User Answers

TOP FDA OFFICIALS RESIGN, SIGN LANCET LETTER WARNING OF BOOSTERS TO ...

So many people sent me this article that rather than include it in this week's honourable mentions' weekly covid story round-up, I think it is significant enough to merit its own blog. In case you did not know, two FDA officials have resigned after signing a letter to Britain's prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, warning about boosters to the injections:

The Meaning of the FDA Resignations

Jeffrey A. Tucker, author of the article, minces no words concerning the significance of the development in the opening of the article:

How significant is it that the two top FDA officials responsible for vaccine research resigned last week and this week signed a letter in The Lancet that strongly warns against vaccine boosters? This is a remarkable sign that the project of government-managed virus mitigation is in the final stages before falling apart.

The booster has already been promoted by top lockdown advocates Neil Ferguson of Imperial College and Anthony Fauci of NIH, even in the face of rising public incredulity toward their “expert” advice. For these two FDA officials to go on record with grave doubts – and their perspective is certainly backed by the unimpressive booster experience in Israel – introduces a major break in the narrative that the experts in charge deserve our trust and deference.

What’s at stake here? It’s about more than the boosters. It’s about the whole experience of taking away the control of health management from individuals and medical professionals and handing it over to modelers and government officials with coercive power.

From the first week of March 2020, the US embarked on a wild experiment in virus mitigation, deploying a series of measures with a sweep and scope that had never previously been attempted, not in modern times and not even in ancient times. The litany of controls and tactics is long. Many of these measures survive in most parts of the US. The retail landscape is still filled with plexiglass. We are still invited to sanitize ourselves when going indoors. People still mask up in proximity to others. The “Karens” of the world are still actively shaming and denouncing anyone suspected of non-compliance.

...

Finally came the pharmaceutical interventions, voluntary at first but gradually mandatory, just as with each previous protocol began as a recommendation until it was mandated.

At no point in these 19 months have we seen a clear admission of failure on the part of government officials. Indeed, it’s mostly been the opposite, as the agencies double down, claiming effectiveness while citing no data or studies, while social media companies backed it all by taking down contrarian posts and brazenly deleting accounts of people who dare cite dissenting science.

I know for a fact that the last paragraph is true, because it happened to me when YouTube deleted one of my News and Views from the Nefarium, telling me it violated their "community standards" which in this case meant following "the scientific consensus" regarding covid and the quackcines. Well, here's some news for you, YouTube, science is not consensus. If it was, Galileo would still be in an Inquisition "lockdown", Cardinal Bellarmine (Galileo's inquisitor) would still be a scientific hero, and we'd still think the Sun revolves around the Earth.

Notably, the article points out that that vaunted "consensus" keeps shifting the goal posts:

“You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations,”President Biden said, reflecting what was the common view in the summer of 2021.

That of course turned out not to be the case. The vaccines appear to have been helpful in mitigating against some severe outcomes but it did not achieve victory over the virus. Israel’s surge in infections in August was among the fully vaccinated. The same happened in the UK and Scotland, and that precise result began to hit the US in September. Indeed, we all have vaccinated friends who caught the virus and were sick for days. Meanwhile, team natural immunity has received a huge boost from a large study in Israel that demonstrated that recovered Covid cases gain far more protection than is conferred by the vaccine.

The fallback position then became the booster. Surely this is the answer! Israel was first to mandate them. Here again, the problems began to show, as yet another magic bullet of disease mitigation failed. Then the inevitable headline came: Israel preparing for possible fourth COVID vaccine dose. So think about this because there is a sense in which the vaccines rank among the biggest failures: in a matter of a few short months, we’ve gone from the claim that they fully protect to they are pretty okay provided you get regularly scheduled boosters forever.

So why the resignations? And who are they? Mr. Tucker puts the case for the motivations for their resignations with crystal clear precision:

Now to the striking resignation of two top officials at the FDA who were in charge of vaccine safety and administration. It was the Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Vaccines Research, Marion Gruber and Phillip Kause. They gave no reason for their departure, which is scheduled for October and November.

The case is fascinating because 1) people rarely resign cushy government jobs unless a higher-paying, higher-prestige job in the private sector awaits, or 2) they are being pushed out. It’s rare for anyone in a position like this to resign over a principled matter of science. When I first read that they were going, I figured something else was up.

These days, extremely weird things are going on within the Biden administration. Even though his approval ratings are sinking, the president has to pretend that he has all the answers, that the science behind his mandates and virus war is universally settled, that anyone who disagrees with him is really just a political enemy. He has gone so far as to denounce, demonize, and legally threaten red-state governors who disagree with him.

This is a deep problem for actual scientists working within the bureaucracy because they know for sure that all of this is a pretense and that the government cannot win this war on the virus. They simply cannot preside over more false promises, especially when the whole of their professional training is about assessing the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

So what can they do? In this case, it appears they had to get away before they dropped a bombshell.

The bombshell is called “Considerations in boosting COVID-19 vaccine immune responses.” It appears in the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet. The two top officials are among the authors. The article recommends against the Covid booster shot that the Biden administration, following Fauci’s advice, is suggesting as the key to making the vaccines work better and finally fulfill their promise.

...

The trouble now is that the top scientists at the FDA disagree. Further, they think that the push for boosters is courting problems. They think the current regime of one or two shots is working as well as one can expect. Nothing is gained on net from a booster, they say. There just isn’t enough evidence to take the risk of another booster, and another and another.

The authors knew this article was appearing. They knew that signing it under the FDA affiliation would lead to a push for their resignations. Life would get very difficult for both of them. They got ahead of the messaging and resigned before it came out. Very smart.

The signed article goes even further to warn of possible downsides. They point out that boosters might seem necessary because “variants expressing new antigens have evolved to the point at which immune responses to the original vaccine antigens no longer protect adequately against currently circulating viruses.” At the same time, there are possible side effects that could discredit all vaccines for a generation or more. “There could be risks,” they write, “if boosters are widely introduced too soon, or too frequently, especially with vaccines that can have immune-mediated side-effects (such as myocarditis, which is more common after the second dose of some mRNA vaccines, or Guillain-Barre syndrome, which has been associated with adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines.”)

In case that wasn't clear enough for all the Karen's and Judy's out there, Mr. Tucker ends with this:

The appearance of The Lancet article by two top FDA vaccine scientists is truly devastating and revealing because it undermines the last plausible tool to save the whole machinery of government disease management that has been deployed at such enormous social, cultural, and economic cost for 19 months. Not in our lifetimes has a policy failed so badly. The intellectual and political implications here are monumental. It means that the real Covid crisis – the task of assigning responsibility for all the collateral damage – has just begun.

In 2006, during the early years of the birth of lockdown ideology, the great epidemiologist Donald Henderson warned that if any of these restrictive measures were deployed for a pandemic, the result would be a “loss of trust in government” and “a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.” Catastrophe is exactly what has happened. The current regime wants to point the finger toward the noncompliant. That is no longer believable. They cannot delay the inevitable for much longer: responsibility for this catastrophe belongs to those who embarked on this political experiment in the first place. (Boldface emphasis added)

In other words, demonizing the "vaxxed" or the "refusers" is not the solution. The solution is holding those who pushed the whole thing from the summits of political power. And remember: it wasn't Mr. Bidenenko who turned Anthony Fausti into a national spokesman for all things planscamdemic and the miracle of the quackcines...

... it was Donald Trump.

What we need now is a new Operation Warp Speed, for some justice to those who have been complicit in all the failed policies, and all the adverse reactions and deaths from these injections, beginning with a compliant media which has carefully avoided covering the contrary science.

(That would be the science of the Galileos, in case you missed it.)

See you on the flip side...

 

52 thoughts on “ TOP FDA OFFICIALS RESIGN, SIGN LANCET LETTER WARNING OF BOOSTERS TO ...”

  1. Joseph et al, the 3rd booster shot of the mRNA vaccine does give significantly increased protection to those that receive it. Please read the report just published in Nature journal.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02516-4

    It says that older Israelis who have received a third dose of a COVID-19 vaccine are much less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 or to develop severe COVID-19 than are those who have had only two jabs, according to a highly anticipated study published on 15 September1.
    The standard regimen for messenger RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is two doses, but some governments, including Israel’s, have started administering third ‘booster’ shots. The latest study evaluated 1.1 million Israelis over the age of 60 who had received their first two doses at least five months earlier. Twelve or more days after receiving a third jab, participants were about 19.5 times less likely to have severe COVID-19 than were people in the same age group who had received only two jabs and were studied during a similar time period.

    1. Hi Michael –
      If you wouldn’t mind, please explain which tests are being used to identify CV19 or variants and how they have been proved accurate with consistent, standardized lab protocols. Also, how are CV19 diagnoses formed? How are symptoms of CV19 distinguished from influenza, the flu (apparently they are different), pneumonia and other upper respiratory disease? How are these other diseases officially reported as distinct from CV19? How are CV19 presentations distinguished from adverse reactions to the treatment itself and/or what now appears to be dangerous hospital protocols?

      And if you have some time, can you please explain how any injection or medical or experimental intervention is superior to innate immunity and how has it been proved that people do not already have innate immunity to CV19 and/or variants?

      Or perhaps you could just provide analysis of which typical reports, trials and testing methodologies utilized by the pharmaceutical industry do NOT employ fraudulent mechanisms that manipulate data and results to fraudulently express safety and efficacy of their products.

      Have you researched the “vaccine” industry at all? Do you forget that these are products developed by repeat felons? Surely you don’t believe after decades of destroying medical science and the health industry, that all of a sudden these companies are “here to help”…

      1. With all the money and lying associated with this Covid-19 covert fabricated virus project, researchers should required to expose all their monetary associations, personal and project fundings, no exceptions.
        But also….
        Copied from the cited Nature article: “Murray is not alone in finding the Israeli results insufficient to justify boosters. A review2 published on 13 September by a team that includes two high-ranking FDA scientists cites a preprint3 of the study and notes that the short-term protective effect documented in Israel “would not necessarily imply worthwhile long-term benefit”. “

          1. They are in deep, they have propaganda, legal, and force systems backing them – it’s sensible for them to keep lying and destroying.

        1. I used to post so much vaccine truth info years back (and was kicked off numerous platforms as a result) and had volumes of statistics crammed into my memory. I don’t remember as much detail now but I’ll share the following and if anyone is interested in more detail I can dig it up from my notes:

          Financial conflicts of interest are the norm resulting in so many complaints involving those charged with vaccine safety, efficacy and regulation, and those charged with recommending vaccines and helping the CDC develop its schedule, as well as other HHS and CDC scandals. So many, in fact, that they triggered an investigation by the HHS Inspector General. The IG’s 2009 report determined that the CDC continued to display “a systemic lack of [ethics] oversight” and determined that financial conflicts of interest between gatekeepers of vaccine safety, advisors and decision-makers regarding the CDC vaccination schedule and legislators who are all also funded by vaccine/pharmaceutical companies.

          Virtually all (97%) of the individuals sitting on CDC advisory committees, including ACIP, omitted relevant financial disclosure information from their required ethics form, and CDC rarely complied with the requirement to “identify and resolve all conflicts of interest…before permitting [those individuals] to participate in committee meetings.” Although the OIG sternly rebuked the CDC to do its job in obtaining complete financial disclosures, the CDC balked at “fully implementing” the recommendation, describing it as “impractical.” They profit from patents, stock ownership, consulting on behalf of pharmaceutical companies, etc. Nothing is done about it because most of it is not illegal (although recently, CDC Director Fitzgerald did resign, supposedly over “tobacco stock ownership” but many people “in the know” think this smells like cover up for something else).

          Also, look into the “Spider Group” within CDC that is either opposition control or an authentic effort to bring attention to fraud and corruption within the CDC. In 2016 a group of more than a dozen senior scientists anonymously filed a complaint against the CDC as being “influenced by corporate and political interests in ways that short-change taxpayers”. The group called itself “Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research”, or CDC SPIDER. These are some of the concerns they wrote on the letter:

          “It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests… and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.”

          As only ONE example (because my post is already too long) in 2014 a Senior CDC scientist and epidemiologist who was Lead Scientist on this “bellwether” MMR study the CDC used to shut down questions on vaccine safety exposed the fraud in this study. Dr. William Thompson provided the CDC’s raw data from this study to an unaffiliated scientist and statistician (Brian Hooker) who was also an investigative journalist on vaccine harm and disclosed that the CDC had manipulated the results of the study in order to claim it proved no link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

          CDC scientists colluded to cover up a relationship between the timing of the MMR vaccine and autism in African Americans that was first discovered in November of 2001. Rather than reporting the results to the public, all data regarding this relationship were destroyed at a secret meeting held some time in August/September of 2002. This fact has been affirmed via an affidavit given by Dr. Thompson to Bill Posey, R-FL in September, 2014.

          Using the raw data from the CDC’s study, Hooker easily proved, unequivocally, through his own statistical analysis that the CDC’s data actually showed increased risk the earlier the MMR vaccine was administered. The data literally showed that black boy infants had 236% increased risk to develop autism w/ MMR if they received the MMR “according to the CDC schedule” which is under 36 months. The biggest risk was “isolation” cases, or children with no prior or comorbid issues in the first year of life. This includes EVERY HEALTHY CHILD and the data showed 700-800% elevated risk for some of these kids and this likely accounts for the insane increase in rates over the past decade or so. This data matched the CDC’s original findings in this study before they were “washed” or manipulated.

          Thompson also walked Hooker through the process of how the CDC knowingly manipulated the data, exhaustively reworking it and excluding data sets until they were able to craft the false and fraudulent conclusions that the vaccine did not cause autism.

          MSM would not cover the whistleblower story; only one Investigative journalist Ben Swann, from a CBS affiliate out of Atlanta, covered it but he had to immediately go silent and underground…literally. He disappeared from the network and from all social media for over a year and has re-emerged only recently. He’s not the only truth-teller shut down by the vaccine industry.

          This CDC fraud involving the 2004 MMR study was the primary focus in the movie VAXXED, along with a very different version of the Wakefield study and it’s why the film was yanked from its debut the Tribeca Film Festival at the last minute. Appx 20 minutes of VAXXED is included in the docu-series I’m sharing.

    2. All this “much less likely” stuff is a lot of baloney

      that is the kind of bullshit we have been listening to since this whole vaccination thing got started.
      except back then it was: “you won’t get sick if…” and then, “you will get less sick,” and then “you’re much less likely than,” and all the time in the background: “if the jab itself doesn’t kill you.”

      thanks for playing, though

  2. This whole theatre of people leav ing and the signed article is big propaganda activity. Again those 2 and the article do not question the validity of the germ theory. This is the crucial point in all discussions. If there is no germ theory than also there is no contagion / spread. When are we really goin g to breakl that lie!!!

  3. In one’s opinion, it [SARS-CoV-2] remains a mad fumble that has breached security, restrictive ventilation techniques, languages, and Big Pharma (although they may still be looking for that golden goose with the gold bullion in eggs), to travel to other countries of unsuspecting populations. There remains no good fortune in it, either.

    Between the legalese of trial lawyers of the courts and the medical science jargonese, both of which poorly demonstrated coherent narratives for the Party, (not that one’s own blabbering will correct any of it for the sake of peace and quiet) each of them got stuck in word wrestling matches of their own doing. Not realizing that their lengthy, linear, and imprecise languages, their language conundrums, were not in their best interest in the first place.

    Most lawyers have extreme difficulty with medical science jargonese when it gets into the molecules and microbes of pathology and immunobiology, let alone to First, do no harm (not, who’s going to pay); the medical science-oriented smocks often do not always understand the procedural outfitting’s behind the strategy in preparing a legal case for the courts as lawyers do – to win – a medical liability claim. (Although there is one Dr of the institutes, in all his smugness, seemingly trying out another caveat of plausible deniability to sneak under the RADAR again) And, still this business of emotive discussion, order giving, mandating, or else, remains a flight – fright – fight scenario playing out because of uncertainties from those unprepared with a narrative to ‘save-their-bacon’ in the courts. It remains the liars verses the lied to, at nearly every corner of development in this microbial free-for-all. And it certainly is free to roam.

    There are those in the present administration seeking to re-define terminology related to vaccines and vaccinations. Their to Be or not to Be a vaccine moment or when is a vaccine not a vaccine but instead a vaccination nonsense. One’s guess, probably to read better in the courtrooms when cases emerge in earnest. It’s likely the bug (SARS-CoV-2, and its progeny) doesn’t care who you lawyer up with, they’re sticking around in your airways anyway when ever given that opportunity. Their price – your accommodating cells with the replicative machinery contained for their use on demand.

    One of the issues with vaccines – is when – they’re administered. Before a pandemic, during a pandemic or after a pandemic. They all have consequences and variables too numerous to tally much less trust a bad guessing college buffoon with a knack for inaccuracy demonstrated. Again, the variables, easily becoming noteworthy in hindsight now have yet to be tallied, another source of incomplete disruptions. All because of a certain Party believing that saving their mugshot or rather their face amongst contesting peers was more important than any other who might come in contact with their countrymen’s microbial escapee that is now learning how to evade immunological attempts at curtailing its spread and mutations much less its existence. It only needs a host to wreak havoc. There are NO ethical means to test that presumption of fate but one Party is callous enough to transplant those ethics with a ruthless end.

    Nearly two years of chaotic pandemic shuffling. This pandemic is very real for the susceptible and infirm as well as for funerary service providers, no matter the country.

    The resignations?! One’s guess, they’re not up to the task if ever they were in the first place. In the meantime, the microbe goes on its own walkabout aided by the latest host it has successfully invaded. No doubt seeking another antigenic shift to exploit and propagate if it were to be giving human guile. One thing is for sure, stop its host acquisitioning, that sustaining environment suited for virus proliferation which contains the biological apparatus to replicate and that contributes toward further successful replication and mutations that are associated with antigenic drift or worse, antigenic shift (possibly, the variants now arising), virus replication and its proliferation, progeny, and mutations cease. Sort of like cutting its supply line and removing its resources of proliferation at the same time. In some ways, the bug cannot achieve immune escape by ceasing to be.

    Then there are the side effects. They’re not done, either. All because of a 0.01-micron sized escapee.

  4. Is there not a difference between science and PAID science.Things get blurry and people get dazzled by the latter which benefits from huge financial incentives.I urge all to please read “PROPAGANDA”by Edward Bernays (the man who single-handedly tricked and fooled the world.)Millions died yet he went on to become famous.I saw him on the Dave Letterman show in the early to mid 80’s.Book is small and easy to read.You’ll find enough online to wet your appetite.I gave a presentation on his dirty deeds and was banned.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      “Mc Mindfullness”: is a religion of the self that accepts the dictates of the market place[which is a rigged game in 20th Worst Century of Monopolies];
      absolutely ruling out any curriculum that critically engages w/the causes of suffering w/in the structures of power and economic systems.
      Mc Mindfullness is branded w/the veneer of hard sciences;
      that verify your thesis at an agreed-upon-price.
      Mc Minfullness easily voids any moral compasses or ethical committments.

  5. Whoever said the Dark Ages ended must really be stoned out Dr. Fauci couldn’t hack it as a Medicine Man Witch Doctor or Shaman in any so-called primitive society. He be toast by now for all the damage and suffering he has caused and his evil experiments in creating bioweapons.

    1. Speaking of toast, Bill G. reportedly arrested weeks ago, git-mowed, tried & convicted of several serious offenses (I.e., murder, trafficking, fraud… stuff like that) & sentenced to death by hanging on October 4th – as reported by Realrawnews.com

      Dunno. Wait and see, not that anyone is commenting except a couple of other sites referencing RRN & one or two reporting w/o attribution.

      Meanwhile, MSM (online) is currently writing about Mr. G’s interview wherein he regrets associating with some guy named Epstein. That’s about it per view from the bunker, where some hunker, while pondering the shifting sands of what passes for truth seemingly in a world where truth is treason.

  6. That is what I have suspected would happen all along: Once they cannot deny anymore that they have made a devastating series of bad decisions regarding the scamdemic, the narrative will be pushed that it was all Trump’s fault. I really do not care at this point, really. They can point blame all they want. I just want it over with.

  7. I couldn’t agree more with your conclusion… The trouble is, the Judys and Karens of America don’t read articles like this, and if they came across one, they’d dismiss it out of hand as “far right,” “misinformation,” or [fill in epithet du jour]. The Judys, Karens, and covidian cultists of all stripes constitute a huge portion of the U.S. population — or, in any case, a whole lot of people. They’re not amenable to science, reason, or debate that might contradict their dogma or threaten their self-image as the enlightened moral vanguard that’s saving civilization from the hordes of germ-spreading Deplorables. All major institutions have the covidian cultists’ back. How, under those circumstances, could justice possibly be done? It would take a complete overhaul of society. I wouldn’t bet on vigilante justice either — that would just make the covidians more firm in their beliefs and be used as an excuse for more state-sanctioned violence against the noncompliant. It’s a Catch-22.

    Justice is what should happen, and maybe someday, somehow it will, in this life or another. In the meantime, I’ll prioritize trying to survive and resist the depredations of our political experimenters-in-chief, while doing what little I can to preserve Western culture.

    1. People who make decisions on how they FEEL about something, versus what they THINK about something, are the reason that generalized voting degrades republics and democracies into shams based on marketing, phony charisma, and promises to “make right” problems that their deficiencies created for them.

    2. Gosh one wonders with only “Judys” and “Karens” wreaking havoc….are there any “Chads” responsible at all? Wow- women aren’t just equal in your post- we rule! (LOL)

  8. Meanwhile,

    COVID Prevention, the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group (FLCCC) I-MASK+ protocol recommends (August 11, 2021 version) —> https://covid19criticalcare.co….m/covid-19-protocols

    – Vitamin D3: 1000–3000 IU (once daily)
    – Vitamin C: 500 – 1,000 mg (twice daily)
    – Quercetin: 250 mg daily (once daily)
    – Melatonin: 6 mg before bedtime (causes drowsiness)
    – Zinc: 30 – 40 mg/day (elemental zinc once daily – Zinc lozenges are preferred)
    – Gargle mouthwash 2 x daily – gargle (do not swallow) antiseptic mouthwash with cetylpyridinium chloride (e.g. ScopeTM, ActTM, CrestTM, ListerineTM with essential oils)

    Budesonide is the leading early treatment for Covid sickness, even more so than Ivermectin and you can buy it over the counter (Rhinocort Allergy Nasal Spray with Budesonide Allergy Medicine) —> https://c19early.com/

    – lvermectin
    Chronic Prevention: 0.2 mg/kg per dose (take with or after a meal) — twice a week for as long as disease risk is elevated in your community
    Post COVID-19 Exposure Prevention: 0.4 mg/kg per dose (take with or after a meal)  — one dose today, repeat after 48 hours

    Zelenko Protocol innovator: 99% survival of high risk Covid-19 patients (Covid-19 Treatment Protocol) —> https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/

    FIND A DOCTOR WHO WILL PRESCRIBE IVERMECTIN, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND EARLY OUTPATIENT TREATMENTS FOR COVID-19 (USA) —> https://www.aestheticsadvisor…..com/2021/02/find-doc

    Text MyFreeDoctor @ (850)750-1322 or Website —> https://myfreedoctor.com/

    1. Attending to one’s health and well being, the immune system a large player in that goal, cannot be stressed enough. How then can less fortunate populations attain some semblance of health remains to be seen.

  9. haven’t posted in forever…but lets float this in a critical thinking forum and see where the chips land…
    what if…the earth nor sun revolve around one another?
    what if…the moon is a stereographic image of earth when it was complete, akin to the “designer” leaving a moving photograph in the sky?
    what if…the moon is actually the map of the whole earth and when combined with the stars, give Man the power to chart his destiny around Earth?
    what if…we’re inside a terrarium with a (liquid) glass dome (with a hole at the center)?
    what if…the moon is a map, shows our known maps only cover 1/4 of the total landmass?
    what if…the moon is a map, shows a missing continent to the northeast of Australia ala Lemuria/Atlantis (recently discovered to be under the water by a japanese professor/researcher)?
    what if…the moon and the sun are actually inside the terrarium? (its turtles all the way down claims aboriginal knowledge)
    what if…the sun’s 26K year cycle is actually to make one revolution around the whole earth?
    what if…the sun is on the other side of earth in 12K years, will lead to another ice age (the last one was approximately when – 12-14K years ago)?
    what if…the whole science field is verifiable groupthink?
    what if…the aliens and alien tech are actually from the other quadrants of earth not known?
    what if…there is actually a very, very tall “mound” at the center of earth, where the four rivers flow from a higher plane (the miles high mound, mt olympus etc) into the lower “bowl” of earth?
    what if…the true rulers of earth, are simply enjoying their high (militarily strategic) vantage point?
    what if…the true rulers used optic technologies to spy into the lower bowls for “compliance”?
    what if…all of this knowledge is cryptographicly detailed in the Book of Enoch?
    what if…we’re simply seeing with our mind, rather than our minds eye?
    going to either pole requires permission by multiple governments…what if they are the gatekeepers to the true rulers to the north and the giant ice wall at the “south”? (consequently there would be two more walls at the extreme east and western sides where planes tend to avoid by using odd flight paths)
    what if…the romans already discovered all of this and built their empire on true knowledge of the map and sowing discord/division among its empire to keep us from exploring Earth?
    what if…those true rulers are going to be making a tour of our quadrant soon?
    curious thoughts i know, but they stem from the water element following a basic law moving from a higher plane to lower and no amount of “spin” can spin me off this basic characteristic of water…

  10. Everybody was adrift the first 6+ months of this Covid19 thing. The only exceptions were people like Fauci and Daszak (and maybe Claus Schwab and the other “serfdom reset” co-conspirators) who were instigating and funding the development of dangerous viruses that were specifically fabricated for ease of human infection. Maybe Wuhan was the only research center, maybe.

    For somebody who probably first ran for President as a brand marketing thing and was probably appalled at having won, he did what he could. Here’s a metaphor: at best Trump was a blind matador in a ring with numerous bulls. 😉

    He showed some resistance to the error of shutting down the economy, he early backed what turned out to be a valid treatment approach – hydroxychloroquine. He could have used Presidential authority to really buck the deep state – ask JFK how well that worked out.

    As for the various centers of authority responsible for this medical-social psychology-economic-legal debacle, being held responsible and being punished……… get real.

    1. Well said!
      As I ponder the variables of How/Why re: world wide WHAM BAM, the subject of control of information recurs. Recall decades spanning efforts of undoing anti-trust regulations, demonization of reporters of malfeasance, reporters of anything, then just reporters (think Gary Webb at the San Jose Mercury News decades ago, and many others).

      Secrecy and democracy cannot coexist. Never has. Never will. A child of ten knows this. Yet, we play Let’s Pretend. So, for starters, let’s clean up the language, or reclaim, and speak with honesty, and minimally. Whoever said eschew obfuscation was on to something.

      Control of information in fact related to those with the most wealth, regardless of the means of amassing wealth, by hook or crook. And, of course fear and intimidation.

      Otherwise, who/how simultaneous worldwide control?

      Obviously wealth and coordination. One tires of being assigned the role of fish in a barrel with limited means of even identifying, let alone prevailing against such circumstances.

      Questions. No solutions, except perhaps to succumb, but I am loathe to give “them” the satisfaction.

      Thanks for listening. Needed a comforting shoulder. It will pass.

      1. Edmund Burke (1729-1797) “Those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.”
        George Santayana (1863-1952) “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

        The problem is that the history most of us know is heavily fabricated and spun.

  11. Robert Barricklow

    These, and other well-founded sciences and research; will fall upon the purposely deaf & dumbed-down ears of the technocratic totalitarian globalized governments[NWO], around the injected humanity of Planet Earth.
    All too soon, all of humanity will begin “to know”;
    and it’s to that blow-back, that “they’re” pulling out all the weaponized stops[tools to counter those truths that are coming to bear arms].
    Driving the world mad,
    in this globalized process
    of technocratic totalitarian governmental lockdown$… “progress”.

    According to who[m]?
    The answer; of course, is in those details.

    Just ask that infamous devil,
    about his famous Old World Order meme:
    you know; “the devil is in the details”.
    Because, it looks like; he’s in those NWO details as well.

        1. The Zetas are obsessed with all things ‘sexual’, they have appetites for such things as ‘playing doctor ‘, they are endlessly curiuos and the worst go by miltitary rank and file.

          1. As a child in public school back in the 70’s , I remember being told to wait on line for a mandatory office visit from some ‘school doctor ‘, ….
            Well we all lined up as if we were all under some kind of ‘spell’
            And then one by one we were seen by the ‘Doctor’, I remember a creepy guy who touched us up and I can barely remember this detail but I think we might have been jabbed.
            When I went home I remember asking my mother did you know this?
            She was brainwashed to believe that
            ‘the doctor was always right ‘ from the 1950’s…..
            T e l e v i s I o n……

  12. I find it interesting how they have issues with the “Boosters” but none with the first 2 shots.

    I think they are jumping ship because they know the mob is coming, and it won’t be happy!!!

    1. Joseph –
      What have you heard about hospital protocols utilizing vancomycin, dexamethasone, remdesivir (and I believe 2-3 other meds) that are all part of a common protocol among some hospitals that whistleblower medical professionals and families of dead patients are starting to discuss as being a deadly protocol. Apparently, the patient (admitted for any reason, which now is looking more and more like injection adverse reactions) gets CV19 testing, which of course is positive. Subsequently, hospital protocol automatically puts that patient on a specific regimen that ultimately results in multi-system failure.

      This is the story of my friend’s uncle as well as another acquaintance. Multiple families are reporting that hospital protocol and the medical staff following it absolutely will not deviate and many can’t even remove the patient from the premises. In some reports, the families are prevented from seeing the patient or entering the hospital. End of life attorneys can’t penetrate the lockdown on these protocols.

      Are we seeing another cycle of increased hospitalizations that in turn over-burden medical facilities (particularly those understaffed already due to injection mandates that are being bucked) that then lead to more juked “infection” stats that lead to more lockdowns?

      Or perhaps just leading to more dead people; the primary goal.

  13. Ludwig Von Bearsnout

    Trump believed the experts at the CDC and the NIH and he tried to move the red tape to intervene constructively in the disease’s process across the USA. Donald Trump did not mandate the vaccine nor did he encourage governors to adopt draconian policy that transferred our authority for our health to corrupt politicians and unelected bureaucrats to say nothing of woolly-headed academics in countless other fields.

    And remember: Its not Donald Trump who turned Anthony Fauci into a national spokesman for all things planscamdemic and the miracle of the quackcines…

    …it was China the Media, Democrats, The Military, Intelligence, Industrial Complex, the “Deep State” the elite, and Mr. Global. It was the entire medical community who knew that something was very wrong and who passively stood aside and let us get run over instead of risking their career….

    and ultimately it was “We the People”. Thats the one that hurts the most.

    It was the adults in this country who knew that this was BS who failed to demand rational advice from our public health professionals to say nothing of our family doctors. We let democracy be destroyed in a totally corrupt vote when we knew Trump won in a landslide. We allow the media to broadcast rank propaganda 24/7 for years. We allow politicians to destroy us with debt. We allow the military to run away and abandon any patina of duty or honor, abandoning American citizens abroad— and allowing a take over at home. Our education system… It’s a long list isn’t it? But all the corrupt people who have let us down has one thing in common: us. We are the element in common in this tale of woe.

    Face the facts: We have been conned out of our socks. We’ve been reduced to pitiful sheep. We’ve been justifying so much crap for so long that we sit atop a mountain of rationalizations crying that “we didn’t know” and we participated in our own downfall. Fauci may have fiddled while the Western World burned but Trump didn’t call the tune…

    …We did…

    JFK said: “Our problems are created by man therefore they can be solved my man.”

    The adults now living will be the group that proves JFK right or wrong. We need to start in our neighborhoods and school boards and work our way up. We need to critically reassess our communication devices and how we get our information. We need to build our communities and we need far more emphasis on our responsibilities to others and ourselves than we do about our “rights”.

    No one is going to fix this for us, our kids, and our grandchildren, because as we have seen: too many have been bought and paid for. Its just us… JFK believed that we have the power to regain our freedom and our self respect. It’s our duty to try.

    1. Yeah, blaming Trump is a little meh. Didn’t he sign an executive order on the use of Hydroxychloroquine? And didn’t the FDA overturn that same order? Doesn’t really matter clinically, since HCQ is already approved for human use, but the effect on policy was deadly!

      However, it’s been widely documented that Trump is a germophobe, so this psyop was tailor-made for him (or he for it). (He’s also afraid of poisoning, which is why he only eats fast food when traveling.)

      Also, given the fact of his likely vaccine-damaged son I find it very difficult to believe that Trump would be such a proponent of said pharmaceutical interventions. What really went on during those closed door meetings between him and RFK Jr.?

      Regarding the con: I made a video recently detailing my speculation that this op is the final movement in the carefully curated ritual which is the Baby Boomer generation. Nobody seems to notice that 2021-1946=75, the average lifespan of a human being, and so we should have been expecting a statistical boom in births to turn into a statistical boom in deaths, with all the potential for political leverage that entails.

    2. Robert Barricklow

      The socially engineered “we”.
      Or, if you prefer: the sheep.
      Or, the dumbed down.

      The ones who believed “them”;
      and did not do their own due diligence; and think for themselves.
      Another, of the countless victims;
      associated w/the Amerikan education system.
      Manufactured “educated idiots’!

Leave a Comment