PEER-REVIEWED AUSTRALIAN STUDY OF THE JABS: THEY’RE NOT SAFE
.... well.... finally! T.M. spotted this one and passed it along, and it's another one of those articles I've got to blog about and bring to your attention, even though anything I would add to the article itself is merely moot. I have to talk about it for several reasons though.
If you're like me, you probably watched in disbelief as the planscamdemic narradigm unfolded. Before we go any further, let me briefly explain what I mean by my onomatopoeia with the word "narradigm." A "narradigm" is a narrative of events or things that, lacking well-founded support, are otherwise being pushed or driving into society in the hopes of creating a paradigm-shift in the consciousness of people or experts by creating an artificial concensus or agreement around it. Quantum mechanics was a paradigm shift; relativity was a narradigm shift (Eddington, you might recall, fudged some of those numbers during the eclipse...) Anyway, you might recall being as appalled as I was by the sudden embrace of the narradigm in Australia. That's what makes this article so interesting; it's coming out of Australia, where we witnessed some of the most over-the-top draconian and tyrannical lockdown and other "health" policies imaginable:
Note what Mr. Kirsch, the author of the article, has to say:
Here’s the two sentences from the paper that everyone should read:
A worldwide Bayesian causal Impact analysis suggests that COVID-19 gene therapy (mRNA vaccine) causes more COVID-19 cases per million and more non-Covid deaths per million than are associated with COVID-19 .
An abundance of studies has shown that the mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous.
Other key insights from the paper
Here are some other direct quotes from the paper:
- COVID-19 vaccines cause more side effects than any other vaccine
- Not only does spike protein produce unwanted side effects, but mRNA and nanoparticles do as well.
- Never in vaccine history have we seen 1011 case studies showing side effects of a vaccine (https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vaccine-scientific-proof-lethal).
- Again, it is inconceivable why it would be impossible to go through the study data in a few months, when it took the CDC less than 4 weeks to give the injections emergency use authorization - unless you want to entertain the idea that the study data were never actually read and scrutinised, a frightening perspective.
- The official public message is that the mRNA vaccines are safe. However, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the medicine and therapeutic regulatory agency of the Australian Government, states quite clearly on their website that the large-scale trials are still progressing and no full data package has been received from any company.
- The mRNA vaccines were supposed to remain at the injection site and be taken up by the lymphatic system. This assumption proved to be wrong. During an autopsy of a vaccinated person that had died after mRNA vaccination it was found that the vaccine disperses rapidly from the injection site and can be found in nearly all parts of the body . … Research has shown that such nanoparticles can cross the blood-brain barrier and the blood-placenta barrier.
- Despite not being able to prove a causal link with vaccines, as no autopsies were performed, they still believed that a link with vaccination is possible and further analysis is warranted.
- In summary, it is unknown where exactly the vaccine travels once it is injected, and how much spike protein is produced in which (and how many) cells.
- The S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein when injected into transgenic mice overexpressing human ACE-2 caused a COVID-19 like response. It was further shown that the spike protein S1 subunit, when added to red blood cells in vitro, could induce clotting.
- The authors found consistent alteration of gene expression following vaccination in many different immune cell types.
- Seneff et al (2022) describe another mechanism by which the mRNA vaccines could interfere with DNA repair.
- It is an amazing fact that natural immunity is completely disregarded by health authorities around the world. We know from SARSCoV-1 that natural immunity is durable and persists for at least 12-17 years . Immunologists have suggested that immunity to SARS-Cov-2 is no different
- Immunity induced by COVID infection is robust and long lasting.
- mRNA vaccines seem to suppress interferon responses. A literature review by Cardozo and Veazev  concluded that COVID-19 vaccines could potentially worsen COVID-19 disease.
- Natural immunity is still not accepted as proof of immunity in Australia.
- A study at the University of California followed up on infections in the workforce after 76% had been fully vaccinated with mRNA vaccines by March 2021 and 86.7% by July 2021. In July 2021 75.2% of the fully vaccinated workforce had symptomatic COVID.
- Acharya et al. (2021) and Riemersma et al. (2021) both showed that the vaccinated have very high viral loads similar to the unvaccinated and are therefore as infectious.
- Brown et al. (2021) and Servelitta et al (2021) suggested that vaccinated people with symptomatic infection by variants, such as Delta, are as infectious as symptomatic unvaccinated cases and will contribute to the spread of COVID even in highly vaccinated communities.
- Countries with higher vaccination rates have also higher caseloads. It was shown that the median of new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people was largely similar to the percent of the fully vaccinated population.
- Multiple recent studies have indicated that the vaccinated are more likely to be infected with Omicron than the unvaccinated. A study by Kirsch (2021) from Denmark suggests that people who received the mRNA vaccines are up to eight times more likely to develop Omicron than those who did not . This and a later study by Kirsch (2022a) conclude that the more one vaccinates, the more one becomes susceptible to COVID-19 infection .
- This has to be seen in context with the small risk of dying from COVID-19… The chances of someone under 18 years old dying from COVID is near 0%. Those that die usually have severe underlying medical conditions. It is estimated that children are seven times more at risk to die from influenza than from COVID-19. [Editor’s note: so why do colleges mandate the COVID vaccine instead of the influenza vaccine?]
OK, the paper is 18 pages long and those were just excerpts from the first 3 pages. Get the picture?
Yea, we get the picture, though I'm quite certain most of the regular readers on this website had that picture clearly tuned in shortly after the planscamdemic narradigm started. For most of us, I suspect there was a particular moment when we realized we were being had, sort of like that moment when the lamestream propotainment media told us that Jack Ruby shot Oswald because he loved Kennedy and was "upset." For me the wake up moment during the planscamdemic narradigm occurred when Orange Man Bad started pushing Operation Warp Speed. I had wondered why, previously, he had been successful in negotiating a drop in drug prices with big pharma, and what the quid pro quo was, when along came the planscamdemic, and my answer. A new virus, requiring a new "vaccine" (which turned out not to be a vaccine in any classical sense), and then the Orange Man Bad said something that made my skin crawl: he openly stated that it might be possible to get the US military involved in its distribution...
No thanks, Don...
Which brings us back to the article: why this hard-hitting article, now, and why from Australia, where we also saw some of the most tyrannical and nonsensical Covid policies?
Well, call me crazy, but I suspect another narrative is being prepped... not a narradigm, just a narrative, which is not nearly as serious as a narradigm, but in its own way, is much more serious, and we may put the whole speculation in very simple terms: a global crime was planned, committed, and carried out, on a global scale, and the means by which that crime was perpetrated was on the basis of the legal immunities from civil and criminal liabilties that pharmaceutical companies have managed to wrest from their host governments. In order to rescind those immunities, fraud must be shown and documented, on a nation-by-nation and - in the case of federal countries like Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, or the USA - on a state-by-state or province-by-province or canton-by-canton basis. Already in the USA some state governments have passed laws forbidding mRNA injections or even their promotion...
... and my bet is, civil suits for the companies that participated and perpectrated it are not far behind, and my hope is, criminal prosecution not far behind that.
In that respect, this article may be the first signal that Australia needs to be watched carefully, for just as it appeared to function as a beta test for the narradigm, it also might be being positioned as the beta test for its overthrow...
See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.