PATTERN DEATHS… NOW ITS CRYPTO-“BANKERS”
"Pattern deaths" has been and will remain one of those topics blogged about on this site, because (1) they are patterns and (2) the ultimate perpetrators and (3) the ultimate motivations remain a mystery. "Pattern deaths" for our purposes may be defined as a sudden cluster of "suicides" or otherwise mysterious deaths of people working in certain areas, and whose deaths would otherwise be considered coincidental if they were not clustered in certain times, or exhibiting similar patterns.
Over the years, we've tracked and noted a number of them on this website. During the 1980s, for example, there were the sudden and mysterious deaths and "suicides" of scientists working in advanced areas of applied physics. One such death as I recall was a scientist working for Marconi who died by walking or jogging between two cars that crashed into each other. Others jumped off bridges(or were thrown off), and so on. At the time the speculation was that the Soviet Union, in a desperate attempt to knock Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" program off the rails, was conducting a KGB "wet works" operation. And the plain fact of the matter was, many of the dead scientists and technicians were indeed working in areas that could very plausibly have been involved in that program.
Move into the 1990s, and the same thing began to happen to scientists working in pathology and diseases, including in immunology, virology, and bioweapons. Then, suddenly, there was a cluster of deaths of people in the field. One prominent bio-scientist, you might recall, supposedly drove his car onto the twin arch-bridges over the Mississippi River at Memphis Tennessee, parked his car on the shoulder, and leaped to his death. Other patterns emerged of scientists dropping dead while jogging, leaping from buildings, and in one or two cases as I recall just disappearing. Someone, in other was, appeared to be killing off pathologists and other people possibly involved in bioweapons research.
Then the pattern deaths shifted again, during the late 1990s, with cycles of the pattern repeating throughout the 2010s, of "holistic doctor deaths," where doctors taking a more "preventative medicine" approach, and loathe to go the way of prescriptions and surgery, suddenly died - oftentimes in clear cases of murder, but without any apprehensions of suspects. But again, there were odd deaths: some were found dead in the countryside where they loved to walk or jog, and so on.
The pattern shifted yet again, you might recall, during the late 2010s, to "banksters", i.e., to people who worked for large banks, and in many cases in their employee insurance divisions. Once again, the patterns became downright bizarre: many bankers from Hong Kong to London to Paris were leaping to their deaths off the top of tall buildings, in some cases, the buildings where they worked, in some cases from their apartments. One unfortunate banker leaped to his death onto cast-iron fences with pikes on the fence bars. Other bankers were simply found in their cars, dead. Another - a mortgage broker in the USA - was "executed" with a nail gun, which the perpetrator had used to drive several nails into the man's head. Others were found dead along their favorite jogging trail (a recurrent pattern in the pattern deaths) indicating they were under surveillance. A few decided to take a walk on the railroad tracks just as a commuter train was passing by, and so on.
Well, now you can add "crypto-'currency' barons" to the list of pattern deaths, for someone, somewhere, appears to be "offing" crypto-barons in the wake of the FTX meltdown. Consider the following stories shared by L.G.L.R., T.S., M.D., E.E., and V.T.:
https://headlineusa.com/crypto-billionaires-deaths-raise-concerns-questions/
Russian Crypto Billionaire Dies in Mysterious Chopper Crash
You get the idea. According to the following article at Zero Hedge, one likely theory is that central banks are using the FTX meltdown to call for regulation and to introduce their own digital central bank "currencies":
Banking Elites Are Using Crypto Bloodbath And FTX Fraud To Justify CBDCs
Other theories, however, have been mentioned, from the Fed doing it in an effort to ward off competition to the dollar, to the Russians, and so on.
Here's my problem with all the explanations thus far, including the one I regard as the most plausible, namely that theory that holds that these pattern deaths are part of a larger campaign to introduce central bank digital "currencies" (and thereby to cut out the competition). After all, currency monopolies only work if...well... if they're a currency monopoly. When was the last time you ever spent a United States Note, and not a Federal Reserve Note? I remember spending them (the bills had the red seal) and even the occasional silver certificate (blue treasury seal) as a boy. They don't exist any more in circulation. Why? Because when the bills would pass into the federal reserve banks, the banks would simply remove them from circulation. It wouldn't do, in other words, for the Fed to be in direct competition with the US Treasury. So the bottom line for me is, the "motivation" and "Most plausible Perpetrator" for this recent round of pattern deaths seems more or less clear... except...
... that I cannot get it out of my head that there's something not quite right even with that explanation. As I put it in my blog last week about the FTX meltdown and Bankman-Fraud's explanations:
Well, consider this: if FTX can go bankrupt so quickly, and in such a way that even a former Enron investigator is mystified as to the extent and nature of the fraud, if it can go bankrupt when its founder, Bankman-Fraud, is one of the very same crypto-"currency" advocates calling for "regulation" of cryptos, if it can go bankrupt, and engage in off-the-charts and clearly political money-laundering, then why on earth would you trust any central bank "digital 'currency'"?
In other words, the fraud to me in FTX is so large that calls for "regulation" and central bank digital currencies - which are now even more apparently not currencies but merely highly volatile and risky "corporate coupons" - that no rational person is going to trust crypto, period, central bank or not, period. While there were certainly calls for regulation of the phenomenon before the Bankman-Fraud-FTX scandal, those calls now have a hollow ring to them, as if they're a kind of last ditch effort to prop up the whole idea of cryptos.
And this brings me to my high octane speculation of the day. If the truth were to be told, when the FTX Bankman-Fraud story first broke, I wanted to share this high octane speculation, but I decided not to do so, just to see if anyone else would mention it. So far, and to my knowledge, no one has. So just so that the theory at least has a mention so that others might be able to look for corroborative or contra-indicating evidence, I'll toss it out there, crazy as it is, and crazy as it sounds: When the scandal broke, it struck me, and still strikes me, as a complete disaster for the whole globalooney cashless society narrative, almost as if someone who knew that the FTX venture was one vast fraud and money-laundering scheme, and intended to use the scandal to cast a nasty light on the whole crypto phenomenon. In fact, such a scheme might indeed be launched by a central bank or by groups of prime banks against other central banks pushing central bank digital currencies. At this stage of the high octane speculation, I think it's simply too early to tell.
But one thing has not changed, but has become even more apparent: if central banks could re-hypothecate all that Yamashita gold in the form of certificates of deposit and other paper instruments, and dramatically increase the liquidity in "the system" by dint of fraud on paper, you're simply a fool if you don't think digital "currencies" allow them the opportunity to do the same thing, on steroids. A push for central bank digital currency is not, therefore, the next stage of "financial progress" and renewal, but in my opinion, the surest sign the old system is breaking down, for once you couple central bank digital coupons with the derivatives still sloshing around in the system, you've got a problem, and it's not going to go away by Augustin Carstens dressing in a tootoo and waving his magic digital wand...
Indeed, the following article comes closest to my own speculation, and the theory has a lot to commend it:
A Grand Unified Theory Of The FTX Disaster
In the main, I tend to think this "Grand Unified Theory 0f the FTX Disaster" is some pretty good high octane speculation. In terms of my own speculation, however, what I'm really suggesting is that someone - perhaps someone "on the inside" - just blew up Mr. Globalooney's scheme. Again, time will tell if this view is corroborated or contra-indicated...
... See you on the flip side...
No Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
This reminds me of the witness deaths around the time of the Warren Commission or the House Select Committee on Assassinations (the Church Report?).
These must be mysterious deaths or suicides where a person trips over and lands on a bullet or knife, or commits suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head. Or the person who threw themselves off a cliff yet there were drag marks found leading to the edge – yep accidents do happen or people were just depressed. As Chief Wiggum on the Simpsons would say “Move along people, nothing to see here.”
there is a ‘competing factions’ aspect to this debacle. as soon as binance (a competitor) backed off from ‘buying’ (?) FTX the collapse ensued.
the push coming from some central banks to impose digital currency is about control and this in response to a situation where financial flows are becoming more ungovernable. chaos increases risk. there are some financial entities that like the risk and benefit from the risk ans some are put at risk. it could be that an ungoverned crypto activity is encroaching the trade space of markets previously dominated by other players. so crypto needed to be attacked for a few reasons.
here is what powell said in september:
“Sept 27 (Reuters) – Digital financial assets require appropriate regulations to ensure a level playing field and protect consumers, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said on Tuesday.
“Within the decentralized finance ecosystem there are these very significant structural issues around the lack of transparency,” Powell said during a panel discussion on digital finance organized by Banque de France.
“We need to be very careful about how crypto activities are taken within the regulatory perimeter…there’s a real need for more appropriate regulation so that as decentralized finance expands and starts to touch more and more retail customers, appropriate regulation is in place…they need ‘same risk, same regulation’ wherever they take place.”
the ‘know the customer’ laws may be modified to report identities in the blockchain.
SBF hired the attorney who represented guislane maxwell. in a criminal trial the evidence will have to establish intent so it will be interesting to see what information is used in a prosecution and in a defense. it will probably only be part of the story.
Belatedly listened to your news and views from the nefarium dated Dec 1. Thanks for your efforts in bringing out info not always easy to find. May the holidays give you time to recharge and refresh.
Could there be two largely independent things going on, accidentally simultaneous?
The crypto bankers’ deaths being an actual (professional intelligence) deep state clean up operation.
The FTX situation is starting to have a different feel, at least to me. The flakes involved, FTX compliance officer was previously implicated in an online poker cheating scandal (a little too obvious for competent quality players), the obviousness of claiming the “brilliant” Sam B-F having got his stake from an improbable arbitrage operation, etc.
I’m wondering if this doesn’t have a monkey see, monkey incompetent imitates, look and feel to it.
In other words: a Hillary and the feminists op with echos of using insecure email servers, tech they really don’t understand, situations quickly going out of control.
Just wondering.
Am I the ONLY 1 read’n🧐🧑🦯 …The Giza Death Star Restored by ‘?Carl Joseph DeMarco’🫣🫢🤗 lol 😝
Stupid me, Zero Hedge wants money
What were the Biden car fires? I hadn’t heard about this.
Seems crypto has alchemy potential as Kryptonite…not so good for the future superhuman movement.
You might have hit a nerve! Zero Hedge won’t load.
This brings up the question of what other groups are on this expanding hit list.
Just posted on twitter by Petrified Covid Parent : Barry and Honey Sherman were killed by the unvaccinated
You got a link to that post?
Lolita Express flies to Bahamas, to make Epstein cryptocurrency, so wicked witch can have a global digital central bank.
Lolita Express flies to the Ukraine, to set up biolabs, so Bill Gates’ programmable viruses can receive latest Microsoft update.
Lolita Express needs “pandemic prevention funding, to build a coalition of political allies, who will support future campaigns”.
Lolita Express is running for president.
Wow, this is a brilliant article, Joseph and it consolidates all the key points in a masterly fashion. FTX-A carried out multiple functions for Globaloney and I cannot help but wonder if there is any connection to the Biden’s numerous “car fires” which occurred last week. We know that both Biden senior and son are peodophiles and may be pressured to pass the necessary regulations, therefore the explosions maybe connected to this unified theory.
When reading the article I kept thinking about the sick and very public dump of the Balenciaga photo shoot, with its very clear peodophile undertones it could clearly be a message for elite players to remain focused and on board with the agenda. Furthermore the whole Kayne (Ye) business is a convenient distraction from the FTX scandal but again it’s worth considering who Ye is targeting, rich powerful Jews, well there are many of those in the global elite like Larry Fink. Indirect, covert messages are being sent everywhere and it’s easy to get carried away with joining up the dots but suffice to say that fingers are pointing at the usual suspects but on this occasion they probably are guilty.
I remember reading somewhere that Meyer Lansky said that he survived to old age in crime, because he never cheated his colleagues. Also, I would guess, because it was understood that he would never rat them out, and that he was highly competent in his roles.
My guess is that Sam B-F and his crypto companies were deep state projects for moving money around. He was selected because of his parents and the assumption that he was not a clueless nitwit – apparently a mistaken assumption.
Perhaps it’s been cyrpto all along.
But, now that the timeline has advanced,
to the implementation square;
the game Bankster token pieces are being “vetted:”
and/or sacrificed as pawns. AS were the previous bansksters,
biologists, & holistic doctors( could have prescribed remedies for Covid19840.
Those that do not “accept” exotic mind control technology 100%
are not going to be placed on the geopolitical action board.
The trial tests of this exotic mind control tech; were cloaked
w/in the quackcines, of the selected players[political leaders,
biologists, nanotechnology scientists, CEOs,
Military(going for 100%?), and more].
[As I read further, I see we’re on the same page/more or less]
For that “someone” I’ll have to ponder.
As my watch is running late.
But, this is my kind of high-octane speculation!
Loved it!
Uh-oh. Pattern recognition without a license.
You might be right about the prime banks and smaller banks fighting back against the Fed. The American Bankers Association has been extremely active the past year. You probably have noticed this if you bank with a small city bank, regional bank, or a credit union.
They have been pushing back and organizing against most things coming out of Washington these days. As far back as that ridiculous IRS reporting scheme Washington was pushing for.
It makes sense, out of all citizens, who is wiser to the Central Banking scheme than the operators of small banks? Very few other groups have a larger collection of people that are awake to the manipulations of the Central Banks. At least at the higher levels of those enterprises.
They are either wise to the shenanigans or they go out of business and dissappear. It might even be fair to assume that those left have been sharpened in our favor over the past few decades.
Also, CBDCs destroy the need for traditional banks as we know them right? Makes sense they would oppose the scheme.
It was clear that those cocaine (and whatever else) sniffing children of ruling knokkelheads weren’t really running things. I mean they are 3-year olds in 30-year human packagings capable of nothing else than being spoiled hissy fitting when to few online likes occur. So, who was running the scam? Are the knokkelheads that confident that sloppyness on this scale crept in due to arrogance in security rigging everything their way? Or is it worse and are all knowledgeable people gone and those kids really run things! If that is the leadership of tomorrow this swansong will come to an end, but with how much damage to humanity and earth in the meantime!