Yesterday, you'll recall, I blogged, or rather, did not blog about an article from a European covid-vaccine statistics compilation of the adverse reactions to the various "vaccines" out there, and particularly on the mRNA vaccines. One of my intentions, unstated at that time and which I state here, was to respond to the hysteria I am sensing in various media pushes for everyone to take the "vaccine", as well as my stated intention to at least provide some information running counter to the covid narrative and the bland reassurances from technocrats that it's entirely safe to do so. In short, I've had it. I've noticed friends taking these things, and frankly, they are in my prayers for continued good health and for a long and happy life. It would be a sin of omission - which most of the lamestream media is guilty of - not to at least report the other side of the story, while local officials and "health experts" continue to push highly experimental vaccines which have undergone precious little animal study and absolutely no long term intergenerational studies, for a "pandemic" whose statistical death rate us low.
I do so again today by posting an audio link to the Tom Woods show of an interview with Kathryn Huwig in hopes that people will share this information with their family and friends. If you do not know who Kathryn Huwig is, I cite the following from the email which V.T. sent to me, which in turn is quoting Mr. Woods:
Not too long ago I wrote to you about the heroic Kathryn Huwig in Ohio, whose COVID analytics have been excellent from the very start.
I wrote to tell you about her appearance at the State House. In her testimony, she held up a chart of ICU bed usage in Ohio since March 2020.
The X-axis, indicating time, was omitted on purpose.
She noted that Ohio's alleged "public health" authorities had picked out certain events and certain state policies as being significant with respect to COVID, either in terms of spread or mitigation.
All right, she said. If these things -- like Thanksgiving and Christmas (which should have led to an explosion in COVID numbers, according to the "public health" establishment), or the implementation of the mask mandate and the curfew (which should have led to lower numbers) -- really had such a significant effect that severe interventions into people's lives were justified, we should surely be able to identify them on the graph even without the help of the dates.
So go ahead, she said. Show me on the graph where the curfew went into effect, the mask mandate was instituted, when businesses opened in the spring, etc.
And of course it's impossible to find these events on the chart, because none of them appear to accomplish anything.
I decided: I have to get her on my show.
Here's the interview: