Cosmic Warfare

ROSCOSMOS’ ROGOZIN: SPACE X SATELLITES AND SPACE PIRACY

B.W. spotted this story about Russia's Roscosmos head Dmitri Rogozin's warning that SpaceX's and Elon Musk's plan to launch 30,000 - yes, that's right, thirty thousand - starlink satellites may be about more than just improving internet connectivity:

Russia’s Space Chief Warns Musk’s Starlink Satellites Could Hijack Cruise Missiles Mid-Flight

There's much more concerning Mr. Rogozin and Russia than just an American company's  dominance of the space-based internet, and the monopoly choke hold on information that it would bring. Already we've seen warnings from various space-powers that they are concerned with the issue of space piracy and the outright theft of space assets. Indeed, the term piracy carries with it certain connotations; pirates operated entirely outside of the law, and in a private capacity; they represented no one but themselves. Thus, behind the concern for "space piracy" what is really being said is that the space powers are concerned about non-state actors gaining a base of power in space.

With that in mind, consider the following from the article:

SpaceX’s Starlink internet satellites may be used to change the trajectories of cruise missiles in mid-flight, or assist special forces and spy networks, Roscosmos Director Dmitry Rogozin has warned.
Speaking to Russia’s Channel One, Rogozin, who has had a long-running, meme-fuelled, mostly good-natured feud with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, indicated the US government has provided SpaceX about $900 million dollars for Starlink, with total subsidies in the next budget expected to reach about $20 billion.
“The question arises: Why does the US government need this? Because this kind of spacecraft does not only distribute internet, but can become a tool for controlling cruise missiles, recalibrating their flight tasks mid-flight, controlling special forces, or an agent network,” he indicated. (Boldface emphasis added)
I submit that if Russia is concerned about the possibility that a private company's satellites could be potentially capable of hijacking cruise missiles or controlling special forces, then any space-power, including the United States, has to be as well, and that by subsidizing the activity, the U.S. might be subsidizing its worst nightmares.
After all, we've already seen talk about turning the USA's nuclear football over to a "committee", a step which seems to me to be fraught with the danger of privatizing or corporatizing that arsenal. And by mentioning this possibility, Mr. Rogozin might be hinting that space satellites are the other side of that coin.
And while we're considering the space piracy angle and Mr. Rogozin's warnings, one should also recall that the pirates of yesteryear were not only a private concern, but that they were also often involved as agents for nation-states,  a convenient "corporate" cover of plausible deniability for the actions of nation states... those pirates could and did tie down the naval resources of a rival, while preying upon their shipping, alleviating the need of the Royal Navy to dispatch frigates and ships-of-the-line to deal with... oh, I don't know, the French and the Spanish...
And subsidizing Musk? Well, in this context, it's a bit like subsidizing Blackbeard with an armed brig or two, or in this case, thirty thousand...
See you on the flip side...

25 thoughts on “ROSCOSMOS’ ROGOZIN: SPACE X SATELLITES AND SPACE PIRACY”

      1. All sites not informing the audience about the false germ theory from Pasteur, on which this whole plandemic is based, can be considered as controlled opposition. The germ theory is the sting that needs to be taken uot of the discussion.

        1. Clif is like most of us here in that regard. He avoids dismissing any possibility. The one he ranks the lowest is usually the least plausible n most insisted on possibility. Ex: 2planes collapsing 3 bldgs perfectly into their iwn footprint in one day.

          I think Clif probly agrees on your issue. He’s processing what others are capable of doing whether or not they agree.

      2. I think there are a lot of intentional lies out there that are psychological warfare. Any that claims they are doing this because of some future ice age, man made climate change, or unsustainabilty are all excuses to get good people to think doing things they know are wrong is necessary because of this or that looming future catastrophy. They are all psychological operations. They are doing all this because they can and because control freaks always want more control. Sadists always want more suffering and misery. A third of the population suffers from these two mental inflictions and are united under the leftist flags. They run things and have been organizing and polarizing like minded people, after identifying them, in all sectors of society for over a hundred years. They finally feel confident enough to make their move.

  1. If there is an agreement between a private entity and the USG, it would be interesting to see the ‘risk of loss’ clause and an agreement ‘to protect and defend’ clause and a possible reimbursement scenario. If I were to guess, and I do not know, it is more likely that there is a possibility for space operations R&D and not actual operations. DoD would not likely transfer command. It would also be interesting to know if the private entity permits transparency into its tasking of assets and any non-government or foreign government agreements. There could be an argument over who owns space ops info.

    1. If there is an agreement between a private entity in the USG my God I should tell financed all of them Google Microsoft Facebook Twitter and most of the big Pharma companies as well where at mercantilism married to fascism and have been for a long time and I doubt any of us are ever going to be able to see any of the agreements

  2. It calls into question what of the salvaging of old inoperative remains of a program. One was an advocate of salvaging “Space Junk.” There’s a lot more of it since the early 90’s.

  3. One question why so many satellites in the first place couldn’t a few satellites in geostationary orbit do the job with less crowding. Could this be a cover for space mines to destroy other nations’ satellites?

    1. AI police and military robots need more eyes in the sky and faster detection and response capability to real time changing conditions. I suspect this is really about installing the infrastructure needed for AI to take over and run things.

      1. Acquiring real-time data is very probably among their objectives.
        AI doesn’t need formally to take over. It’s sufficient that we unconsciously comply with its goals.

  4. 30,000 satellites !?
    If the location and spacing were known, somebody could probably work out what they’re actually trying to do with this system. It can’t be just be a saturation of human life everywhere with Hollywood sewage and CIA fakery,,,, or can it?

  5. I think the biggest problem with us is the definition of US Government. Our perception still is that it is an entity from the people for the people. That is why we still question why does the US (government) need this investment in the network for internet. Now, if we read the US government as an entity in place only for the corporations, then things will get more clear. It is the fascistic model with is rolled out in front of our own eyes where we are to hypnotized by perception management to understand what really is going on. I feel very scared about the latest development in all areas.

    1. Correct. It is primarily a language problem. You are governed by a governor, abstracted into governance by government.

      Originally, you were led by a cyning, abstracted into cyningscip in a cyningdom. Cyning is kin to clans, as the word says.

      Governor is substitute for a Roman proconsul, whereas cyning is indigenous, and can be broken down, into lesser parts, as prefixes and postfixes.

      CYN- means kin.
      -ING means open grassland.
      -SCIP means creation vessel.
      -DOM means judgment.

      A wordsmith crafts words, and has power of definition, therefore.

      1. anakephalaiosis

        A homestead ruler must be kindred, otherwise he has no say. Period.

        Pretenders are thus tarred and feathered, and throw out of town.

        Acronym superstructures, by apron-Jesuit Jacobins, is communism.

        In the beginning, there was a wordsmith.

  6. Robert Barricklow

    Of course those 30,000 Star-Link Satellites are going to have stacked military objectives by the score. You imagine it; it’s there and then some.
    Not only are there numerous satellites; there are numerous targets,
    humans being the prime one IMO.
    Tied into the injection fraud; the new Re-Set “currency”; and numerous covid1984 stacked operations?

    Running late…
    White Rabbit

  7. I was always suspicious of Starlink and suspect it is more about mass surveiliance than communications. And the infrastructure needed for an AI police, military robots, and self driving, flying, and submersible fleets. Like everything the Globalists are up to, you can count on the worst, most insane scenario you can think of being their true goal.

  8. anakephalaiosis

    Papacy sends out 30.000 Jesuit missionary moles, to subvert some unsuspecting aliens.

    Assyro-Babylonian and Greco-Roman empire succession needs lebensraum in vacuum.

    Vatican Bank is prospecting, for a new golden Eldorado, in zero gravity of the heavens.

    Pope Satan is calling God, on the telephone.

Leave a Comment