THE LATEST FROM FRANKENSCIENCE: HEADLESS HUMAN “EMBRYOS”
...yes, you read that headline correctly. According to this story spotted and shared by M.W., an Isreali firm is proposing to grow human embryos - without heads - in artificial wombs, all for the purposes of harvesting their organs, for God-knows-what:
Human Embryos WITHOUT HEADS to be Grown in Mechanical Wombs
Citing yet another article from M.I.T., (see This startup wants to copy you into an embryo for organ harvesting), both make clear that this Israeli start up wants to copy you so that your organs can be sold, presumably back to us... or whomever. The kicker is, the claim is actually made that growing embryos without heads or brains somehow solves all the ethical difficulties; from the first article:
The idea of this startup is to
- take stem cells from any given individual, such as you or me
- modify the genetic code of those stem cells to prevent the formation of a human head (or brain) when developing as an embryo
- seed these genetically modified cells into a jar serving as an artificial womb and grow an artificial human embryo, but without a head
- According to the startup, this somehow “avoids ethical dilemmas”
Although Hanna doesn’t think an artificial embryo made from stem cells and kept in a lab will ever count as a human being (NO SHIT — I.C.), he has a contingency plan to make sure there is no confusion. It’s possible, for instance, to genetically engineer the starting cells so the resulting model embryo never develops a head. Restricting its potential could help avoid ethical dilemmas. “We think this is important and have invested a lot in this,” says Hanna.
This plan does have some interesting possibilities, and the article mentions old people who would benefit from youthful immune cells.
The article does not say this out loud, but perhaps a large target market would be all old people who destroyed their immune cells through “Covid vaccine” injections and want to reverse the effect the vaccine had on their immune systems.
Anyway, the plan, to be explained in simple language, would be something like this: if I get older, and need a replacement organ that is not affected by aging, I could pay this startup to grow an artificial infant, without a head, but otherwise, a copy of me when I was an infant. Then they could harvest organs from that headless infant to transplant into my aging body, avoiding immune rejection seen with regular transplants.
Now, those are just the author's qualms about this, and for the record, I agree with him. I would even go so far as to question the "optics" of an Israeli firm being behind this, as it looks too "talmudic" in its willingness to treat the goyim (and their embryos) as cattle. It's more along the lines of "Mein Fuehrer, we'd best keep this project a secret..." Getting wind of this - not to coin a very grizzly pun - would guarantee some revulsion and revolt from some Germans and Jews. I'm in their camp; put me down in the revulsed and revolted column.
As one might imagine, however, I have larger and other concerns. The first is: I do NOT trust scientists. Sorry folks, but when you all with but few exceptions seemed to line up behind the planscamdemic and the injections, you became scientismists, not scientists. You're not worthy of our trust, because we still don't know what's in your injections ever since you painted your doorposts and cloaked yourselves and your pharma companies with a special passover immunity and assured everyone that they were both safe and effective. Now the insurance companies are noticing the actuarial spikes of dead people, and even the Center for Disease Communication and the World Health Obliteration are noticing an extreme spike in adverse reactions, reactions which are a grizzly Frankencatalogue of horrors. But you knew that "something" might happen, and were willing to experiment on humanity itself, and release "whatever" just to satisfy your power lust and "curiosity".
But I digress... Back to the scientismists: I also do not trust you not to be growing those missing heads and brains somewhere. After all, if you can grow organs for transplant "when the old ones wear out," why not a brain for the person suffering an inoperable and terminal brain tumor? In fact, why not several brains all from the same person, so that you can conduct all sorts of other experiments? And how many "embryos with brains" did you have to cover-up, conceal, and quickly burn before you "got it right?" Woops, there's that grizzly holocaust image again.
That's concern number one.
Concern number two is the implicit materialism assumed to be true, and underlying the whole project: bluntly put, it is the whole idea of locating consciousness - our very personhood - "inside the skull," i.e., inside the brain. No brain, no person, no consciousness. Crazy as it sounds, I'm not buying that notion either, even though I realize that about 99% of the human population subscribes to it. I'm from a much older school that adheres to the notion that "personhood" is somehow seated or related to the whole body, and that there's no single physical locus of that personhood. If scientism wants to grow embryos and harvest organs in Israel, then we need them to explain to us what consciousness is, and where it is. While you're at it, you might want to explain to us how and why people who have been clinically brain dead on the operating table for several minutes come back and tell their astonished surgery teams that they saw and heard everything being done and said. You might also want to explain to us how that man in France, literally born without 90% of a brain, manages to function and, well, to be a person with clear intelligence, consciousness, and emotions? (See https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-thursday-edition-1.3679117/scientists-research-man-missing-90-of-his-brain-who-leads-a-normal-life-1.3679125) Those are just two of the significant exceptions to the brain = person rule, and the latter one also poses the thorny arithmetical problem of what percentage of a brain constitutes an adequate seat of consciousness? The point I'm driving to is: what if consciousness is a non-local and distributed phenomenon? If so, then the "ethical dilemma" is not solved by this approach, rather, it is aggravated, and in spades.
But really, we need go no further in comprehending the horror being proposed, than to indulge in a bit of theater:
"Tell us, Dr. Frankenscience, what did you do in med school?"
"Why, thank you Jane, for having me on your show. I grew human infants in artificial wombs without heads or brains so we could harvest their organs to help the living who needed transplants."
"I see... well, uhm, what did you do with the other organs that were not needed?"
"Oh Jane, we don't waste anything. We harvest those too, and sell them to laboratories that need to conduct experiments."
"I see. Well, tell us Dr. Frankenscience, how long did it take to develop this technique?"
"Oh, there were a few stops and starts and dead ends... er... (cough)... not to coin a pun (nervous laughter), but in the end we were successful...(more nervous laughter)..."
"Can you tell us how many of those dead ends there were?"
"(very nervous laughter)...oh...ah.... well....uhm.... It couldn't have been more than ten or twelve as I recall..."
See you on the flip side...
No Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Some folks might suggest that this could demonstrate an introduction to how current humankind was introduced to this life sustaining malleable spheroid of [Earth-Gaia-Terra]. These sorts of [ideas] seem of ancient origin even involving early therianthropic hints through historical records.
This looks like a story arc for the Full metal Alchemists series Shoul Tucker would make a great front man for this business.
There was some talk of this gene tweaking back in Mar 2021. Many of the sources were of noted neurosciences having discovered that some brain cells continue on for a time [minutes to hours] AFTER the heart has ceased supplying oxygenated blood to brain cells. It used to be thought that 4-minutes was the rule to get the heart and lungs back to supplying the major organs with oxygenated blood again, through mechanical means (cardio-pulmonary-circulation) (CPR)). . . . Apparently, there are further considerations in medical science evolving that are as intriguing as they are alarming. . .
Some folks hinted at transplants here, . . there would seem to be a private enterprise or two seeking to get past that [ethical dilemma] as they seem to already have the science and scientists on the payroll and possibly secretive complexes built to catty out the heavy lifting of research & development (R & D).
It seems to me the more time goes by, the more science itself tends to support your point of view on consciousness, Dr. Farrell. Take, as just one example from biology, the gut-brain axis: “a bidirectional network between the brain and the gastrointestinal (GI) system with complex components involved such as the vagus nerve, immune factors, neuroendocrine pathways, and microbial metabolites” (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/gut-brain-axis; emphasis added). So we have human biology pointing to a connection between the brain and digestive system, a connection that involves emotions, personality, and psychology. Right there you have a dispersal of consciousness within the human body — to say nothing of what’s going on outside the body.
Note that the gut-brain connection is thought to be bidirectional, so that not only may the gut affect the brain, but the brain may affect the gut. How’s that going to work out for intestines grown without a brain attached?? Scientists just assume we’re made up of discrete individual parts that were somehow fitted together, like an automobile or Frankenstein’s monster. Like a car’s transmission, if an organ fails, just switch it out for a new one — no problem.
The benighted, crass materialism of the majority of scientists, coupled with unbridled greed, lust for control, an obsession with immortality, and lack of an ethical or moral compass that points to anything but profit and power, is going to be the downfall of humanity if we don’t get it under control.
Or, “they” are well aware of the multidimensional conscious connections/whole..
Give the devil his due.
I’m sure some of the “they” at the top are aware. I think their foot soldiers — the scientific types in schools, labs, and hospitals around the world who actually implement the agenda — are mostly unaware, since they’ve been steeped in materialistic scientism.
This sounds like the plot to the movie, “The Island” with Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson. Wealthy people growing conscious clones as an insurance policy in case of injury or illness. When needed they could harvest their organs and blood for life extension. Appears that they are probably already doing this and are being criticized for them being conscious. Headless solves that. The only problem is trying to control genetic mutations after having modified to remove the head. I’ll pass!
Maybe this is what they are trying to resurrect…
https://www.theoi.com/Phylos/Sternophthalmoi.html
Hmmm…
Thank you for this wonderful historical image from Africa Mpaff!
According to the WEFs nasty little 8 point plan, theyll be able to 3D print organs anyway so why would they need this stuff ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKwENH-m4oU
Here’s another of their great ideas by the way – The Line – this is where they plan to put you once youve been stripped of your assets. Isnt is wunnerful ? And you never have to leave !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kz5vEqdaSc
A City Line says the wolf to the sheeple, “All the better to keep you in line.”.
A 5 minute enforced walk limit.
AI authority; it makes all your decisions for you.
You’ll own nothing; including your mind.
The road to hell is lined w/Dudley Do-Right architects.
Talk about Johnny Cash’s, “I Walk The Line”. [5 mile limit]
Except the words are,
“The Line Keeps A Close Watch On That Heart of Mine.
[meaning the Line owns your heart; its theirs].
My God, if this isnt fully fledged Third Reichian scientific experimentation at its most satanic, then nothing is. As if creating headless foetuses isnt bad enough. Its Mengele version 2.0. Abhorrent.
Symbolism and metaphors are magickly passing through Alice’s Looking Glass
via Great Re-Set globalized policies. Symbolically, Israel leads the way
in dumbed down sheeple, by going headless.
Just think; heartless leaders, will have a brainless populations in no time.
Of course “we” have them now[metaphorically],
but now – along withFrankenscience, royal incest, and transgender
passing through the WEF Re-Set Looking Glasses; no moral barrier are too sacred.
What country is going to double down?
Two heads are better than one.
Pretty soon some will be making bodies w/more arms.
How many countries will join in the new arms race?
Then you have China.
Now there would be a smorgasbord of countless possibilities of bodies and heads.
Back to Israel.
When are they going to go hybrid?
You know, creating biblical mythological creatures?
Centaurs? Cyclops? Golems? Oni? Ogre? Gnomes? Faeries? Gorgons? Mermaids?
Yes!
The Great Re-Set is looking more & more like…
no tomorrows!
At least no “normal tomorrows.
Is this the, the great Re-Set’s new “normal”?
Many organs, particularly the heart, may need brain inputs to develop and function properly.
Aside from that, it’s not such a bad idea. Think of it- you could keep people like Soros and Klaus alive indefinitely.
I was always suspicious of Dick Cheney’s heart transplant. He bragged in an interview he didn’t have any rejection issues and didn’t have to take rejection drugs if I remember correctly. I suspected then they may be hiding some kind of treatment from us commoners. At the time I suspected they grew it but was unsure how. Was there an unlucky, unaware younger back up clone? Did they grow it in a lab or chimera? Or through the DNA database knew exactly who might be a perfect match?
Organ bags….they’re attempting to manufacture organ bags…
Just like they use embryo “stuff” to create flavoring for their meatless burgers, https://slate.com/technology/2017/07/the-gruesome-truth-about-lab-grown-meat.html I’d guess the left-overs in the organ bags (or those bags nearing over-ripeness) will end up in human “food products” – the modern Soylent green. They’ll tout the health benefits… “Our Yum-Bag biscuits are the ultimate food! Loaded with nutrients and no contaminants as they’re grown in a high-tech, clean environment”
Eaten alive frogfest for cannibals. No leftovers.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/mtvmgmpto7q1780/frogfest-03.mp4
I remember hearing stories of people who have had organ transplants having the same food and other interests as their deceased donors.
Not only that, but that they are able to have conversations with those people to a certain extent. There’s that famous case of the famous black bodybuilder who had a heart transplant. They don’t tell you who the organ donors are when you are a recipient, but he swore he knew it was a little old Asian woman. Why? Because he could feel her, talk to her, and understand her in some fundamental way.
It’s on one of the Joe Rogan podcast episodes. Very interesting man and story.
Yes and memories too I think. It does make you wonder where is the seat of consciousness, as Dr. Farrell says. For this reason I would not want a donated organ. Scientism is playing out way too much like a Hollywood horror B movie. WTF is wrong with these scientismists? Have they become so desensitized?