Hello everyone, and Happy New Year! I'm back after a much-needed rest from the holidays, and I hope you and yours are rested and refreshed as well, because if you thought 2020's sauce had some nasty lumps in it, I strongly suspect 2021 will have more lumps, bumps, folds and crinkles than Angela Merkel in a pantsuit.
But for all that, Happy New Year anyway.
So what, you may be wondering, was the biggest story in my email box over the holidays? Not surprisingly, it was the ongoing planscamdemic, the rush to get everyone to take the "vaccines", and some related stories from some Roman Catholic hierarchy urging people to receive the vaccines "because it's the Christian thing to do," to nurses taking it on TV, and then collapsing on camera a few minutes later, and then tweeting to explain that it was not a reaction to the vaccine, but due to a chronic nervous condition. Really? Nurses prone to fainting due to chronic nervous conditions? I want the name of that hospital or clinic she works in, because I want to be sure to avoid it. On top of all this, we've had reports - as expected - of adverse reactions to these "vaccines," including some horrific reports of "monsterism" which, as of yet, are unverified, but frankly, I wouldn't doubt them.
While all this was going on, in the State of New York the state senate is pondering a bill to put "vaccine refusers" into detention as health risks to the general population should the governor of that state declare an emergency(thanks to H.A.H. for spotting and sharing this one):
But c'mon, you knew this was coming. After all, if they can "lockdown"(a prison term) economies by gubernatorial or mayoral edict, they can lock you up and throw away the key if you are a refusenik. In what must be a supreme irony, the mask of this being a "free democratic republic" came off the moment the masks went on. In reality, what this bill looks like is simply a post facto attempt to give their actions the color of law. Don't worry, give them time, and some bright "progressive" somewhere will argue that detention is "inhumane," and will propose creating "autonomous zones" just for refuseniks, sort of like reservations. "You can travel free inside this area, but outside, you have to have your vaccine papers in order." We all knew that was coming too: no international travel without your papers.
In spite of all of this, the stories continue to come out about adverse reactions in some vaccine recipients, like this one concerning a doctor in Mexico who received one, and suffered adverse reactions including encephalomyelitis (this one spotted by B.W.):
We shouldn't be surprised about the myelitis, because there were similar reactions reported during "vaccine" trials in the U.K. But perhaps it's stories like that that are behind an unusual phenomenon: health care workers and professionals including doctors and nurses are refusing the new vaccines in high percentages. Take a look at these stories shared by V.T. and M.D.:
In other words, in spite of a media-marketing campaign stoke fear over covid and to promote the "vaccines," many doctors and nurses aren't fooled. And that says a lot, because they are dealing with it on a daily basis, and see the horrible deaths it has caused. Yet, they're "choosing which risk" to accept. (A good thing the stories are not from New York, as they might end up in detention.) Of course, predictably, some are pushing for corporations to make it policy for employees to take the vaccine in order to continue employment, and yea, we probably all expected that one to come down too. The only problem is, such policies might open them up to liability for adverse reactions, so it will be necessary for Congress to extend the vaccine non-liability laws from Big Pharma to corporations with mandatory vaccine policies. Prediction: it will happen.
But believe it or not, all of the foregoing was just prelude in my usual long-walk-around-Harvey's-Barn sort of way to the main story and focus of this blog, and a story submitted by V.T.:
It's worth pondering a couple of statements:
We built Moderna on the guiding premise that if using mRNA as a medicine works for one disease, it should work for many diseases. And, if this is possible – given the right approach and infrastructure – it could meaningfully improve how medicines are discovered, developed and manufactured.
Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
We have a dedicated team of several hundred scientists and engineers solely focused on advancing Moderna’s platform technology. They are organized around key disciplines and work in an integrated fashion to advance knowledge surrounding mRNA science and solve for challenges that are unique to mRNA drug development. Some of these disciplines include mRNA biology, chemistry, formulation & delivery, bioinformatics and protein engineering.
Accompanying all this fluff is a diagram of what looks like a covid virus. Notably, none of the context here is directly about, nor concerned with, covid. It could be anything they're talking about. But that's the point: Moderna's whole general approach is to tailor an "operating system" to specific diseases and/or viruses.
All of which brings me back to a point I made last year in connection to the "Baal Gates" model of "vaccines," speculations I advanced in connection with the arrest of Harvard chemistry and nanotechnology professor Dr. Charles Lieber for allegedly not disclosing his financial connections to the virology laboratory in Wuhan China. What I speculated was that the "virus" appeared to be a "magic" virus: it had at that time (and by my lights, still has) no apparently regular behavior nor vector nor pattern of infection. It appears here, there, everywhere, and in highly varying circumstances and effects. It can kill some people, and barely affect others. At the time, I suspected it may have been bio-engineered, with a nano-component that would respond to certain electromagnetic stimuli or other environments. That remains speculation. What does not remain speculation is that the response to it appears to be rather similar: we're going to inject you with a "vaccine" that effectively contains an "operating system" that could conceivably affect messenger RNA, and hence even conceivably affect one's DNA, and hence, one's progeny (already there are stories that some of these vaccines might affect female fertility and should not be given to pregnant women). We simply do not know, because no one has done any inter-generational testing for the long term effects of such "vaccines." Injecting an operating system such as this might well turn out to be a bio-engineered weapon in its own right: "behave, or we'll send a signal and really screw you up." It appears to have "co-morbities" which factors supposedly include low vitamin D and zinc deficiencies, and so on. (Perhaps the New York state legislature should consider expanding their detention regulations by following the same "logic" as that often touted by mask-wearers, to include people who do not take vitamin D and zinc supplements too, as they're increasing "risk" to others.) So even if these "vaccines" are not motivated by some hidden malign purpose, we still simply do not know the long term effects, the inter-generational effects, of taking them.
And while I'm out on the end of the twig of high octane speculation here, let me propose one more: the adverse reactions we're seeing in some people to these "vaccines" appear to my non-professional eyes like allergic reactions or reactions a body might have to the presence of mRNA or DNA components that it both recognizes and does not recognize. And perhaps the health care workers refusing to take these "vaccines" recognize the inherent risks of tinkering too much and too freely with the body's "operating system" by injecting another one.
The bottom line: the response of medical professionals from nurses to doctors who refuse the vaccine means that the carefully crafted media marketing campaign about the planscamdemic and the "vaccines" is not monolithic.
In short, the narrative has collapsed. And anyone telling you otherwise might be trying to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn, or a vial of snake oil.
See you on the flip side...