirled, and... boom. A "coolant accident" to the coolants on the massive magnets forced the whole thing to be shut down while repairs were made. Repairs done, the squirrels were fed their nuts, the flywheels turned, belts whirred, protons whirled, and voila, they discovered the Higgs boson. It was at that point we heard the first glimmers that, oh yea, they might also be looking for evidence "hyper-dimensions" too.

Now we get this little nugget on what that evidence might be:

If successful a very new universe is going to be exposed – modifying completely not only the physics books but the philosophy books too.

It is even probable that gravity from our own universe may “transfer” into this parallel universe, researchers at the LHC say. The experiment is assured to accentuate alarmist critics of the LHC, many of whom initially warned the high energy particle collider would start the top of our universe with the making a part of its own. But up to now Geneva stays intact and securely outside the event horizon.

No doubt the LHC has been outstandingly successful. First researchers proved the existence of the mysterious Higgs boson “God particle” - a key building block of the cosmos - and it's seemingly well on the thanks to revealing ‘dark matter’ - a previously untraceable theoretical prospect that's now believed to form up the foremost of matter within the universe. But next week’s experimentation is reflected to be a game-changer. Mir Faizal, one in every of the three-strong group of physicists behind this experiment, said: “Just as many parallel sheets of paper, which are two-dimensional objects [breadth and length] can exist during a dimension [height], parallel universes can even exist in higher dimensions.”

“We predict that gravity can leak into extra dimensions, and if it does, then miniature black holes are produced at the LHC. Normally, when people consider the multiverse, they think about the many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics, where every possibility is actualized. This can not be tested so it's a philosophy and not science. this is often not what we mean by parallel universes. What we mean is real universes in extra dimensions. “As gravity can effuse of our universe into the additional dimensions, such a model may be tested by the detection of mini black holes at the LHC.” (Emphasis  added)

You don't say... so, in the quest to look for hyper-dimensions we're looking for (1) "leaking gravity" which is "leaking" into (2) some sort of parallel universe, but, thank goodness, it's not all that wacky "multiverse theory", which we're now being told is "philosophy" not "science," in spite of the fact that many physicists not only originated the theory, but subscribe to it. And all of this is going to be conclusively decided by CERN's WMD (Wonderful Machine of Determination).

Uh huh... uhm... pardon me for asking guys, but I seem to recall a certain famous physicist who connected gravity and time, and who, in making that connection, set up the whole implication of a multiverse? And I seem to recall other famous physicists taking about uncertainty and observer effects and arcane things like that, who also made their own contribution?...

So hang on folks, because I suspect the story will change again...

 

 

47 thoughts on “CERN ADMITS IT, SEEKS “CONTACT” WITH PARALLEL UNIVERSES”

  1. BTW, I just want to add further, Dr. Farrell was talking about Buddhism and multiverse in his interview with Dark Journalist.

    I just want to add Buddhism is not a different religion per se, it was a school of thought in Hinduism as Cārvāka. There are still several followers of it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charvaka

    But Hindu cosmology also predicts about the big bang and multiverses. Even the same school of thought accepts that.

    Having the spirituality doesn’t mean you totally leave the science behind, experimentation behind, or it some kind of evil materialism.

    Again it is a very Christian way of looking at things, Its very binary way of looking at things, if you believe in science, you are materialistic. No, that’s not what Buddhism is all about, neither Charvaka says that.

    Even Dharmic traditions support the progress of science, and always making the right & logical choices. Otherwise how we explain the technologies in Mahabharta.

    1. Ashtanga is traditionally known in the West, as the eight-fold discipline of Odin (íþróttir Óðins). It is a topological metaphor. We can both define it, and use it.

      Dharmachakra is basically an 8-point compass, and its skills in usage is navigation. It is a scientific discipline. It is mathematics of Samsara (rebirth).

      Biblical Genesis is a basic 4-point compass, poetically expressed in four rivers. A shadow falls in ALL sundials. That is duality in Mahabharata.

      Duality is solved in Samadhi, when eye, and source of light, are the same – transcending original Narcissus, in his topological metaphor.

      32-point compass, in Notre Dame’s window display:
      https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pnz9jpb73u1gfla/druidry-for-dummies.pdf

      1. Aah, you brought Ashtanga, till 1965 Pattabhi Jois was a communist, who was nothing till then, and used to protest in streets of Bombay against Nehruvian govt.

        Then, KGB gave a cover and voila. But let’s not go into that.

        As for duality in Mahabharata, there is no duality as such. It only explains what Dharma is. Mahabharata is very quite easy to understand, it is not even written in some kind of complex, mysterious, or ambiguous way.

        But if we still want to justify certain wrongdoings of Krishna ( I am certain people in the US would have some knowledge of Iskon and Krishna) as some duality then best of luck.
        But he is still god in Hinduism, even after some people call in the west as “evil” acts. He did all kinds of wrongdoings to win the war.

        I don’t believe in God personally, but he was certainly a great man, and that’s what dharma is.

        And today if we start to call Krishna’s thinking and mentality as evil, that would be the biggest hypocrisy.

        1. Don’t waste your time replying to “anak”. I’m not even sure if it is a real person. They never seem to have any coherent comments, just chat bot level haiku’s about Druid and Rune nonsense.

    1. Well, it’s pretty clear we’ve got mad scientists running the show (in physics, medicine, AI… you name it), and they don’t seem to care if they’re playing with fire. IMO technology has developed way beyond humanity’s moral, ethical, and spiritual ability to handle it. So another Atlantis moment in coming years or decades wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

  2. I don’t think they meant multiverse in a sense they open a Stargate and say hello. Or any kind of mirror Universe as some kind of experiment of CPT violation.

    What they doing is trying to discover particle interaction with extra-dimension, as the string theory predicts.

    And actually, we should be happy about it, CERN if it is able to predict it, we found Theory of Everything.

    1. CERN is sovereign body, and that is normally imperial and proconsul position.

      Subject slaves are denied sovereignty, whereas corporations are granted personhood.

      Happiness in Stockholm syndrome is endorsing slavery as freedom.

      “We’re Not Gonna Take It.” – Twisted Sister.

      1. CERN is as much sovereign as much UN is. No one cares about the sovereignty of CERN. If European nation-states want to destroy it, it is destroyed. You only need yes from 2 nations, Germany and France. Not only that, you only need France. (IMO, in terms of national power, Germany is far far weaker than France).

        Sovereignty means nothing by itself, if that what it is, I start to declare my house as sovereign.

        You have to establish the writ, and CERN by itself is incapable of doing it. You need military power to do so.

      2. And as for Stockholm syndrome about freedom, we should choose words very carefully.

        Human Civilization since inception was always a pyramid in structure. Equality and freedom are very ambiguous terms, absolute equality and freedom exist nowhere. Absolute freedom is narcissism.

        Humans have nurture of not accepting the authority of anyone else, we are rebelled by nature, we shouldn’t lose this part. but that doesn’t mean we start to rebel against our own kind. Religious people start to call this as a way of Lucifer, but anybody noticed there was no evil angel in any of the Dharmic traditions. And even Dharmic religions don’t contextualize evilness as Abrahamic religions do.

        And I have very serious contempt about Abrahamic religion contextualizing evil & good as binary. In my opinion, it’s more like becoming holier than thou, like a narcissistic approach about evil & good.

        We need to be very clear and logical about it.

  3. What’s that expression CERN folks and affiliates might want to review for meaning and quite possibly disappointment? “Don’t call us we’ll call you.” Or maybe, “We’re sorry, the number you have dialed has been disconnected or no longer in service (We saw you coming).” Perhaps, service unavailable, might be more meaningful just before another coolant leak sounds an alarm and the Geneva’s lights go out anyway despite being on a separate grid. There might just be an unexpected gate keeper requesting a password or need to know access code.

    Makes one wonder how the fields of the magnetosphere might look like under proper filtering techniques for subtle shifts. A sudden aurora over Geneva might look pretty cool.

    Then again, another universe (not really knowing the extent of this theorized present one) might turn out to be a vacation resort (for the bought off elitist’s). Or how about, the LHC might just create another “Big Bang” (making one wonder who’ll be around to measure those presumptive effects). Ah, yes, perhaps they’ll discover the center of the current EXPANDING universe to mark its bull’s eye (to graph a ray from that vertex, of course, as one continues to move from it). That observer / experimenter effect should be interesting. That thing called time will tell what surprises might be instore for the rest. Maybe a, soon to be, new zip code.

  4. Take your pick the Stargate franchise or the Howard the Duck movie with those snake-dragons coming from another parallel universe like Howard. Are our elites using the LHC to do god knows what to increase their already bloated power and wealth how much is enough for these addicts?

    1. snake dragons? hehe, last scene of the end of the first series of Raised By Wolves, but I still expect the thing to morph into the head of a Rottenchild, like in The Fly.

  5. In any case, somehow, somewhere, everyhow, everywhere there is a Lord of the Rings, or natural laws, that will deal with them if they transgress too much, and run rings around them. Protesting too much, Shiva dancing around the golden calf, will not help the hypocrites.
    Joseph Chiappalone (as seen on Rense) reckons the universe is disappearing due to dark matter, and the show starts (ends) here at the end of 2022. That is, in his universe, which was a mistake and due to be corrected with all good children (with souls) going to heaven (another dimension) and some of the robots (90% of the people) getting valid soul inserts as a bonus. Good enough for me, and we shall see.
    https://rense.com/general96/fait-accompli.php
    I guess if a virus ‘leaked’ into here, it would make the Anrdomeda Strain look like COVID84.

    1. promo thru rense.com
      UFO sighting (Unpromo’d Farrell Object)
      2hr30min
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1iPBi7BMOU&feature=youtu.be
      Q & the Qult: A Multi-Spectrum Analysis
      “QAnon has been vilified and censored by the corporate media, and billed as the Second Coming by followers. Joseph P. Farrell and Catherine Austin Fitts join Bernard Grover to discuss the whos, whats, whys, and hows of the Q Phenomenon. These two remarkable guests bring diverse and well-informed views to a highly misunderstood and contentious topic. Bernard has written over 35 articles spanning the three years of the Q Phenomenon. The latest article is linked here, with additional links at the bottom of the page: “

  6. This talk about CERN always reminds me of one of my fav teevee shows “Fringe”, which as you might recall was about experiments going awry with parallel dimensions encroaching upon one another, and how the Humans dealt with it. I always thought they cancelled it because it was getting a bit “too real”.

    1. The “Fringe” series is an apologetic damage control, to cover up experiments with vaccine/drugs on children.

      Such transgression will always awaken the “day of reckoning” coming down, and the powers that be seek damage control.

      A floating tank acid head tries to escape, into the future, with a minor by the hand – the repeating theme.

      Inducing autism/split personality is unholy.

      1. The article seems highly suspect to me. Lots of grammatical errors and statements that don’t make much sense. I couldn’t find anything related to this “news” on the CERN website.

  7. If you see everything as infinite waves in an aether. And where multiple waves collide you get positive swirling points that can trap wave generated negative nullification points in long lived eddies which have the characteristics of particles as they bond with other such formations and gain mass. Then everything is really just aether. Resonance from the vibrations of these formations sets up the exact same timing and interactions else where in the aether like multiple nearby pendalums are observed to do in close proximity. Since we are dealing with something on an infinite scale all parallel universes stacked and locked with our own may be at different stages of achieving resonace to our particular resonance. The timing of the ones on top our in our past and the ones below us are our future. But orbiting our stack in other dimensions are infinite other timelines that are at angles to us. The farther away you get from your point of consciousness at right angles the weirder and more extreme the differences become or is these formations at angle visible to us as other celestial bodies and beings we call 3D reality? Time may exist as parralel universes and 3D manifestations might be points of multiple times line stacks at different angles to our own observed stack interacting with our stack producing our 3D aspects at these intersections.

    1. If so slightly alternative versions and even exact same 3D manifestations exist simultaneously in multiple locations, dimensions and parallel universes of aether. These 3D manifestations even exist at greater and smaller scales of being because of quantum entanglement resonance created by our 3D pendalum with other simular configured pendalums at greater and smaller scales of dimensions. Our points of conscious view may in reality be formed from interaction at angles with countless alternative other universes and timelines and may exist simultaneously on them as well but at different points in their timelines and alternative timelines. Our current point of experience is just one of infinite we will eventual experience. Now is CERN trying to mechanically jump or alter dimensional manifestation points and timelines at a minute scale? Better hope it does permanently change our our current natural resonance too much!

        1. You mean, Roger, like Atlantis?!!! 😉

          I wish one of you scientific minds would check out RogerMudFossilsUniversity’s Electron Flood Theory. Since I do not have a scientific mind I cannot understand what he means by everything being “explained” in this simple demonstration!

          I DO like his other work of collecting rocks which were once pieces of organic living things: lungs, heads, hearts, etc. One of the lungs he found actually bled onto his workbench!! Because he is SO outside the Established Mainstream Science he cannot get anyone to interact with him on a scientific basis. He get ignored!! So typical in this Follow The Money “system” we live in.

          1. Thanks Loxie for the Roger Mud Fossils Electron Flood Theory suggestion. Looking at it now. I like to play around with many different visual models especially ones I think I’m the first one to look at things from that potential perspective. Only later I find out others have explored similar as well. But after I observe from their perspective I immediately start looking for subtle alternate potentials to branch off from their perspective they might not have followed. They are just models of different potentials from different potential perspectives. I’m not a mathematician though, so it’s purely conceptual for my journeying into the unknown. I’m more interested in growing my consciousness with these musings than making any break throughs or even being right. It’s the journey not the destination for me right now.

    2. Didn’t do too good a job describing what I was seeing as I was seeing it here. But the gist was time may be a wave flowing through a book of planes/pages where each moment in time or page is a whole separate universe and plane of existence. But time planes only have 3D objects on them where other time alternate planes intersect with them from infinite other angles at the frequencies necessary to produce the 3D phenomenon being expressed there. Still can’t adequately explain it with words. But from our current conscious moment which is moving through the 3D manifestations created by multiple resonating universes and planes we are not aware that each choice we make and change of direction moves us into another plane of existence. We also exist in other planes where we chose differently simultaneously. The difference between conscious manifestations and unconscious ones is that conscious ones can change their direction of time flow manifestations. But all times, places, and 3D manifestations also over lap each other in the same place and time but at different scales of being. Also, the resonance of all that can be, creates and repeats our experiences and every other potential experience somewhere on every intersecting plane or scale of being in multiple but at unobservable distance because of the resonating pendalum effect. Alright loosing my train of vision while I concentrate on typing again so I’m stopping here. Just a small slippery glimps. Our consciousness is like the electron, what we know and perceive depends upon where it currently flows, but it also flows everywhere else as well simultaneously but we are not aware of those other potentials simultaneously because of the planes of time and scale that separate perception.

    3. “The timing of the ones on top our in our past and the ones below us are our future. But orbiting our stack in other dimensions are infinite other timelines that are at angles to us. The farther away you get from your point of consciousness at right angles the weirder and more extreme the differences become”

      I think that is a very intriguing insight! Orthogonal rotations in “your point of consciousness” producing weird and extreme differences……..food for thought.

  8. That they’re now admitting to that[God knows what other ops they’re keeping under wraps]; means[IMO], it’s an fiat accompli.
    At least, in their view. Or, perhaps “it” gave them no choice in the matter. Crazy Elitist Radical Decisions; like playing w/cosmic dice. Thanks for taking these momentous chances on behalf of humanity. Or, did AI “guide” these Crazy Elites R Diabolical. That my frame.[Now, to read on past your headliner]

    You might have told that individual, that’s why he[“worked on several colliders”] didn’t move-up-fast in CERN’s chain of command. He wasn’t nuts. Crazy. Myself, I’ve always suspected “time-travel” motives in the collider phenomena.
    Like being a made man in the mafia; CERN join the “made sovereign” brethren like the BIS and/or the Vatican. These organization are of a common ideology that is inhuman to their rotten cores. Also common is their “black magick” aspect. Think magic virus, an/or the God particle.

    So, are they now making/taking a living universe …
    into this parallel parasitic one?

    Hey, maybe they’ll inadvertently prove how black holes are formed: by the insanity of a few bozos w/lots of cash to cosmically burn!
    The only uncertainty is …
    why were these crazies let out of their box?

    Who is their masterful madman?
    Is “it” even living?
    A dead ringer?

  9. Is this the reason that the North American craton is shifting along with all seismic plates around the world? Could this be the cause of the very mysterious hot spots erupting on the surface of earth along with quake swarms? I’m talking about substantial increases just this past week. We already know TPTB have no reqard for life on this planet. I’m like you Dr. Joseph, I worry about Cern.

  10. One has to wonder about that statue of Shiva and the weird occulted opening ceremony associated with CERN.
    So far, every attempt to locate Dark Matter has failed. It’s an electric Universe, it would seem, and the evidence for that has been coming at an increasing pace.
    Now they are planning higher power levels and bigger colliders. There is more to this than readily meets the eye.

      1. Quinn Micheals had some yt videos with plausible speculations that the ring systems are computational and crucial to AI systems. And that they’re all over the planet. A few are known. He is most likely the guy who found all the rings that showed up when foolish staff were leaving their gps equipped fitbit bracelets on and running while they were in these ring facilities. He had one in Antarctica. Another in an ocean. All over.

  11. In the absence of information, there is much room for speculation. So, I tend to go with hard ‘data’:

    First, as Joseph mentioned, there is the creation of CERN as an independent entity – unrestrained by standard laws. This reminds me of the City of London, the Vatican, etc. Someone (aka the PTB) went to a lot of trouble to put this in place.

    Second, CERN has almost a blank check, moneywise. There has been an enormous amount of money spent ostensibly for “pure science” (cough cough). This unlikely scenario suggests that the science is not for ‘pure’ purposes but for applications.

    Third, the PTB have been long-known to weaponize everything. If you had a toothpaste tube, they would weaponize that. It is a mindset.

    Shake and stir the above, and you get a general idea of what the CERN Large Hadron Collider is probably about…

    1. True, toothpaste tube is a delivery system for flouride. Plastic containers leak chemicals to alter hormones. Food is colored and preserved with all kinds of goodies to keep the medical establishment customer lines longer than they otherwise would be. Appliances and our vehicles track everything we do and black boxes have black ops capabilities built into them most likely. Our fiat currency slowly steals all our resources and turns us into debt slaves through fiat interest collection.

Comments are closed.