Many people this past week have been sending me articles related to the ongoing planscamdemic and the rollout of the "vaccines" to deal with it. Many of these articles concern what appears to be a growing list of adverse reactions to the vaccines. "If the actual virus doesn't get you, maybe the 'vaccine' will," seems to be the mantra of the day. For example, consider this article shared by B.W.:
Some of the statements in the article would be absolute howlers for their summary of the "reasoning" and "logic" aspects of the mass vaccination drive, were not people's lives in the balance. Consider just the opening three paragraphs:
The Norwegian Medicines Agency stressed they were not alarmed by the deaths - they expected some - but is updating its advice to allow doctors to make a judgement whether to vaccinate their most frail patients.
Sigurd Hortemo, chief physician, said 'common adverse reactions to mRNA vaccines, such as fever and nausea, may have contributed to a fatal outcome in some frail patients,' in the body's first report on vaccine side effects.
The agency noted that clinical trials of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine 'did not include patients with unstable or acute illness - and included few participants over 85 years of age.'
Oh really? Few elderly and "patients with unstable or acute illness" were included in the clinical trials?
Then why, for crying out loud, are you giving it to such patients? And are now having to "adjust" your recommendations?
Then consider the statistical implications of this statement:
Overall, Norway has seen 57,279 cases and reported 511 deaths during the pandemic.
Zero Hedge is much less sanguine about Norway's "adjustment":
Notably, China itself is highly skeptical of the "vaccines" according to the Zero Hedge article:
Yang Zhanqiu, a virologist from Wuhan University, told the Global Times on Friday that the death incident, if proven to be caused by the vaccines, showed that the effect of the Pfizer vaccine and other mRNA vaccines is not as good as expected, as the main purpose of mRNA vaccines is to heal patients.
A Beijing-based immunologist, who requested anonymity, told the Global Times on Friday that the world should suspend the use of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine represented by Pfizer, as this new technology has not proven safety in large-scale use or in preventing any infectious diseases.
Older people, especially those over 80, should not be recommended to receive any COVID-19 vaccine, he said.
All of which is a problem since it is the elderly who are at most risk (quite frankly at any real risk at all) and thus who need the protection the most. The Chinese health experts instead say that the most elderly and frail should be recommended to take medicines to improve their immune system.
There's similar news from Israel:
And for a round-up of such stories, look here(article shared by G.F.):
And if that doesn't convince you that there's "something going on," and "it isn't good", consider these stories (shared by D.K.):
And there are many more.
Normally I would comment much more about any one of these articles. But today I thought it was more important to make you aware of these stories - and this sample is only skimming the surface - than to comment at any length about them. I bring them to your attention to help you make informed decisions.
That said, I do have one comment. I don't know about you, but in watching this mad scramble to "vaccinate" everyone against a virus with a small fatality rate, I have to wonder about the state of "science" itself in the west. Most readers of this website are probably already aware of the inconsistencies even in the way that the statistics of cases were compiled and reported. "The books were cooked," is the old expression, and here there seem to be cases of wholesale double-bookkeeping. That aspect of what I've been calling the planscamdemic are known. There are readers of this website who have lost loved ones to the virus. And even they have noted the reaction is all out of proportion to the threat. Which brings me back to the "science" and particularly the "vaccines." I don't know about you, but I get the impression from watching these pharmaceutical companies that we are watching a collection of witch doctors in their loin cloths and big primitive wooden masks, dancing around a bubbling cauldron, tossing in a pinch of rhinoceros horn power, eye of newt, and a little mRNA.
Stir vigorously, and serve cold.
See you on the flip side...